Site icon Flopping Aces

The Gestapo, the KGB, the Stasi and now the HDSP (House Democrat Secret Police)

DrJohn

 

There have long been secret police. The Gestapo, the KGB and the Stasi are classic examples. To that we may now add the House democrats. For three years Adam Schiff has claimed to have secret evidence of Trump colluding with Russia.

Ranking Member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Adam Schiff (D-CA) says Democrats will not only continue with the Russia investigation but they found evidence of collusion. Schiff also said they have new documents from an important witness.

Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee released their own 98-page report, which charged that the Republican document “reflects a lack of seriousness and interest in pursuing the truth.”

It’s secret but it’s in plain sight:

Sunday on ABC’s “This Week,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) insisted that despite special counsel Robert Mueller not indicting anyone from the Trump campaign for crimes related to conspiring with Russia in the 2016 presidential election, “there is significant evidence of collusion.”

Schiff said, “There is significant evidence of collusion. We have set that out time and time again from the secret meetings in Trump Tower to the conversations between Flynn, the Russian ambassador, to the providing of polling data to someone linked to Russian intelligence and Stone’s links to Wikileaks.”

Then he added

He continued, “There’s a difference between compelling evidence of collusion and whether the special counsel concludes that he can prove beyond a reasonable doubt the criminal charge of conspiracy. As I said before, I leave that decision to Bob Mueller. And I have full confidence in him.”

He had full confidence in Bob Mueller right up to the minute Mueller found no collusion or conspiracy. Then dems lost all their faith in Mueller.

It was time for a new tactic- the dawn of the House democrat secret police (HDSP). This HDSP would find a new meme on which to pounce. They have abandoned Russia hoax in favor of the Ukraine hoax.

It’s reminiscent of the Kavanaugh saga- one secret witness after another.

Kommandant Adam Schiff had a spy in the White House (a CIA guy who worked with Joe Biden and was most likely tasked there by Brennan) who contacted Schiff’s office when he thought he had dirt on Trump. Schiff was so giddy he could not control himself

His office was contacted directly by the whistle blower directly, rather than the WB contact the IC IG as is regulation. Schiff then waited a month to spring the notification.

Yesterday the full whistleblower complaint against President Trump’s alleged behavior during a phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was released. The call took place in July, but the date on the letter and who it was sent to are raising questions.

The complaint is in fact dated August 12. It was sent to House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff in addition to Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr. The news of the complaint didn’t break until last weekend.

dems tried to keep the identity of the WB secret but little by little details leaked out until the WB was almost certainly identified. Then it started- the WB wanted to testify- in secret.

WASHINGTON—Lawyers for the CIA officer whose whistleblower complaint helped ignite an impeachment inquiry into President Trump have asked Congress whether their client could submit testimony in writing instead of appearing in person, according to people familiar with the matter.

The request reflects concerns about whether the whistleblower could testify to Democrats and Republicans without revealing his identity, and fears that doing so would lead to it being publicly leaked, jeopardizing his personal safety. The intelligence committees haven’t yet responded to the inquiry about potential written testimony, the people said.

Or maybe because the WB had nothing more than hearsay. Or maybe it was because there were several errors in the complaint.

There were problems with this WB

Schiff put himself and the WB on thin ice and decides he doesn’t need the WB testimony after all.

Then John Brennan blows the WB dog whistle

Brennan lauded the anonymous person who filed a whistleblower complaint against President Trump as someone who “deserves our praise and gratitude” in a tweet earlier this week.

A short time later, he called on other potential whistleblowers to come forward and join the dance of the anti-Trump Resistance.

And magically, several other WB’s materialize.

Then the House Democrat Secret Police sprang into action. They subpoenaed virtually every Trump aide, including diplomat Kurt Volker. Volker was summoned to testify- in secret- but Schiff wasted no time leaking what he wanted and Republicans in turn made their own disclosures.

There was no “quid pro quo” requested of Ukraine related to security aid, former U.S. Envoy to Ukraine Kurt Volker told lawmakers in a closed-door session.

Sources familiar with Volker’s testimony Thursday said the former diplomat rejected repeated assertions by House Democrats that Trump dangled security aid in exchange for cooperation from Ukraine in investigating former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden.

“He testified that the Ukrainians were not pressured, they never raised the issue of a quid pro quo with Volker, and they did not view the president’s call or subsequent interactions to be inappropriate,” the source told the Washington Examiner.

As this did not serve Schiff’s aims he refused to release the testimony. Mind you- all of this testimony is occurring behind closed doors and virtually everything you hear about it comes from leaking democrats.

Then it was  Marie Yovanovitch. She claims she was the victim of “unfounded and false claims by people with clearly questionable motives”

but is said she has been insubordinate.

Next up Schiff issued a subpoena for Fiona Hill to testify and testify she did:

WASHINGTON—President Trump’s former top Russia adviser told House committees Monday that she and other White House officials grew so alarmed about the administration’s efforts to push Ukraine to open certain investigations that they raised their concerns with a White House lawyer, according to people familiar with the matter.

Fiona Hill, who served on the National Security Council and left the administration in August, testified for about nine hours before three House panels as part of the impeachment inquiry examining the president, his administration and his allies’ dealings with Ukraine, including a July call in which he pressed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden.

In her testimony, she detailed a July 10 meeting she attended with senior Ukrainian officials, then-National Security Adviser John Bolton, and other U.S. officials in which the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, Gordon Sondland, raised the issue of the investigations, the people said.

But she has some interesting baggage. She worked for George Soros.

Then it was another former Pompeo aide – Michael McKinley- and the result?

All the while democrats have ratcheting up the secrecy and leaking bits that seem to bolster their case while hanging Republicans- who are abiding by the rules- out to dry.

So Republicans feel tight restrictions on what they can say. What was Yovanovitch asked? What did she answer? Were her answers consistent with what is known about the case? Republicans can’t say, fearful that Schiff and Democrats will come after them.

Here is the clever part, from the Democratic perspective. As the Yovanovitch interview began, her 10-page opening statement quickly leaked. In it, Yovanovitch made her case for all the press to read. Headline after headline appeared, all based on the statement:

  • Washington Post: “Ousted ambassador Marie Yovanovitch tells Congress Trump pressured State Dept. to remove her.”
  • Politico: “Marie Yovanovitch says Trump ousted her over ‘unfounded and false claims.'”
  • CNN: “Former US ambassador to Ukraine says Trump wanted her removed and blames ‘unfounded and false claims.'”
  • New York Times: “Ukraine Envoy Says She Was Told Trump Wanted Her Out Over Lack of Trust.”
  • Wall Street Journal: “Trump Pressed for Ukraine Envoy’s Removal, She Tells Lawmakers.”

Democrats and Yovanovitch got their side of the story out without any rebuttal from Republicans. Beyond the leaked written statement, what did she actually say in the deposition? Did Republicans question her about her claims? Did the questioning reveal any facts not included in Yovanovitch’s opening statement? Were there any contradictions?

None of that was known. Yovanovitch’s opening statement instantly became the accepted version of the story. Meanwhile, Republicans said nothing.

This has completely one sided by design. Holding an official vote would give the GOP the power to subpoena their own witnesses but dems are not going to allow it. And if Republicans don’t comply the whackos of the left are prepared to jail Republicans.

Michigan Democratic Rep. Rashida Tlaib says House Democrats are “trying to figure out” how to arrest Trump officials who resist subpoenas during the impeachment process, promising to “take care of them.”

The politician was speaking at a “Congress, Coffee and Congress” meeting on Tuesday.

“This is the first time we’ve ever had a situation like this. So they’re trying to figure out, no joke, they’re trying to figure out, well, is it the D.C. police that goes and gets them? We don’t know. Where do we hold them?”

Tlaib suggested people like Attorney General William Barr and Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross could be jailed in Detroit. “So I just want you to know I will relay your message, I will tell them they can hold all those people right here in Detroit, we’ll take care of them, and make sure they show up to the committee hearings. We won’t hurt them. We’ll make sure they come and show, right? I’ll make sure that you’re in charge.”

You will remember that Eric Holder was found in contempt of Congress without suffering a thing.

Desperate, Schiff is badgering witnesses

In a secret interview, Rep. Adam Schiff, leader of the House Democratic effort to impeach President Trump, pressed former United States special representative to Ukraine Kurt Volker to testify that Ukrainian officials felt pressured to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden’s son Hunter as a result of Trump withholding U.S. military aid to Ukraine.

Volker denied that was the case, noting that Ukrainian leaders did not even know the aid was being withheld and that they believed their relationship with the U.S. was moving along satisfactorily, without them having done anything Trump mentioned in his notorious July 25 phone conversation with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

When Volker repeatedly declined to agree to Schiff’s characterization of events, Schiff said, “Ambassador, you’re making this much more complicated than it has to be.”

Unilateral leaking. Badgering witnesses. False testimony. Totalitarianism. Fascism. Secret Police. A coup to remove the President of the United States- in secret.

This is what the democrat party has become.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Exit mobile version