Loretta Lynch says the best response to terrorists is love and compassion. Why not the same for gun owners?

Posted on by ( 59 comments already! )
Spread the love

Loading

lor lynch
 
The stupid just keeps pouring from the obama regime. We’ve come to expect asininity and golly they don’t disappoint. Our Attorney General let fly some words which leave you incredulous.

“We stand with you to say that the good in this world far outweighs the evil, that our common humanity transcends our differences, and that our most effective response to terror and to hatred is compassion, it’s unity, and it’s love,” Lynch said. “We stand with you today as we grieve together, and long after the cameras are gone, we will continue to stand with you as we grow together in commitment, in solidarity, and in equality.”

This even tops the Valley Girl Marie Harf who said ISIS wouldn’t behead people if they only had jobs:


 
Why do we not respond to murders with love and compassion? Why do we not respond to sexual assault with love and compassion? Why is it only terrorists who deserve love and compassion?

I find this amazing. Love and compassion for terrorists, but not for US citizen gun owners, and especially not the NRA, which as I have noted is about the only thing standing between the obama regime, democrats and the US Constitution. What the left wants is nothing less than the suspension of the US Constitution. After all, if one Fundamental Right can be abridged, so can all. So where’s the love and compassion for the NRA?

When they couldn’t have their way, democrats resorted to juvenile behavior.


 
By the way, the left is lying to you about the no-fly list:

The Senate amendment in question, proposed by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, would have applied to a much larger group than the no-fly list. As we reported in December, Feinstein’s office told us the measure, which would have allowed the attorney general to block gun sales to individuals on these lists, would have included a few terrorist databases, and the no-fly list is a subset of one of them.

The largest of the databases is the Terrorist Identities Datamart Environment, or TIDE, which included 1.1 million people as of December 2013. The second is the FBI’s Terrorist Screening Database, which is referred to simply as the Terrorist Watchlist, and contained about 800,000 names, Christopher M. Piehota, the Terrorist Screening Center director, said in congressional testimony on Sept. 18, 2014. The no-fly list is a part of that database. It contains about 64,000 names, according to Piehota’s testimony.

So, while Clinton said the measure applied to suspected terrorists on the no-fly list, that’s only 64,000 names. It actually would have applied to well over 1 million people who are on government watch lists. Republicans defeated the amendment in early December.

Republicans also put forth an alternative aimed at protecting those who wrongly find themselves on these terrorist watch lists — it would have delayed a gun sale and required a court ruling to actually block the sale — and it also included measures to defund cities that don’t help enforce federal immigration law. That measure also failed. Both were amendments to a Republican bill to repeal the Affordable Care Act.

And speaking of stupid, here’s tax cheat Charlie Rangel asserting that citizens do not deserve to have the protection of weapons while he does:

What about Rangel’s own constituents in his Harlem district? Should law-abiding residents who live there have concealed carry permits too?

“I wouldn’t want them to have it. I know what you’re trying to say. Corruption is corruption, and it’s bad,” Rangel said.

“Law-abiding citizens just shouldn’t have to carry a gun. You’re not gonna push me in that direction,” he said, standing just five feet from a Capitol Police officer, who stood at his post by the House Speaker’s Lobby.

TheDC noted to Rangel he and other members of Congress are protected by armed members of the U.S. Capitol Police.

“Well that’s a little different.  I think we deserve–I think we need to be protected down here.” Rangel laughingly insisted.

Problem is, you can’t fix stupid.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
59 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Is it mere ”stupid?”
Or, is there something else?

Do Loretta Lynch’s Ties with ‘Muslim Advocates’ Org Explain Her Whitewash of Orlando?

Lynch and DOJ Civil Rights Division head Vanita Gupta have appeared at gala events for an organization called Muslim Advocates. The George Soros-funded charity has badgered the New York City Police Department away from monitoring the most radical mosques in the city.

The organization is also responsible for rewriting training materials for federal law enforcement to decouple the role of radical Islam from terrorist acts. An inter-agency working group comprised of multiple federal law enforcement agencies in 2014 adopted this whitewash urged by Muslim Advocates
…..
Muslim Advocates lobbies the administration heavily to oppose any link between terrorist acts and radical Islam.
….
Muslim Advocates also conducts recruitment and training for lawyers designed to help FBI terrorist targets and interviewees navigate the interviews. Their annual report states:

Throughout the year [Muslim Advocates] grew [their] internal volunteer referral list for FBI interviews. Today, the list is over 130 lawyers nationwide who are ready and able to assist community members contacted by the FBI.

0

Lynch is off her meds against needs meds to keep her from saying stupid things and John Lewis and his fellow brats in need of being sent to their rooms without supper

0

Some people think that the best way to decrease the number of radical jihadists is to invade and occupy Muslim countries
But you can’t fix stupid
The Sunni Saufus and Gulf Sheiks financed and gave arms to ISIS
The USA looked the other way be because they hoped that ISIS would be the front line against Iran
This is like the same mistake we made giving billions to the most radical Islamists in Afghanistan to force the Russians out
Our allies become our enemies, our enemies our allies
We now give/sell arms to Vietnam to counter China

0

@John: Alas, that is what the twisted “logic” of a Prog would say….”You break it, you own it”.

How about “We find out you’re allowing ISIS–Queda–Hezbollah–Taliban–Boko Haram–et al, to operate within your territory without a rigorous defense WE will come take care of the problem for you….and then LEAVE the rebuilding to you!”

0

@Bad Papa: “WE???” That sounds like a great idea
How about YOU going over first and showing us all how personally committed YOU are ?
Bring some friends if you want ! Send us back postcards and emails.
Maybe Dr J will go over as a medic

0

John Lewis,Dianne Fienstien,Jim Carrey,Jamie Foxx,,Liam Nesson, in NIGHT OF THE LIVING DUMB

0

So…..

The way to deal with a rabid dog is to pet it?

The way to deal with a home invader is to seat him and the table, fix him dinner, then give him the good silverware and your wallet while topping it all off with a hug?

The way to handle some thug groping your wife and daughter is to hand them a condom?

But of course, when dealing with one’s non-leftist political foes, one is to “hit back twice as hard”, right?

Unsurprising leftist hypocrisy.

0

@Pete:
Pete are you ready to join up with Big Poppa and fly over to Iraq?

0

@John: Been there…. Done that…. Going back again!….
Checkmate!
And you John?? Willing to go rebuild?

0

our most effective response to terror and to hatred is compassion, it’s unity, and it’s love,

.40 compassion
9mm unity &
.30-06 love
In a pinch, tactical nukes…

0

@John: That’s “Bad Papa”….

0

You deny Americans their 2nd Amendment rights and award radical islamic terrorists with love!! Just when you thought the Obola administration could NOT get worse we get this bird!!

0

Liberals way to stop crinimals sending them to counseling serial killers to meditation seminars arsonists to day camp and rapists to tree hugging seminars

0

@Bad Papa: @Bad Papa:
I didn’t f it up
If you think you can put Humpth Dumpty back together again …..
Maybe with your past experience you think this time results will be better
I doubt it but certainly would encourage YOU to do what you keep saying others should do
But looks to me that every time it just gets worse

0

@Mike: @Mike:
Well head on over and give it your personal best

0

You just can’t fix stupid.

0

@John:

Already been there twice, and Afghanistan once. Also Saudi Arabia and Kuwait.

And if called up to go back to fight terrorist scum again, I’d have no problem doing it. Of course, I’d want a commander in chief that wasn’t a despicable wanker….

0

Looks like Mad Madam Mims off her meds better get her some more

0

And John and the other liberals’ answer to the problem is…?

Keep whining about how “we” (meaning “The U.S. except for the llberals”) caused it and now we just have to endure it.

Silly little people, liberals. Yes, all of them.

0

@John:

The USA looked the other way be because they hoped that ISIS would be the front line against Iran

Not Obama. He and Hillary supplied them with arms.

0

@Ditto:
Citation please

0

@Nanny G:#1 Hmmm…. so the NRA lobbies Congress to protect the individual’s right to self defense and the left charactorizes them as killing children but Muslim Advocates lobbies Congress AND the DOJ to deny law enforcement the tools they need to root out terrorists, DIRECTLY resulting in deaths and the left praises them.

@John:

Some people think that the best way to decrease the number of radical jihadists is to invade and occupy Muslim countries

Well, occupying the areas where terrorists freely and openly set up training camps where they plan their terror attacks is a necessary strategy, but I would not expect a leftist to understand anything like that. It proved pretty effective in Afghanistan and Iraq until Obama decided historic lessons do not compare with his amazing intellect. So, WITHOUT occupation, ISIS grows 4,000% and we have another global terror organization.

How about YOU going over first and showing us all how personally committed YOU are ?

Make no mistake, no one is suggesting YOU go over there to “help”. The situation is bad enough as it is.

I didn’t f it up

But you voted for and blindly support the guy that did. So, in your own little ineffective way, yes, you did F it up.

@Pete:

Unsurprising leftist hypocrisy.

Particularly hypocritical when being advised by the most hateful people in the country.

0

@Bill:
Nanny how has that strategy of occupation been working out? Are tgere more or fewer “terrorists” now than 15 years ago
The funding of radical Islam and forcing the Russians out of Afghanistan, how did that work out?
Saddam at least kept radical Islam from growing
The big loser in Iraq were the Christians their population is now less than half under Saddam
The invasions and occupations have not been worth the cost
Bush continues to be the most despised POTUS

0

@John:


Biden’s admission: US allies armed ISIS

Asked about US policy in Syria, Biden touched on the dirty secret of the current US-led war against the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria. ISIS (or ISIL as the Obama administration terms it) is essentially the creation of the United States and its allies who fomented civil war in Syria against the government of President Bashar al-Assad.

Referring to Turkey, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, Biden said, “They were so determined to take down Assad and essentially have a proxy Sunni-Shia war, what did they do? They poured hundreds of millions of dollars and tens, thousands of tons of weapons into anyone who would fight against Assad—except that the people who were being supplied were al Nusra and al Qaeda and the extremist elements of jihadis coming from other parts of the world.”

“Now you think I’m exaggerating,” he continued, to emphasize his point. “Take a look! Where did all of this go?” Biden claimed that the US opposed arming these al Qaeda-linked groups, which included ISIS, adding, “We could not convince our colleagues to stop supplying them.”

According to Biden’s narrative, only in the summer of 2014 did these countries realize that ISIS was a threat to them as well as to Assad, and shifted, joining in the US campaign of air strikes against ISIS targets in Syria. He gave as an example the position of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, suggesting that he had admitted the error of a permissive policy towards the extremists: “President Erdogan told me, he is an old friend, said you were right, we let too many people through, now we are trying to seal the border.”


Biden’s Admission: US Allies Armed ISIS

Whatever the level of “intentionality” involved, ISIS was the recipient of the US-supported arms aid to the Syrian rebels, routed by the CIA through Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Turkey and other Mideast client states. The State Department and CIA were well aware that the Syrian rebels included many Islamic militants, including those linked to al-Qaeda, because it had previously employed many of these fighters in the overthrow of the Gaddafi regime in Libya in 2011.

Originally established as Al Qaeda in Iraq during the eight years of warfare that followed the US invasion of Iraq in 2003, the group only took the name ISIS in April 2013, long after it had built up significant strength in Syria as part of the US-backed rebel forces fighting the Assad regime.

In other words, as Biden admits, ISIS was created by the methods pursued by the US government and its allied reactionary regimes, both the Islamist government of Erdogan in Turkey and the Gulf monarchies like Saudi Arabia and the UAE.

Another confirmation of this relationship came in the form of a Washington Post report Sunday on the supposedly contradictory role of the sheikdom of Qatar, another of the Persian Gulf despotisms that is a client state of American imperialism. Qatar hosts the huge Al-Udeid Air Base, headquarters for US air operations in the region and the directing center of the air war in Syria and Iraq.

Busted! CIA reveals Hillary and Obama armed ISIS

The Obama administration pursued a policy in Libya back in 2011 that ultimately allowed guns to walk into the hands of jihadists linked to the Islamic State (ISIS/ISIL) and al-Qaeda (AQ) in Syria, according to a former CIA officer who co-authored a report on behalf of the Citizen’s Commission on Benghazi (CCB), detailing the gun running scheme.

Benghazi Commission: Obama Admin Gun-Running Scheme Armed Islamic State

In Congress, the then-bipartisan group known as the “Gang of Eight,” at a minimum, knew of the operation to aid and abet America’s jihadist enemies by providing them with material support. So says Clare Lopez, a former CIA officer and the primary author of CCB’s interim report, titled How America Switched Sides in the War on Terror, speaking with Breitbart News.

(Snip)

“The Obama administration effectively switched sides in what used to be called the Global War on Terror [GWOT] when it decided to overthrow the sovereign government of our Libyan ally, Muammar Qaddafi, who’d been helping in the fight against al-Qaeda, by actually teaming up with and facilitating gun-running to Libyan al-Qaeda and Muslim Brotherhood [MB] elements there in 2011,” explained Lopez. “This U.S. gun-running policy in 2011 during the Libyan revolution was directed by [then] Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and [the late Libya Ambassador] Christopher Stevens, who was her official envoy to the Libyan AQ rebels.”

To avoid having the funds tracked back to the Obama administration, the arms flow to Libya was financed thru the United Arab Emirates, while Qatar served as the logistical and shipping hub, she noted.

“In 2012, the gun-running into Libya turned around and began to flow outward, from Benghazi to the AQ-and-MB-dominated rebels in Syria,” Lopez added. “This time, it was the CIA Base of Operations that was in charge of collecting up and shipping out [surface-to-air missiles] SAMs from Libya on Libyan ships to Turkey for overland delivery to a variety of jihadist militias, some of whose members later coalesced into groups like Jabhat al-Nusra and ISIS [also known as IS].”

Jabhat al-Nusra is al-Qaeda’s Syrian affiliate.

“The downstream consequences of Obama White House decisions in the Syrian conflict are still playing out, but certainly the U.S. – and particularly CIA – support of identifiable jihadist groups associated with the Muslim Brotherhood, Jabhat al-Nusra, Ahrar al-Sham, the Islamic State and other [jihadists] has only exacerbated what was already a devastating situation,” declared Lopez.

Some of the other weapons that eventually ended up in Syria included thousands of MAN-Portable-Air-Defense-System (MANPADS) missile units, such as shoulder-launched SAMs, from late dictator Muammar Qaddafi’s extensive arms stockpiles that pose a threat to low-flying aircraft, especially helicopters.

“It’s been reported that President Obama signed an Executive Order on Syria in early 2012 [just as he had done for Libya in early 2011], that legally covered the CIA and other U.S. agencies that otherwise would have been in violation of aiding and abetting the enemy in time of war and providing material support to terrorism,” notes Lopez. “Still, such blatant disregard for U.S. national security can only be described as deeply corrosive of core American principles.”

Libya Amb. Stevens was killed by jihadists in Benghazi on September 11, 2012, along with three other Americans.

Echoing a Benghazi resident who provided a first-hand account of the incident, retired U.S. Air Force Lt. Col. Dennis Haney, a CCB member, suggested to Breitbart News that Hillary Clinton’s State Department armed some of the al-Qaeda linked jihadists who may have killed the four Americans in Benghazi.

“The reason the U.S. government was operating in Libya is absolutely critical to this debacle because it reflects where America went off the tracks and literally switched sides in the GWOT,” points out Lopez. “This is about who we are as a country, as a people — where we are going with this Republic of ours.”

“There can be no greater treason than aiding and abetting the jihadist enemy in time of war – or providing material – weapons, funding, intel, NATO bombing – support to terrorism,” she continued. “The reason Benghazi is not the burning issue it ought to be is because so many at top levels of U.S. government were implicated in wrong-doing: White House, Pentagon, Intel Community-CIA, Gang of Eight, at a minimum, in Congress, the Department of State, etc.”

0

Well of course they did
Our current allies are continuing to arm and finance ISIS
This is done as a proxy war against Iran
It began with our Sunni Awakening and the Sons of Iraq
What we are seeing in Iraq with ISIS. “terrorism” is just a continuation of the Sunni /Shia civil war that began as soon as the Shia got control
Now who do YOU root for now tfatvItaq has been torn apart by our liberation?
The Sunni “terrorists” ?
Or Irans allies the Shia?
Tough choice huh?
And after choosing please tell me how much treasure and how many lives ( yours of course not included) are you willing to spend
Oh yeah, and what is your exit plan

0

Israel is also supporting ISIS as they see yheirvmain enemy as Iran/Hezbollah
That matters little to me but maybe means something to you

0

@John:

Now who do YOU root for now tfatvItaq has been torn apart by our liberation?

I don’t “root” for any of the Islamic forces. Not my monkey, not my circus. I do support relocating the Christian refugees out, but Obama isn’t allowing any Christian refugees to escape the bloodthirsty jihad persecutions and beheadings.


Israel is supporting Syrian rebels, and has made it’s own strikes on Syrian government forces, but that doesn’t necessarily equate to “supporting ISIS.” Israel has a national security interest in keeping the Syrian civil war from spreading into Israeli controlled lands.

efense Minister Moshe Ya’alon said Monday that Israel has been providing aid to Syrian rebels, thus keeping the Druze in Syria out of immediate danger. Israeli officials have previously balked at confirming on the record that the country has been helping forces that are fighting to overthrow Syrian President Bashar Assad.

During a briefing with Israel’s diplomatic correspondents at the IDF’s headquarters in Tel Aviv, Ya’alon said that Israel’s ongoing humanitarian assistance to Syrian rebel fighters, a source of growing conflict between Israel and its own Druze population, safeguards the minority population in Syria.

“We’ve assisted them under two conditions,” Ya’alon said of the Israeli medical aid to the Syrian rebels, some of whom are presumably fighting with al-Qaeda affiliate al-Nusra Front to topple Syrian President Bashar Assad. “That they don’t get too close to the border, and that they don’t touch the Druze.”

The Druze on Israel’s side of the Golan, Ya’alon charged, acted “irresponsibly” last week by attacking an Israeli ambulance carrying wounded Syrian rebel fighters. One person was killed and another wounded during what Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu termed a “lynching.” The person in the Israeli ambulance was not affiliated with the al-Nusra Front, and his death would provoke calls for revenge, Ya’alon asserted.

Israel has treated over 1,000 wounded Syrians in its hospitals since the onset of the civil war in 2011.

Israel will continue to act with sensitivity regarding the Druze, Ya’alon said. “On the other side — the rebels on the other side feel that we’re acting sensitively,” he said.

Israel has provided humanitarian assistance to wounded Syrian fighters located near the shared border since the civil war stated, the defense minister said. He said that such aid is extended under two conditions – that the fighters don’t let Islamic extremists to get close to the border, and that they don’t hurt the local Druze population.

An assumption, that all of those fighting the Syrian regime are affiliated with ISIS, is not supported by fact.

0

I hope Britain reads Pete’s phrase, “Despicable Wanker”. It will become Obama’s official name until the end of time.

0

Here is Netanyahu saying that israelil soldiers have been helping ISIShttp://www.liveleak.com/view?i=0bc_1448229854 http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/07/11/hack-of-netanyahu-chief-of-staff-shows-israeli-control-of-isis/
Ahh the fabled “moderates” who are fighting Assad phantoms, how many are there 4 or 5?https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/sep/16/us-military-syrian-isis-fighters
says Gen Austin head of US Central Command
As for only allowing christians in as refugees
Well Ditto if you aren’t demanding the the immediate destruction of ISIS by Obama good for you
Maybe you have learned that we only make things worse in the Mideast.
Let the Saudis and the Iranians go at it. The Sunni and Shia have been fighting for a long time

0

here is another Israel wants ISIS to winhttp://300sploggers.blogspot.com/2015/10/netanyahu-isis-is-good-for-israel.html

0

@john:

Here is Netanyahu saying that israelil soldiers have been helping ISIS

Did you even read the article you linked?

First of all, ISIS and ISIL are not the same. ISIL, ISIS, Islamic State, Daesh: What’s The Difference?

ISIS: The militant group, which began as the Iraqi branch of al Qaeda during the U.S. occupation, gained this name after it invaded Syria in 2013. ISIS is short for “Islamic State in Iraq and Syria,” or “Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham,” which is an old Arabic term for the area.

ISIL: ISIL translates to “Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant.” The Levant is a geographical term that refers to the eastern shore of the Mediterranean — Syria, Lebanon, Palestine, Israel and Jordan. It’s the term the U.S. government uses since the “Levant” is apparently a better translation for al-Sham, the Arabic name for the region.

Obama and Hillary have given arms to ISIS, but Obama does not support ISIL, and in fact Obama has said: “The threat from terrorism is real, but we will overcome it. We will destroy ISIL and any other organization that tries to harm us,” Obama most carefully differentiates between ISIS and ISIL. ISIL resistence fighters are one group of insergents fighting against Syria’s Assad,

Got that? OK let’s go on.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has pledged to punish a group of Syrian Druze individuals in the occupied Golan Heights who attacked injured ISIL Takfiri militants en route to a hospital in Israel.

The Israeli military ambulance in occupied territory were transporting two injured ISIL militants to a hospital for treatment when it was attacked by Druze Syrians. Providing medical aid to war injured of forces other than your own is in following the Geneva Convention and not “supporting them.”

A state of war has existed between Israel and Syria since the state of Israel was created. By aiding the anti-Syrian government insurgency against Assad in Syria’s civil war, Israel is hoping for regime change and a cease of the decades of war between the two nations. That is why Israel has been treating injured insurgents.

As for only allowing christians in as refugees

What about Christian refugees? Neither the sentence before or after in your post has anything to do with Christian Refugees. Did you take a bong hit and forget where your were going with that?

Well Ditto if you aren’t demanding the the immediate destruction of ISIS by Obama…

Why would Obama be planning to destroy a terrorist organization he helped create and armed?

Maybe you have learned that we only make things worse in the Mideast.

Your generalization is simplistic, xenophobic and rather naive. The Middle East has always been a hotbed area and likely always will be. Unfortunately theirs is a problem that inevitably reaches far beyond their borders. I agree with supporting our allies, and not bowing down to our enemies. As the only democracy in the Middle East, I completely support our being a strong ally with Israel and helping to protect them. I agreed with helping Kuwait when Saddam invaded them. (I also slammed Bush Sr. when he didn’t finish the job.) I did not support George (the younger) Bush’s decision to go back into Iraq following 9/11. I thought that there was a greater need to go after Osama Bin Laden, and that we should have held off on going after Saddam at that time. Saddam wasn’t going anywhere.

0

@Ditto:
Did you even read the article ? Netanyahu was angry because the Druze attacked the ambulance that was carrying an off officer and a soldier Israel has treated over 1000 wounded fighters think they were all moderates??? Israel has its own agenda fighting Iran Syria and Hezbolkah which also means helping ISIS
As far as Isis and idol. There is not a fines worth of difference between them
You were against the invasion and occupation of Iraq?
Don’t remember you being in any of the marches

0

You wanted BushI to finish the job ? And then what ? Then everything would have been roses and the Sunni and Shia would have joined hands and danced in the streets?
The only thing holding Iraq together was Saddam The invasion and occupation of Iraq was a disaster
With no end in sight and NI the surge didn’t work,

0

Iraq only became a disaster after Obama mismanaged it.

0

media totaly over looks black on white crimes their negelcting theuri duities and need to be canned buts its the chief editor who need to be selling pencils on the corner to afford their polo club dues

0

Iraq was a disaster from the beginning
It was Bush who signed the SOFA
Obama was bound to that
If Bush was so great why hasn’t he ever been invited to attend even a GOP convention?
Obama is leaving with more than a 50% approval rating 2 or 3 times what Bush left with
Even the GOP treats Bush like a leper

0

@John: Your Bush hating crap is old!! Reality is seven long years later and you are an idiot to continue to blame Bush!! Lets be clear here, hilldabeast looked at the same intel and voted to support Bush!!

0

@Bad Papa: John is all mouth and no action.

0

@Common Sense:
It’s not just me CS
The GOP hates Bush too that is why they didn’t invite him to the conventions in 2008 2012
I would LOVE to see him attend

0

@Randy:
Bad Papa is still peeved for me asking why HE isn’t willing to put his butt on the line to fight ISIS
Probably like Divk Cheney not going to fight the evil Commies You have “other priorities ” it IS easier just to blame Obama than to risk your own butt
So let’s see some action there Big Guy

0

@John: Randy put his butt on the line more than once for his country meaning he has forgotten more about putting his butt on the line for his country than you have ever known. It looks like Bad Papa has as well as have a number of us here. It’s always good to see a lefty troll through here to tell those who have served that they should do more even though they themselves would never think of putting their butts on the line.

0

@another vet:
Great you gave skills and experience
Now you want to end ISIS? Or the Takiban ?
Go ahead
Bell that cat yourself
Quit asking for others to do what you will not do yourself

0

@another vet:
The invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq created more terrorists than they eliminated
The USA overwhelmingly elected Obama twice, you in the minority want something done well looks like you are going to have to do it individually
But I think it highly unlikely that any posters here will do anything more than gripe about Obama not doing what they themselves are unwilling to do

0

@John:

Word has the lie to that repeatedly. What it proves is that liberals suffer from CRS syndrome.

BTW John it seems you haven’t noticed that Obama still has troops there without a SOFA. He’s even increased the numbers.

0

@John: Put it to you this way, when those of us who took an oath to serve our country, we did it to protect all Americans including those like you who obviously don’t have a clue as to what it means. It’s a shame brave souls sacrificed their lives for ungrateful people like yourself.

Quit asking for others to do what you will not do yourself

What part of I’ve already done it don’t you get? By the way, let us all know when you start going door to door to confiscate firearms from people. Time to follow your own advice.

0

@John:
I didn’t relaize we invaded Iraq and Afghanistan in 2011.

http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2015/11/daily-chart-12

0

@another vet: John is off his medication again!

0

@another vet:

Put it to you this way, when those of us who took an oath to serve our country, we did it to protect all Americans including those like you who obviously don’t have a clue as to what it means. It’s a shame brave souls sacrificed their lives for ungrateful people like yourself.

I think John is completely clueless that a good many of the regular posters here are in fact veterans. John seems so quick to demand those of us who have already served to go back. I think that if he is so damn eager for people to go to war, he needs to get off his punk ass, out of his parent’s basement, and sign up himself. He wont of course.

0

@Ditto: He has posted here for a long time. He is all talk with little thought or reasoning. His memory is about 5 minutes long. He also show symptoms of long term memory loss since he continues to repeat himself and thing long ago properly disputed.

0

I don’t think you guys should be so eager to send our military over to do what you think should be done without first saying that you would be willing to do it
I certainly don’t think that we should have invaded and occupied Iraq or occupied Afghanistan
So don’t be saying What I
want when I didn’t say it

0
1 2