Trump Immunity — pretty much what was expected.
Absolute immunity for core POTUS powers.
PRESUMPTIVE IMMUNITY for "official acts."
No Immunity for private acts.CJ Roberts writes opinion, with Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch and Kavanaugh join in full; Barrett joins all but one part;…
— Shipwreckedcrew (@shipwreckedcrew) July 1, 2024
BREAKING: In Trump v. United States, US Supreme Court holds that a former president has absolute immunity for his core constitutional powers. And he is entitled to at least presumptive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts. There is no immunity for unofficial acts.
— Election Wizard (@ElectionWiz) July 1, 2024
…No protection for unofficial acts. So the issue is whether what constitutes official acts. It is a very for Trump in the sense that the Court rejected the lower court and recognizes some immunity. That will further delay the lower court proceedings, but Trump will have to argue that his actions fall within these navigational beacons. The lower court judge has been highly favorable for Jack Smith in the past. Yet the court is arguing that there is a presumption of immunity for their official acts beyond the absolute immunity on core constitutional powers.
…Note this language:
Whenever the President and Vice President discuss their official responsibilities, they engage in official conduct. Presiding over the January 6 certification proceeding at which Members of Congress count the electoral votes is a constitutional and statutory duty of the Vice President. Art. II, §1, cl. 3; Amdt. 12; 3 U. S. C. §15. The indictment’s allegations that Trump attempted to pressure the Vice President to take particular acts in connection with his role at the certification proceeding thus involve official conduct, and Trump is at least presumptively immune from prosecution for such conduct.…”The question then becomes whether that presumption of immunity is rebutted under the circumstances. When the Vice President presides over the January 6 certification proceeding, he does so in his capacity as President of the Senate. ”
…Now this:
“With respect to the certification proceeding in particular, Congress has legislated extensively to define the Vice President’s role in the counting of the electoral votes, see, e.g., 3 U. S. C. §15, and the President plays no direct constitutional or statutory role in that process. So the Government may argue that consideration of the President’s communications with the Vice President concerning the certification proceeding does not pose “dangers of intrusion on the authority and functions of the Executive Branch.”
The d&ath nail in Jack Smith’s case against Trump pic.twitter.com/VVHV5z4Nr6
— Spitfire (@DogRightGirl) July 1, 2024
Due to the Supreme Court ruling granting Trump immunity from criminal prosecution for official acts while in office:
The Jan 6th criminal case in Washington DC against Trump just was crushed.
The criminal case in Georgia against Trump will likely also be dismissed.
— Wall Street Silver (@WallStreetSilv) July 1, 2024
Thomas Massie was right, Jack smith was unlawfully appointed. He can get fcked! pic.twitter.com/cskEwgO8v4
— Gunther Eagleman™ (@GuntherEagleman) July 1, 2024
Big chunks of Smith's indictment are going to be lost to the "official authority" — interactions with other Exec. branch officials, particularly DOJ, are going to be off-limits and immune.
— Shipwreckedcrew (@shipwreckedcrew) July 1, 2024
Last paragraph of the official syllabus from the SCOTUS #immunity decision pic.twitter.com/LWE9l2IH7O
— Ron Coleman (@RonColeman) July 1, 2024
![](https://floppingaces.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/curtlogo.png)
See author page