It has finally all come together.
Two years ago, I had the feeling that COVID was a lab leak. Egged on by Anthony Fauci, the media went into a full court press on anyone who dared suggest it. Somehow Fauci “knew” that Donald Trump would have a surprise infectious outbreak on his hands. Fauci argued vociferously that COVID did not come from a lab.
Something was wrong.
In January of 2020 Fauci also told us
““…..This is not a major threat to the people of the United States and this is not something that the citizens of the United States right now should be worried about.””
Here is Fauci telling everyone that he would fund Gain of Function research
Highlights from Fauci’s 2013 Workshop on Gain of Function research. The entire lecture is on YouTube.
Yes they funded it. Yes they knew the risks. They just assumed that scientists across the globe are infallible. pic.twitter.com/Rco5x1ICBd
— Maze (@mazemoore) July 21, 2021
Let me remind you what Gain of Function is
Gain of Function Research
Certain gain-of-function studies with the potential to enhance the pathogenicity or transmissibility of potential pandemic pathogens (PPPs) have raised biosafety and biosecurity concerns, including the potential dual use risks associated with the misuse of the information or products resulting from such research.
On October 16, 2014, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy announced the launch of the U.S. Government (USG) gain-of-function (GOF) deliberative process to re-evaluate the potential risks and benefits associated with certain GOF experiments. During this process the USG paused the release of federal funding for GOF studies anticipated to enhance the pathogenicity or transmissibility among mammals by respiratory droplets of influenza, MERS, or SARS viruses.
Fauci has repeatedly testified under oath that the NIAID did not fund Gain of Function research.
U.S. and Chinese researchers funded by Dr. Anthony Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) created viruses in a Wuhan lab that exhibited over 10,000 times higher viral load in humanized mice than the natural virus they were based on, according to an infectious disease professor citing documents recently released by the agency.
The US nonprofit group EcoHealth Alliance notified the NIAID in two reports that between June 2017 and May 2018 it had created three lab-generated chimeric SARS-related coronaviruses in China that exhibited “significantly higher” viral loads, documents first reported by The Intercept show, but the agency continued to fund the project with taxpayer dollars without flagging it for review by an independent federal committee created in late 2017 to oversee gain-of-function research.
A group led by Peter Daszak approached DARPA (Defense Advanced Projects Research Agency) with a proposal to create a new Corona virus.
US and Chinese scientists were planning to create a new coronavirus before the pandemic erupted, leaked proposals show. Last month, a grant application submitted to the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Darpa) revealed that an international team of scientists had planned to mix genetic data of similar strains to create a new virus.
The grant application was made in 2018 and leaked to Drastic, the pandemic origins analysis group.
‘We will compile sequence/RNAseq data from a panel of closely related strains and compare full length genomes, scanning for unique SNPs representing sequencing errors. ‘Consensus candidate genomes will be synthesised commercially using established techniques and genome-length RNA and electroporation to recover recombinant viruses,’ the application states.
This would result in a virus which had no clear ancestor in nature, a World Health Organization (WHO) expert told The Telegraph.
This is the blueprint for the COVID 19 virus.
New documents detail how Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance and China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology were planning to use gain-of-function experiments to artificially insert “human-specific cleavage sites” into coronaviruses in order to increase their ability to infect human cells.
The newly released documents, which are part of a funding proposal submitted to the Pentagon’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) program in 2018, detail a blueprint for the creation of a COVID-19-like virus. The ostensible goal of the research was to get ahead of nature by predicting whether viruses might evolve over time to acquire those enhanced traits.
When COVID-19 first emerged, some scientists were puzzled that the virus had a human-specific adaptation at the cleavage site. A study in the science journal Nature noted that the COVID-19 virus “exhibited the highest binding to human (h)ACE2 of all the species tested.”
It was that human-specific binding feature of COVID-19, absent in coronaviruses of the same phylogenetic tree, that has distinguished it from past outbreaks. The virus’s unique ability to bind to human cells makes it highly transmissible and has enabled its rapid spread throughout the world
COVID-19’s unexplained binding feature has resulted in a pandemic that has cost millions of lives and upended world economies. By contrast, both severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) were responsible for less than 1,000 deaths each worldwide.
Citing the potential for great danger and violating the moratorium on Gain of Function research, DARPA refused. But then
Last month, it emerged that the US had funded similar research to that outlined in the 2018 grant proposal.
Files obtained by The Intercept as part of an FOI request to drill down the possible root of COVID and whether the US had any role in it showed that in 2014, the National Health Institute (NIH) approved a five-year, yearly grant of $666,000 a year for five years ($3.3million) for EcoHealth Alliance, a US research organization, into bat coronavirus.
They have all denied lab leak of the novel virus which does not appear in nature, but then
…the database of viral strains at the Wuhan Institute of Virology was taken offline some 18 months later, making it impossible to check what scientists there were working on.
To be clear, the 2018 initial proposal was turned down, but the research went on under the radar, funded by NIAID. The databased was scrubbed.
They clearly didn’t want anyone to know what they were doing.
This morning Jim Jordan was on Sunday Morning Futures, and these were the highlights
On January 31, 2020, Fauci was told that COVID 19 was most likely a lab leak and that there was no plausible natural scenario for it coming from nature.
Then it appears that Fauci bought off Garry.
You can watch the interview here. Jim Jordan and James Comer published a letter they sent to DHS Secretary Xavier Becerra. It reads in part:
Despite Dr. Fauci claiming otherwise on multiple occasions, he was, in fact, aware of the
monetary relationship between NIAID, the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), EcoHealth
Alliance Inc. (EcoHealth), and the WIV by January 27, 2020.1 Dr. Fauci also knew that NIAID
worked with EcoHealth to craft a grant policy to sidestep the gain-of-function moratorium at the
time.
This new policy, designed by EcoHealth and agreed to by NIAID, allowed EcoHealth to
complete dangerous experiments on novel bat coronaviruses—with very little oversight—that
would have otherwise been blocked by the moratorium.
In January 2020, Dr. Fauci was also aware that EcoHealth was not in compliance with the terms of its grant that funded the WIV.4
EcoHealth was required to submit an annual progress report to NIAID by September 30, 2019,
and had not yet done so.5 The Committee subsequently learned that EcoHealth failed to submit
these reports presumably to hide a gain-of-function experiment conducted on infectious and
potentially lethal novel bat coronaviruses.
By January 27, 2020, Dr. Fauci knew NIAID had funded EcoHealth, the WIV was a
subgrantee of EcoHealth, and EcoHealth was not in compliance with its grant reporting, in
particular a grant that NIAID knew had gain-of-function potential on novel bat coronaviruses.
It is unclear if Dr. Fauci reported any of these issues to his superiors. We need to know the entirety
of what Dr. Fauci knew and when he knew it.
Now read as they conspire to fabricate a letter refuting the lab leak claim:
On February 1, 2020, Dr. Fauci, Dr. Collins, and at least eleven other scientists convened
a conference call to discuss COVID-19.7 It was on this conference call that Drs. Fauci and
Collins were first warned that COVID-19 may have leaked from the WIV and, further, may have
been intentionally genetically manipulated. Again, it is unclear if either Dr. Fauci or Dr. Collins
ever passed these warnings along to other government officials or if they simply ignored them.
Only three days later, on February 4, 2020, four participants of the conference call
authored a paper entitled “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2” and sent a draft to Drs. Fauci
and Collins.8 Prior to final publication in Nature Medicine, the paper was sent to Dr. Fauci for
editing and approval.9 It is unclear what, if any, new evidence was presented or if the underlying
science changed in that short period of time, but after speaking with Drs. Fauci and Collins, the
authors abandoned their belief COVID-19 was the result of a laboratory leak. It is also unclear if
Drs. Fauci or Collins edited the paper prior to publication.
On April 16, 2020, more than two months after the original conference call, Dr. Collins
emailed Dr. Fauci expressing dismay that the Nature Medicine article—which they saw prior to
publication and were given the opportunity to edit—did not squash the lab leak hypothesis and
asks if the NIH can do more to “put down” the lab leak hypothesis.10 The next day—after Dr.
Collins explicitly asked for more public pressure—Dr. Fauci cited the Nature Medicine paper
from the White House podium likely in an effort to further stifle the hypothesis COVID-19
leaked from the WIV.
It is alleged that the ironically misnamed EcoHealth violated the terms of its NIH grant repeatedly.
The letter shows that “NIH — and specifically, Collins, Fauci, and Tabak — lied to Congress, lied to the press, and lied to the public,” Richard Ebright, lab director at Rutgers University’s Waskman Institute of Microbiology, tweeted Wednesday night when sharing the letter. “Knowingly. Willfully. Brazenly.”
They made the COVID 19 virus.
They were warned that it probably leaked out.
They tried to suppress the information.
They ridiculed the lab leak theory.
The letter wasn’t real.
It appears that insiders were bought off.
Yet one keeps asking why Fauci continues to protect this and his CCP colleagues. The answer is pretty ordinary.
[the_ad id=”155722″]
Money. Chinese money.
Sen. Roger Marshall, who was called a “moron” by Fauci, was finally able to unlock Fauci’s investment portfolio and it’s stunning.
The Matthews Pacific Tiger Fund’s fact sheet, published in September 2021, revealed the fund has invested 42.7 percent of its investors’ money into companies in China and Hong Kong.
Among the companies listed is the enterprise named Wuxi Biologics Cayman. Headquartered in China, the Wuxi Biologics Cayman is in the pharmaceutical business.
Wuxi Biologics Cayman’s website states the enterprise is the “leading global open-access biologics technology platform offering end-to-end solutions to empower organizations to discover, develop, and manufacture biologics from concept to commercial manufacturing”:
With a total estimated capacity of exceeding 430,000 liters for biopharmaceutical production planned after 2024 in China, Ireland, the U.S., Germany, and Singapore, WuXi Biologics will provide its biomanufacturing partners with a robust and premier-quality global supply chain network.
The fund’s additional investments into China and Hong Kong include Tencent Holdings, Ltd.; Alibaba Group Holding, Ltd.; AIA Group, Ltd.; and Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing, Ltd.
Fauci is deeply invested in China and retribution would put a big dent in his fortune.
I suspect there are more shoes to drop. Meanwhile, 5.4 million people have died from the virus Fauci called the “risk worth taking.”
DrJohn has been a health care professional for more than 30 years. In addition to clinical practice he has done extensive research and has published widely with over 70 original articles and abstracts in the peer-reviewed literature. DrJohn is well known in his field and has lectured on every continent except for Antarctica. He has been married to the same wonderful lady for over 30 years and has three kids- two sons, both of whom are attorneys and one daughter on her way into the field of education.
DrJohn was brought up with the concept that one can do well if one is prepared to work hard but nothing in life is guaranteed.
Except for liberals being foolish.