Obama Releases Long-Form Birth Certificate

Loading

I’m kind of surprised he sprung this now but I’m guessing he wanted more press for his budget “plan”. He could of released this a year from now and really made the birthers look bad just prior to the election.

Thankfully, hopefully, we can stop talking about this loser of a issue.

Exit video….a happy Obama scolding the press and the birthers

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
105 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

@johngalt, I had to laugh when Obama did this today. There never was any doubt as to the existence of this form of birth certificate. The lawsuits had issues with the legitimacy of that document… i.e. out of sequence numbers, conflicting affidavits, timing, etc. This, of course, doesn’t combat the lawsuit points, but it appeases many. And for that I’m grateful. So danged happy to watch Trump squirm.

My question to the Chump, at this point, is… where’s your tax records? Did he not say he’d release his tax records when Obama released his BC?

Hey… maybe Obama’s disgruntled with Trump because he appears to be working more for Hillary than the GOP (since he makes a great clown front man for the GOP only…), and wants Trumps tax records for some IRS audits for more cash to pay down the debt. er… no, that won’t work because the debt is too large. Maybe he just wants to harrass an old Hillary support adversary while he has control of the IRS.

@GaffaUK… where you been, you Mother Country type, living down under?

@Openid.aol.com/runnswim, the Chump will remain in buffoonery because his motives have never been political… unless he’s trying to aid Hillary in replacing the Zero in 2012. My guess is he moves on to another scandal that doesn’t require actual knowledge… like Obama’s school transcripts. Oh wait! He already has!

@Wordsmith… I believe you had a typo. You did, of course, mean “chump” card.

@DrJohn, I know full well you don’t like the Chump anymore than I do. Don’t tell me you’re buying into his “lookee what *I* did” bit? Releasing this is non news, as we all know this has existed for ages. I’m not sure what the Chump thinks he accomplished, but I’m so looking forward to his tax disclosures, as promised. Or will that be the first Chump/non candidate campaign promise broken?

Thanks for the bas relief subject, Curt. Maybe we can move back to the pressing issues now?

@MataHarley:

Thanks for the bas relief subject, Curt. Maybe we can move back to the pressing issues now?

Exactly!

Photoshop expert: and author of more than 17 books on computer graphics Mara Zebest: Obama’s Latest Long-Form Birth Certificate Is a Fake!

http://gatewaypundit.rightnetwork.com/2011/04/critics-obamas-latest-long-form-birth-certificate-is-a-fake/

@Greg #2:

Greg…..#2.
Please see<a href="@Nan G: “> this.

If you look at the whole thing, not just what’s posted here at FA.
See this PDF copy.
There is a signature of the current State Registrar.
Alvin T. Onaia.
His signature is under his sworn statement:
“I certify that this is a true copy or abstract of the record on file with the Hawaaii State Department of Health.”
He dates it April 25th 2011.

@Nan G:

So?

It required a waiver of Hawaii state policy for Obama to obtain a copy of his long-form birth certificate–the first the state has granted since 2001.

Regarding “forgery:”

Similar stuff was said about the 2008 “short form” document, e.g.

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/07/atlas-exclusive.html

At some point, however, the conversation changed from the short from having been forged to the short form not being the long form.

????

@Greg #2. Nan’s point indicates to me that, if the forgery theory were to be correct, it would have to be a vast conspiracy involving not only the White House but the White House and the Hawaiian state government.

I like a good whodunit as much as the next person. But this is a case where the birther/forgers had better be right — if this controversy boils on, despite evidence presented to date, and it turns out that the birther/forgers are wrong, I have a hunch that this is going to give Obama a currently much needed upward bump in polling. All of Obama’s critics risk being tarred with the same broad brush if the storyline changes from conspiracy to persecution.

– Larry Weisenthal/Huntington Beach

If this document is legitimate, we now have PROOF that BO’s father was indeed a Kenyan national and, therefore, a British subject at the time of BO’s birth. The Constitution requires the President be a “natural born citizen,” and this is defined as “a person whose parents were BOTH American citizens at the time of the birth.” Thus BO is NOT a legitimate President and is indeed a usurper. We should be nice, however, and not demand his incarceration for treason, but merely that he leave expeditiously and never be heard from again.

@Bubble (#58): I think that your comment may illustrate to others what I mean about turning a possible White House conspiracy story line into an anti-White House persecution story line.

Basically, you’d agree that he was born in the USA to a certifiable American mother who, along with her American mother (Obama’s grandmother) raised him from infancy — the British subject father departing the scene long before Obama reached the age of reason.

Obama wouldn’t be the first. Google Chester A Arthur. There’s a precedent and there’s zero percent chance that any court will ever agree with the tortured “natural born citizen” arguments which are so prevalent in the birther universe.

His father contributed a sperm and then basically abandoned him.

Some day we’ll probably have a Presidential candidate who was born in America of a certifiably American mother, artificially inseminated (either in vitro or in vivo) with an anonymous donor sperm. Let’s say that said candidate is the true Tea Party messiah. Will it then be incumbent upon the government to search through the sperm donor records to establish the citizenship of the anonymous donor?

That’s how silly these arguments really are. Maybe they make perfect sense to the birthers, but I strongly predict that, if pursued, this will trigger an anti-birther backlash, which will, to some extent, lessen the acceptance of all anti-Obama rhetoric.

Americans really don’t like witch hunts.

– Larry Weisenthal/Huntington Beach, CA

Make the ‘birthers’ look bad? Don’t think so. Experts are already combing over this document and there are still too many problems that point to it being faked. At any rate, we should drop the issue because ogabe either can’t or won’t produce a real document. We should pack back that knowledge (like so many other things) and move on to attacking his policies full bore. He’s a liar, has been, always will be. Oh…and a socialist. End of discussion. Just another thing to remember come 2012.

MAYBE, he’s getting ready to move back to his father’s land ,
and this is his going away present to the devastated AMERICA ,
HE promissed to change it forever, he has done it, and there is nothing worse to do,
then move out.
let it be a warning for the future of this TOLERANT NATION

Larry, a nice analogy, is it original or gleaned from a medical discussion board?

For hypothetical discussion of Constitutional theory is AI considered a “Natural Birth” or a natural insemination in the medical field? Or does it continue to be an artificial insemination, natural only in the sense that a human child comes to term. We assume you won’t resort to Liberal bias in presenting your views. (Just joking)

It is unlikely the subject will ever arise, for there will surely be some definitions, delineating measures, and rules defined once we are beyond the Age of Obama and his insistence on accepting him and his pronouncements, based solely on his word and that of the propaganda mediums.

SKOOKUM, hi, there seems to be more than usual, a lot of libtards here to debate this POST, I wonder
who send them to defend the certificat, as a legit, if they don’t know themself what to say about it,
with all the millions having been paid to concealed the paper, that was suppose to have been lost,
when they are so few persons guarding that book, from outsidersclaiming his one birth paper
is suspicious of course, and now this newly done paper is coming to get people to beleive
it’s legitimacy so late after so many highly intelligent AMERICANS worked and spend so much on fees rejected by a COURT on each one is also suspicious indeed, and it wont at all satisfy MR TRUMPS RESEARCH LATELY
WHO PUBLICLY GAVE HIM THE PRESSURE TO COME UP WITH THE RIGHT LONG FORM WHICH
IS A BLACK FORM, BEING DONE IN THOSE YEARS, AS THE TWINS BORN ALMOST THE SAME TIME HAVE SHOWN TO THE PUBLIC WITHOUT RESERVATION, when a guy running for the top job of the AMERICA had refused to show any legitimate paper yet, as MR MCAIN HAS GRACEFULLY COMPLY TO SHOW KNOWING THE REQUIREMENT OF THE PRESIDENCY’S DEMAND OF LEGITIMACY,
ALSO MADE OBAMA RIGHTFULLY SUSPICIOUS, BY SO MANY AMERICANS,
THIS NEWLY DONE LONG FORM IS NOT ACCEPTABLE NOW, ALTHOUGH HE WOULD HAVE GET AWAY WITH IT, MOST PROBABLY AT THE BEGINNING AT THE SAME TIME THAT MR MCAIN PRODUCED HIS PROOF, BUT TOO LATE now at this time to stop the searchers of truth, on the contrary, they have more questions than before.

With regards to his BC being fake, is it possible? Sure. But what’s the standard of proof? For all practical purposes anything he produces or for that matter anything anyone produces with regards to their BC, can be labeled as fake. At some point in time we need to move beyond this issue. As for the natural born citizen issue, I’ll leave that one to the Constitutional scholars, but here is how Title 8 of the U.S. Code Section 1401 defines people who are “citizens of the United States at birth:”

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/8/1401.html

Unless I’m missing something, it appears as though (a) applies to Obama. As previously stated, I’ll leave that for the Constitutional scholars to decide. Does his association with anti-American radicals and his policies bother me? It sure does. A great deal. Does the citizenship issue? No, unless someone can show otherwise.

@ilovebeeswarzone: Agreed. If he would have produced this three years ago it probably would have run its course by now. The fact that he was able to produce it now proves that he could have produced it back then as well. It’s called nipping a problem in the butt before it gets out of hand.

@another vet #64:

As for the natural born citizen issue, I’ll leave that one to the Constitutional scholars, but here is how Title 8 of the U.S. Code Section 1401 defines people who are “citizens of the United States at birth:”

I have been interested in the presidential qualifications long before I heard of Obama and I have been infrequently reading what I could about it. Actually, my interest started in the Reagan administration when I lived in Arizona and unrestricted illegal immigration had the attention of even our lawmakers in Washington. Laws were passed then that were going “to solve the illegal alien problem forever”. Must have been written by the same guys who wrote all those treaties with the Indians because forever wasn’t all that long.

I am not all that intelligent and I have to admit that the more I read about what “natural born” means specifically, the more confused I am. There have been cases where I have read that it has been accepted (by a court) to be a certain specification but MY best understanding is that it needs to be legally defined more narrowly to avoid challenges such as this chinese fire drill. Some citations I read actually require the FATHER to be AMERICAN but I can’t imagine that getting by without howls in this day of delicate sensetivity.

John McCain was held to the generally accepted standards concerning US territory or military bases being considered US soil but no one was denying that he was a citizen, just his “natural born” status. Reading the link provided by another vet, http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/8/1401.html , Obama would be at the very least a CITIZEN as defined by section (d) and maybe/probably/certainly as defined in (a).

If there is a legal standard for this important qualification, why is it so difficult for ANY citizen to find?

another vet , I’m not sure that he had that certificat proving he was born in USA, at the time,
that’s probably the reason why the questions will multiply,even more, why now?
was it not existant at the same time MCAIN SHOW HIS, WHY WAS IT NOT EXISTANT IF SO,
WHY PAY SO MUCH MILLIONS TO CONCEAL IT, WHY DID HILLARY GO TO KENYA
RIGHT AFTER HE WAS ELECTED AS A DIPLOMATIC MISSION SECRET, NEVER MENTIONNED;
WHY DID THEY NOT COPY THE BLACK PAPER OF THAT TIME, and we must know how
easy to reproduce any paper and ARTTREASURED FROM ANY ERA NOW, THERE IS MORE QUESTIONS THAN BEFORE
BYE

How do we know the Barack Obama’s alleged father was really his father? Maybe Barack Obama’s real father was, in fact, an Angolan communist? Or maybe his real father was an NBA point guard, vacationing in Hawaii. That would solve the problem, because then he’d have two American parents. Obama’s mother seems to have been a pretty loose sort of a woman, after all. Shouldn’t we have Obama’s “alleged” father’s body exhumed and DNA-typed, to establish paternity? Shouldn’t the alleged fathers of all future Presidential candidates be subjected to paternity tests?

Who else can we be certain that a future President might not be made up of alien DNA?

– Larry W/HB

Dink Newcomb, hi, HE might be consider a citizen, but IS he elligible to be a PRESIDENT? that is another requirement that many are denying him of, and those are highly intelligent born AMERICANS challenging the fact, with money and problem to get answers from judicial ground which don’t let them approch that avenue because IT’s eazy for them in position to dismiss the citizens requiring the answer,
they are being turn away and wont take a dismissal for an answer,
this is another dividing card that was used by the author of this refusal to clear his name
lending the SOCIETY OF MANY TO BELEIVE HE IS NOT A PRESIDENT AS FOR NOW STILL NOT CLEAR.
THERE IS A COLONEL WITH MANY COMBAT YEARS IN HIS BACK WHO ARE DOING A PRISON TERM TO STICK TO HIS UNANSWERED DEMAND TO HAVE A DEFINITE ANSWER.
NOW it’s obvious which one you or anybody in his right mind will side with at this point;
meaning the one exposing a possible traitor of this NATION, OR THE PATRIOT WHO HAS PROVEN HIS ALLEGEANCE TO THIS COUNTRY’S LAWS OF THE LAND, WITH MANY YEARS OF FIGHTING
FOR THE CITIZEN’S FREEDOM OF EVEN VOTING FOR AN INCOMPETANT PROOVEN PERSON
TO TAKE THE LEAD AND ORDER A RULES OF ENGAGEMENT TO THE BRAVEST OF THIS NATION.

openid.aol.com/runnswim
yes good idea, that is not a regular position of any kind,
that should required all test of mental superior ability and
detection of balance of positive and negative ability to judge an event to be dealt with on the spur of a moment answer, that is what is shown and required from military high standard,
so IT IS SURELY MOST DEMANDING FROM A PRESIDENT TO BE,
NOT HOW MUCH MONEY HE IS BEING GIVEN BY FORHEIN COUNTRY TO GAIN HIS SUPPORT LIKE IT HAPPENNED NOT FOCUSSING ON THE ABILITY OF THE FUTURE WANT TO BE PRESIDENT OF AMERICA THE GREATEST NATION ON EARTH, HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN TESTED FOR ULTIMATE POSSIBILITY TO KNOW WHAT IS REQUIRED OF HIM OR HER,
THAT IS WHY THE MILITARY DISCIPLINE IS MOST NECESSARY AND A BIG PLUS
FOR BECOMING A PRESIDENT,OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
OTHER NON QUALIFIED SHOULD GO ABROAD TO SEEK A LEADERSHIP OF LESS EVOLVED COUNTRY.
WHERE IT IS EAZYER FOR THEM TO QUALIFIED, BUT NOT IN AMERICA,
THE BEST PEOPLE NEED THE BEST PRESIDENT

@Dink Newcomb: I ran into the same issues you did. The link I posted was the most definitive thing I could find (although I didn’t look everywhere). The purpose of the law was supposedly to have elaborated on what is contained in the Constitution. Even at that, there was one web site that put down what they claimed was Title 8 and changed some of the wording to their liking. You had to compare them real carefully but there were differences.

You might have learned by now that Hawaaii went ”paperless” in 2001.
That means that, before Obama was a blip for president, his official papers on his birth were put on computers.
All that the current State Auditor had to do was look up his ”spot” on the computer and hit ”print.”
Everything that was there is on the ”new” printout.

Obama has never been touted as a computer hacker.
LOL!
Heck, he hasn’t even been that good at the things he has been touted about!

@ilovebeeswarzone: This raised some other questions and caused others to be resurfaced as well. People will be arguing about them for awhile too.

another vet, yes, he think he had it bad, but he will get more questions
from the BLOGGERS to come and haunt him, and give him nightmare this time.
that will teach him to level with the people of the oppositions, or suffer the consequences of lying or omit to say important things that AMERICANS WANT TO KNOW.
bye

Its going viral on Youtube. In, fact Youtube cannot disable the posts fast enough. The computer nerds are downloading from the Presidential website, then are pulling layers off this computer generated scam. The computer scammer forgot to “flatten” the layers and the computer nerds are having a field day generating from the garbage. The backgrounds are different. There are chromatic aberations all over the place. The layering is so blatant that forensic specialists are going to reject it in seconds. The IT tech who fabricated this Obamination is definitely heading for shelter under the bus.

@oil guy from Alberta, #75:

A post made today on Free Republic states that the document layers are most likely artifacts generated by the normal operation of scanning, Optical Character Recognition, and PDF software–not by any editing done in the course of creating a forged document. The same layering result was duplicated by the author by scanning a different document, converting it to PDF, optimizing the PDF, and then examining the result in Illustrator. The software produces the effect.

There’s absolutely no hope of any such reasonable explanation ever catching up with a new conspiracy theory element that has already gone viral, of course.

Oh, Larry; I swear, is there a trace of presidential petulance in your demeanor. Petulance might be in vogue with progressives, but it’s still considered rude to the rest of North America. Have I stepped on protruding digits? There was no intent to offend; you may have noticed my offensive satire and criticism can be extremely sharp and like the scalpel, can cut deeply with little effort. I thought you were above the petty anger and tantrums of the commoner. I asked some provocative questions as a matter of hypothetical and light discussion and you come back with a response that belies your education and position. I have come to expect so much more from you Larry; not in respect to creative thought, for your discussion on the Bush Tax Cuts has become redundant and tedious. You are an educated man, Larry. You should strive to set a higher standard for discourse and debate, raise the standard so to speak. Should we expect less? We who have been only partially educated and mainly in the school of hard knocks often at best. Some of us play with humor and consider ourselves clever if readers enjoy a chuckle, but we can find coarse and vulgar discussion on almost any Progressive commentary, that is why we choose FA as our intellectual port of choice. Let’s try just a little harder to be civilized; some of us do look up to you as an example.

The Free Republic post mentioned above was actually from National Review Online. The complete article can be found there.

@Skook: Regarding my #68. I was just trying to be funny. If you re-read it with this in mind, maybe my intent will be more clear. I was reasonably serious up to this point, but I finally just gave up, threw my hands into the air, and decided to join the party. Sorry that the joke fell flat. Truly, I meant no real offense with this.

– Larry W/HB

openid.aol.com/runnswim,
yes, that’s why ,I took you on, with my answer,
bye

Larry, an eloquent response; yes, humor is a gamble that seems to fail as often as it succeeds. Don’t give up on humor, but perhaps it should be applied in a more benign, rather than caustic method when referring to our CiC. If one of us Conservative types would have used such distasteful imagery, there would have been cries of havoc and the ravenous hounds of racism past would have been unleashed on our trail. LOL

Greg, on Free Republic, a post from the Daily Mail in Britain, the Whitehouse copy has been scrubbed and the new version has been flattened. They still forgot to put the State of Hawaii seal on it. What’s next? Scrub and redo? Save some time, whitehouse minions. Go to Youtube to set the errata correctly.

For the most up-to-date, current summary of the state of ForgeryGate, this is a great place to start:

http://www.webpronews.com/obamas-birth-certificate-new-conspiracy-theories-2011-04

P.S. I just love this one, also… I want one, I want one!

http://www.proveyourbirth.com/

– LW/HB

Has anyone else gotten any email disguised as a new comment reply from Flop. Aces, showing floppingacescommentn​otifier@gmail.com as the sender of a comment by thesexylingerie but was really spam from thesexylingerie.co.uk ???
I got one email on this thread and one on another thread tonight. When I click the read more link it takes me to the FA thread page but the spam comment is not posted. Has FA been hacked somehow orr has my email address being used maliciously

Dink Newcomb, I received # of them on arow on my site, they where selling those sexy lingeries,
I don’t think they are malicious, but who knows, I notice them before, they only
advertising their product,

Thanks Bees— that indicates to me that it is probably linked to FA. Someone has somehow obtained our email addresses from the FA database to use to spam us. I hope FA becomes aware of it because any security they might have assumed they had is now in question.

It was just spam and what probably happened is that Curt or one of the other moderators deleted the comments, but the email notifications would still have gone out.

@Mike Smith: If your familiar with Adobe illustrator, you can download the document from the White House web site, and take apart yourself. Whoever made the forgery forgot to “flatten” the layers before posting it. In the beginning of this it was claimed that no long form existed, that’s why the other fake was posted. But all of a sudden a long form appears

Disenchanted, How wow you come with a new one on your 3, that is realy a good one to ask questions,
thank’s for passing it on, It is the first time I hear of this fact, He sure cannot get away with this info.
bye

@disenchanted:

SImple enough – he wasn’t born there.
I am in the graphics business. It is a bad fake and the release was done to discredit the only Republican who has the chutzpah to take on this abysmal president – Donald Trump. Too bad Trump gave up so easily – this is an even bigger story – an obviously altered BC that flies in the face of three members of his own family, several African papers in Kenya and Tanzania, and common sense. The man has hid EVERYTHING about himself – perhaps because he is an old left MArxist like his neo-Marxist professor at Occidental let out of the bag? This blog doesn’t tell the real story.

What am I to believe? Curt calls this a “loser” issue at the top, yet I’m completely won over by John. Does Curt believe it’s still a loser issue, even though John post is valid? That even though the BC is a complete fake, knowing that won’t get rid of this fraud?

@openid.aol.com/runnswim: Maybe we should do a flesh analysis on you to check for the presence of carbon. If the test is negative then no need to do a more expensive DNA test. If it’s positive, ok, we do the DNA.

Larry re# 68 No need to apologize.I found your post humorous as I find many “serious” right wing posts re BHO birth downright hilarious.
Skooks You are ALMOST always a voice of intelligence and humour. Both of you guys,KEEP EM COMING.

@rich wheeler: When it comes out that we find out what Obama is hiding, will you then eat your words and smug comments?

Obviously he is hiding something.

Until recently – no birth certificate

No grade school records

No high school records

No college records

No thesis

Nah, he isn’t hiding anything…

Can you offer a reasonable explanation as to why he would spend millions to keep all these records in the shadows and out of public view?
.
.

Anticsrocks Tell me you’re not a birther.Curt and Skooks say “get over it” What nefarious secrets do YOU think he’s hiding? Prove he’s “spent millions” hiding what?
You ready to vote Romney/Rubio to beat him?

anticsrocks, hi,
you know the propaganda the forces of those followers is such, that they gathered some other that
followed without a simple question even the most basic question, could have gotten their suspicion to elect an invisisible profile of a man claiming by voice only to be a real , able and worthy to give an oath in front of the whole NATION OF THIS SUPER AND GREATEST UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
IT break me down to tears to see the people so depress, to see some so low down to be giving up ,
to see some so fill with hate now, being program to continue their inciting among the colors of skin, among the religion of GOD AND HIS BELOVED SON , ENOUGH TO BAN THE NAME IN SCHOOLS AND HIGH LEARNING UNIVERSITYS, OF AMERICA. YES CONTINUE TO INCITE AGAINST THE WEALTHYS TO MAKE THE POOR HATE THEM AND MAKE THEM RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR OWN POVERTY,
SOME OF IT DONE BY A FAIL GOVERNMENT’S DECISIONS,A GOVERNMENT SPENDING IRRATIONALY
AND SENDING THE BULK OF THE PEOPLE’S MONEY ABROAD TO SUPPORT INSURECTIONS OF
THE MUSLIMS CONTRYS. WHEN YOU NOTICE THE ECONOMY OF USA PLUNDGING AND IN NEED OF FUNDS THAT HAD BEEN GIVEN ONLY TO MASSIVE UNIONS AND BANKS AND FOREIGNERS WHO HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO THIS REGIME ASCENDING AND RULING LIKE A FOREIGN DICTATOR OF COMMUNIST SOCIALISTIC AGENDA THA FAILED IN CENTURYS OF TRYING, AND RESPONSEBLE FOR KILLING SO MANY HUMANS.

CURT, I STILL RECEIVE THE QUOTE in top of the comments from FA’
SAYING THIS MAY NOT have been sent by: floppingacescommentnotifier@gmail.com
it’s been like that for a couple of weeks, and I have no way of taking that message out on my site,
just so you know, and I don’t know if anyone else get that quote, when they receive the same comments, all of the comment get the same quotation in front
bye

Dang Bees If I just read your stuff I ‘d never get out of bed. Cheer up.Life is good.
Suggest volunteer work at Vet Hosp. or Homeless Shelter good for the SOUL AND SPIRIT.

#100 I gift it to Ms Bees. Keep those happy, positive, upbeat posts coming.

Viva La Canada

Semper Fi