While there is no shortage of heartbreak and disaster to focus on in the wake of Japan’s (now upgraded) 9.1 magnitude earthquake, yesterday morning my thoughts concentrated on what was then a quiet story in the background… the problem with then one of Japan’s many nuclear power facilities that supply about 30% of their needs.
By yesterday eve, the story started gaining traction as rising radiation levels were detected at the adjacent Fukushima #2 facilities. Because the cooling back up generator systems had failed, the pressure was building in the core and plans were made to open valves, releasing some of that pressure. Apparently, the plant’s officials decided to use seawater as a coolant, which would indicate they had written off the 40 yr old plant’s functional future, as it would corrode the metal innards.
Despite efforts, in the US’s west coast mid-night hours, the Fukushima #1 facility exploded, blowing the roof off one building and destroying exterior walls where the troubled reactor was housed.
Tokyo Electric Power Co.’s Fukushima No. 1 nuclear station after an explosion. KYODO PHOTO
While some media (such as the NYTs above) quoted officials that said with the explosion came an abatement of some of the radiation levels, it also led to others, expressing increasing concern about an imminent “meltdown”.
First, to put some perspective on the extreme event of a meltdown, we non-nuclear engineers need a better handle on how these facilities are constructed and what fail safe measures are in place by design. The BBC article today provides a basic working visual for we non-nuclear engineers, plus a diagram of a boiling water reactor system. It explains how the pressure could build as a result of a failed cooling system, and also explains that if the actual metal containment vessel that actually houses the cores were intact, that radiation should be contained.
And the big fear within the anti-nuclear movement, as used in the film The China Syndrome, is that the multiple containment of a molten core might not work either, allowing highly radioactive and toxic metals to burrow into the ground, with serious and long-lasting environmental impacts – total meltdown.
However, the counter-argument from nuclear proponents is that the partial meltdown at Three Mile Island did not cause any serious effects.
Yes, the core melted, but the containment systems held.
And at Chernobyl – a reactor design regarded in the West as inherently unsafe, and which would not have been sanctioned in any non-Soviet bloc nation – the environmental impacts occurred through explosive release of material into the air, not from a melting reactor core.
According to Chief cabinet secretary Chief Yukio Edano, the reactor’s containment vessel was not damaged by the explosion and remains intact.
But the world is getting some mixed messages INRE the reactor status. The facility’s owner, Tokyo Electric Power Company (Tepco), insists that ther reactor is in “subcritical” mode, while Ryohei Shiomi, an official at Japan’s Nuclear Safety Commission, is quoted as having said a meltdown was possible. The latter possibility is heightened when Japanese authorities steadily widen the evacuation area, and prepare to distribute iodine as a protection against radiation exposure. As of today, some media have been reporting the same news, but with a more hysterical tabloid headline, “3000 flee Japan’s nuclear RED ALERT”.
Granted the last thing Japanese officials need is to pile on mass panic over the reactors. I would say that headlines like UK’s tabloid, “The Sun”, uses above doesn’t help… but then, I doubt the Japanese are busy reading The Sun these days. Japan is a nation already stressed to maximum in resources, grief, and facing possibly decades of rebuilding. There are cities and agricultural areas that were virtually wiped clean by the tsunami. And now with a large portion of their power in the state of emergency, the rescue and recovery effort is nothing short of a precipitous climb.
The BBC is more concerned it’s a TEPCO “cover up”, noting that thus far, “…the whole incident so far contains more questions than answers.” Even the NYTs above noted what they find to be inconsistencies, and suggest that TEPCO’s facilities are fraught with a past filled with safety violations.
Yes, folks… while the body count still rises, search and rescue commences for the thousands missing, all amidst high magnitude aftershocks, politics and energy agenda has begun to enter the picture. And they are going to use TEPCO’s plant as their poster child.
I suggest that this story is not dissimilar to the explosion and sinking of the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig in the Gulf. It’s dangerous to allow catastrophic events to dictate energy policy and direction. US oil and shale reserves are plentiful, and provide inexpensive energy for consumers. Nuclear power is clean, also affordable, and if Japan can demonstrate containment and success – even in such an earthquake volatile region of the world – then abandoning this type of energy using fear tactics is simply despicable.
For me? I’m following this story not because of the politics I knew would be interjected along the line, but because it is one more heinous event on top of what they are already having to deal with. Like the Deepwater Horizon, I’m going to leave aside the smearing of companies, and cheer on successful containment, solutions and possibly new design ideas for future safeguards. Japan doesn’t need to lose any more if it’s citizens to radiation exposure.
UPDATE 3-15-11 10:28AM: From Reuters live blog updates:
Yukiya Amano, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, told a news conference that there was a “possibility of core damage” at unit 2. “The damage is estimated to be less than 5 pct.”
UPDATE 3-15-11 8:13am PAC Time: A Japan Times 3-15-11 article, is putting out some radiation levels.
But fears were heightened Tuesday over whether a containment vessel might be compromised, after the suppression chamber of the No. 2 reactor’s containment vessel failed.
A small explosion took place at the No. 2 reactor, causing partial damage to the chamber. Attached below the vessel, the suppression chamber’s function is to cool the steam flowing from the vessel and thus relieve its internal pressure.
At 10:22 a.m., a radioactivity monitoring post near the No. 3 reactor showed 400 millisieverts per hour, 400 times the amount an ordinary person is exposed to in a year.
The figure was 100 millisieverts per hour near the No. 4 reactor and 30 millisieverts per hour between the No. 2 and No. 3 reactors.
The radiation leak prompted the government to order residents between a radius of 20 km to 30 km to stay indoors to prevent exposure. People living within a 20 km radius have already been ordered to evacuate.
“There is no doubt it is an amount that would have (a harmful) effect on the human body,” Edano said. “But that is the amount right near the leak. The farther away, it drops.”
Radiation exposure of 7,000 to 10,000 millisieverts per hour is considered a lethal dose, said an official at the Institute of Applied Energy. A millisievert is 1,000 microsieverts.
UPDATE 3-15-11 8:05A PAC Time: Below is the status of the four reactors as TEPCO’s Fukushimi Daiichi site as of 9PM 3-14-11, Pacific Time.
UPDATE 3-14-11 9:21pm PAC Time: Reuters live blog updates say that radiation levels in Saitama near Tokyo are reported to be 40 times normal levels: (Kyodo quoting local government)
UPDATE 3-14/11 7:54PM PAC Time: While I’ve been absent from FA for the past day and a half, taking care of what I would hesitate to call domestic house “emergencies”, the FA community as thrown in interesting tangents and data in my absence. Thank you all.
As of this moment, CNN is reporting of the newest two explosions. Three of the six TEPCO reactors are experiencing different levels of failure, and the Japanese authorities have widened the area to include anyone within 30 kilometers of the power plants should remain inside, as the levels between all the released emissions in the air have reached a level they describe as being enough to “affect human health”. Hard to determine what that means, but it’s obvious that between the damage, and the difficulty of keeping the cores cooled, and maintaining the existing flooding of seawater and release of pressure in each of the reactors.
At this moment, Units 1-3 have different degrees of failures, and all three have experienced explosions. Units 1 and 3 have been overheating. Unit 2 is the latest entry to the mix, and it is uncertain at this update if Unit 2′s latest explosion has damaged the containment vessel. Heretofore, all officials have been adamant that neither Unit 1 or Unit 3′s containment vessel was compromised.
At this moment, I’ve been having a problem accessing TEPCO’s press release site. It is, no doubt, overloaded, and becomes a hit and miss as to when you can get in.
According to a late posting Reuters article, Japan is asking the US for additional equipment to help keep the core cooling process stable.
UPDATE: 3-12-11 9:45PM PAC time: MSNBC reports the Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano says the cooling process for one of the crippled reactors is going well. It should take about 10 days to totally fill the reactors containement vessel with seawater. In the interim, the 2nd reactor with a cooling problem seems to be following the same procedures as the first… release of pressure, then injection of seawater and boric acid.
The Japanese authorities have classified the event at Fukushima Daiichi Unit 1 as a level 4 “accident with local consequences” on the International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale (INES). The scale is used to consistently communicate the safety significance of events associated with sources of radiation. The scale runs from 0 (deviation — no safety significance) to 7 (major accident).
The 1979 Three Mile Island accident in Pennsylvania was a level 5 (“accident with wider consequences”). The 1986 Chernobyl disaster was a level 7 (“major accident).
UPDATE: 3-12-11 9:35PM: Ah yes… Never let it be said a Democrat Congress member with an agenda to pursue allows even someone else’s crisis to go to waste. Already MA Rep Edward Markey, the senior Democrat on the House Natural Resources Committee, warns that the US is vunerable to the same “…nuclear accident that has sent waves of fear through northeast Japan.” Waves of terror? Over the reactor? The Japanese, quite used to earthquakes, are more wary of the tsunamis. I see no “waves of terror” INRE the power plants, save in the Congressman’s mind.
UPDATE: 3-12-11 9:28PM PAC Time: TEPCO, owner of the crippled reactors in the news, has their own press release site. Per their news, all six units of their Daiichi Nuclear Power Stations have been shut down. Three are due to regular inspections.
UPDATE: 3-12-11 3:23pm PAC Time: Personal comment… Wolf Blitzer is an ass! The Japanese Ambassador is *not* an enemy of his people, or a war criminal. Blitzer, in his quest for some breaking catastrophic news, demonstrates he knows nothing about Japanese culture, their approach to crisis, and emphasizes he’s simply a news whore.
UPDATE: 3-12-11 3:04PM PAC Time: CNN’s Wolf Blitzer is blazing headlines that a “possible meltdown is in progress”, and trying to get the Japanese Ambassador to “admit” that it’s happening. Ambassador reiterates that the container vessel is, indeed still in place…. Mata Musing: do your best, guys. Get it under control, and forget the pundits trying for disaster headlines!
UPDATE: 3-12-11: Three tested positively for radiation exposure. Levels not mentioned. From CNN live blog news:
[1:20 p.m. ET, 3:20 a.m. Tokyo] Authorities have begun radiation exposure testing around Fukushima prefecture where three people – randomly selected out of a group of 90 – have tested positive for radiation poisoning, according to Japan’s government broadcaster, NHK.
UPDATE: 3-12-11 11:38AM: A CNN report ID’s the 2nd plant with cooling trouble as Fukushima Daini , located in a different town in the same prefecture.
Most of the concern initially had centered around the first Daiichi plant, which Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano told reporters on Friday “remains at a high temperature” because it “cannot cool down.”
That plant and three others were shut down after the quake hit around 2:46 p.m. Friday local time, prompting authorities in Tokyo to declare a state of atomic power emergency.
Three of the Daiichi reactor’s six units shut down because of the earthquake, while operations at the other three were out due to “regular inspection,” the Tokyo Electric Power Co. said in a news release Saturday.
…snip…
The trouble the Daiichi plant happened after its once operating reactors had been successfully shut down, Edano said.
UPDATE 3-12-11, 11:29A PAC time: The French Nuclear Safety Authority says current winds make it likely any radioactive fall out would drift out over the Pacific.
“Apparently the situation is serious,” Mr Lacoste said, adding that his team was receiving incomplete information from Japan because of the number of people tied up with managing the crisis.
Again, as on the last thread, I so appreciate all news updates you all add. This is a fast moving story that requires the latest updates that you will run across. And it’s much easier to have the sequence of events in one or two posts, as opposed to several outdated posts over time. Besides, I can’t do it all without you!
Not all the reports about the explosion said why it happened. This was a hydrogen/oxygen explosion. The hydrogen came from the cooling process. Without saying that, it could lead to people to believe the explosion was nuclear related.
That’s true, Gregory. But then, were it a nuclear related explosion, there would be no hiding radiation exposure. Nor would there be any reports of a decline in the leakage of radiation. Whether the levels have gone done in reality, I don’t know. But I, personally, automatically assumed it was not a nuclear related explosion because of the absence of radioactive fallout.
How can you get a Nuclear Explosion out of 5% enriched Uranium? It’s IMPOSSIBLE. The explosion was Hydrogen related. It HAD to be.
I don’t think the reconstruction of the devastated areas in Japan will take decades, as was suggested in this essay. First of all, Japan basically got the shit kicked out of it in ’45 and it didn’t take decades to rebuild it. (Using ’45 technology).
Furthermore, I’ve seen several video reports and read quite a few eyewitness reports from blogs that are right at the scenes of some of the worst devastation.
A couple things jumped right out at me.
The Japanese public have their act together!
These people were obviously trained and prepared. Many of them (other than professionals like police and fire) are shown to be grabbing gear (gloves, uniformly colored and reflective overalls, hard hats ect.) and were sprinting into action leading people into areas safe from falling debris, helping the wounded, putting out small fires and leading people out of buildings.
These people knew what to do, and did it. FAST.
Also, there are absolutely no reports of looting or civil unrest. (Unlike the animal show in New Orleans).
No signs of panic. People are polite, waiting in lines and letting traffic merge, following the directions of public officials.
The Japanese should be PROUD of the way their countrymen and women are responding to this disaster. I sure am!
I look forward to seeing the restoration and reconstruction efforts in the coming year.
I said ‘year’ instead of ‘years’ because from what I’m seeing of self-discipline these people are demonstrating, I wouldn’t be surprised if a year or two from now you wouldn’t even know this happened.
Just an amazing and refreshing display of courage and community spirit.
Thinking of what would be happening in America if this kind of thing happened makes me shudder.
MATA hi, I tryed the sign saying; read open thread 1 here in red and big,
on your post and it said ; PAGE NOT FOUND, bye
just a wild guess; could the previous TSUMANI,had a inderect effect of destabilisation underground,
which with time brought about this event,
Thanks for the heads up, Bees. An HTML programming error on my part, and is corrected now.
@Nostradamus, I mean no slight to the Japanese… a well disciplined culture who never places limits on their achievements. Just to clarify if that’s what you thought I meant about decades.
I would hope it wouldn’t take that long, but I fear the reality of returning to the status quo would indeed take that long. And I’m speaking of two distinctly different rebuilding endeavors.
For the Miyagi communities, towns and cities that were wiped clean like a black board, there is not just rebuilding the physical buildings. Which may, or may not be accomplished in the somewhat ambitious timeframe you suggest. Before a community can be reinhabited in the same flourishing status enjoyed before, they will need businesses, supplies, customers with paying jobs to support those businesses, etc. It is rebuilding commerce simultaneously. In all comprehensive planning is a balance between business and residential growth. Rebuilding a community is not just slapping up the previous buildings. If that were the case, rebuilding many of the US areas that are virtual ghost towns because of economic reasons, or prior disasters, would be much easier.
For that reason, I would hope for, but not anticipate, your timeline of recovery. In fact, many Japanese may not return to that area for the risk and memories. Others who considered that area for their future may now reject it for the same reasons. It may start out smaller as a community and take time to again grow to previous status and population.
Then we come to the agricultural communities that were destroyed…. crops, animals, ag buildings, inventory, supplies, fencing, equipment. All gone. It is virtually impossible to reach the anticipated annual crop yield they have done in previous years in the time frame you suggest. The clean up, assessing environmental and ocean deposits that may negatively affect the soils… or even replacing the soil nutrients that were there for years is one issue. The clean up alone may take up to a year, before one can even plant even the first new crops or replace their herds. I don’t know of any rancher or farmer who thinks they can duplicate a complete loss of business in the time frame you suggest.
Then there’s getting insurance claims completed to purchase new equipment, till the soils, buy the crops, replace the herds, the ag buildings needed – all added to building the home for the farmers. The latter is a piece of cake… assuming insurance claims go thru quickly. The former is not that easy, as I’ve outlaid in the paragraph above.
Only after all the equipment, supporting structures, and soil is ready can the first crops go in. An ambitious timeline for even a modest yield, unlikely to match the regular performance prior to the tsunami, would be three years at best, IMHO. And that’s banking on one heck of a first year yield.
Also remember that the rest of the country who has damage will also have to wait for their insurance claims… (BTW, I hear that Afleck has the bulk of the Japanese insurance biz)… then face the same slow rebuilding of commerce, buildings and residences.
I, too, admire the Japanese compartmental discipline and drive. Always have. Worked many years for a Japanese company where I developed a respect for the culture. (not to mention a real penchant for shabu shabu). But they will not be hasty, nor haphazard in their rebuilding. They are not a culture of snap decisions by nature. It will take time for them to achieve the same pre-disaster status. Perhaps somewhere between your “year” and my “decades” is the real answer.
MataHarley: You bring up several good points, especially about soil contamination and whether it would be wise to rebuild in an area(s) already proven susceptible to this type of disaster (Tsunami).
But one thing I know is that the Japanese are deviously diligent planners (as well as archiving everything that was there) and I have no doubt the surveyors will be out there in short order re-plotting every building lot. The decision on whether to “rebuild” what WAS there (for the same use) is one thing.
Three things are certain.
A) Look at how they employ technology into everything they produce. There is no question that these people are capable of adapting to change in a swift and meaningful way. Anything they rebuild will undoubtedly be BETTER than what they had in place.
B) Land in Japan is at a premium. They will find a use for every square inch. If need be, they will rebuild higher, stronger and more efficient. One thing you probably won’t see are “Katrina Trailers” all over the place. After the most powerful earthquake in their recorded history just a few hundred miles from Tokyo (And they get more earthquakes than anywhere else in the world) not a single high-rise building collapsed. NOT ONE. Now that is “planning” for ‘ya. California Northridge? Not so good.
If it wasn’t for the Tsunami, Japan would have been barely affected by the 4th most powerful earthquake in recorded history (It was recently upgraded to 9.1). The reactor secondary cooling system failed because the diesel generators were flooded by the Tidal Wave.
C) This is a nation with the worlds 3rd largest (arguably) economy. Yet they possess basically no natural resources. (One of the reasons for the Pearl Harbor Attack. We put Imperial Japan under embargo).
They have made a CULTURE out of importing raw materials, applying brain-power to those materials and transforming them into marketable products at the cutting edge of technology. To them it’s not even just “a way of life.” It’s a matter of survival as a Nation.
They didn’t invent the TV, Automobile, Stereo, Cell Phone, Computer or really much of anything. But they sure beat the snot out of their competition in re-inventing all those things and a lot more.
As for funding, they’re pretty good at good at funding major projects too. I would not be surprised to see their government just take charge of the whole process. Government puts up the cash and deals with reimbursement by insurance companies back to the government instead of to the owners at a later time. Guaranteed replacement value is what’s important.
Japan knows that the longer it takes, the more vulnerable their economy becomes.
It will be interesting to see what they do and how successful they are.
So far, Wall Street seems to be betting on Japan because after this disaster began the American Stock Market rose when many predicted it would sell off.
I’m sure there will be plenty of companies willing to bet on Japan and invest in their efforts to rebuild.
One other thing is certain: This sure ain’t Haiti.
I do believe we are on the same page in faith in the Japanese themselves, Nostradamus. Which is why I wanted to make it abundantly clear my prediction of “decades” was not a judgement call. But in addition to rebuilding under normal circumstancs, the Japanese economy was still in jeopardy, which only makes that rebuilding process slower. Also, because I spent many years working with those who made decisions “across the pond”, as we called it, I know they are not a culture who rushes willy nilly into projects quickly. They are a very careful and deliberative culture by tradition.
There’s an interesting perspective by the Curious Capitalist I had read that echoes what I feel are the hurdles the Japanese must overcome in their recovery. He quotes some B of A/Merrill Lynch economists, and their assessment on Japan – post this event, and considering their fragile economy prior.
Consider the already declining growth of Japan’s GDP, then add the assumed impact loss on an already low number. Then assume that 1% cost of rebuilding.
ouch… “Uphill” is a term that is ambitious at best.
As creative for funding as the Japanese are, they are also not fiscally ignorant of their current status, and what this may do to their recovery timeframe. (thus my “decades”….) I did take this into consideration when I pondered their uphill path. They were, after all, at one of the largest debt burdens of any industrialized country, at about 200% of GDP. None of this weighs in their favor.
I’d always bet on the Japanese to snap back. Just not at the speed you project, or I’d like to see.
By the way, regarding “Japanese Planning”, have any of you seen this short video, “One Minute Warning” cross-posted by “Hot Air?”
Watch the whole thing (4 minutes in total).
I GUARANTEE YOU that if the same thing happened 300 miles from Los Angeles nobody would have a clue until the buildings started pancaking down Hollywood Boulevard.
THIS….is “Planning”:
http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/03/11/6247882-how-quake-prediction-works-or-not
@MataHarley:
I was not aware of that (Negative estimate of 8% GDP contribution). But actually, I thought it was worse because I thought I read that the Honda and Nissan Plants were in jeopardy as well as their ports of export.
I actually have no idea where those are all located.
No doubt that those figures you posted are not good news, and I thought their Debt-to-GDP was improving from 2-times GDP.
I guess it’s what you classify as “improving”, Nostradamus. As you can see by the chart below, when you consider where they were in 2009, it’s improved. But in steady decline at a very inconvenient time right now.
Thanks for the chart.
No, that’s not good and I thought the improvement was much greater than 3% (Which the chart doesn’t even reflect anything close to).
I know about “The Ten Year Recession” due in large part to their “Quantative Easing experiment” that our nit-wit-in-chief is now trying.
I believe that the Japanese equivalent term for what you are describing is called “The Lost Decade”, Nostradamus. Many thanks for your flexibility and analytic abilities in this discussion, BTW.
Posters here at FA are correct!
Emergency at a second reactor, Japan’s nuclear agency reports
So, it was the hydrogen, not the rods that blew.
Thanks.
But you know, Japan HAS also had quite a lengthy history of destruction via Cyclones too, some of which rank right up there with the ‘best’ of Hurricanes.
I’ve never been to Japan so in my mind I perceive it as a kind of Singapore (been stationed there on layover to another Amph Group) only with a more ‘American’ type of government. I KNOW that’s probably foolish and naive but I have to say that so far I’m pretty impressed with the way they’re handling things.
What WOULD disappoint me is if we discovered they weren’t being honest with their press releases regarding the severity of the problems they’re having with the reactors.
Mata writes:
What do you me “we”, white woman?
I’m retired now, but worked in the nuclear industry for a number of years out West. My specialty was Residual Heat Removal systems.
John Cooper, yes, I was wondering when you would show up,
this post is a good one for your expertise
and another one missing who eventualy show up is
TallGrass, he is also an expert ingeneer in nucleor,
bye
Another reactor [this makes it 6] at Fukushima nuke plant loses cooling functions
TOKYO, March 13, Kyodo
Tokyo Electric Power Co. said Sunday another reactor of its quake-hit Fukushima nuclear power plants had lost its cooling functions, while at least 15 people at a nearby hospital were found to have been exposed to radioactivity……
More at link.
Thanks for remembering Mizz Beez {hug}. I’m in a pizzy mood tonight, so maybe I’ll post something tomorrow. My peach trees are blooming here in NC, and I’m eagerly awaiting the bees to show up and pollinate the blossoms.
NanG–It’s simple. The cooling systems (mostly) run on electricity. No electricity=No cooling. With the reactors shut down, these plants must rely on external utility power or internal diesel generators to run the emergency cooling systems. Apparently, the dumb a**es who designed these Japanese plants placed the emergency diesel generators on ground level where they could be flooded by a Tsunami.
When offsite power failed, and the diesel generators failed, there was nothing they could do to save the plant. Everything went dark.
John Cooper, yes they will and you will eat those juicy sweet pears soon
John Cooper, as you mentioned, they did have the back up generators that failed. Then again, you have to take into consideration that this facility, and design, is four decades old. That is already nearing the end of it’s functional life span, not to mention behind the latest technology. Probably why they decided to pump the sea water in and render it virtually beyond repair. But I would be curious… they are obviously of the mindset that the facility isn’t worth saving. Assuming that the containment vessel for the cores is mostly intact, what would be the optimum way to implode/destroy the facility with the max containment potential?
Oh, BTW..been waiting for a readers post from you on this. Where ya been? Why the heck are you leaving this crap to me, the novice? LOL
I think there’s plenty of hyperbole on the media side, and well as extreme caution on the government/TEPCO side. I wouldn’t take the big cable three, or the western press’s interpretations as a measure of their honesty, Nostradamus.
I think there are two things in play here. First, there are a lot of “cooks in the kitchen”, which confuses the media message. (i.e. too many people “in charge” of the reactor problem).
Secondly, I think the Japanese government does not want to instill panic into an already stressed citizenry. If they can curtail any meltdown… of any degree (and there are different degrees of melting vs meltdown, and whether that has massive effects)… then why panic a nation already living on the edge for the simple items like food, water and shelter? That nation doesn’t need a Wolf Blitzer or FOX News rewriting reality, desperate for another nuclear catastrophe as a headline.
Listening to FOX News today, and I was equally disgusted. Frankly, FOX has annoyed me since the moment the earthquake happened. Me, the insomniac, started catching the anchor reports from it’s first reporting in the wee hours (and stayed with it with cat naps inbetween), and frankly… the bimbo they had on the anchor desk for this was truly embarrassing. CNN genuinely has a wider net of overseas contacts and affiliates as sources to draw on. Problem is, they had dipshit anchors too. I swear, if I could have reached in and throttled Wolf Blitzer today… that pompous gorilla idiot… I would have during his interview with the Japanese PM. Wolf’s expertise and finesse doesn’t extend much further than grooming his beard, and using a zipper while in the men’s room. The Japanese Ambassador was more kind and polite than I would have been. His attempt to educate bone head Wolf to Japanese approaches to crises were patient, and a waste of time. Wolf only wanted to look like a “hard hitting reporter”. What an idiot.
Won’t even bother going to MSNBC. Tried the Weather Channel, and they were using used CNN video handoffs as “new video”.
Comes down to this… CNN for the generic, and the internet for the breaking news. But only if careful on the reporting.
Thus, as shown to me clearly during this event, I’ve come to the conclusion that I can do without FOX, CNN and MSNBC equally and live by Internet news. I do really like the biz news channels, but their punditry can be just as annoying at times. Save Cavuto, of course. My biz pundit hero.
@MataHarley:
I agree completely because internet sites comprise the whole spectrum of gathering news and opinion, and for the most part do a decent job of separating the two.
Simple phrases like “I think, I Believe or In my opinion” let the reader know….WTF IT IS that they’re actually looking at!
Websites also run the whole gambit of coverage from “Big Journalism” , “Pure Bloggers”, “Left vs Right”, “Just Science”, “All Law”, “Op-Ed” or a pleasant mix of those, like RealClearPolitics does.
In addition – (VERY IMPORTANT) – websites like FA, RightWingNews, AOS, Hot Air and most others hyperlink words embedded in their commentary to give the reader some insight on how they developed their opinions in the first place.
CNN and FoxNews are catching on but are still woefully lacking in that regard and all to often post opinion as news and that really pisses me off. And Liberal news sources are famous for what they ignore and what they promote. Josef Goebbels perfected that art and believe it or not learning how to do that and recognize it are courses taught in Officer Candidate School.
I know it when I see it.
A perfect example is when you see the same talking point repeated by several liberal media parrots like “Shared Sacrifice” or “The previous Administration” or “Unexpected increase in” used over and over.
The internet has unchained the public from the bondage of that practice used ad-nauseam in the days when all your propagan…..I mean “News” came from the big 3 of CBS, ABC and NBC. (Okay, I’ll throw PBS in with that infamous group).
May Dan Rather enjoy his retirement. (By the way—How’s that lawsuit going Dan buddy? Haven’t heard much about it in the past 3 years).
Just say’in.
Nostradamus, here’s more reading on Japan’s economy, their plans for spending, economic outlook, etc from Bloomberg this eve.
JC, in order to avoid the damage from this 30′ tsunami wave, they’d have to had mounted the generator four stories up. Even tho the generator is that elevated, what’s to prevent failure in the rest of the power chain, likely powering elements at lower levels? Strikes me as just placing the generators at a higher level doesn’t completely solve the problem. Isn’t that rather like having the GFCI outlet just below the ceiling, powering a computer tower on the floor, and still expecting the computer to work when the room floods? The facilities, if not the containment vessel, were also damaged by the tsunami.
I do believe they are still trying to sort out why the back up generator system did not work in this facility. Many other of the same facility’s units (they have six in that location, I believe), with the same back up system, did perform as expected.
@MataHarley:
Thanks for that link. I believe it pretty much sums up some of what both of us were saying.
What I will watch for is what you touched on, the reimbursement process from insurers and reinsurance companies.
I just hope that this recently cursed country gets some relief from weather and geological disease.
And I also hope that our country will assist in ensuring Japan isn’t taken advantage of in areas of offshore resource harvesting and national security issues by their dubious neighbors while in a position of weakness and while Japan tries to focus on domestic issues vs foreign issues.
I’ll step in here as someone who spent close to five years living in Japan, and who’s devoted considerable time to studying the country and language as well. Japan is indeed a highly disaster prepared country; when you face down earthquakes, volcanoes, and typhoons on a regular basis, you had better have your act together. However, let us all remember that this is the 5th most powerful earthquake in recorded human history. I compare this to our government having built bomb shelters all over the place to ensure the continuation of governance in the case of a nuclear World War III. What was always the caveat with these shelters: “Anything but a direct hit.” Well, Japan is very disaster prepared, but they took a direct hit on this one. The quake happened a scant 80 miles off shore, so that tsunami wave was liking crashing through houses maybe 10 – 15 minutes after the violent shaking stopped. As far as the nuclear plant, my guess is that it is practically impossible to engineer something that will shake off an 8.9 earthquake without any ill effects. They could have had alternative generators set-up, but they were simply damaged in the course of all that shaking, and absorbing the impact of tons of water moving at high speeds (estimates were the wave was moving across the land at 40 – 50 mph).
Now, the reason why there is some suspiscion amongst the Japanese media when hearing reports from Japanese officials regarding possible radiation leaks has to do with history, and to a degree Japanese culture and sociology. Back in the fall of 1999, there was a nuclear “incident” at a plant in northern Ibaraki Prefecture. The government and officials from the plant management were painfully slow in releasing details; as they have been with certain other industrial accidents in Japanese history. Basically, it is borne out of a cultural belief that it is better to have a few people in an affected area suffer, than to cause wide-spread panic by full disclosure. Am I in any way saying that this is what is going on here; no. I simply am trying to point out why there is a degree of skepticism amongst the fourth estate types when announcing official government statements. I earnestly hope and pray that in this case what the Japanese government is saying is on the level; as I lived for some time in the city of Iwaki, which is quite near the nuclear plant in question, and still have a number of friends there. Hope this contributes a little to the discussion.
I echo the above post, in hoping that the U.S. will help watch Japan’s proverbial back in the “tough” Northeast Asian neighborhood, while it deals with this internal tragedy. I was encouraged to hear that South Korea (a nation with which Japan has considerable historical acrimony, and even some current friction), was also deploying disaster relief units to help.
Mata–
I’m flattered (blush) that you’d ask me for a Reader Post. I’d gladly do it but my expertise is in PWRs, not BWRs. I would only be speculating on what’s going on in Japan. Now I could write a book on the deficiencies in the Residual Heat Removal systems in Westinghouse 4-loop PWRs…Oh wait, I did that already. It was only 42 pages long, but the management told me where to stick it. When I gave my findings to the NRC in 1982, that ended my career with the utility. They didn’t fire me exactly, they just transferred me to a remote power station in the Sierra Nevada mountains in the middle of winter. I got the message, and just moved on. Oh, the NRC wasn’t interested at the time either, but years later they took some of my advice. Oh well, I have the personal satisfaction that I was an engineer ahead of my time. But I digress…
I don’t know enough about BWRs in general or the specific design of the plants in Japan to offer much other than generalities. I believe that the diesel generators and RHR systems are probably similar in both BWRs and PWRs. Here’s a simple of the emergency cooling systems in a BWR (Sure wish I could see the other half of the page). You can see those “Safety Relief Valves” discharge into the “Supression Pool” in the bottom of the primary containment. We have to figure that when emergency cooling was lost, those relieved and blew steam down into the suppression pool.
On the diagram, you can see that the two RHR pumps suck from the reactor (near Recirc. Pump A), cool the water in the heat exchangers, and then pump the water back into the core (above Recirc. Pump A). That would be the normal configuration.
If this diagram applies to the plants in Japan, then the entire RHR system is in the Reactor Building. Bad thing, because now there’s no way to manually open or close any of those valves or anything. At least in the Westinghouse PWRs, all that stuff was in the Auxiliary building so the operators could get to it even if there was a release in the main containment structure.
Oh, several posters mentioned a hydrogen explosion. It that’s the case, then it confirms a substantial meltdown. From Wikipedia
Until you mentioned it, I hadn’t realized that those plants were 40 years old. That may explain a lot about the design. I’ll keep looking to see if I can find a diagram of the plant in Japan.
John Cooper, hi, could the RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL SYSTEM , of THE cOMPANY HAD A
FLAW in the making it? because of the fact that you took all the time to write a 42 pages book
giving your ingeneering expertise was most important for WESTHINHOUSE to pay attention enough to figure a potential probable flaw and to reexamine the plans,?
NOW get that book out and check the possibility of a relation probability to occur in JAPAN:
AS you know, It take only one bad SCREW to destroy any big or small and most sophisticated technology driven COMPONENT of any kind
Mizz Beez:
Yes, the Westinghouse plants had a number of design flaws in their RHR systems, mostly related to the suction valves going closed “spuriously” (to use the language of the NRC). Imagine a garden hose with two valves in series. Both of them must be open for water to flow through the hose. Close either of them and the flow stops. That’s what the Westinghouse RHR system is like.
In the Final Safety Analysis Report [FSAR] – the legal document “proving” that each power plant is safe to operate, Westinghouse claimed:
Yet those valves spuriously closed all the time (27 incidents through 1981) at plants around the world due to their byzantine control system.
Secondly, there was no alarm to alert the control room operators that the suction valve had gone shut while the pump was running and cut off cooling to the reactor. A number of RHR pumps were destroyed by cavitation while the pumps were running with the flow of water cut off. (No problem, the ratepayers sprung for the replacements.)
Thirdly, in Westinghouse plants designed prior to 1965, there was only a single suction line from the primary system. They claimed (in the FSAR, again), that the system was totally redundant, but obviously if that line broke during an earthquake, it would disable both RHR systems. IOW, Westinghouse lied, and the NRC bought it. Later Westinghouse designs, and Combustion Engineering designs featured two lines from the primary system. Those were truly redundant.
There were many other problems with the system, but like I said, nobody was interested. Amazingly enough, the NRC let the utility get away with calling the RHR system “non-safety related”, even though NRC Regulatory Guide 1.139 required it. To get around that conflict, the NRC just withdrew the Regulatory Guide on “Guidance for Residual Heat Removal”. Problem solved!
Well hell, it’s only a nuclear plant. We wouldn’t want to be conservative or anything…
Oh, for any researchers that might be following this thread “Decay Heat” is sometimes used synonymously with “Residual Heat”. Some plants use RHR and some plants use DHR.
Just think, I compiled all this information before AlGore invented the Internet!
John Cooper, although I dont understand all in your comment, I have the feeling that they will find bad dreams following the JAPAN DESTRUCTIVES EVENTS, I strongly feel there is somewhere a bad screw relation, in what is going on, thank you for your informations, hide your book somewhere never to be found by the wrong people, but keep it availeble for the right people who would surely want to know more of it, as your book has gain a priceless interest on both side, WORLD WIDE thank you
A couple weeks ago the Shinmoedake volcano woke up after 42 years.
Then, last week one of Hawaaii’s volcanoes had its cone collapse and more lava than usual is coming out.
Then the Japan earthquake swarm, including the 9.1.
Then another volcano on the ”ring of fire.”
Now, today the Shinmoedake volcano started back up again!
It is not raining, it is pouring!
And who knows where it will strike next.
Many parts of the west coast of North and Central America, even South
America are also on the ring of fire.
MATA in case you don’t already know,I read at GUARDIEN, that JAPAN is already bracing for a second EARTHQUAKE, and so far they approximate the death toll to 88000 ,
one men mentionned It’s so huge as BIBLE dimension.
bye
@ Mata:
I think even if it was a brand new facility, given the severity of what they have described the incident, safeguarding the core from becoming uncovered is their prime goal at this time, regardless the financial cost.
I think your questions here really are good… It looks like several layers of the safety have been peeled away. Now we hope the containment holds. Oh, and keep in mind now since the fuel rods have partly melted down this reactor is hot (highly radioactive) for the next 600 years. Only time will tell what will happen next, I am praying that the sea water works and cools the core. If the core does become uncovered it would be unimaginable as to the damage and potential loss of life particularly since it will be the luck of the wind direction that will keep the cesium (and other elements) from killing thousands.
From Article in Time
If man had control of these elements in earlier days, an accident in 1411 would now be considered no longer dangerous. We as a society have a duty to understand fully what we are working with. I am in favor of using nuclear power for electrical generation… however… this incident SHOULD cause everyone pause given the stakes. The damaged reactors will now be monuments for the next 600 years. That is almost the age of Notre Dame Cathedral in France.
What is the half life of an oil spill? Are there any cesium eating microbes out there? We need not act as the apologists to the nuclear energy community (even those who want to see the use of nuclear power). It should be up to them to make their case with us being very sharp at looking at what they represent as facts. A good case of cynicism never hurts when the downside is so big.
Many decisions need to take place… beyond how to design one safely… such as where we build the reactors… there is potential for them to fail (no matter how clever we think we are).
blast, this is good to learn, thank you for it; would you know if the wind and
AIR CURRENTS would or could bring those radiations and toxics elements to this part of the hemisphere or another neighbourly part of AMERICA? thank you
@ilovebeeswarzone: not sure, but the news has shown them describing the potential for it to get into the jet stream. That sounded like speculation, but if it did, I would guess it could get to the US. Obviously if there was on shore or southern winds (and a breech of containment), Japan would have serious problems. I hope this effort they have with the sea water works, the cover the reactor with water, cool it down.
blast thank’s, you know evaporate water they pour into that core,bring VAPORS by the intensed heath in the air, so am I right to think that will make into clouds countaining toxicts radiation, while thoses clouds travels, push by air currents around the world, untill some here and there along their routes will let in rains on the EARTH anywhere ,with the radiation toxcins it countain therefor poisonning our wells
and agriculture land, and waters at diffrent parts of the GLOBE,?
Spontanous Anti Nuclear Demonstration in Berlin, Germany
Once the core has melted, I’m not sure that covering it with sea water will do much good. It’s a matter of surface area and heat transfer. With an intact core, there is a lot of surface area around the fuel rods to carry away the heat. With a molten blob, not so much.
In a PWR, there’s a phenomenon called Departure from Nucleate Boiling [DNB]. When the reactor is operating correctly, only tiny little steam bubbles (like in a glass of champagne) are produced along the fuel rods, then swept away to collapse by the primary coolant. If the coolant flow is inadequate for any reason, you get “film boiling”, which means each fuel rod is surrounded by a “film” of steam. If that happens, the heat transfer from the nuclear fuel to the water goes way down because the steam acts as an insulator. In that situation, the fuel rods can get too hot and melt. It’s a dangerous thing in a PWR, and I think the same scenario is possible in a BWR.
You can see the difficulty in discussing technical stuff like this. Everybody’s eyes just glaze over…
Edit: Winds at Japan Power Plants Should Send Radiation out to Sea
Good news
@blast, #26:
The current Japanese accident should give us pause concerning expansion of the prevailing uranium-based nuclear power industry. We shouldn’t let it be used to put us off nuclear energy in general, however. Nuclear power is an essential component of America’s energy future.
The nuclear reactor problems we’re watching in Japan wouldn’t be happening with a thorium fuel cycle reactor. You simply don’t have the possibility of a core meltdown. Nor do you wind up with any high-level nuclear waste to dispose of. You can get 300 times the energy from a given quantity of thorium as from uranium.
The United States has greater domestic thorium reserves than any other nation in the world–enough to last for centuries. When you mine rare earth metals you get your thorium for free, as a by-product. We currently have stockpiles.
Thorium reactors are no theoretical, pie-in-the-sky energy technology. Early on, we chose uranium over thorium reactor technology simply because we wanted the hot by-productions of uranium fission for nuclear weapons. A thorium reactor is under construction in India that is scheduled to be in operation later this year. We could and should be doing the same.
My thoughts and prayers go out to the Japanese people. I looked at the photos of the damage and the devastation is horrendous.
GREG, hi, we learn every day, I never heard the name THORIUM,
My step son’s horse’s name is THOR, that is all I knew,
It’s very interesting to read, It seems to have a potential to get businesses interested,
too manage that resource, thank you
@Greg: good feedback. I hope the decision is not made by those who have a vested interest in supporting the lesser technology.
Wordsmith: In reading the article, it seems that only 300 people showed up for that protest. I guess the rest of the population was enjoying their nuclear-heated homes at the time.
Greg writes: “The current Japanese accident should give us pause concerning expansion of the prevailing uranium-based nuclear power industry.”
Really? Tell us, how many people have been injured or killed by nuclear power plants since their inception fifty years ago?
@John Cooper, #48:
Would you argue that the potential for a major catastrophe isn’t there, based on the observation that one hasn’t happened yet?
If we’re going to expand nuclear power production–and we need to–we should expand into a nuclear technology that’s much safer, far more efficient, creates no huge problems in terms of waste, and depends on a cheap fuel that we possess in great abundance. That was my point.
@John Cooper: Ever heard of Chernobyl?
Greg–
I’ll answer your question when you answer mine.
blast–
Same question to you: How many people died at Chernobyl?
@ John Cooper:
70 died, and many thousands were exposed to radioactive elements that statistics have shown have lead to cancers and other illnesses. 336,000 people had to be permanently relocated and a huge area of agricultural land was made unusable.
COMPARE to their long time without any life threatening, the NUCLEAR POWER PLANT STILL have a good name as life beneficial compare to life killers, if you consider EARTHQUAKE or TSUMANI ecetera
@ilovebeeswarzone: not sure your point. if you are comparing natural risks vs. man made ones, we choose to build reactors. (so we can choose how safe to make them, where to place them etc). We do not control earthquakes or tsunamis… of course Japan has the strongest regulations for construction… and it looks like that paid off for Tokyo, but not for the areas were the tsunami hit. no doubt they will look for solutions for protecting populations from that as well.
ONE area that puzle me is that we havent master the dependance we are under of ELECTRICITY,
we have evolve the technology, but with the need of the connect to, even as we use batterys they need to be connected to recharge or wont do the work for long
@John Cooper:
Fair enough. To date, we’ve had no U.S. fatalities in the United States owing to the catastrophic failure of a nuclear reactor. So far as I know, Three Mile Island is as close as we’ve come. An earthquake affecting nuclear power stations in Illinois could change that picture very quickly. Any number of unforeseen events might. Any high-technology device will eventually fail.
—
Chernobyl utilized a nuclear reactor technology that many experts consider inherently unsafe. That technology might compare with currently used U.S. reactor technology as currently used U.S. technology would compare with thorium reactors. You’ve got inherently hazardous on one end of the continuum and safe on the other. Safe is definitely better.
Only 50 deaths are officially attributed to the Chernobyl accident. Some of those people essentially sacrificed themselves knowingly and died fairly soon as a result of their efforts to bring the reactor accident under control. The longer-term, unofficial death count includes from 50,000 to 100, 000 radiation-exposed clean-up workers who had died as of 2006. Some have projected up to a million may eventually die prematurely, with radiation-induced cancers as a primary cause. Large surrounding areas were rendered uninhabitable for years due to lingering environmental radiation. People have moved back in spite of the warnings.
http://www.ippnw-students.org/chernobyl/research.html
blast–
I read that “30 lives were lost during the accident or within a few months after it. Figures from the Ukraine Radiological Institute suggest that over 2,500 deaths were caused by the Chernobyl accident.” I read where the land around Chernobyl is still contaminated with Cesium. Whether it was 30 lives or 70 lives, it shouldn’t have happened, but put it in perspective, please.
Having worked in the industry, I know that a lot of safety improvements could be made here in the U.S., but consider the number of lives which would be lost every year without nuclear electricity. By all means, live off the land for a year and see how you like it.
Chernobyl was a horrible disaster, but to compare Soviet-style nuclear technology with plants designed by free people is like comparing apples and prunes.
Greg–
That was a worthy reply until you started quoting from some commie youth organization.
Yes, there are risks associated with nuclear power, just like there are with everything else in life. Many people are killed in oil/coal/gas fired power plants, but it doesn’t make the news. It’s certainly possible that bad things can happen at nuclear plants as are happening to nuclear plants in Japan at the moment. The response of a rational person would be to mitigate the risks and press on.
The risks of nuclear power are no reason to commit suicide as a society, which seems to be the goal of the left these days. No coal – no oil – no nuclear – no electricity – back to the dark ages.
Seems appropriate. It was a commie nuclear power plant. They also built crap automobiles and toasters. *S*
@Greg:
Greg, before I make any other comment in this topic, let me tell you a little about myself. I joined the Navy in 1989, and spent 10.5 years in the Navy Nuclear field as a Machinist’s Mate. After the Navy, I worked at a company that did service work at some Illinois nuclear power plants.
I cannot agree with this statement you made:
Uranium is used in currently operating plants, including those within the Navy, for many reasons, but not because, as you said, “we wanted the hot by-productions of uranium fission for nuclear weapons.”
The truth is that Uranium was used because that is what was being researched at the time at the University of Chicago first, and then elsewhere. As to it’s use, there are several types of reactors out there, still in use in the US, and differing fuels are used based on desired results and the type of reactor the fuel is loaded into. The Navy uses pressurized-water reactors, loaded with Highly Enriched Uranium, or U-235 which occurs in roughly .7% of all naturally occurring Uranium.
Other reactors use naturally occurring Uranium, which is composed mainly of U-238. Still others use Plutonium, and there are a couple more that are more experimental than anything.
Your Thorium reactor quote is as follows:
Do you know, or understand why Thorium would be used? Probably not, so I’ll explain. Thorium is naturally occurring, mainly as TH232, and in pretty large quantities, as you say. Unfortunately, this is as right as you get in your post.
Th232 is loaded into “slow” reactors, typically with a graphite moderator, in order to ‘breed’ U233. This U233 is then moved into a conventional style pressurized water reactor, or a boiling water reactor, and as such, would have the same inherent risks associated with any other reactor using Uranium as fuel.
Your statement that a Thorium core cannot melt down is incorrect. A loss of the moderator, such as happened in Japan in their Uranium based reactors, removes the cooling aspect of the reactor, and thus the high temps from left-over fission builds heat until the material itself reaches it’s melting point. Thorium reactors are typically loaded with a thorium-oxide, which has a melting point of about 3300F. However, depending on the “age” of the material, much of it may already be converted to Uranium, which generally has a melting point of just over 2000F. In short, depending on the fuel makeup at the time, it can still meltdown.
Oh, but you do! The by-products of the fission of Uranium, which comes from the Thorium, is highly radioactive, with a very long half-life. Fortunately, it is not a large quantity of mass, and indeed, the by-products themselves can be reworked into other product uses, and the left over amount of Uranium can be reprocessed into new fuel pellets, rods and such. France currently does this instead of sending the spent fuel straight to long-term holding facilities.
As for the Japan nuclear incident, the main issue was the failing of the cooling pumps, causing a large spike in pressure to the point the vapor released violently. Remember, their reactors are the boiling water type reactor, which produces steam straight from the coolant, sent to turbines to make electricity, condensed and sent back into the reactor to make more steam. While this style reactor is more efficient than a pressurized-water reactor, it is not safer.
Here is a link to see simplified diagrams of each:
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/basic-ref/students/reactors.html
Now, in the US, about 2/3 of the civilian power plants are of the PWR(pressurized water reactor) type. In a PWR, while a loss of coolant pumps can occur, the likelihood of a Japan type incident is much smaller, mainly due to the pressure vessel controlling pressure inside of the primary system, and the steam generators(a heat exchanger between primary and steam systems) continually taking away heat from the primary coolant.
You said:
I completely agree with both of those statements. Nuclear power is a very good way supplying the necessary electrical power to the country, both at present and in the future. The problem is that it takes so long to build a plant from start to finish, mainly due to the lawsuits by environmentalist types. A true commitment to nuclear energy would help streamline the process, making the plants cheaper to build. At present, Nuclear plants cost many, many times more than your typical coal plant, even while the operating costs are much, much lower.
Thorium might be an answer to future fuel possibilities in nuclear plants, but your assertion that it’s safer than what is here already is simply not true.
BTW, Three Mile Island’s nuclear “accident” ended in a miniscule release of radiation which was entirely contained within the containment building. One safety system failed to perform as designed, but others did, rendering the whole “accident” to be nothing of real note.
@johngalt, #60:
I’m glad we agree on those two points, at least.
I’ll defer to your opinion on that, since it’s obviously based on expertise that comes from considerable training and work in the field. I’ve mainly read articles of the popularized science variety, which are admittedly prone to err on the side of wild-eyed enthusiasm. Still, it seems to me there’s something genuinely promising there, and within a lot closer reach than the holy grail of nuclear fusion.
The diagrams you linked of the two existing types of U.S. commercial reactors are informative. (Mr. Happy Atom’s smiling face might seem a little bit too reassuring to be entirely trusted by someone such as myself. I live within 100 miles of each of 10 separate operating nuclear power stations, several of which are much closer.) I’ve gathered that a thorium reactor design would be different from both. Here’s a diagram of one such design, in case anyone wants to have a look to make comparisons. As I understand it, the thorium and uranium fuel mixture would be dissolved in a liquid floride medium, which could be quickly gravity-drained out of the reactor to provide for a very rapid shut down if needed.
“Why I Am Not Worried About Japan’s Nuclear Reactors”
The Pentagon was expected to announce that the aircraft carrier Ronald Reagan, which is sailing in the Pacific, passed through a radioactive cloud from stricken nuclear reactors in Japan, causing crew members on deck to receive a month’s worth of radiation in about an hour, government officials said Sunday.
My dad was in the US Navy during tests in the Pacific Ocean.
Some of his crewmates later died of leukemia.
This group of sailors will bear watching.
johngalt: Your #60 was really excellent. Thanks.
Wordsmith: Your link was interesting but I think Oehmen was mistaken on a couple of points. I could be wrong, but I’ve never heard of water dissociating into Hydrogen and Oxygen at high temperatures. The Hydrogen comes from the reaction between water and the Zircaloy fuel rod cladding at temperatures above 1500C.
Secondly, I disagree that simply flooding the core with water is sufficient to carry away the decay heat. There needs to be some kind of circulation. Also, if a substantial portion of the core has already melted into a puddle, the puddle doesn’t have enough surface area to facilitate heat removal. (The China Syndrome)
I’m still unclear on how the primary containment vessel can still be intact after those hydrogen explosions. Perhaps they were venting the hydrogen into the reactor building and the H2 accumulated up near the ceiling. But what would have set it off? It’s a mystery to me.
Edit: One more thing. I call BS on Oehmen’s statement that the “plugs didn’t fit” on the portable generators they brought in to power the RHR pumps. If the plugs didn’t mate up, they would have just spliced the wires. More likely they couldn’t find portable generators big enough (they would have to be maybe 1,000HP) or they didn’t have a long enough “extension cord”.
The RHR pumps where I used to work were 400HP, 480V 3-phase, IIRC. The output of the diesel generators was 12KV. So they would have had to splice directly into the motor control center for the RHR pump(s). Who knows where those were located and if it was even possible to get there.
@Nan G:
Depending on their definition of a “month’s worth of radiation”, it can be dangerous, or it can be simply nothing at all. Are they talking about an average person’s radiation exposure? Are they talking about a nuclear power plant worker’s exposure? Are they specifically talking about a Navy sailor, who works on a nuclear powered vessel, and his/her radiation exposure? Are they simply talking about the allowable exposure, per US regulations, or Japan regulations?
All of those are quite different levels of exposure, and as such, depending on how they define that “month’s worth of radiation”, the levels of exposure the sailors were subjected to can be quite different.
In my opinion though, it is nothing to worry about for the sailors themselves. Many of the service personnel maintaining US civilian reactors receive their annual allowable radiation exposure in days while working maintenance on a plant. The “plume” or cloud traveling across the ocean now will likely disperse enough that any radiation that is measureable will not register above known background levels.
Just pray for the safety of the People of Japan, including the US Military attempting search and rescue actions, and hope for those plants to be shut down safely.
I’m not getting into this debate, I’m just too damn upset and beside myself over this nightmare. I’m still trying to get communications connections up to friends who are over there before the disaster.
@John Cooper:
It is termed thermolysis, as opposed to electrolysis for the conventional way to split water into hydrogen and oxygen.
In thermolysis, temperatures of 2500F or more require no electrical input for the splitting to occur.
You are correct in that simply flooding a core will not be sufficient. It must be a continual flood, keeping the level of the water above the core continually until the decay heat has diminished, and even then, a borated water solution must be injected in order to “kill” any remaining fission.
Your right about the electrical plugs. It simply isn’t that hard for electricians to splice the power cabling in order to supply the power necessary for at least one of the coolant pumps to run.
Mr. Irons, so sorry that it touches so close to you, and I guess so many who are worryed about loved one, I hope they are safe and unabled to reach you, like some mentionned prayer is the must on theses days, take care
That was really bad situation, there were died lot of people’s and them who were live is not difficult to bellive all bad things what was true or not,
There is all information about this
Fukushima nuclear crisis explained
@John Cooper:
John, I am taking it in to consideration, however human beings cannot claim that we are perfect nor that we can foresee every potential problem in advance. We may plan, we may design, but we cannot see the future. Mata used the Deepwater Horizon disaster here… well, just look at that as example. A company did not properly follow procedures, human failures, poor oversight, along with engineering failures and you have a major incident (even though it was considered state of the art). The same could take place within a nuclear power plant. Malfunctioning computers, bad valves, and human error could result in an accident. If a core became totally uncovered and melted down… potentially could breech the containment vessel. Major disaster.
I am in favor of nuclear energy use. However…. IT MUST BE DONE RIGHT. And that would include using the best materials and locating the generators in places that would not put major population centers at risk, prime farmland etc.
I guess you feel 30, or 70 or whatever is a necessary risk… but of course it does not take into account the costs to society and families. Hundreds of thousands had to be relocated… businesses, shops and devastation to an economy. How about the thousands (many of them children at the time of exposure) ended up with thyroid cancer.
From IAEA report
Nuclear power use should never be approached cavalierly… it is serious business. We should never cheerlead for such a process. The industry needs to make its case. Keep in mind when it comes to money people will do and say anything to get their way. As much as I want to use this form of power… I think it is prudent to be an advocate and skeptic at the same time.
John, you obviously knew a number of deaths before asking me… I can see your perspective, hey only 30, 70, 100, whatever died. Things happen. Planes crash etc. But you are minimizing the over all danger. This would be worse than a Katrina… hundreds of thousands would be permanently effected. Although the “Soviet era” engineering was less secure… does not mean anything when we see the downside to using such energy and a major accident.
Only in a few days will we know what will happen in Japan.
17 US military exposed to radiation from Japanese power plant
johngalt: Thanks for the info on thermolysis of water. I didn’t know about that. Wikipedia states:
Yikes! 2,500C is 4,532F! I have my Steam Tables right here and they only go up to 2,400F. So I’m wondering just how one would heat water to a temperature of 4,532F.
Apparently the US had depended on Japan to buy $100 million in our debt every year.
This is about to stop.
There is no hint as to whether Japan will sell what paper it does hold of US debt, but just not buying more can be very bad for us here, interest rate-wise and inflation-wise.
____________
I saw a so-called expert on TV saying that every thing and every one on the USS Ronald Reagan’s deck was presumed exposed and washed down as if they and the stuff were ”hot.”
Prayers.
Let’s talk about the radiation released from the Fukushima nuclear plant for a moment. In the first place, it’s NOT “fallout”, like the idiots in the media are screaming. Fallout is the radioactive particles of dirt which were blasted into the atmosphere by a nuclear weapon. Those settle on things and get breathed in by unprotected people.
Nobody has any idea what was actually released from Fukushima and therefore how dangerous it is and what kind of precautions should be taken. Chances are, it was mostly noble gassed Xe and Kr. Being “noble” they aren’t absorbed by the body even if they happen to be inhaled. So the “victim” gets a slight dose while the gas dwells in the lungs, but that’s it.
Other stuff like Iodine and Cesium are a different matter. If they’re inhaled, they stay in the body and radiate it from the inside, eventually causing cancer. The Iodine seeks the Thyroid, and the Cesium seeks the bones since it’s chemically similar to Calcium. But if one is wearing the proper breathing protection mask, those are not a concern either.
There are even worse things (fission fragments), but one would think a nuclear carrier would have plenty of skilled rad-protection people on board with state of the art monitoring equipment and protective gear. Also, one hopes that “someone” has been keeping track of the radioactive plume from the Japanese plants and the Captain didn’t just sail through it unprepared.
John Cooper, hi, how can we be sure of the adequate preparness done to protect our MILITARYS,
AS NORMALY the PRESIDENT would publickly reassure the NATION of what has been done to make sure the CREW has been received all the attention required to protect them, by doing two actions, one was turn away theCARRIER and delay or cancel the original mission, and the number 2 is not having react promptly as soon as the JAPAN tragedy occur, therefor being totaly responsable for the CREW’s IRRADIATION and follow out of having been too close to it as they pass through the cloud,
which either it is should be told to the public truthfully, as we have to keep in mind that our military are not EXPANDEBLE but most needed and appreciated from the world over for their contribution
to OUR FREEDOM; and everyone should know that without our militarys we would fall into a COMMUNIST, MARXIST DICTATORIAL total NEFARIOUS POWER, TO BE DELT AND DESTROYED BY NONE OTHER THAN OUR MILITARY.
Tepco said the water levels fell because the pump temporarily ran out of fuel and workers failed to notice it quickly enough.
It was not immediately clear how long the reactor’s core lay fully exposed or to what extent it heated up in that time.
from Murphy’s law…
“If anything can go wrong, it will.”
Mizz Beez:
I think it is pretty much up to the Captain of the U.S.S. Ronald Reagan to assure his crew is protected. From the Captain’s Facebook page:
I’m somewhat concerned that if the sailors had particulate matter on their bodies, then they might have inhaled some of whatever it was.
@blast:
It’s amazing that some people don’t take that to heart. That is why, speaking of nuclear power, that Navy ships have levels upon levels of redundancy built into the systems. Apparently, the law doesn’t translate so well into other languages.
@John Cooper:
And my questions from my response to Nan G in #65 are answered. That radiation amount is negligible, all things considered. As I stated, some workers gain much more radiation exposure than that in a shorter period of time. I am not worried about those sailors. Indeed, airline pilots receive many times more than the amount those sailors received simply by a cross-country flight.
@johngalt:
Unless they travel through a plume of radioactive materials… I for one would not want to breathing in any radioactive steam or be exposed to it.
The reality johngalt is we are not immune from mistakes, accidents and unforeseen reactions, including the US Navy.
John Cooper, It’s very responsable from the CAPTAIN in command of the CARRIER TO
RESPOND in such a detailed way to our concern, and we are confident of the safety of the AMERICAN militarys as his CREW well taken care of, thank you
with respect to the CAPTAIN’S RANK, MAY GOD PROTECT YOU ALL
John Cooper, they would have to be XRAY,as soon as possible if your concern is right,
but then, are the XRAY would become a dangerous actions because of their own
projection of radiation even minimal, could it be that they would create a worse irradiation if in fact they have swallowed some minute particuls,like some kind of confrontation between two of the same element could increase the amount of already in place of the radiation,?
johngalt: I was always fascinated by how difficult it actually is to identify the type of radiation and the nuclides which were the source. I think the common perception from watching too much TV is that you just hold up a Geiger Counter and that will tell you everything you need to know. It’s really more like a mystery novel.
The plant where I worked had these suitcase-sized boxes in various areas which sucked ambient air through a HEPA filter. From time to time, the filter paper was removed and any particles trapped on it were identified. For routine surveys, they used “Rad-Owl” Ion Chambers which were sensitive to beta and gamma. For alpha they had some kind of pancake probes with an extremely thin window.
I think the problem is that in a nuke plant, you know what kind of radiation to expect where. Nobody knows what belched out of the Japanese plants. Anybody remember those RB-57F’s that used to fly though clouds of Russian fallout and take samples? I used to correspond with a guy who flew those back in the sixties. He died of cancer.
Slightly off topic; these are tsunami-related rather than reactor-related: Before and After satellite photos of several Japanese towns. You can drag the midline divider on each photo to the right or left to reveal the full image.
@blast:
I didn’t comment about the carrier traveling through the plume/cloud and being protected by redundant systems. My comment was in regards to the accident itself.
This is a true statement, however, one can do much to protect themselves and others from them.
@John Cooper:
True, on the radiation sources. The sources present in everyday rocks, minerals and the general background that one can receive will vary depending on where you spend your time, but it isn’t a large amount. The fact that the sailors were exposed to a month’s worth in an hour would be troubling if that month’s worth was what nuclear plant workers are exposed to. Given that the Captain stated it’s a month’s worth of normal background radiation, there are many people who work around nuke plants, weapons, medical equip., etc. that receive more.
@johngalt
well, the land based power plant has many redundant systems. NHK is reporting one of the reactors have high radiation leaking out. this probably will be the beginning of something much much worse.
johngalt: I’m not arguing with you, because you probably know more than I do about this stuff. All I’m saying is that the “amount” of radiation is pretty much a meaningless concept. I’m sure you’re familiar with RADs and REMS and all that. Comparing the dose of gamma one receives on an airliner to the same dose received by inhaling some alpha emitter is really not a valid comparison. My old Radiation Protection Manual states:
So when the good Captain Thom claims that his sailors received the same dose as cumulative background radiation for a month, that’s essentially meaningless to anyone who knows about this stuff as you do. I guess we just have to take him at his word…
Oh, for the non-techies on this thread, RAD is “Radiation Absorbed Dose” – a measure of the number of ionizations produced in one gram of your body mass. REM is “Radiation Equivalent Man” – RADS x the quality factor (how biologically dangerous each type of radiation is).
Mizz Bees:
There’s really no good test for ingested or inhaled radioactive particles. X-rays won’t detect them. All they can do is a urinalysis or (in some cases) a whole body scan. Once it’s in there, it’s hard to get it out.
John Cooper, hi, they must feel terrible if they have doubt about ingesting those particuls,
I can imagine their family’s thoughts on this, spechialy if it can’t come out of their body,
thank you, for your info as usual
Thanks for linking that, Greg.
@Greg:
Sad as it is, it tells the story better than many of these overheated reporters.
I see that I’m obsolete. Rather then RADS and REMS, the new terms are Grays and Sieverts. 1 Sv = 100 rem
I’ve caught up in reading the comments by all of you. Civil and interesting debate, BTW… There’s a few I wanted to make a quick response to.
blast, you are expanding the context of events further than was my original intent. But my gist of your comments is that where there is risk to build (nuke plants or otherwise), you shouldn’t build. Now I don’t know of a place on earth that is safe from Mother Nature, so where would that be?
On the other hand, I would agree it’s foolhardy to build homes, power plants or anything else on a faultline. Then again, faultlines exist everywhere, and in places you wouldn’t expect. So where do we go with that? Is that stopping the US providing aid and funding to rebuild New Orleans, a city that is below sea level? How selective shall we get in what is worthy of the risk?
INRE the comparison between radiation long lasting effects, and your casual write off of an extensive oil spill that the Deepwater Horizon did not become (much to the chagrin of many enviro wackos…). I suggest you are short sighted in your scope of analysis. What you see as the risk of radiation half life is obvious. What is less obvious to you is the health of the oceans, the current and it’s effect on our most base lifeform, plankton.
Truthfully, the supertankers that must make their way around Cape Horn in the world’s most treacherous and unpredictable waters, can have the same devasting effect with a single sinking of a tanker and the right circumstances of an oil spill. Those waters would lead to the currents in Antartica, when then feed the rest of the ocean’s plankton life. If you want to talk “half life”, what do you think would happen with the slow destruction of plankton? Read up on it.
That said, should the supertankers not make that trip? Is that a reason to quit utilizing one of earth’s natural resources? No. But it is another reason why advancements to limit the impact of accidents are always on the move.
If you want to live in a world where there are no risks, buy yourself a bubble. Otherwise, it doesn’t exist except in your dreams.
Yes, John Cooper. I did actually know that, but if you were thinking I was suggesting that in my post title, I assure you it was the definition of “fallout” related to residual and or ensuing events, and not radiation.
And I certainly hope it stays that way, johngalt. They have their hands full in all kinds of ways. Considering the magnitude of this quake, which as I mentioned was upgraded late Saturday, it’s amazing the reactors have not been damaged more than they were. When going up against Mother Nature’s power to this extent, hard to believe man can construct anything that can withstand it.
I would think that the latest warning for those within 30 kilometers to stay indoors may be judicially prudent, but certainly falls short of the radioactive Armaggedon that is blasted on the news 24/7 at the moment. Serious, yes. But I’m not convinced that this cannot be gotten under control.
But the lastest Unit 2 blast, and uncertainty about the integrity of the containtment structure, does present one ugly scenario.
BTW, just as a very sad aside, the official death toll is now topping 5000, according to a Japan times update. This is after the most recent find of some 2000 bodies along the shoreline of the Miyagi Prefecture.
This doesn’t sound good.
“The situation at Japan’s quake-stricken power plant is deteriorating markedly, with a fire burning in a fourth reactor and radiation readings rising.”
“The French embassy in the capital warned in an advisory that a low level of radioactive wind could reach Tokyo within 10 hours.”
Greg, just to clarify, there is little about this entire event that *is* good. Your update is the same as the latest I added to the original post above. However that “low level of radioactive wind” has been discussed on TV and via authorities as akin to the levels we’re exposed to when receiving a “chest x-ray”. We don’t know numbers for sure, but still no Armaggedon here. And we’re not hoping for one.
“Affecting human health” is also a phrase used by the EPA. But again, it depends on many factors, and perhaps the sensitivity of the one exposed.
mata,
I wonder if we should consider oil as a natural resource… it cannot really be put in your car as crude oil. And I see you have become a nature lover… actually I think drilling in areas where one cannot control the outcome is STUPID. As you have pointed out plankton is our base life form. So why risk the outcome given our present capabilities? Oh, yeah… drill baby drill. Bumper sticker energy plans.
I hope that we should leave our planet in better condition (than we received it)… you go after the budget deficit, how about an environmental deficit? I love reading how democrat and liberals leave junk behind at rallies and that conservatives clean up after themselves. A few plastic cups vs wanton damage (through lack of regulation, poor regulation or anti regulation). I love Teddy Roosevelt, the greatest Republican President of the 20th century. He could see the damage being done and wanted to preserve our true natural resources.
We not only want to use the last drop of our national oil supply, but we are leaving our future Americans with a huge debt (this was my same complaint when Bush was President). Do we deserve to use everything today? Yes, lets just be gluttons and use every last drop and screw future generations. Lets not look at alternatives, and not INVEST in those as well.
Back to the question at hand Mata. I pray that the problems in Japan are solved without many more problems. It is sad to see one of our greatest allies suffer so.
That was your buddy George’s idea. I personally think folks that live by rivers and below sea level… well, you made your bed now sleep in it. Oh, how about the current Republican budget that cuts support to earth quake and tsunami detection??? Penny wise and dollar f00lish?
blast’isms…
Gee.. you can’t wear a cotton puff either. It’s not grown as a dollar bill. I guess, by your standards, it’s not a natural resource either? And all endeavors can have unexpected turns of events. There is very little in life where you can “control the outcome”. Thus far, we have not hit an issue where we don’t control the outcome… stopping the flow, clean up, for oil slicks etc. I suggest, blast, that you don’t leave your house. You may get mugged at the ATM, someone may hit your car, or heaven forbid you can slip on your urban sidewalk. Those nasty concrete things outta be outlawed… LOL
The rest of your oil diatribe is pure bunk. Man couldn’t possibly tap all the oil that is beneath the earth’s crust. What we can reach (today, at least) is only a small segment of what’s there, and it’s continually creating more. What hyperbole. But let’s say we skip your expansion of what was a casual reference by me to note the dangers of deciding policy on catastrophes and skip your AWG horse manure on this thread, eh? Nor will I encourage your diversion into budget issues either. This is a thread focused on Japan, the power plant problems, and any politics that surround nuclear power – especially when used as “a crises that simply can’t go to waste”.
And to respond to the sarcastic sentence you edited out (showed up in my email box…), I have always been “a nature lover”. I am merely amused you concrete warriors think you know so much about it with your weekend trips once a year to get your Nike’s a bit dirty. LOL
MATA, thank you for such good work regarding your follow up comments,
of your POST, could it be better for a NATION to miniaturize the building of such powerplants in the future? I know might be more costly but easyer to pinpoint the coumponent tiredness and
also easyer to change any other pieces of this so complicated building,
you also put your finger on the so very important factor, which is the FAULT LINE,
that probably exist in every COUNTRYS OF THE WORLD, and should be avoid for those construction,
I found it all very interesting, bye
@MataHarley, #96:
Hope that’s correct. There was a third explosion around 7 hours ago (6 AM Tuesday, Tokyo time) followed by increased radiation levels, with speculation that containment in one of the reactors might be compromised. I see now that I missed your reference to that in the last line of #93. It’s hard to sort real times out the way info comes up online. Repeated reports of previously reported events, etc…
GREG I just now observe with horror that I was one shot before the 100 comment,
well that leave me one option, that is to congratulate you,
Blast, don’t pick on BUSH, because you’r angry on some other thing, HE his my buddy too,
and we miss him yet
Well, bees, YOU win the dalmation. I missed it by one. *sniff*
Blast, when you read the MATA 98 th comment again, you will agree that It is very funny,
bye
@blast:
Now, I don’t want to start a huge argument or anything, but you are only half right. Civilian power plants have much less in the way of redundant systems because when they encounter a serious problem, they simply shut down and fix it. U.S. Navy nuclear plants cannot do that, and for submarines, which only have one reactor, a reactor shutdown while underway and underwater could be the death of them. Hence, the multiple upon multiple power sources, coolant pumps and all manner of secondary type systems to ensure they make it back “up top”.
It might be, and it definitely bears watching.
That amount is less than 1REM, and although it’s much higher than background levels, still isn’t something people need to worry about like it’s the end of the world. Japan officials are taking the appropriate precautions, the plant personnel themselves are working tirelessly to minimize the problem.
@John Cooper:
No argument on my part. If I stated differently than you on any subject within my post, it’s purely meant to inform others here of the facts.
There certainly are a lot of chicken littles on the news networks. Kinda makes one wonder where all the real experts are. Hopefully contributing behind the scenes to Japan to minimize the damage. Unfortunately, people are going to go crazy thinking the world is coming to an end.
johngalt, I was reading an add on my gmail that CANADIENS fear the worse are stock pilling POTATOES,
as a survivor item food, that is along what you mention about the fear of what is happening,
THE bank of JAPAN add 8 trillion yen trough one day operation
Here’s a fact sheet on the Fukushima 1 plant. All of the units there were built by GE (which explains why Obama has remained silent. His good friend and golfing buddy is the CEO of GE).
It’s interesting that Fukushima 1, Unit 3 began using MOX (mixed plutonium-uranium) fuel in September 2010.
John Cooper, thank’s I think this post will have to stay alive for a long time to come,
bye
Then again, not to play devil’s advocate, john cooper, Onagawa to the north of Fukushim Daiichi has all Toshiba reactors, and it’s functioning properly. Tho it did have it’s moments in the past few days.
Here’s an interactive map of all Japan’s power plants as of 2007. Truly the Fukushima plants are those closest to the epicenter, and in the heart of the tsunami damage. I don’t think anyone can suggest that they impact of the event was equal to both locations since there is likely different shorelines between Daiichi and Daini, which is 6.8 miles south.
I do, however, see blogs eager to demonize GE. As I said above, it’s amazing these decades old plants actually fared as well as they did. Truly difficult for man to construct something that can withstand Mother Nature at her most fury.
John Cooper, what’s your take on the last blast of number 2
Mata
I agree with you as to GE, but the age should have nothing to do with it. They should either be 100% and upgraded or shut down if obsolete. And now, after the fact we see the outcome of man vs. nature when it comes to a nuclear power plant. We cannot afford to allow this to happen here.
What’s “100%” when it’s facing a 9. plus magnitute earthquake and a 30 ft tsunami, blast? I repeat, it’s virtually impossible for man to “100%” build anything that is completely foolproof against such forces. In the end, Mother Nature always wins. We can only hope it’s with minimal damage.
MATA, do you know if an earthquake of the number 9.0 has ever happen?
Bees, the USGS upgraded the Japan earthquake to 9.0 over the weekend. I remember hearing it on the news Saturday. The Japanese have a different scale for measurement – Shindo. Then there’s the Wadati scale that is slightly different than Richter.
Either way, it was upgraded, and one heckuva shake up.
And yes, there have been several 9+ magnitudes in history. Remember, this is only since man has been measuring them. Doesn’t mean they haven’t happened in the past before we had this technology.
Largest was a 9.5 in Chile in 1977. That same year, Alaska had a 9.2. A third 9.0 magnitude in 1977 was in Kamchatka. Needless to say, 1977 was a busy year for big quakes.
In 2005, there was a 9.1 off the coast of Northern Sumatra. So this isn’t the largest earthquake, but it is Japan’s largest earthquake in recorded history.
And the chicken littles continue to come out of the woodwork:
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/editorials/la-ed-nuclear-20110314,0,7818400.story
There is much opinion that is wrong in this editorial, not the least of which is their assertion that the quake itself is responsible for the reactor problems. If one wants to be purely technical about it, I guess they could agree that the quake was the cause, but then they would be diminishing the role that the tsunami played in everything.
Without the tsunami, the backup power sources for the coolant pumps would still be operating, and nothing would have been spoken about the reactor problems they are experiencing.
In the U.S., there are very few areas of the country at risk from both a high magnitude earthquake, and a resultant tsunami wave. The area around Seattle is one of these, however, there are no nuclear reactors close enough(1 in the entire state of WA, and well inland) to be at risk.
Nuclear power plants have built in redundancy, including power supplies for essential systems. The happenings at the Fukashima plants are the result of a nearly perfect storm of events that all played a part in the resulting reactor issues. None of that is very likely to happen here in the U.S.
Mata–
There’s no such thing as a “standardized” nuclear power plant. The design of the reactor building is pretty much the same, but all the auxiliary buildings and offsite power lines are built according to the lay of the land at the site. If I had to guess, I speculate that the buildings housing the diesel generators at Fukushima 1 were more vulnerable to a tsunami than the diesel generator buildings at Fukushima 2.
We wouldn’t be having this discussion if the emergency diesels (or their switch gear) hadn’t been flooded. Usually there are three diesel generators per unit, any one of which could power the RHR pumps. Obviously, there was a single-failure mode that nobody considered when the plants were built. Maybe in the Japanese design there were only three diesels that powered all six units. Who knows?
The plants where I worked had three individual sets of 500KV lines providing offsite power to the plant – two of them via separate routes. It was also possible for one unit to power another. Who knows about the diversity of the offsite power to the Japanese plants. Each unit also had an oil-fueled “packaged boiler” which could provide steam to run auxiliary feedwater pumps. I don’t know whether these GE plants have those or not, and if so, why they failed. (Probably the loss of power to the blowers and pumps on the package boiler.)
John Cooper… I’m confused because I – “white woman”, as you call me… LOL – never said any plant was “standardized”. Huh? You sure you aren’t thinking about Mr. 100%, blast instead?
I agree that the damage and problems are actually a result of the tsunami (a byproduct of the earthquake). What I don’t know is that TEPCO’s daini facilities got hit with the same height of wave. In fact, there is little damage or news on that Hamadori area. Looks like it’s mostly Sendei and north.
Dear “White Woman”– I hope you got the joke. Remember when the Lone Ranger and Tonto were surrounded by Indians and the Lone Ranger asked Tonto “What are “we” going to do?” Tonto replied, What you mean “we”, white man?
Oh, I got the joke, john cooper… just wondering how you got to be Tonto instead of me… LOL
@johngalt, #106:
This would probably be an excellent example of how accurate reporting has lost out to the quest for higher ratings. It’s now as important to keep the audience emotionally engaged as to inform them.
This creates layer upon layer of uncertainty: media with ulterior motives, on top of official government and industry sources with ulterior motives, reporting on a rapidly developing situation that on-site experts are unsure about to begin with.
I found this rumor that the Japanese might not open their Nikkei stock market tomorrow troubling….until I saw this graph comparing the Kobe earthquake vs this one on their Nikkei stock market:
http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-nikkei-after-kobe-sendai-earthquake-2011-3
YIKES!
Pingback: UPDATING) NEWS OPEN THREAD II – Japan’s Tsunami “Fallout”: failing … | Fukushima-nuclear.com