2 Jan

Anti-Social (Guest Post)

                                       

freeloadernation

There is a good reason that socialism is not a good fit for Americans. We’re not very social. We have a history of isolationism due to our geography but more so due to the fact that our country is made up of cast outs and throw away peoples who left their homeland for freedom and the opportunity of a better life—slavery not withstanding. Opportunity is what makes people tick, and take action. Each new program from the government lessens the opportunity we all currently have. By taking from some you lessen the return on their effort and by giving to others you lessen the effort they need to exist and prosper. People, as all forms of life, will take the path of least resistance. Americans don’t remain in poverty because they were born into poverty, they remain poor because poor is enough to survive and to prosper requires a great deal of effort. It is hard to let go of the free/subsidized housing– even if the neighborhood is dangerous and unsanitary. It is hard to let go of the food stamps- even though your diet is limited and restaurants don’t accept them. It is hard to be responsible for your own bills and education expenses and insurance and getting a job and getting there on time and doing what is expected of you and…. It is easy to just not try and stay fed, housed, and cared for by the government. It’s hard when you think about the guy down the street who did all the hard things including paying the taxes to pay for you to not have to try so hard. Luckily he is faceless and nameless and the word government does not make you think about him.

Europe is made up of populations that have coexisted—though often not peacefully—and are essentially the same people and culture. While the British prefer beef and the French lamb, and the wines of Italy, Spain, Germany, and France have distinct nuances, the fact remains that essentially the same people have inhabited the same region for thousands of years. In America—with the exception of native Americans—this is not the case. We are a country made up of cast outs and throw away peoples who left their homeland for freedom and the opportunity of a better life. We are the descendants of those that refused to join with the status-quo. Our forefathers were the ones who took action rather than cover.

Today our elected leaders busy themselves improving our life by limiting our freedoms. They do not understand the damage done to the human spirit when the government provides for rather than allowing individuals to provide for themselves. As individuals we see the damage done by overly protective parents—spoiled, under performing children that invariably fall short of their parents accomplishments. But somehow we fail to acknowledge the damage done by social programs that were well intentioned but failed to realize the ultimate goal of creating competent, capable individuals that would contribute ultimately and indirectly pay back society for the charity bestowed upon them.

There are those who feel that Europe should be our model. I disagree completely. Europe has enjoyed its longest period of peace and prosperity because the United States took on the responsibility of safeguarding Europe from its enemies- both domestic and to the East. Europe flourished under U.S. protection because the U.S. footed the very costly bill of its the military presence in Western Europe. Japan similarly succeeded due to having very low defense costs thanks to the U.S. giving protection to Japan from their potential enemies.

There is no country able, much less willing, to afford the U.S. the protection so that we may drastically cut our military and save all that money. And our enemies grow stronger, not weaker. A strong argument could be made that the U.S. should lessen or eliminate our military presence overseas and allow allies to pay for their own defense.

During the Reagan years there was an unwritten policy of spending as much as possible on defense and to leave as little as possible for social programs. Today the Obama administration is spending as much as it can—or should I say much more than we have or possibly will ever have—on entitlement programs as well as defense programs. Our monthly Federal budget deficit is equal to the annual budget deficits under Reagan, and with the increase in costs brought on by healthcare, we are truly sealing our economic doom.

“Ask not for whom the bell tolls, it tolls for thee…”

This entry was posted in American Exceptionalism, Economy, Europe, Freedom, Nanny Government, Socialism and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Thursday, January 2nd, 2014 at 10:00 am
| 266 views

6 Responses to Anti-Social (Guest Post)

  1. neal says: 1

    Actually, the Native Americans settled here for the very same reasons. My people escaped the blood cults of South America and the Polynesian islands. The Pueblo tribes migrated from Asia, same deal. Mix in some ancient Vikings, Middle Eastern stock, some Welsh, Celts, what have you. North America has always been the New World.

    This place has a history of being the last stand.

    ReplyReply
  2. Nanny G says: 2

    As Captain Kirk so aptly put it in “A Piece of the Action” in 1968, the Federation would be taking a 40% cut.
    So, too with federal government plans.
    Remember the headlines?
    If every impoverished household had been given all the welfare money that went into federal coffers, instead of gov’t employees getting their piece of the action, each household each year would have been given over $60,000.
    Obama and liberals use welfare-speak as a way to shame or guilt-trip Americans out of hard-earned cash so they can line the pockets of their own….with the crumbs that fall off the table going to actual poor people.
    Remember, too, Obamaphones don’t come from Obama.
    He just allows the credit for them to fall on him.
    We each pay a tax on our monthly phone bills for that free service.
    Also a rich Mexican man gets $10 a month for EVERY ObamaPhone used in the USA.

    ReplyReply
  3. Dink Newcomb says: 3

    @neal:

    This place has a history of being the last stand.

    I agree Neal! This country was founded by and thrived due to people who saw America as a new beginning. It has now become merely a destination at the end of the line (the payoff).

    ReplyReply
  4. Nanny G says: 4

    Maggie Thatcher wrote that socialism cannot work because, sooner or later, they always run out of other peoples’ money.

    ReplyReply
  5. Dink Newcomb says: 5

    @Nanny G:
    You nailed that one.
    Human nature, by and large is awash with greed, jealousy, possessiveness, resentment– OVERT altruism, not even close. It is a fact that the same human who, without thinking who will run into a burning building or dive into an icy river to save someone in peril without any hesitation will often step over the starving husk of a drug addled wretch who made that string of decisions to be there!

    ACTION, NOT ABSTENTION, is the life force that drives us. Any system that ignores this is bound to fail where the system that recognizes it and attempts to guide it should succeed or at least flourish. I don’t know many people who consider capitalism (as practiced) perfect but most adherents concede that it sure does get you out of bed every morning.

    ReplyReply
  6. neal
    that’s a good one,
    it was a fine mix, until they allowed the other in,
    and still coming,
    bye

    ReplyReply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 

Switch to our mobile site