Wasserman-Schultz admits being an idiotic liar [Reader Post]

Loading

Debbie Downer, aka Debbie Wasserman-Schulz, was interviewed by John Roberts on Fox News Sunday. Roberts asked her about the Priorites USA ad that implies that Mitt Romney caused a woman to die from cancer.

In the ad Joe Soptic says

“When Mitt Romney and Bain closed the plant, I lost my health care, and my family lost their health care,” Soptic says in the minute-long spot. “And a short time after that, my wife became ill . . . she passed away in 22 days.”

There you go. Mitt Romney killed her.

Never mind that Romney left Bain in 1999. Never mind that Bain was run by Obama donor Jonathan Lavine at the time of the closing. Never mind that Bain offered Soptic a buyout. Never mind that Soptic’s wife had her own insurance. Never mind that Soptic’s wife was diagnosed with cancer six years after GST Steel was closed.

Never mind all that.

Debbie Downer claimed that she didn’t know to which political party Priorities USA belonged.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=afIG0Vgd0aY&feature=player_embedded[/youtube]

The transcipt

ROBERTS: Should the Democrats be releasing an ad that accuses a presidential candidate, through inference, of being responsible for a woman’s death?

WASSERMAN SCHULTZ: First of all, that’s a Priorities USA ad. That’s not a Democratic ad; it’s a Priorities USA Super PAC ad.

ROBERTS: Do you deny that they’re Democrats?

WASSERMAN SCHULTZ: I have no idea the political affiliation of folks who are associated with that Super PAC.

What a difference a day makes. Today she admits to being a lousy liar.

“Soledad, of course I know the Priorities USA super PAC is a Democratic-affiliated super PAC,” Wasserman Schultz said. “But the point I was trying to make was that…”

And the rest is completely irrelevant. Over at Powerline, John Hinderaker nails it

This is pretty hilarious; as usual, the Democrats have no intention of appealing to anyone other than the ignorant.

The political lives of democrats depend on it.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
60 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Ya know, I’m thinking Brian’s goal is to drive people, especially new people from this site with his unbalanced and childish behavior. That way they don’t learn the facts.
Obama has a similar strategy. Disgust people to the point they don’t want to vote or hear anything about the election. They know high turnout does not favor them in this election.

@Brian Miller: Nah, you’re just reading into things, perhaps because you’re picking a fight with anyone you can here at FA.

I looked up the data after I asked you if you knew, and thought you’d like the article because it seemed like the data was solid. Yes, I think it deceitful for the Obama campaign to rouse up hate by charging Romney for doing something he himself did in 2008–buy the election with lots and lots of cash. Read the email above.

Relax, dude. It’s just politics.

@Nathan Blue: Yeah, I knew you were just doing a shuck and jive, asking questions you already had answers for, and lying all the way….”not that it has anything to do with this while all the while it does”. Comes easy to ya, the lies. it’s just politics, the way you play it. Typical, yeah, i get asked these bogus questions alot here, something the person already has an answer for, but they pretend….their whole lives, I suppose. Like you.

Obama is terrible, but you are still what you are also.

@Nan G: The best part is this:

“We’re doing this differently, with ordinary people chipping in whatever they can afford — but it’s going to take a lot more of us to match them. Will you donate $3 or more today?”

That’s the farce that they’ve been spreading, that Obama got into office because of three-dollar donations and not Soros and Friends.

@retire05: Retire05 you must be older than I thought if you remember Jackson’s campaign! Were you in the Indian campaigns with him? LOL

DWSlut-the gift that keeps on giving!! The wing nut of wing nuts.

@Randy:

Nope, but my ancestors were. They were on the losing side of Andrew Jackson’s policy of Amerindian genocide.

@Brian Miller: I think you’ve just answered the question of whether or not you are mature enough for discussions such as these. Perhaps you have something better to do, such as go to class or look for a job? Though I wonder if your paranoia makes it hard to stay employed? Regardless, I think it’s time for you to run on home, boy. The adults are trying to talk . . .

(If you think it necessary to post another paranoid, verbal tantrum, I wouldn’t–I won’t be back to this article to read it so you’re just wasting your time . . . more than the usual, I would guess)