13 May

Glenn Beck – All The President’s Men

                                       

Very strong show by Glenn Beck today on all the President’s men, it’s an eye-opener. Yes, he is a bit of a showman but the information provided is a must see. Spend 30 minutes to watch all of it:



About Curt

Curt served in the Marine Corps for four years and has been a law enforcement officer in Los Angeles for the last 20 years.
This entry was posted in Ayers, Barack Obama, Class Warfare, Economy, Environment, Global Warming, Liberal Idiots, Obamanomics, Politics, POWER GRAB!, Socialism, Socialized Health Care, The Shadow Party. Bookmark the permalink. Thursday, May 13th, 2010 at 7:13 pm
| 1,465 views

154 Responses to Glenn Beck – All The President’s Men

  1. Hankster58 says: 101

    Aye… when you ask him for facts…. “Aye” gets “Nay”!!! LOL!!!!! :mrgreen:

    ReplyReply
  2. MataHarley says: 102

    sock puppet of Victor Tiffany: I don’t listen to Limbaugh, but I get plenty of e-mail about his false claims. Oh, did I mention that he’s a racist?

    Ah… the urinal wiz admits he doesn’t form his own opinions, but is herded by the cyber masses. Gosh… who woulda thunk it? LOL

    ReplyReply
  3. Hard Right says: 103

    Being told what to think is so much easier than thinking for themselves. It’s the very essence of being a lefwing fascist. Yet they think they are the “reality based community.” Buwahahahahahahaha!
    Hey victor, did you know that AZ ISN’T a border state? This is according to a Dem so you can slurp it up without question.

    To translate the above into libtard–arrrggglbargle, droooool, pfffft, waaaagggggh, ackfthpt!

    ReplyReply
  4. MataHarley says: 104

    sock puppet of Victor Tiffany: YOu want to see exactly who I am, click on my link.

    Now why on earth would I give a pig’s fart who you are? Based on your presence here, one can easily tell life is waaaaaaay too short to waste on such banal activities.

    ReplyReply
  5. Missy says: 105

    @The Glenn Beck Review:

    You are quite an idiot. You know nothing about any of the posters here.

    Throughout winter I have watched some of his programs and found them to be accurate and have mentioned that on another thread. Much of what he was exposing then had already been hashed, rehashed and sourced on several Hillary blogs and Larry Johnson’s NoQuarter during the campaign.

    Since spring broke, I rarely have time for the internet unless it’s raining, just not going to waste my time on your links let alone do any research just to be able to play with you.

    Not that my routine is any of your business and as I said upthread, I’m not participating in your obsession, just lobbing dirtballs and strangely, you are attempting to turn that into a Glenn Beck debate, you’re making something out of nothing.

    Day late and a dollar short, not interested in what you are peddling, we’ve been through Victor Tiffanys here before. Now, Aye did throw his coins in the pot and you appear to be afraid to show your hand. Snicker.

    ReplyReply
  6. Alexander Zaitchik, author of the recently released Common Nonsense: Glenn Beck and the Triumph of Ignorance, sat down with David Weigel, then a The Washington Post blogger, for an interview. Zaitchik: “[Beck] doesn’t know enough about the world to understand why his grand-unified theory of a 100-year progressive plot is a laughingstock outside of his own TV and radio studios.”

    This post and consequent comments are The Glenn Beck Review’s best example of Beck’s supporters captured by his con.

    I’m making stars out of many here. Wait, did I type stars? I meant examples. Make yourselves proud!

    ReplyReply
  7. Missy says: 107

    Victor is a legend in his own mind.

    ReplyReply
  8. MataHarley says: 108

    Still being herded, eh Victor? Do you have an original thought? Apparently not. I’ve seen jello molds with more character….

    ReplyReply
  9. Hankster58 says: 109

    So, Alexander Zaitchik “connects the dots” for you, and you fall for it….. hmmmmm where have I heard some accuse others of such things………

    Vicki sez…. I don’t listen to Limbaugh, but I get plenty of e-mail about his false claims. Oh, did I mention that he’s a racist?

    You know all about him, and his views, etc…. “because somebody TOLD YOU it was so”…… GREAT way to RESEARCH …Bonehead! LOL!!!! Oh MAN!! LOL!! the more you talk, the deeper the stupid goes!!!

    Oh, as to Beck and Racism… did you watch the VIDEO of the actual WORDS he said, on his show of Black Heroes of the American Revolution?? It’s on this site… maybe you should take a look, and see the words from the “horses mouth” instead of “other peoples E-mails”….. or the voices in your head!!

    FACTS! FACTS! FACTS! :twisted:

    BS I can get from any drunk at the local bar…….

    Oh, and as for Alexander being an “impartial writer here….

    “I was recently on Grit TV with Laura Flanders discussing the Tea Party I attended in Morristown, New Jersey, as well as the Alternet article I wrote with my old Moscow colleagues Mark Ames and Yasha Levine. There was another Tea Party later that night in downtown Manhattan, but I didn’t have it in me to attend another one of these things, which are part GOP convention floor, part Minutemen rally. ”

    Rather BIASED guy, don’t you think??? So, the product out is = to the bias going in… so, you have proved nothing but there is someone who doesn’t agree with him. Big surprise there, heck about 50% of America (lefties etc) don’t agree with him!! LOL!.. so what??

    ReplyReply
  10. Hankster58 says: 110

    I read his Bio…Yeah, Alex spent LOTS of time hanging out in Commie/Socialist nations, working/writing etc…. should fit in well with your n Obi’s agenda….that why you like him, Quote him so???

    ReplyReply
  11. Oh, hi again. This post of loyal followers is now the final example in a point about Glenn Beck, namely that he’s really amazing. Comments here prove this.

    The link to this page doesn’t come from my blog; I’m a contributor to the Syracuse Examiner. It’s the top item now under news & politics (pick the latter when it drops down). Like Beckerheads here care that Beck makes false claims.

    The story was about two recent, false claims that he’s made on his radio show.

    You’re in the news!

    Readers from the Examiner can get back to the story here, or venture to The Glenn Beck Review for a more thorough understanding of the man these “locked and loaded” reactionaries so adore.

    ReplyReply
  12. MataHarley says: 112

    sock puppet Victor… amazing how you continue to show up and still say nothing. Whatsamatter… no email from someone to tell you what to think today? pity….

    Still pimping for your irrelevant blog? Embarrassing….. You might consider getting a life, dude.

    Oh… BTW… nothing to it for being an “Examiner” contributor, guy… been there, done that. You send in a bit of your stuff, and they give you a forum. Got one granted to me after I applied, basically doing nothing. Decided why waste my time. Have better things to do making a living than meeting their posting requirements. They aren’t a discerning bunch. Just need volume, not quality. Judging by your persistant babble here, I guess you can meet that criteria easily. What, no real job? Gawd… tell me we don’t have another FA “sponge”, emulating demented commenter, “CRAP”.

    Examiner is rather a “blog by committee that doesn’t care”, so to speak. Count me still unimpressed. Perhaps moving into even into the annoyed stage. May have to pull out the official FA gnat swatter for you.

    ReplyReply
  13. Hankster58 says: 113

    Obummer makes false statements every day….. so when are you going to beef about that?? BECK cannot directly affect you, Obummer DOES directly affect you. Your anger is MISGUIDED!! Your time and efforts wasted…. good lil Liberal lapdog!! Obi likes you! good boy!! good Boy! waste your time looking the other way!! Woof Woof!!! geez.. sickening…..

    ReplyReply
  14. Missy says: 114

    @MataHarley:

    May have to pull out the official FA gnat swatter for you.

    I say hang him with the thong. Da da dum dum dum.

    ReplyReply
  15. MataHarley says: 115

    LOL Missy. I doubt any of the male species FA authors would yield their thongs!

    ReplyReply
  16. MataHarley: “sock puppet Victor…”

    Do you even have an idea what “sock puppet” means Harley? I didn’t, so I looked it up. It would mean that Victor Tiffany is not my real name. It would mean that my links do not go where they should.

    One does not become an Examiner without a background check.

    Someone claimed that I present no information here. Here’s two points about “Crime Inc.” Even casual observation of Beck’s presentation of this conspiracy theory makes it clear (to people with critical minds) that Beck never mentions what law was supposedly broken. No broken laws; no crime.

    Also, Beck bemoans that MSM doesn’t look into his allegations. Guess what: Beck doesn’t look into his allegations. No one from the Glenn Beck show – not one of his 10 researchers – or Fox “News,” has bothered contacting the “wizard” behind Crime Inc. Beck claims that this man is a Marxist. He isn’t. Beck pulled one of his stunts of taking the “wizard’s” words out of context like he does with Obama, Soros and Gore among others. The wizard explained his words in a post that is still inaccessible on WordPress.

    Finally, there’s still sleazy right wing tactics being employed here of attacking the messenger while ignoring what I’m saying. There are conservatives complaining about Beck too. See this article on Commentary Magazine.

    Beck supporters are not conservative. Like Beck, Beckerheads are reactionary. Beck’s faction want to return to the golden years of when American corporations were free to do whatever they wanted, the public interest be damned. Luckily for this country, Beck’s faction is a minority, a loud, angry and frightened minority, but no where near the mainstream.

    ReplyReply
  17. MataHarley: “sock puppet Victor…”

    Do you even have an idea what “sock puppet” means Harley? I didn’t, so I looked it up. It would mean that Victor Tiffany is not my real name.

    Dood!

    Are you really this dense?

    A sock puppet is a false persona…or one of multiple personas used by Interwebz posters pretending to be something or someone else.

    So, using that definition, and the simple fact that you originally posted here under “Victor Tiffany”…yes, your “The Glenn Beck Review” monker is indeed a sock.

    Such a simple concept…yet it slipped right past you.

    Someone claimed that I present no information here.

    Uh…yeah, that would be me. Multiple times.

    Still no facts. Still no cogent arguments. Still no proof of anything. Still not an original thought bouncing around in the vast space within your noggin.

    Herding, as Mata calls it, is a very apt description. Just going wherever you’re led, with not a single critical thought in the process.

    You continue to post, trying desperately to pimp your pitiful excuse for a blog, and now, another site where you drool and dribble onto the pages.

    A mental midget amongst giants on this site; what a total waste of bits and bytes you are.

    PS…I, being a diligent researcher, managed to find cached versions of your old WordPress site which was shut down due your TOS violations and, well, let’s just say unimpressive is a mild, but appropriate, descriptor. Certainly nothing worthy of being recovered.

    PPS…For those keeping score at home, Victor Tiffany is a liar, a hypocrite, a fraud, and a charlatan and, by examining his words and deeds, that can be easily proven.

    ReplyReply
  18. Aye Chihuahua: “A sock puppet is a false persona…or one of multiple personas used by Interwebz posters pretending to be something or someone else.
    So, using that definition, and the simple fact that you originally posted here under “Victor Tiffany”…yes, your “The Glenn Beck Review” monker is indeed a sock.”

    I know it’s tough for you, but try reading with more comprehension. I’ve explained why my comments went from the old blog name to my name and now to the new blog. There’s no false persona involved. The Glenn Beck Review is what I make comments on because it’s my blog. It’s standard practice. I’ve never tried to pretend anything.

    I would not expect followers of someone as absurd and deceitful as Beck to be reasonable, so making false accusations of me is just par for the course.

    You also claim that I offer “no facts.” What part of Beck did not contact the “wizard” of Crime Inc do you not understand? That’s a fact; he did not bother calling or e-mailing him. Beck can afford to go to him and interview him 60 Minutes style, but Beck can’t be bothered with something as enlightening as hearing directly from the people he points his chubby finger at.

    Beck is the laughing stock of people with three digit IQ’s. He has help put far right candidates on the ballot this November and if the Dems retain control of both houses, I think that he’ll become marginalized where he belongs, back to talk radio.The primary test case for this will be the Senate seat in Nevada. Angle is way out of the mainstream. Another is Rand Paul’s effort in Kentucky.

    The American people are not supportive of Tea Party candidates, not in numbers that wins elections. That’s a fact.

    ReplyReply
  19. I know it’s tough for you, but try reading with more comprehension. I’ve explained why my comments went from the old blog name to my name and now to the new blog. There’s no false persona involved. The Glenn Beck Review is what I make comments on because it’s my blog. It’s standard practice. I’ve never tried to pretend anything.

    Um….speaking of “reading with more comprehension” here’s where it got by you:

    A sock puppet is “…“a false persona…or one of multiple personas used by Interwebz posters pretending to be something or someone else.”

    So, let me just ask you directly: Have you, or have you not, used multiple personas on this site?

    It’s a simple question, so a simple yes or no will suffice.

    What part of Beck did not contact the “wizard” of Crime Inc do you not understand? That’s a fact; he did not bother calling or e-mailing him.

    Really?

    Prove. It.

    Then, after you present unimpeachable “proof” of your accusation, kindly lay out your case as to why such direct contact, or lack thereof, is relevant to the examination of the facts in question.

    ReplyReply
  20. MataHarley says: 121

    sock puppet: One does not become an Examiner without a background check.

    As I told you, I jumped the Examiner application hoops myself, and decided not to have an Examiner spot because they are looking for minimal posting numbers. Perhaps you have that spare time, but between earning a living and what time I can devote to FA, I don’t. However to tout yourself as some sort of recognized political force merely because you passed a background check is sheer fantasy. WaPo or the Chicago Tribune didn’t hire you because you are a stellar journalist (not that they would recognize one if they saw one).

    You went the Examiner route because your blog can’t get off the ground, and you wanted the Examiner built in potential exposure. They, however, don’t care about quality of content, save that it’s not crossing legal boundaries. What they care about is web hits. So I suspect you might find your slanderous butt in the same legal boat as L.A. Parenting Examiner, who’s spun lies finally garnished her a few attorney cease and desist letters. Where was the Examiner staff? Well, they don’t monitor the Examiner blog content because, as the WritersWeekly put it, it’s just another pay per click meat market.

    So presenting yourself as some sort of accomplished political commentator because you got yourself an Examiner page is the height of absurdity. What you’ve really proven is that you’re gullible enough to fall for a scam. BWAHAHAHAHAHA

    ReplyReply
  21. What they care about is web hits. So I suspect you might find your slanderous butt in the same legal boat as L.A. Parenting Examiner, who’s spun lies finally garnished her a few attorney cease and desist letters. Where was the Examiner staff? Well, they don’t monitor the Examiner blog content because, as the WritersWeekly put it, it’s just another pay per click meat market.

    @MataHarley:

    That’s hysterical Mata…..absolutely hysterical.

    So, the owners of the Examiner sites are similar, if not identical to, the Nigerian e-mail scammers or the guys on Craigslist who want to ship you the car after they get the Western Union, eh?

    And Mr. Three Digit IQ, the self-proclaimed smartest guy in the room, wandered right into it without even knowing.

    A penny a view….maybe. Heh! What a dolt.

    Hey Tiff, sweetheart….time to brush the Cheetos dust off your shirt, come up out of the basement there on East King Road, and get a real job pal. This whole Interwebz thing aint workin’ out well for ya and Torie is only gonna support your sorry azz for a limited time.

    Just sayin’.

    ReplyReply
  22. Hankster58 says: 123

    Beck supporters are not conservative. Like Beck, Beckerheads are reactionary. Beck’s faction want to return to the golden years of when American corporations were free to do whatever they wanted, the public interest be damned. Luckily for this country, Beck’s faction is a minority, a loud, angry and frightened minority, but no where near the mainstream.

    >>>Interesting.. You claim I’m a “Beckerhead” and in the same deal claim you can “READ MY MIND”!!!! YOU “know our thoughts”….who we are, where we lean Politically……
    Frankly, I think you must be a Reject from the “Psychic Hotline”!!!! That’s it! YOU used to work there, Dionne Warwick fired you, and now you do this!!!! …….
    Sounds DUMB, right?? Well it’s no Dumber, than you trying to tell me/us what we think, who we are, what we do!!! Get it now? you come3 off like an IDIOT! We talk events and actions….. things going on, things we SEE, political actions, motives, and connect THOSE dots….
    You simply attack people who “attack the attackers”!!!! To what useful end???
    Sorry, but those out here looking at you, it’s funny and hysterical! That’s the truth fella… and we’re “no where near the Mainstream”???? LOL!!!! I guess you don’t read the POLLS these days!!! I know. it’s ok.. you can’t be bothered by little things, like FACTS!! Especially those thwt don’t support you point of view……

    Beck is the laughing stock of people with three digit IQ’s. He has help put far right candidates on the ballot this November and if the Dems retain control of both houses, I think that he’ll become marginalized where he belongs, back to talk radio.The primary test case for this will be the Senate seat in Nevada. Angle is way out of the mainstream. Another is Rand Paul’s effort in Kentucky.

    >>> Uh, buddy, Do NOT be so fast to simply worship an “IQ” number!!! The number, without some sort of “morals” behind it is useless!!! What do I mean?? What do you think Bernie Madoff’s IQ was??? Tim Geithner?? Bet HE is a smart one, tho he’s also a TAX CHEAT…. um, I’ll bet Obama is pretty smart too, those he’s WAY off base. and out of step for THIS nation!! The lousy SOB that writes Computer Viruses and Worms is a VERY “smart” guy, but that doesn’t mean Millions do not want to KILL HIM, for the damage ha does, as a stinking low life… so, IQ alone, without character, substance, and decency, is NOTHING! Useless!
    I could go on, but I think you get the drift
    So, where does that put those who are laughing???

    But enough of showing you where you slant is wrong……

    Lets try, for the umpteenth time, to get YOU to answer a simple question….

    IS Obama trying to Force the USA down a SOCIALIST path????

    Yes or No? Can you handle that simple, straight forward question???

    ReplyReply
  23. Hankster58 says: 124

    sorry for the typo’s above…. eyes badly messed up this morning..

    ReplyReply
  24. Hankster58 says: 125

    GaffaUK…. that skit was cute! Did you ever see “Phil Donahue” back in the day??? He acted in a similar way!! LOL!!!

    ReplyReply
  25. Hankster: “IS Obama trying to Force the USA down a SOCIALIST path????”

    When I went to school, one question mark was used.

    Clearly, people who watch Fox “News” have been lead to believe this, but it’s just not the case. On 6/17 I believe, Beck showed Soros stating that the financial systems in collapse last year should have been nationalized, but instead we practiced what’s called super-capitalism where the state props up and re-enforces capitalist institutions.

    Obama did this with GM, and the plan is to sell the stock owned by us back to the market eventually. If you think that his health care legislation was “socialist,” then you really don’t know what socialism and is and you don’t realize that Nixon in this respect was a socialist.

    No, I don’t think Obama is a socialist or trying to lead us there. He’s doing things to prop up a system that has failed the American people again and again. Eventually, enough Americans will realize how unfair and morally bankrupt and unfair capitalism is and look to find alternatives. Free market policies are wiping out the middle class, just as Marx predicted they would. What FDR, Obama and other liberals do is try to make markets work and work for more people, not just the wealthiest 1% of people who run our plutonomy.

    Economic democracy, where free speech is not left at the door of companies we work for, is an alternative that has been tried successfully around the world and here in the U.S.

    ReplyReply
  26. Hankster58 says: 127

    Who is dumber… someone who does something once, and fails??? Or someone who does the same mistake over and over????
    You make my point for me….

    “No, I don’t think Obama is a socialist or trying to lead us there. He’s doing things to prop up a system that has failed the American people again and again. ”

    >>>Insanity is defined as the act of doing the same thing over and over, and expecting a DIFFERENT result each time!!”

    If he KNOWS it’s failed, why repeat it?? STUPID! Waste of Money, time and effort! So WHY did he do it?? political payback. The typical Chicago political way… where he LEARNED politics! Pull your head out and get some fresh air, and fresh perspective, you’ve no clue about anything pal!! LOL!!

    ReplyReply
  27. Those keeping score at home will note that Tiff continues to evade my questions.

    Why is that Tiff?

    Could it be because you are a liar, a hypocrite, a fraud, and a charlatan who is willfully and brainlessly herded along by his keepers?

    ReplyReply
  28. johngalt says: 129

    @A.C.

    As in your case, he has not responded to my challenge to him of providing an actual fact regarding his assertion that Glenn Beck is a liar, fraud or hypocrite so that posters here may refute them. In fact, up to this point he has merely involved himself in sparring with certain posters here and continually referring to Beck as a liar, fraud, or hypocrite.

    As for Tiff himself, you have finally shown in your post 124 what many of us here have believed of you. You are, simply put, nothing more than a lib/prog Obama apologist who has done nothing more than choose Mr. Beck as your vehicle towards denouncing conservative principles. Using terms such as super-capitalism and plutonomy, both coined very recently, one by a well-noted leftist, and both used by leftist bloggers judiciously, have identified your particular choice of information sources. I have a sneaking suspicion that if Mr. Beck were not a Fox news talking head, and not as outspoken as he is, that you would have chosen a different vehicle to outlay your delusions. Limbaugh is a favorite of lefties, but overused, hence why I suspect you did not choose him instead. Regarding Mr. Beck himself, other than a few choice items presented here, he isn’t one who we(meaning FA conservatives) do NOT use him as sources for our information. Your flippant comments regarding Beck, and your failure to produce an example of him lying, defrauding or hypocritical points of view, complete with your source material for such accusations, have made you nothing more than a laughingstock here at FA. We are not scared, not even worried, that you will make “examples” of us, as we do not run in the same leftist circles as you do apparently, so, in effect, we could care less what you or any of your leftist pals think of us. We hear enough of that from no less than the President and vice-president themselves anyway. If you really wish to engage us in useful discussion, then produce proof of your claims. We are waiting patiently.

    ReplyReply
  29. @The Glenn Beck Review:

    Hey Tiffany….

    I’ve spent a little time today studying the cranial drippings contained in the cache pages of your old blog site….

    Is there anything you wish to amend, retract, revise, alter, etc prior to my lowering the boom on you and demonstrating to everyone here in black and white how you are a liar, a hypocrite, a fraud, and a charlatan?

    Oh, yeah, I’ve got the goods on you.

    I will, however, give you a fair head start to clear the air and correct your past wrongs.

    Tick tock Tiff.

    Tick. Tock.

    @johngalt:

    This guy is nothing more than an unmedicated loon with delusions of grandeur.

    I doubt he’ll have anything concrete to offer to anyone who addresses him…he certainly hasn’t so far.

    I really do hope that he will take me up on my offer to recant his prior proclamations about Beck and Limbaugh. It will save him a barrel of embarrassment in the very near future.

    ReplyReply
  30. Hankster58 says: 131

    Aye.. your superior prowess at pointing out his inability to back his claims and/or debate you has him running for cover.. that, added with Mata “wussy whipping” him has him cowering in fear, probably behind his Momma now!! LOL!! hehehe…. Me? I just “needle him for fun”…. Heck I know pretty well whats going down, and he’ll never get it, or admit he see’s truth, because he don’t WANT to!!!
    The minute his eyes open, he see’s the light… the Angel chorus sings AAAAAAAAAAHHHH!!
    He’ll realize he’s spent all this time, The Fool!!!!! Rather than see that day, he stays in Fantasy land.. where he’s happy, content, and rules his domain, in his “Burger King” crown!!! :lol: :lol:

    ReplyReply
  31. Aye Chihuahua, “I’ve spent a little time today studying the cranial drippings contained in the cache pages of your old blog site….”

    Really. I wish I could get access to it.

    “Is there anything you wish to amend, retract, revise, alter, etc prior to my lowering the boom on you and demonstrating to everyone here in black and white how you are a liar, a hypocrite, a fraud, and a charlatan?”

    Have at it. (You do know that a fraud and a charlatan are the same things, right?)

    Knock yourself out. Aside from using this post as an example of how irrationally loyal Beck’s fans are, I’m done with this site. I definitely have more important things to do with my time than to argue with the tools of Glenn Beck.

    Ta tah….

    ReplyReply
  32. johngalt says: 133

    @Tiff

    What you have proven is that you still refuse to come here with actual facts proving Mr. Beck is a liar, fraud and hypocrite.

    I fail to see your motivation in using this site as an “example” to show “how irrationally loyal Beck’s fans are”, when we aren’t really what most people would classify as Glenn Beck fans. While many of us listen to him from time to time, we certainly do not follow in lockstep with everything he states, as you obviously think that we do. If that were the case, every other post on this site would be a rehash of his daily topics, yet, that isn’t the case, is it?

    As I have stated, it is obvious to us that you are only using your hate of Mr. Beck as a vehicle to espouse your liberal/progressive ideology. As for being done with this site, good riddance to you, since you have failed from your first post here to add anything of substantive value to any discussion.

    ReplyReply
  33. MataHarley says: 134

    … and the sock puppet slithers back under it’s rock, unable to suffer any more personal humiliation. 8-O

    You might try to pack a little reading into your oh so busy schedule, hunting for more than five readers for your dissertations, sock. Start with the constitution and the bill of rights, if you please. 1st Amendment, most notably. As I started out with your exaggerated horse manure, if the nation can survive the likes of Chris “tingle leg” Matthews, Keith Overbite, Randi Rodent, and Fat Ed Schultz, I’m sure it can live thru Glenn Beck as well.

    ReplyReply
  34. Wordsmith says: 135

    I’m done with this site.

    I definitely have more important things to do with my time than to argue with the tools of Glenn Beck.

    …he/she/it says 130 comments and 8 days later…. :roll:

    ReplyReply
  35. Donald Bly says: 136

    @Tiffany

    “No, I don’t think Obama is a socialist or trying to lead us there.”

    What part of Obama’s wealth redistribution plans are NOT socialism?

    ReplyReply
  36. Hankster58 says: 137

    He’s leaving?? Really?? Time to Break out the Cabo Wabo and mix me a “Red Rocker” and celebrate!! Cool! :)

    ReplyReply
  37. I know Hankster; it’s tough to have someone sticking pins in your hero, even if he is a liar, hypocrite and a charlatan.

    I had to pop back because today, and only today, WordPress has made my original blog open for viewing; so I can copy the content.

    You want to see my proof that Beck lies? Start with the beginning: Does Glenn Beck Lie? Volume I (4/04/2010)

    Not convinced? Try: Volume II.

    There I have six examples of Beck’s hypocrisy documented. My favorite is the Must See Video Clip: 3 in 1 (lie, hypocrisy and fraud).

    Check out “What would Jesus say about Glenn Beck?

    Again, it’s only available today although I have it all copied now and will transfer it to my new blog later this week.

    Unless you want to be mindless Beckerheads, you should at least check out what I did, what the link to my original blog points out.

    ReplyReply
  38. Donald Bly says: 139

    @Tiffany…. I thought you were done with this site… please be done with us… please please please…

    ReplyReply
  39. johngalt says: 140

    @Tiff

    The action you are undertaking, having read your blog posts, is one of spin. For example, you rail against Beck and call him a liar based on his claiming of a viewership drop in ratings(~30%) being comparable to LeBron James going from 40pts/game to 39pts/game, and you call him a liar because the math doesn’t add up. Technically, yes he was incorrect, however, looking at the numbers for viewership of other programs listed on your site, his idea is quite correct.

    The following is just one particular example of your being incorrect about a supposed lie that Mr. Beck undertook:

    As for your assertion that Beck lied about the SEIU calling him a “fear monger-in-chief”, and that it was the ADL instead, I point you to this site and story:

    http://www.seiu.org/2009/12/media-matters-crowns-glenn-beck-americas-1-fearmonger-in-chief.php

    Notice, if you care to, that this was posted on SEIU’s OWN website a full 4 months and some odd days PRIOR to your rant against Beck. Care to tell us again how Beck lied about the SEIU and their term for him?

    I told you that if you brought your claims against Beck here that more than likely you would get smacked down, and this was just with a few minutes of perusing your blog. I am sure there are many, many more instances where you take Beck’s words and spin it to “prove” your point, however, your site is/was useless to me in any meaningful way.

    ReplyReply
  40. Ohhh…looky there…Tiff finally managed to recover the worthless contents of his blog site….

    How exciting.

    Remember back when you were busy making fun of the research skills of other posters?

    Yeah?

    Well, now its our turn to point and laugh at Mr. Three Digit IQ who doesn’t even have the Interwebz research skillz needed to find the cached blog contents he lost due to TOS violations.

    By the way, just so that you know for sure that I was indeed able to find your stuff here are links to screen shots of just two of the complete posts I recovered from your now defunct [snicker] blog site.

    Cast your eyes upon them and wallow in your inability to accomplish what I, your Interwebz superior, achieved in less than two minutes:

    Post 1: http://easycaptures.com/fs/uploaded/381/6027018705.jpg

    Post 2: http://easycaptures.com/fs/uploaded/381/4142212277.jpg

    Ah, yes, there’s nothing like the scent of slow roasted inferiority on a beautiful Wednesday.

    Sux to be you, eh?

    Tiff, you’re not the first leftist/statist/prog/libtard to burst through the saloon doors with a smarmy swagger and an overgrown sense of self-worth.

    You’re not the first to have ever engaged in vituperative pontification while crowing about your superior intellect either.

    You’re not the first to try and edumakate “The Great Unwashed”TM while exposing yourself as an absolute loon during the entire process.

    Nor will you be the last.

    You’re also not the first to go dashin’ for those same swingin’ doors like a crying six year old girl when the going got tough although “Ta tah…” might actually unique to your own sad state of affairs.

    Over and over and over again you were asked for facts to back up your arguments. Over and over and over again you failed to produce anything.

    I cautioned you that you needed to bring your “A” game to this site otherwise you would make a fool of yourself.

    I gave you the opportunity to amend, retract, revise, alter your prior comments…yet you passed up the chance to do so:

    Have at it…. Knock yourself out.

    You chose poorly.

    Sux to be you, eh?

    Ladies and gentlemen, Victor Scott Tiffany, writer/owner of The Glenn Beck Review is a liar, a hypocrite, a fraud, and a charlatan.

    LIAR===> Tiff claimed on his blog that Beck lied about his ratings:




    View at EasyCaptures.com

    See what he did there?

    Just blatantly, outright lied about Beck’s ratings.

    Follow the TV by the Numbers link and see for yourself.

    See? Tiff claims that one day’s ratings (4/29) are equal to one week…must be Dimocrat math, eh?

    There are others but it’s not necessary to document them. Once a liar, always a liar.

    HYPOCRITE ===> Tiff criticized others here for engaging in name calling referring to it as “so impressive” while…wait for it…engaging in name calling such as “Beckerhead” or “tool”.

    CHARLATAN ===> It seems that this site is not the only one where Tiff played with the sock puppets.

    FRAUD ===> From his very first post here, Tiff has repeatedly made claims on this thread that he cannot even begin to prove.

    The same is true throughout his no hit wonder blog site.

    Repeated attempts by various posters here to engage him in honest debate have gone unanswered because, deep down, he knows he’s perpetuating a fraud.

    Now, just as the music gets going and we’re ready to dance, he dashes away like a scared six year old girl.

    If you’re gonna be a loonatic Tiff, be a loonatic….If not, get a lobotomy, some EST, or, at the very least some advanced pharmaceuticals.

    With that, my work here is accomplished. Victor Scott Tiffany, Interwebz Blogger Extraordinaire, now dwells in the far corner of the basement of irrelevance.

    PS….Tiff, the Pulitzer Committee still hasn’t called and “Do you want fries with that?” will always be a part of your lexicon.

    .

    ReplyReply
  41. Missy says: 142

    Aye, you are my favorite spider! :wink:

    ReplyReply
  42. @johngalt:

    That was fantastic work by the way.

    I had missed that particular jewel.

    Notice that we’ve seen nothing of Vanquished Tiffany?

    @Missy:

    Thanks Missy…when these loonytards start insulting my friends here, I take it personally and make it my mission to draw ‘em in and wrap ‘em up tight.

    ReplyReply
  43. AYE CHIHUAHUA: hi, your comment above, how can I forget you on my first trip here, and someone attack my english wording, and you came to help and you did not even know of me; I never forgot your kindness. bye :roll:

    ReplyReply
  44. johngalt says: 145

    @AC

    Thanks AC. I promised Mr. Tiff what would happen if and when he came here with his claims and his “proof”. That was only found in a few minutes of perusing his blog and a couple mouse clicks. If he insists on continuing his fantasy here, I will be happy to oblige him by adding to his embarrassment, lol.

    As for your own smackdown of Mr. Tiff, I am always impressed when yourself, Mata or Wordsmith gets jumps into the fray.

    The question is: Will he actually post here again? I say post since I am 99.9999% (hmmm, better than the EPA requirement. Damn I’m good, lol) sure that he will at least visit to view any posts after that last one of his.

    ReplyReply
  45. Donald Bly says: 146

    AYE… I think you’ve been misstating Tiffany’s IQ as three digit. Didn’t you mean digit 3 IQ. I personally don’t think his IQ is in the three digit realm…. perhaps in the 70-75 range… let’s see… 1, 2… yup that’s only two digits.

    ReplyReply
  46. Hankster58 says: 147

    “I love the smell of a “Bitchslap” in the morning!!!”
    LOL!!!! Well it kinda went like that!!!! :lol: :lol:

    ReplyReply
  47. Dakota says: 148

    Hello all!!!

    I’ve been a nuisance in the slums over there at Tiff’s place for a while. He’s still ranting, raving, and making a nuisance of himself. He constantly uses pejoratives instead of discussing any relevant topic content.

    Well, it looks like whatever happened here, I missed it. I am glad to be here now and I love the theme of this site!

    ReplyReply
  48. Dakota, hi , don’t wait to long ,the next time there will be moore of interesting post for you to read, best to you for theses HOLLIDAYS

    ReplyReply
  49. Ghost says: 150

    @Victor Tiffany: terminate yourself along with your email notices.

    ReplyReply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>