Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi considers the US president a blessing to the Muslim world. In a speech published in London-based al-Hayat newspaper on Saturday, Gaddafi praised Barack Obama, called him a “friend” and said there is no longer any dispute between his country and the US.
Speaking in the Libyan city of Sirt at an event marking the 24th anniversary of an American attack on Libya, he said, “At the time, we were the target of the American cannon, the American navy challenged us in the gulf of Sirt and attacked us all along Libya’s shores. America tested Libya, and the Libyan people resisted the large country, but today, thank God, the difference is great.”
He said, “Now, ruling America is a black man from our continent, an African from Arab descent, from Muslim descent, and this is something we never imagined – that from Reagan we would get to Barakeh Obama.”
I am starting to intuit a consistent ”policy” from Obama.
Obama supported the protesters in Egypt and Libya.
But Obama let protesters twist in the wind in Iran.
Now Obama is praising the lifting of the state of emergency in Algeria.
But what did Obama accomplish in each case?
The Muslim Brotherhood in all likelihood will rule over Egypt within a few years.At that time Sharia will be instituted over all of the people of Egypt.
In Libya Sharia is the only option that the protesters agree on.
So Sharia will rule Libya, soon, too.
Iran already has Sharia.
HMmmmmmmmm……..
So these protesters are not being encouraged.
Algeria set up a state of emergency when, in 1991, Sharia was set to become the form of rule in that country.
All Islamic (Sharia) political parties were banned.
Obama praised the lifting of this state of emergency rule and Sharia will most certainly be the law of the land in Algeria soon as well.
So, what’s my deduction?
In every case, Obama acts in a way that will support the establishment or preservation of an Islamic (Sharia) state. It is starting to seem unlikely that he keeps doing this by accident.