by Jeff Childers
The truth continues slowly seeping out of the needle’s pointy end. This morning’s exhibit is the UK Telegraph’ story from yesterday headlined, “AstraZeneca admits for first time in court documents its Covid vaccine can cause rare side effect.” The AstraZeneca vaccine – lauded at its launch by Prime Minister Boris Johnson as a “triumph for British science” – follow the science! to the money! — is now discarded, no longer used in the UK, having been knocked out by the much more dangerous mRNA vaccines.
After a year of intense litigation in a class-action lawsuit brought by vaccine injured British folks, who’ve suffered brain bleeds, clots, and strokes, AstraZeneca finally grudgingly admitted in a court filing last week that um, well, maybe it does cause problems, after all. It’s just so baffling how the jabs are looking a bit less like a ‘triumph’ and a bit more like a painful trial.
In its latest filing, the giant British pharma company admitted that:
The AZ vaccine can, in very rare cases, cause TTS. The causal mechanism is not known. Causation in any individual case will be a matter for expert evidence.
These pharma people and their ugly corporate media handlers think we are stupid. Explain how they could possibly know with certainty that jabs causing TTS is very rare, but at the same time still have no idea about how it is caused.
TTS stands for Thrombosis with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome. It causes blood clots and low blood platelet counts. One year ago in May 2023, AstraZeneca’s lawyers insisted the exact opposite was true, writing, “we do not accept that TTS is caused by the vaccine at a generic level.”
If the evidence for a causal connection “in very rare cases” is strong enough to warrant an admission just one year later, why was the company so firm about rejecting it before?
The lawsuit includes 51 plaintiff, whose combined claims exceed 100 million pounds sterling. The Telegraph gushed, “The Government has pledged to underwrite AstraZeneca’s legal bills,” as if that were some wildly generous move, but almost certainly AstraZeneca’s contract requires the British government to indemnify the vaccine maker.
Kate Scott, whose husband suffered a permanent neurological injury after his vaccine-induced TTS, told the Telegraph it shouldn’t have taken this long to get an admission: “The medical world has acknowledged for a long time that TTS was caused by the vaccine. It’s only AstraZeneca who have questioned whether Jamie’s condition was caused by the jab.”
Sarah Moore, one of the small-firm lawyers bringing the claims, also noted how far behind the science the drugmaker is, compared to proper doctors: “It has taken AstraZeneca a year to formally admit that their vaccine can cause the devastating blood clots, when this fact has been widely accepted by the clinical community since the end of 2021.”
The same is true here in the States, of course. In spite of thousands of case studies flooding the academic literature, Pfizer, Moderna, the corrupt CDC, and the useless FDA all continue irrationally to insist the only “real” jab injuries are mild myocarditis/pericarditis, injection shot soreness, and temporary flu-like symptoms.
Behold the baffling disappearance of the “safe and effective” shibboleth from pharma’s covid jab lexicon. Here’s how AstraZeneca now lamely describes its defective, recalled product:
From the body of evidence in clinical trials and real-world data, the AstraZeneca-Oxford vaccine has continuously been shown to have an acceptable safety profile and regulators around the world consistently state that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks of extremely rare potential side effects.
How far the mighty vaccine has fallen! From being trumpeted as “the safest and most effective vaccine in human history” down to generic pharma phrases like “an acceptable safety profile.” Not to mention the squishy, jello-like, totally subjective term, “benefits outweigh the risks” wording that is popping up more and more here in the US about the mRNA shots as well.
‘Risks’ and ‘benefits’ are not clinically objective terms. How can they possibly compare the benefit to someone else of (allegedly) avoiding a mild case of covid? How can they evaluate someone else’s willingness to take the risk of getting TTS, however rare?
mRNA “vaccines” are a direct result of the elites trying to get rid of meats, including both chickens and eggs.
Oh, and people, too. They call us “useless eathers.”
Traditional vaccines (the ones that work) incubate inside eggs.
It takes millions of eggs to stop a “pandemic.”
But that requires millions of chickens.
The war on natural meats and proteins is being waged via fires, bird flu, bovine TB, sheep’s scrappie, etc.
Elites, like George Clooney, insist every single person on earth be “vaccinated” with mRNA style jabs.
We see, and Astrazeneca admits, rare, deadly “side effects,” happen after people get their jabs.
We are already seeing fertility rates plummet where the majority of child-bearing age women are vaxxed.
We are already seeing death rates spike to alarming levels as actuarial tables prove.
The whole truth of i being a bio-weapon for depopulation might be next disclosure.
Why were they so quickly to try and force this vaccine upon us can we say Depopulation of the Earth of Humans?!