Woman Goes Public With Allegations Against Herman Cain

Loading

Quick post about the Herman Cain allegations from a Sharon Bialek. Here is her accusation:

At that time I had on a black pleated skirt, a suit jacket and a blouse. He had on a suit with his shirt open. But instead of going into the offices, he suddenly reached over and he put his hand on my leg under my skirt and reached for my genitals. He also grabbed my head and brought it towards his crotch. I was very, very surprised and very shocked. I said, “What are you doing? You know I have a boyfriend. This isn’t what I came here for.”

Mr. Cain said, ‘You want a job, right?’ I asked him to stop, and he did. I asked him to take me back to my hotel, which he did right away.

Cain immediately issued a statement regarding the charges:

Just as the country finally begins to refocus on our crippling $15 trillion national debt and the unacceptably high unemployment rate, now activist celebrity lawyer Gloria Allred is bringing forth more false accusations against the character of Republican front-runner Herman Cain.

All allegations of harassment against Mr. Cain are completely false. Mr. Cain has never harassed anyone. Fortunately the American people will not allow Mr. Cain’s bold “9-9-9 Plan”, clear foreign policy vision and plans for energy independence to be overshadowed by these bogus attacks.

Which is a complete denial. But that won’t stop the media from demanding HE prove he didn’t do it rather then demanding SHE prove that he did.

Couple questions. Why did she not bring this up many years ago if she felt it was sexual assault? Why now?

If the allegations are true lets go through them bit by bit.

Ms. Bialek contacts Herman Cain for a meeting. She meets him in a hotel room that he paid for. She goes to dinner with him. She goes for a drive with him. What was said during all that time? Was there any sexual signals going on? If so, was this just a sexual pass made by a man who was turned down, after which he drove her home?

I don’t know….but anyone represented by Gloria Allred already is starting deep in the hole to me. But she is the one with the burden of proof here.

Don’t expect that to happen tho, the double-standard continues.

Arkansas Governor Bill Clinton allegedly trolled for women, using state troopers as his procurers. As president, Clinton engaged in oral sex with Monica Lewinsky in the Oval Office. He lied about it under oath and was impeached, though later acquitted by the U.S. Senate. Other sexual accusations tainted Clinton, including one that he raped one Juanita Broaddrick. That “everybody lies about sex” and “it was just sex” and didn’t affect his public responsibilities, were just two of the exculpatory statements from Clinton’s Democratic defenders. James Carville slimed Paula Jones, one of Clinton’s accusers, by saying you never know what you’ll find “when you drag a hundred-dollar bill through a trailer park.”

Many other Democrats in modern times have been caught with their pants down — JFK, John Edwards. Some paid a political price. Most did not because their policies were favored by the liberal media, which gave them cover.

UPDATE

Why was Sharon Bialek Fired?

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
142 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Mr Cain ran for the U.S. Senate seat in Georgia in 2004…. What stopped this bit^h from saying anything about sexual harassment by Cain then?? Why didn’t ‘any’ of these bit#ches say anything then? What did they have to “loose” then ? Certainly “not a job”…(you want a job right?). Even more so why is the MSM not asking this same question of her (them)???

Statement sounded very ‘rehearsed’ to me…

This is a typical Liberal character assassination and the MSM are willing to pay some bitches some big money to lie….I believe Gloria Allred is just a ambulance chasing hack….I hope there is some investigation into these women’s background(s)..see where they have been and what they have been up to for the last 15 years…hummm? That could shed some light on their motives…

These women re-discovered their moral outrage at the very moment that Cain started to look like a contender. Before that, their overpowering impulse to seek justice slept soundly for a decade and a half. Amazing coincidence, that.

Check out Gloria’s chin!! She’s clearly taking this one on to fund a chin tuck.

She went to the Oct 2011 TEA party in Chicago as set-up for this, too.
But I have a question:
IF Herman was driving taking her in a his car to dinner than back to her place how did he have one hand up her shirt and another hand forcing her head down?
He was driving the car!
LOL!
(She conflates.)

She says that as soon as she told Cain to stop and take her to her hotel he did.
Wow!

But then she claims that she didn’t complain to anyone because she wasn’t working at the time.
IF she wanted to charge him with sexual assault she wouldn’t need to be working for him or with him or anything else!
Weird.

So far we have four claims.
One was settled for a small amount (especially compared with $850,000 to settle the false charges Juanita B. made against Bill Clinton).
Another got nada. Her claim was rejected by the NRA.
A third didn’t bother to charge Cain at the time, and will not come out of the shadows now.
And this one. She didn’t charge him then, nor will she do so now. She just wants to make a stink.

A whole lot of nothing.

The accused is a kink polyamourous pants digger.

The portion of the press conference concerning Sharon Bialek’s personal history.

I’m drawing no conclusion about her credibility at this point.

This one is going to hit cain hard, unfortunately. We have been waiting for a libdem with some money to help derail his bid. And now she is here, and has declared war. Unfortunately though for Cain he not only has the libdems but the establishment as well to contend with at the same time. They, they being the pundits like O’Riley, and others have been doing everything possible to sway their viewers/listners, away from Cain and to a more acceptable candidate like Rommey/Perry. Not to mention the GOP. They are playing with fire though, because they might just get a repeat of 08 if the GOP puts foward another Rhino.

Gloria All RED is probably paying this woman with DNC cash to make this stuff up. She has been a media whore and always pops up with a new surprise. No doub’t Gloria is also being paid somehow by the Obamma boys, in an attempt to try Cain in the media. Never

The lib NYTs has more on the story, most of which makes you scratch your head and go “huh”?

Employed just over six months. Accuser said she and her boyfriend had met Cain at convention dinner in that brief period. And it was his (the boyfriend’s, so she says) “suggestion” she contact Cain for “..help getting a job back at the association or employment elsewhere.” But Cain had left the Association a month earlier.

???

She said she “arranged” to meet Cain in the bar at her hotel, and was “surprised by the size of her hotel room, which had been upgraded to a suite.”

“He asked how I liked my room,” Ms. Bialek said. She said that he “smirked” and said, “I upgraded you.”

[Mata Musing:…”smirked”???]

The two later went to an Italian restaurant for dinner. As they drove back after dinner, she said, he “suddenly reached over and he put his hand on my leg, under my skirt and reached for my genitals.” She said he also “grabbed my head” and pulled it toward his crotch.

….snip….

“I was surprised and shocked and I said, what are you doing? You know I have a boyfriend,” Ms. Bialek recalled saying. “This is not what I came here for.”

“You want a job, right?” she said Mr. Cain responded. “I asked him to stop and he did.”

Okay, call me crazy, but who has job interviews in bars, over dinner and hotel rooms with someone they only met once, and is no longer employed at the place where she was fired?

And if her behavior led Cain to believe she wanted more than a job, and he acted on that, did he… or did he not stop immediately at her request?

Allred… who really shouldn’t be allowing profile camera shots these days, but I digress… said she has “..two affidavits from friends of Ms. Bialek’s testifying that she had told them of the incident at the time. Ms. Allred did not release the affidavits to the press.”

Affidavits from when? This past couple of weeks? How convenient. Filing any charges? Or just waving papers around, generated coincidentally just when Cain is gathering momentum and has others who at least filed charges when it happened, and didn’t wait for this money, gold digging opportune time.

And why are all these women finding it professional behavior to meet the bosses in bars, hotel rooms and over dinner… solo? Unless, of course, we don’t have their “profession” correctly described….

No surprise you wouldn’t question her credibility yet, @Greg… that would eliminate that oh so wonderful tingle of excitement running up your leg, right? Perhaps you’ll tell us just who arranges for job interviews under these conditions… to ask for a job back “or” (as suggested by her “then boyfriend”.. rolls eyes..) from a guy who is no longer at that association… and waits 14 years before mentioning it to authorities or lawyers?

Coincidentally, her “then boyfriend” said they “stopped dating some 15 years ago”. Interesting… that’s right about the time that Ms. Bialek arranged a very unconventional “job interview” at a hotel to get her job back or…. and all with a guy who no longer worked for the associations. I guess he fired her, too. LOL

Did I mention, ahem, Cain no longer worked for the association? Shall I say it again?

And apparently, not only did he “stop” at her request, but she didn’t find it important enough to press charges. Only now… now why is that, I wonder? (scratches head perplexed)

Personally, I think Cain should sue her and Allred for defamation of character, slander and libel. If this woman thinks she has a case, she should be at the court house, filing briefs and making police reports. But to hit the press with all kinds of stories, johnny-come-lately “affidavits”, and expect the onus to be put upon Cain for innocence is totally antithesis to our laws.

If she wants to accuse him, do it in a court of law, and bring the proof. The media is not a courtroom. It is a vehicle for slander and libel for those who have no real case.

Oh, but then, who arranges a job interview in a hotel bar and room, over dinner, with a guy who no longer works for where she was fired?

I think I get it. It’s about money, and 15 minutes of fame.

Thanks for wading through all that mire for the gold, Mata.

The woman apparently allowed Cain to upgrade her room without a squawk.
She also apparently allowed him to take her out on his dime without a squawk.
She finally claims to have balked when he made an advance.
AND, if any of it is true, Cain took it quite well when she said ‘no.’

@MataHarley: But no-one not even on Fox is pointing out those glaring inconsistencies Mata. No one. Its like one big pile on. How many more women in the coming weeks who will swear that they were also felt up, and be waving a piece of paper that they signed at the time, but did not complain to anyone? I believe that Cain can still pull out of this, but he will have to make up the loses. And is that possible at this stage? Then if cain sinks we got the Newt who is already carrying some heavy baggage, and may be easier to sink than Cain, then it will be Bachman with her headaches, and maybe child abuse, affairs, whatever, and that leaves Obi liteRommey and Perry wanna be. Great just friking great!

A Chicago newser has done a bit of background on her:
http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/iteam&id=8422203

Some of it:

Bialek’s resume and a trail of public records indicates that changing jobs has been a regular occurrence for the Chicagoan. She has worked for at least nine different employers over the past 17 years and appears to have struggled financially.

The public record on Bialek begins in 1991 when she filed personal bankruptcy for the first time while living in Des Plaines.

Between 1993 and 1996 Bialek worked for four different companies in promotion and marketing positions.

In 1996, and part of 1997, Bialek was at the National Restaurant Association. After being let go from that job in mid-1997, she says that she went to Washington, D.C., to meet with Cain, president of the association, because she needed a job.

In 1999, Bialek’s son Nicholas was born and a paternity lawsuit was filed by the father, a media executive.

In 2001 came Bialek’s second personal bankruptcy, filed after sizable legal bills. That year she was hired by WGN radio where she worked until 2004 when she took a marketing job and then a job at WCKG radio.

Along the way, according to her attorney, Bialek also held positions with Revlon and Easter Seals.

Bialek currently lives in Mundelein with fiance Mark Harwood.

Per the “professional” woman, she said:

In her statement to the press, Ms. Bialek said that she had been fired at the association after about a year working for the group’s educational foundation in its Chicago office. She said she sought Mr. Cain’s help to find other employment during a trip to Washington about a month after he left the group

Let’s see… timing is everything when delivering a joke, and tossing sheeeet against the fan.

She only worked at the association for six months…

Sue Hensley, a spokeswoman with the restaurant association confirmed that “Sharon Bialek was employed by the National Restaurant Association Educational Foundation from 12/30/96 – 6/20/97.”

Herman Cain became the CEO of the NRA in 1996. According to their Wiki site, Cain was President from 1996 to 1999.

Considering she said he had left the group a month or so earlier, this means this would have had to have transpired in mid-late 1999, or early 2000…. about the same time the other women were filing charges. Not to mention with her son’s birth in 1999, she was apt to be bigger than a house, and I can’t see anyone attempting what she accuses Cain of doing with a woman in advanced pregnancy.

Yet her “then boyfriend” says they stopped dating “…some 15 years ago”

Somebody’s math isn’t right, and lies always tend to show themselves up in these nigglely details.

All puns intended “more will be revealed” she’s long time ready for a Playboy nudist spread with curious – curious lifestyle. She needs to define her defination of the verb “grab” and how it has fits into her sex life lifestyle. The hotel has a record of her stay and how the suite was paid. She is a very high maintenance woman so her credit history could use a peek which translates into half-mil from Hefner or Larry Flint to get her full-frontal pixies in print.

Credibility?

Gloria Allred.

What else do you need to know?

@Gary G. Swenchonis: But no-one not even on Fox is pointing out those glaring inconsistencies Mata. No one. Its like one big pile on.

And now you know why I don’t watch the cable new shows anymore, Gary. Not even FOX News. I stick with the business channels these days, and internet news. Why? Because pundits and so called “journalists” have forgotten why a free press is important.

People are tried in the press, with their willing aid, all the time. Virtually anyone can say anything on the media, and somehow the burden of proof falls on the accused, instead of the accuser. That is exactly the opposite way it works in our court system.

Obviously, we need a media to hold “the media” responsible. But they sure are gullible saps, only out for ratings.

She spent serious time in Miami sunbathing.

Sorry, soothsayer… IMHO, this woman is way beyond “…long time ready for a Playboy nudist spread”. I suspect ol’ Hef has higher standards than that.

I’d like to know why Bialek was fired.

She wasn’t “laid off”. She was fired.

Why is no one saying why?

@MataHarley:

Photo Shop works wonders.

Just sayin’

If Nan G’s source’s data is correct, then when she was supposedly harassed by Cain in mid to late 1999 or early 2000, she was either in advanced pregnancy, or had a newborn at home. And she’s traveling around, making job interviews in hotel bars, over dinner and hotel rooms?

Stinks as much as this woman’s cheap perfume… you can pretty much smell it from the video.

This crap about just making big time media accusations, and bypassing the courts, royally PO’s me… I vote that Cain sue’s her wrinkled arse.

What ever happened to that maid of Meg Whitman’s?
I ask because this gave me déjà vu.

🙁
Josh

I agree with Mata, Cain should sue, ALL of them. I’ll tell you what would be the ultimate revenge to the bottom dwelling sucking media, PALIN. Sarah Palin, jump on in!

@Curt: I did not know weather to laugh or puke at that video. And these libdems tell us that they are the open-minded people? That was nothing but plain unadulterated racism. I know this was all so predictable, but it still so sad that people will believe BS like this crap.

What a load of BS. This woman is being paid by barry and his criminal czars to take down Cain. Cain is a formidable opponent and barry is getting scared. This woman is lying. I was a victim of sexual harassment and tried to resolve it immediately. Even during that short time they tried to say I waited too long, so this woman is full of crap. By the way, my suit lasted ten years and I went through hell.
It would take too long to tell you what management did to me, but I sucked it up, ( drugs and a psychiatrist helped too) and after ten years, I won. What did I win? Very little except principle. This woman harms other women who are truly harassed and unfortunately it still happens today.

Wow, this gal as a totally fantastic memory. I wonder if she can repeat it again…..without a script.

A semi-pro shows up with turkey neck for a lawyer, it might bother the weak minded and those who follow the propaganda like brain damaged lemmings, but I find the whole fraud to be outrageously funny. If we are dumb enough to trust the Liberal Machine and the state directed media, we deserve to be led by the Socialist Moron in the White House.

At this point, how could any intelligent person assume, with a reasonable degree of confidence, that the allegations are true, or false?

Anyone making a pronouncement either way is taking a political side, plain and simple.

Since Allred has been paid to join the charade, you can be absolutely certain the charges are false.

You know, you guys are making some good points but the issue is that this is number four. There is something there and Herman Cain needs to address it head on – which he should have done last week. Does this disqualify him? No. But if he doesn’t get in front of this it will be his end. As to the woman, I have a few issues with her statement. There is something iffy that I’m just not buying. First, I can’t get with the “I just happen to get a hotel room and invited Mr. Cain by the discuss getting my job back”. Who does that? Why not meet him in his office? Then when she saw the upgrade her “does he think I’m a slut radar” should have went off. Men don’t upgrade hotel rooms for women if they are not planning on using the room to smash. Hell, when it comes to my female friends, I may super size their fries, but that’s about it. So she knew what the deal was. Politically speaking, Herman Cain needs to put this to rest. There is now a face to these allegations and specific conduct on record. The “Liberal Media” meme is not enough.

Why do people dislike Allred so much? Was it that she represented a female witness who testified against Scott Peterson? Her help in drafting a California anti-pornography ordinance? Her representation of Nichole Simpson’s family? Her class action suit against a corporation’s systematic age discrimination against employees? Her law suit against Roman Polanski for the sexual abuse of a 16-year-old girl? Her suit against a bank that refused to cash a check intended to help pay for the funeral of a young soldier killed in Afghanistan? The complaint she filed against the TSA for humiliating a young woman in public?

As lawyers go, surely there’s something about her to approve of.

Allred… sued the BSA for “gender apartheid” because they didn’t admit an 11 year old girl. duh… that’s why there are BSA and GSA’s.

Sued Sav’on for having both a boy and girl toy section…. gasp. How discriminatory.

Sued the Friars Club in Beverly Hills because they were a male only club.

The anti-porn draft never passed. Good thing… we do still have a 1st Amendment. But then Ms. Allred doesn’t believe in the 1st Amendment, as it pertains to others. Thus she bilked CA State Senator Schmitz (Republican, of course) for a “settlement” for herself – claiming “slander” (she oughta know.. queen of slander that she is…) – using her sleazy media court tactics for a trial.

Tried to sue Arnie for sexual harassment for her client… lawsuit dismissed in court. Allred does much better in the media court than the real ones. Shock jock tabloid lawyers are worthless in the real arena.

Threatened to sue Meg Whitman when she was running for office last year, finding a housekeeper willing to say Whitman emotionally abused her and exploited her financially. That, of course, was only a threat and Allred ran her court in the media… as is her usual genre. And always to get a settlement, so they don’t have to really provide proof. It’s just enough to slander someone in the media for extortion when Allred is involved. She’s the tabloid darling. Of course, the housekeeper only got $5500 in back wages/expenses… considerably cheaper than what Whitman would have paid in court. Besides, it must have been funny to see Allred go thru all that crap for such a pittance of attorney fees… Not much racking in the big bucks of late with her MO.

She tried to sic CA’s Child Services on Michael Jackson… busybody that she is. (the infamous baby hanging by the foot moment). But that’s the Glorified Gloria… always trying to insert herself, even when not wanted or necessary.

Actually, getting people to file (except in this case, it seems) sexual harassment charges for settlements is her specialty. Or, as I like to think of it, she’s a professional blackmailer, using the media to prod for easy money out of court… where she generally loses. Why? Because as I said, she’s an ambulance chasing, cheap, busybody shock jock quasi-lawyer who puts her personal agendas before justice and points of law. And frankly, an abomination to what this nation’s justice system is all about. Allred is the poster child for the lawyer-under-a-rock analogy.

But congrats on receiving your ‘Glorious Gloria Fan Club” card.

Au contraire, l’axiom de Napoleon “rein arret nos’enemie quel-qu-on fait une erreur” Advisable to Candidate Cain is “Option Five” aka “Do Nothing”. Strategically the scenario is heat-water-kettle-steam so when the water boils out to steam the kettle starts to melt down which is precisely the case that is happening now. Their only option is more bimbos which causes jealousy deminishing returns from the first original wave of bimbos resulting in LIFU (Last In First Up) mass confusion. Sharon, Bimbo #4, already has a lot of meat on her plate which for the right amount of coin she’ll expose.

Allred goes back a very long way. I remember my mother complaining about her in the 60’s and 70’s I think.

A Situation:

Employee A, Male, mid 30’s, working as a higher management position in a logistics department for a Company is dealing with a very stressed work load. Worker is known to be always on time, works well with others and has a clean record within the Human Resourcing department in relations to discipline.

Employee B, Female, late 20’s or early 30’s, working in a fabrication process as a foreman or supervisor and is deals only with logistics staff when shipments of resources are causing line stoppages. Employee is known for causing problems amongst other co workers and has been set to training in how to handle work place relationships.

Employee A has never met Employee B but Employee B due to various personal reasons is disgruntled in how Logistics is using a JIT (Just In Time) delivery handling system for resources to fabrication. Employee B makes a series of complaints to her direct Manager but is told to deal with it as the JIT system is company policy, and Employee A is running the Logistics system to task with with is expected to department time tables. Employee B now needs an alternate means to change Logistic’s operations which translates to staff replacement and Employee A is in the line of fire. Employee A still has never dealt personally with Employee B due to department offices beign segmented and seperated in different buildings spanning a city block but it doesn’t stop Employee B from filing a Sexual Harrassment complaint to Human Resourcing. Human Resourcing takes up the complaint and investigates Employee A without ever going into prior worker discipline history of Employee A or B and have Employee A fired on false witness from Employee B and cohorts of B.

You think this doesn’t happen in the business word for you Liberals… think again, I’ve seen at least three managers lose their jobs at Cessna alone from trouble making women who wanted things changed in departments they hated. It also works the other way around, especially in Unionized shops. Gods, how I’ve seen a few lazy shits claim the boss was threating to beat them just to get rid of the boss.

The first two allegations against Cain is curious as the fact that the NRA actually held an investigation into both women and Cain in both discipline history and in relation to the claims against him. It is curious to note that the NRA offered them severance packages after the investigations and a nondisclousre agreement clause that seals their discplinary history within the company. Very curious… It’s like the org was washing its hands of two trouble makers, because if the allegations were indeed true then Cain would have been terminated without any severance pay and would be facing possible court time for commiting crimes. But then again, this is the same Media culture that ignored Bill Clinton’s sexual assaults on women when he was Govenor and then President while also ignoring John Edward’s secert affair till he started to become a real challenger for the 2012 Demcorat President ticket…

This gal, had to read the “it’s burned into my memory details”.. from a WRITTEN STATEMENT??? And, she READ it, almost like she was not FAMILIAR with the DETAILS!!! Watch it again, listen to HOW she reads it…. like a person reading a acting script for the FIRST time, not familiar with the actual lines…. had this REALLY Happened to her as stated… WHY does she have to READ it from a PREPARED STATEMENT????? And, if it was true, even READING it…. She would have Read it with CONFIDENCE.. not in that “halting/stumbling” manner……

Smells BAD here folks……

And GREG.. Allred is a Camera hogging sensationalizing self centered bitch….. Sorry. Of the TENS of THOUSANDS of GOOD LAWYERS.. she uses the NATIONAL ENQUIRER of Lawyers???
She shot her Credibility to shreds, by hiring this IDIOT Allred…

@Greggie: Well, it only took you 30 plus comments to jump the thread and defend a bottom feeder like Alred.

It took only 1 comment to bypass any consideration of the accusations and get straight on to the business of tarring and feathering the accuser. For the time being, I’ll stick with my position that no one here really knows the truth–myself included.

I don’t know what country you live in, Greg. But in the America I was raised, the burden of proof is on the accuser. And they generally level their charges within a reasonable time after the event, and via a court of law. They don’t attempt to try the accused in the media.

Victims usually call the police… not press conferences, talking heads, and cameras to try their cases. And they don’t arm themselves with a cheap, busybody shock jock quasi-lawyer who puts her personal agendas before justice and points of law…. bandying about affidavits taken over a decade after the event.

So Greg… now that you find it more convenient to blame the accused, instead of the accuser who has an obvious timeline problem…. 1997? 1999 or 2000, which is when Cain left the Association?… how about letting us know what kind of person arranges job interviews in hotel bars, restaurants and hotel rooms with a man who no longer works at the place where she wanted her job back (or another job) whom she only met once? What would possibly make her think that the President of that association would want to hire, or help, a person who was fired after only six months?

Just what do you think her “profession” is? Media whore comes to mind

Cain has full rights, and should, sue both Allred and this woman. This is a mockery of justice, and a sad statement of the tabloid mentality of this nation. But then, maybe they’ll be too busy mourning Kim Kardashian’s quickly marriage/divorce to notice.

I guess the upside of all this is that it’s giving Ace’s two incher a cheese hard erection for the first time in years.

@MataHarley, #39:

If Mr. Cain wants to sue her, fine. Maybe it’s better to interrogate politicians about their sexual conduct under oath before they’re sworn into public office, rather than after.

@Greggie: You said:

If Mr. Cain wants to sue her, fine. Maybe it’s better to interrogate politicians about their sexual conduct under oath before they’re sworn into public office, rather than after.

Let me translate:

“Well, once again Mata trounced me like the lightweight that I am and so I must find some witty comeback that has absolutely nothing to do with the OP, rather than admit I was wrong. Again.”

@Greg:

Greg, which is worse?
Taking a girl on a date and seeing how far that date will get you, then politely accepting where ever she draws the line ….
OR
Smoking pot and snorting cocaine?*

I only ask so we know what Greg thinks.

One is LEGAL.
The other was ILLEGAL when Obama said he did it and it is STILL ILLEGAL today!

*Dreams from My Father by Obama pages 93-94

@Greg: Maybe it’s better to interrogate politicians about their sexual conduct under oath before they’re sworn into public office, rather than after.

Do tell, Greg… do you now rue the two term Clinton presidency? How’s Oregon’s David Wu settling with you? And of course, we can’t leave out the infamous Weiner, can we?

Hummmm… notice no Gloria Allred in any of those cases? Oh… right. They’re Dems.

Yup… agendas before justice. Snake in the grass, Allred.

Oh wait! Correction! My Bad. The ambulance chaser did get hired by sexting Weiner partner, Ginger Lee. Don’t think that, since the woman admitted to being a willing partner, either of them got a thing. Supposedly it was all about “clearing Ginger Lee’s name” so she could again be a “feature dancer”… LOL! I guess she thought her rep would be hurt, but who the heck remembers?

Gloria, of course, was happy to comply with setting up the press conferences so she could keep her press creds alive and well (not to mention getting paid… trying to boost this girl’s 15 minutes of fame). However she never went after Weiner for anything.. including a settlement. So she kept her “assail GOP only” record intact. And failed in the 15 minutes of fame bit as well. However Ms Lee did return to her “feature dancing” at a strip club without incident. Probably because no one would have remembered her anyway. She wasn’t exactly likeable or unique, being as there were others.

Oh yeah… forgot another high profile winner for her… representing the Tiger Woods mistress. Of course, that didn’t turn out so well for the ambulance chaser, being as the mistress is now suing Allred for malpractice. Lovely… what was that Rush said about the parasites having parasites now?

Greg, I mug you…. do you call the cops NOW??

Or wait a dozen years, HOPING that SOMEDAY….I’ll be LEADING in the polls in a political race, and you report it THEN???

I rest my case.

Many pundits, even Democratic ones have been saying that there is no clear evidence to back up the accusations against Cain and that the “importance” of these accusations is being overplayed by some in the press. The result that the incomplete accusations by anonymous accusers is insufficient, and it looks like this might just fizzle out. Until #4 shows up out of the blue.

I don’t know if Cain ever sexually harassed a woman or not. Without formal charges, evidence or witnesses this is simply “he says ..” “she says…” There is rarely witnesses with sexual harassment, and often comes down to who do you believe. It seems to me that this is all too convenient to come out now when Cain has peaked in the polls, and it stinks to high heaven to be hitting the news at this time. It is not uncommon for notoriety hunters to jump on a bandwagon of accusations of crime or scandal, purely for the media attention. This could also be a case of politically motivated character assassination of the worse kind. (Puts me in mind of the television show “Leverage.”) Who is footing the bill for Allred, and who pointed M. Bialek in Gloria’s direction? Hell, these accusations are nothing compared to the stories of peccadilloes and sexual harrasments by one Bill Clinton, which the press mostly ignored.

Clearly this is an orchestrated event to take Cain out of the running.

Mark Levin fisks the most recent accuser and her account via The Right Scoop:

Going through the story that was laid out in the press conference today by Sharon Bialek, Levin has found a few ‘problems’ that necessitate more information. He said earlier in the show that he was unable to get Gloria Allred to book her client on his show, so he’s basically left with just questions that need answers. One such question is why, after Cain had already ‘upgraded’ Bialek’s hotel room and then took her out to eat at an Italian restaurant would Cain then ask Bialek why she was meeting with him. Another question would be why he took her to the NRA to show her around if she had already worked there before? And there’s more:

Statement sounded very ‘rehearsed’ to me…

She is not a public speaker, so “rehearsed” is not out of the ordinary.

He was driving the car!

My impression is, they were parked.

Gloria Allred is probably paying this woman with DNC cash to make this stuff up.

We don’t know this, but a real news organization would investigate this. If she has been a full-time homemaker and single mom, it is curious how she has been getting by. However, another article said that she has been living with a boyfriend, which is not exactly the same as being a single mom.

And it was his (the boyfriend’s, so she says) “suggestion” she contact Cain for “..help getting a job back at the association or employment elsewhere.” But Cain had left the Association a month earlier.

It is reasonable to ask, is she aware of this. Perhaps Cain was no longer working for the association, but met with her anyway. However, her firing seems to have occurred while Cain is president of the restaurant association.

who arranges a job interview in a hotel bar and room, over dinner

From her story, this struck me as being the oddest arrangement, apart from remarking, “When are you running for president?”

She has worked for at least nine different employers over the past 17 years

Although, not damning, this is unusual. However, I know very little about fund-raising, which seems to be the area that she was in. Perhaps that is more common in this field? Being “let go” from one arm of the restaurant association after 1.5 years is a very short time (which period of time was actually 6 months). I wonder what the cause was? Is there any chance that Cain had something to do with this firing or that she thought that she had? That is pure conjecture.

This crap about just making big time media accusations, and bypassing the courts, royally PO’s me… I vote that Cain sue’s her wrinkled arse.

I think Cain should sue her and Allred for defamation of character, slander and libel. If this woman thinks she has a case, she should be at the court house, filing briefs and making police reports.

This is not really an option. How can a presidential candidate find the time to sue someone and run for president at the same time? On the other hand, she never sued Cain or filed charges because there was nothing to sue him for, nor did he commit any criminal act, assuming that her story is 100% accurate.

The latter is a possibility; however, it is also possible that she flirted with Cain a great deal, and that Cain misread these signals (again, assuming that her story is accurate). It is not impossible for even an honorable man to be led astray.

Gloria Allred…has been a media whore and always pops up with a new surprise.

This does not make this story false. In my opinion, Allred derailed the California governor’s election with a mostly true story by an illegal house maid.

Considering she said he had left the group a month or so earlier, this means this would have had to have transpired in mid-late 1999, or early 2000…. about the same time the other women were filing charges. Not to mention with her son’s birth in 1999, she was apt to be bigger than a house, and I can’t see anyone attempting what she accuses Cain of doing with a woman in advanced pregnancy.

Isn’t the time 1997 when this was supposed to have occurred?

The hotel has a record of her stay and how the suite was paid. She is a very high maintenance woman so her credit history could use a peek which translates into half-mil from Hefner or Larry Flint to get her full-frontal pixies in print.

The hotel may not be willing to make this information public (it would indicate whether Cain upgraded her or not, because he would have paid for it). It might be, in her mind, to cash in on this via the ways you have suggested.

We always have to bear in mind, even if this women is a partial nutcase, her story could be reasonably close to the facts. I am not saying that it is, nor does this change my support for Cain. Being a male, I understand that we can be tempted.

One other thing….

If she had previously worked for the NRA, then why would Cain supposedly be taking her to show her the offices of the NRA?

Sniff.. Sniff…

Yeah, something smells rotten here.

Would love to see this chickadee under cross examination.

with regards to the hotel room, why would Cain make advances in the car, when he spent all of that money getting a great room for this gal? Why wouldn’t he ask if he could check out the room to see what the upgrade looked like?

It is curious to note that the NRA offered them severance packages after the investigations and a nondisclousre agreement clause that seals their discplinary history within the company. Very curious…

If the charges are false, a company would want to get rid of women like this, who make such allegations.

I’ve been waiting for this:

Witness: Cain accuser hugged him during Tea Party meeting a month ago

The Cain Encounter …

They hugged each other backstage in a full embrace like old friends.

She grabbed his arm and whispered in his left ear.

She kept talking as he bent to listen, and he kept saying “Uh, huh. Uh, huh.”

Huh?

“I don’t know if what she was giving him was a sucker punch, but he didn’t put his arm down while she was talking to him,” said the Sneed source.

◆The “he”… is GOP presidential contender Herman Cain, who has been accused of sexual harassment by several women.

◆The “she”… is Chicagoan Sharon Bialek, who held a news conference Tuesday as the only woman to PUBLICLY accuse Cain of sexual harassment.

◆The Sneed source … is WIND radio co-host Amy Jacobson, who tells Sneed she witnessed the Cain/Bialek encounter a month ago while backstage at the AM 560 WIND sponsored TeaCon meeting in Schaumburg Sept. 30-Oct. 1 at the Renaissance Hotel and Convention Center.

http://www.suntimes.com/8592168-417/sneed-witness-says-cain-accuser-hugged-him-during-tea-party-meeting-a-month-ago.html

Cain, if he had been lured by this woman’s flirting, would reasonably ask, in the midst of dinner, “Why are you here?” She said before it was all about a job interview, but maybe Cain is looking to clarify the situation.

If she flirted and used her sexuality to raise money, that may explain why she was let go after 6 months.

If she was flirty with Cain, this may explain this being an odd job interview.

Because Cain has been married for such a long time, he may not be ready to “come clean” about this or other situations.

So, I am not dismissing her charges out of hand; nor do I think that this disqualified Cain as a Republican nominee. On the other hand, I am not convinced that she is being honest either.

It’s the next day….will she be on a media blitz?

1 2 3