Obama’s SOTU Address – One Of The Worst

Loading

Krauthammer – this was one of his weakest speeches

Ok, the SOTU is done and here are my thoughts.

It sucked. I mean big time. One of the worst I have seen in a long long time.

The bulk of this speech was about going “green” energy and rah rah rah. More money for infrastructure, more money for education….and then he threw in some Rodney King “can’t we all just get along” crapola.

It didn’t do what it was supposed to do…tell the American people the state of the union. It’s in trouble and most of us aren’t worrying about windmills and electric cars. On top of all that he appeared to be quite enamored with the for-profit police state in China making some cool solar panels.

They’re investing in research and new technologies. Just recently, China became home to the world’s largest private solar research facility, and the world’s fastest computer.

All in all, not much added up during this speech.

The ledger did not appear to be adding up Tuesday night when President Barack Obama urged more spending on one hand and a spending freeze on the other. Obama spoke ambitiously of putting money into roads, research, education, efficient cars, high-speed rail and other initiatives in his State of the Union speech.

He pointed to the transportation and construction projects of the last two years and proposed “we redouble these efforts.” He coupled this with a call to “freeze annual domestic spending for the next five years.”

But Obama offered far more examples of where he would spend than where he would cut, and some of the areas he identified for savings are not certain to yield much if anything.

For example, he said he wants to eliminate “billions in taxpayer dollars we currently give to oil companies.” Yet he made a similar proposal last year that went nowhere. He sought $36.5 billion in tax increases on oil and gas companies over the next decade, but Congress largely ignored the request, even though Democrats were then in charge of both houses of Congress.

Obama also argued that tackling the deficit means furthering reducing health care costs. He believes repealing ObamaCare would add a trillion dollars to our deficit and doesn’t acknowledge the harm it will do to our economy if we DONT repeal it.

Earmarks

Obama then

“Done right, earmarks have given legislators the opportunity to direct federal money to worthy projects that benefit people in their districts, and that’s why I’ve opposed their outright elimination,”

Obama now during the SOTU –

And because the American people deserve to know that special interests aren’t larding up legislation with pet projects, both parties in Congress should know this: If a bill comes to my desk with earmarks inside, I will veto it.

But the fact of the matter is that Boehner already pledged no bills with earmarks will be sent to Obama in the first place. Hell, just a few short month ago, when Democrats held both chambers, Obama continued on signing those earmark-laden spending bills with glee.

Not now apparently….amazing what an election can do.

Then you just knew he would bring some class warfare into the mix:

And if we truly care about our deficit, we simply cannot afford a permanent extension of the tax cuts for the wealthiest 2 percent of Americans. Before we take money away from our schools, or scholarships away from our students, we should ask millionaires to give up their tax break.

It’s not a matter of punishing their success. It’s about promoting America’s success.

Baloney. It is in fact a matter of punishing those who succeed. Plain and simple.

Congressman Tim Griffin:

I think about his inaugural speech and what he said about living within our means. That was before record deficits that added $3 trillion to the debt. The tough part comes with the actual proposals. The challenge we face in terms of the debt is so great that tweaking at the edges is not going to do the trick. We need bold ideas, not only from the President but from the House and Senate.”

Oh, and when he did finally get on to foreign policy he spoke about his diplomatic efforts to control the spread of nukes. He even had the gall to say that the Iranian government “faces tougher and tighter sanctions than ever before.”

Wow….tough talk tough guy. That’ll show em. We know how well those sanctions worked against Saddam eh?

Jonah Goldberg:

I don’t think his naked calls for what amounts to industrial policy excite anybody who won’t get a check if they’re enacted. And the theme “winning the future” sounds even more focused grouped than it did when Newt Gingrich came out with a book by that title a few years ago. I wouldn’t be surprised if he got a bump in the polls, but if I were a GOP strategist I’d take some solace in the fact that this is a guy who has, once again, misread the political moment.

Finally, I’ll leave you with Rep. Paul Ryan and his response to this speech:

Full transcript below:

Good evening. I’m Congressman Paul Ryan from Janesville, Wisconsin — and Chairman here at the House Budget Committee.

President Obama just addressed a Congressional chamber filled with many new faces. One face we did not see tonight was that of our friend and colleague, Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords of Arizona. We all miss Gabby and her cheerful spirit; and we are praying for her return to the House Chamber.

Earlier this month, President Obama spoke movingly at a memorial event for the six people who died on that violent morning in Tucson. Still, there are no words that can lift the sorrow that now engulfs the families and friends of the fallen.

What we can do is assure them that the nation is praying for them; that, in the words of the Psalmist, the Lord heals the broken-hearted and binds up their wounds; and that over time grace will replace grief.

As Gabby continues to make encouraging progress, we must keep her and the others in our thoughts as we attend to the work now before us.

Tonight, the President focused a lot of attention on our economy in general — and on our deficit and debt in particular.

He was right to do so, and some of his words were reassuring. As chairman of the House Budget Committee, I assure you that we want to work with the President to restrain federal spending.

In one of our first acts in the new majority, House Republicans voted to cut Congress’s own budget. And just today, the House voted to restore the spending discipline that Washington sorely needs.

The reason is simple.

A few years ago, reducing spending was important. Today, it’s imperative. Here’s why.

We face a crushing burden of debt. The debt will soon eclipse our entire economy, and grow to catastrophic levels in the years ahead.

On this current path, when my three children — who are now 6, 7, and 8 years old — are raising their own children, the federal government will double in size, and so will the taxes they pay.

No economy can sustain such high levels of debt and taxation. The next generation will inherit a stagnant economy and a diminished country.

Frankly, it’s one of my greatest concerns as a parent — and I know many of you feel the same way.

Our debt is the product of acts by many presidents and many Congresses over many years. No one person or party is responsible for it.

There is no doubt the President came into office facing a severe fiscal and economic situation.

Unfortunately, instead of restoring the fundamentals of economic growth, he engaged in a stimulus spending spree that not only failed to deliver on its promise to create jobs, but also plunged us even deeper into debt.

The facts are clear: Since taking office, President Obama has signed into law spending increases of nearly 25 percent for domestic government agencies — an 84 percent increase when you include the failed stimulus.

All of this new government spending was sold as “investment.” Yet after two years, the unemployment rate remains above 9% and government has added over $3 trillion to our debt.

Then the President and his party made matters even worse, by creating a new open-ended health care entitlement.

What we already know about the President’s health care law is this: Costs are going up, premiums are rising, and millions of people will lose the coverage they currently have. Job creation is being stifled by all of its taxes, penalties, mandates and fees.

Businesses and unions from around the country are asking the Obama Administration for waivers from the mandates. Washington should not be in the business of picking winners and losers. The President mentioned the need for regulatory reform to ease the burden on American businesses. We agree — and we think his health care law would be a great place to start.

Last week, House Republicans voted for a full repeal of this law, as we pledged to do, and we will work to replace it with fiscally responsible, patient-centered reforms that actually reduce costs and expand coverage.

Health care spending is driving the explosive growth of our debt. And the President’s law is accelerating our country toward bankruptcy.

Our debt is out of control. What was a fiscal challenge is now a fiscal crisis.

We cannot deny it; instead we must, as Americans, confront it responsibly.

And that is exactly what Republicans pledge to do.

Americans are skeptical of both political parties, and that skepticism is justified — especially when it comes to spending. So hold all of us accountable.

­­In this very room, the House will produce, debate, and advance a budget. Last year — in an unprecedented failure — Congress chose not to pass, or even propose a budget. The spending spree continued unchecked.

We owe you a better choice and a different vision.

Our forthcoming budget is our obligation to you — to show you how we intend to do things differently … how we will cut spending to get the debt down… help create jobs and prosperity … and reform government programs. If we act soon, and if we act responsibly, people in and near retirement will be protected.

These budget debates are not just about the programs of government; they’re also about the purpose of government.

So I’d like to share with you the principles that guide us. They are anchored in the wisdom of the founders; in the spirit of the Declaration of Independence; and in the words of the American Constitution.

They have to do with the importance of limited government; and with the blessing of self-government.

We believe government’s role is both vital and limited — to defend the nation from attack and provide for the common defense … to secure our borders … to protect innocent life … to uphold our laws and Constitutional rights … to ensure domestic tranquility and equal opportunity … and to help provide a safety net for those who cannot provide for themselves.

We believe that the government has an important role to create the conditions that promote entrepreneurship, upward mobility, and individual responsibility.

We believe, as our founders did, that “the pursuit of happiness” depends upon individual liberty; and individual liberty requires limited government.

Limited government also means effective government. When government takes on too many tasks, it usually doesn’t do any of them very well. It’s no coincidence that trust in government is at an all-time low now that the size of government is at an all-time high.

The President and the Democratic Leadership have shown, by their actions, that they believe government needs to increase its size and its reach, its price tag and its power.

Whether sold as “stimulus” or repackaged as “investment,” their actions show they want a federal government that controls too much; taxes too much; and spends too much in order to do too much.

And during the last two years, that is exactly what we have gotten — along with record deficits and debt — to the point where the President is now urging Congress to increase the debt limit.

We believe the days of business as usual must come to an end. We hold to a couple of simple convictions: Endless borrowing is not a strategy; spending cuts have to come first.

Our nation is approaching a tipping point.

We are at a moment, where if government’s growth is left unchecked and unchallenged, America’s best century will be considered our past century. This is a future in which we will transform our social safety net into a hammock, which lulls able-bodied people into lives of complacency and dependency.

Depending on bureaucracy to foster innovation, competitiveness, and wise consumer choices has never worked — and it won’t work now.

We need to chart a new course.

Speaking candidly, as one citizen to another: We still have time … but not much time. If we continue down our current path, we know what our future will be.

Just take a look at what’s happening to Greece, Ireland, the United Kingdom and other nations in Europe. They didn’t act soon enough; and now their governments have been forced to impose painful austerity measures: large benefit cuts to seniors and huge tax increases on everybody.

Their day of reckoning has arrived. Ours is around the corner. That is why we must act now.

Some people will back away from this challenge. But I see this challenge as an opportunity to rebuild what Lincoln called the “central ideas” of the Republic.

We believe a renewed commitment to limited government will unshackle our economy and create millions of new jobs and opportunities for all people, of every background, to succeed and prosper. Under this approach, the spirit of initiative — not political clout — determines who succeeds.

Millions of families have fallen on hard times not because of our ideals of free enterprise — but because our leaders failed to live up to those ideals; because of poor decisions made in Washington and Wall Street that caused a financial crisis, squandered our savings, broke our trust, and crippled our economy.

Today, a similar kind of irresponsibility threatens not only our livelihoods but our way of life.

We need to reclaim our American system of limited government, low taxes, reasonable regulations, and sound money, which has blessed us with unprecedented prosperity. And it has done more to help the poor than any other economic system ever designed. That’s the real secret to job creation — not borrowing and spending more money in Washington.

Limited government and free enterprise have helped make America the greatest nation on earth.

These are not easy times, but America is an exceptional nation. In all the chapters of human history, there has never been anything quite like America. The American story has been cherished, advanced, and defended over the centuries.

And it now falls to this generation to pass on to our children a nation that is stronger, more vibrant, more decent, and better than the one we inherited.

Thank you and good night.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
106 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I’ve often wondered

we should ask millionaires to give up their tax break

when he and his democratic counterparts are going to chip in their millions.

Oops sorry my bad, forgot they freely want to use the working classes begotten gains and be danged if anyone is getting a penny of theirs. But hey, a million here and a million there from the libs/progressives in Congress, Hollywood, the Jessie’s and Al’s and around the nation it would add up and at least start to put a dent in our problem.

On top of all that he appeared to be quite enamored with the for-profit police state in China making some cool solar panels.

I don’t think it’s a matter of being enamored with anything. I think the point he was making is just the opposite: If we’re not careful, the technology of the future is all going to be coming from somewhere else. Probably the monitor you’re reading this on and the keyboard you’re typing on were made in China. Extrapolate the trend 5 or 10 years into the future.

He also made a reference to our critical infrastructure. No one seems too worried about the fact that it’s both out of date and falling apart. Meahwhile, our chief competitors are rapidly modernizing. Project that out a few years also.

Private interests working within the context of our capitalist economy haven’t been doing squat about either of these systemic issues. It might even be argued that they’re partially responsible for them.

I was just so dang glad I didn’t have to be distracted by Pelosi’s constant blinking and leaping out of her chair. And I have to say, that pairing up of “across the aisle” stuff really put a damper on the standing ovations stuff, eh? All in all, not much roaring of approval from the crowd from either side, save for the token “we love the troops” remark, and the salmon agencies joke. I say let’s keep the pairing up. Shaves a lot of time off of speeches that do nothing more than political posture.

Anyone notice that Fox News delayed the first time ever 3rd “party” response from Michele Bachmann until sometime into Greta’s coverage? CNN and MSNBC streamed it more timely after the SOTU and GOP rebuttal.

All in all, save for the die hard predictables, few seemed impressed. But then, as I said days ago in my post… just another dog and pony show, and lots of spending, disguised as “investments”.

Am I the only one who had a WTF moment when Obama used the “Sputnik moment” analogy? I get that he was probably trying to invoke some kind of JFK vibe, but given the decline of the space program in the decades since 1957, and the fact that neither he nor most of those who put him in office were alive in ’57, it seemed a really bizarre and outdated image to invoke.

Two more years of this inanity… *sigh*

What pissed me off more than anything was getting phone calls, emails, and text messages while the President was speaking, about totally unrelated things. Either these people were oblivious that the President was speaking, or they don’t know me very well. Embarrassing.

Maybe we should go back to the way it used to be. When it was started the State Of The Union was delivered in a letter to Congress. That was it. No speech. Is anybody else tired of it being used as a campaign speech? I also would like to see a rule where no applauding or cheering is allowed. It ain’t a rally.

I wouldn’t put much faith in him vetoing any bill with earmarks in it. I am guessing that the earmark will be written into the bill so that it doesn’t appear as an earmark.

Marc Thiessen had a great analysis this morning on Fox. He noted that Obama gave a Reagan’s, Clinton’s and Bush’s speeches. Obama spouted conservative words while selling big government and more spending.

@RandomThoughts: Indeed- and it gives me an idea.

Before we take money away from our schools, or scholarships away from our students, we should ask millionaires to give up their tax break.

Most people making $250K a year are not millionaires, but are trying to get there.

We believe a renewed commitment to limited government

This is total bullsh*t. Absolute, complete bullsh*t.

Obama knows you can fool Democrats all the time.

Barack Obama is NOT a natural born citizen, as required by our Constitution, and therefore,MUST BE REMOVED BY FORCE,if neccssary!! Taged,Baged,AND THROWN IN GITMO AS AN ENEMY OF THE UNITED STATES!.

Natural Born means a Child Born on US Soil to 2 US Citizens.

It’s not funny Any more..it’s High Crimes and Treason!!!
We are One nation , under GOD Let’s pull together as AMERICANS!.WE THE PEOPLE DEMAND THE “Unconstitutional Usurper” and let rebuil our great nation!
It’s up us “WE THE PEOPLE” each an every one of us to stand!
Civil War cannot be allowed to happen because Congress failed to perform it’s duty to protect and uphold the Consitution. !

Never forget..They work for us!, “WE ARE A MIGHTY FORCE IF WE MOVE TOGETHER AS ONE”!

DEMOCRATS,REPUBLICANS,INDEPENCE.. WE ARE AMERICANS FIRST! DEMAND THE TRUTH!!!

(CAPT-DAX)…—…”Save our Ship”

I had this weird feeling that just any second we were going to see the curmudgeon side of POTUS . . . at any second he was suddenly going to start pointing his finger and berating the commoner. The total disjointed, flippity-flop, from one subject to another appeared to me to be a man beckoning, almost pleading for support. The body languange of those shown was a picture of disdain and doubt. This was a dullard speaking to the professional audience. If there was a time when Odours-ama caused chills to run up and down people . . . this was the prime example of the cold shoulder. Even the college student that amabO . . . “am absolute Zero” . . .directly addressed during the speach and was shown on national tv had a strange look of consternation on his face.

Believe me, the socioligists that will study the crowd will have a nothing really pleasant to tell the POTUS about HIS totally zeros speech last night.

Have you noticed that this Prez is a new aspect of zero . . . he is a negative zero . . . wow, even the mathmatics people have a new state of nothingness to study, lol

Chief wooden-head, wearing his new serious gray hairdo, gives wooden speech. It’s as is something had stolen his balls and put them in their lock box.

Thanks Curt, your recap is better than the speech, it was like waiting for the novacaine to work before the dentist starts the drill. Dud of a speech.

From Congress man Paul Ryan:

Whether sold as “stimulus” or repackaged as “investment,” their actions show they want a federal government that controls too much; taxes too much; and spends too much in order to do too much.

And during the last two years, that is exactly what we have gotten — along with record deficits and debt — to the point where the President is now urging Congress to increase the debt limit.

We believe the days of business as usual must come to an end. We hold to a couple of simple convictions: Endless borrowing is not a strategy; spending cuts have to come first.

Obama still isn’t getting it or doesn’t care, investments take money, money he chose to rid our country of, it’s gone, fun and games are over. We are so deep in debt to the Chinese and when he brought up their solar research facility my thought was, how soon did they tell you they will be exporting new and improved solar panels to our shores. What kind of deal did he make with China now?

Parts of the speech to me, seemed to be borrowed, this stuck out like a sore thumb:

Obama:

“we will not relent, we will not waver, and we will defeat you.”

President Bush:

“we will not tire, we will not falter, we will not fail”

Much better? I remember W also starting the phrase off with “we will not relent…..” in another speech, Obama is back to his old trick, before he borrowed from his pal Patrick Deval’s speech. Still didn’t help, it worked for President Bush, fell flat last night.

China has the fastest super computer. Just ask them. Don’t think they’ll let you verify their claim, tho. (Translation: BS!)

Yes Obama will get a temporary bounce. Once the GOP gets things in gear we will see that disappear.
As for the dem response, they’ll claim Paul was spreading doom and gloom rather than an accurate assessment.

NPR was all over itself in proclaiming that Zippy was continuing a tradition of more than 200 years.
Of course President Wilson was the first to actually appear before Congress.
Please explain to me why I should believe OZero.
None of his promises from the past have been kept.
He provided no justification for his unqualified faith in Government.
He provided no explanation for his failure to do any of what he described in his speech during his first two years in office. He did not explain the lobbyists in his Administration, his unqualified support for earmarks, his job-killing mandatory Health Insurance program, his Felony Theft of the assets of GM (and donation of the same to the UAW), his crony Stimulus Bill, or any of the rest of his Administration’s acts.
Of course his speech was uninspiring.
I would rather listen to a speech from “Joe Isuzu”. Remember him? At least Joe could turn to us, with a twinkle in his eye, and ask, “Would I lie to you?”

Not having to watch Mrs. Pelosi jump up and down relentlessly was the highlight of the speech, in my opinion. He spoke alot but didn’t say much. I do believe the repubs screwed up by being lovey dovey and sitting with the dims. When the dims jumped up to applaud their(our) leader it looked like the whole gallery was up. The repubs, if I’m not mistaken, have more total members and it would have sent a better message to see half the gallery sitting on their hands while the other half applauded. Someone said this morning that they can’t listen to Mr. Obama because his method of speech is nerve racking. He attacks with “word bullets” in his staccato delivery which tends to lull people to sleep and they only remember the buzz words. This guy is good in a bad kind of way. Just my opinion though, please don’t send me to a re-education camp.

windmills? His buddy Larry Summers runs a hedge that funds wind farms. The new Enron style scam where aholes pocket a 30% federal cash rebate and 2.1 cents per KwH rebate. Wind energy has a wholesale cost of almost 20 cents per KwH and most transmission companies tack on another 5.5 cents per KwH delivery charge.

WTF is expensive energy going to do to our economy? Who the heck is buying Tesla’s, Fisker’s, and Volts? The people in this country without jobs? The immigrants dumped here by Catholic Charities who live off Section 8 housing vouchers and general assistance? The estimated 12 million illegals? The asswipes in Chicago ghettos?

Limited government? By a President who has been on a power grab since day one? Nevermind how Washington is out of control financially. We have State’s out of control, not counting most county, and city budgets being sucked apart by excessive political salaries.

Go back to Chicago, use your supposed super powers to fix THEIR social and fiscal problems. Then, come back to Washington if you are successful. Otherwise, STFU you noodlekeg.

SOTU by Userper?

From time to time recently we have heard that so-and-so BELIEVE??? that Obama was born in Hawaii. WE DO NOT NEED OBAMA’S BIRTH CERTIFICATE TO KNOW THAT OBAMA IS NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN. Obama’s father WAS NOT a citizen of the United States; therefore, OBAMA IS NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN. The propaganda from Hawaii’s governor and recently from others is an attempt to end the debate. But like the Tea Party, the “Birthers” will not cease and desist from insisting that Obama be removed for failure to qualify according to our Constitution.

What is incredible is that ALL of those who have uttered that Obama is qualified have been sworn to uphold the Constitution. Like the vial and corrupt Nixon, Obama should be removed immediately.

Back on your birther soapbox again, AdrianS? You did a cut/paste of the same comment over here, and two days ago you did it here. We’re not new here… we know how you feel about this, but geez guy… must you resort to spamming?

I failed to catch the Pretender in Chief, I dont believe anything he says so his stating it to Congress makes no difference. All that matters is what Republicans plan on doing this year and how they plan on driving him out of office.

Wonder why Obama didn’t mention that Jeffery Immelt, CEO of GE and the man who Obama seems to think knows how to create jobs, shut down the last American GE plant that manufacturered solar panels last June and moved the entire operation to (wait for it, you know it’s coming) CHINA?

@RandomThoughts: didn’t he not too long ago put the end to the NASA program? so why would he want to bring that up in our memories. what a putz

First, lets get the false kumbaya moment out of the way- it was just a lame ttempt to diffuse the conservatives numbers, since they won all those seats, and made it appear to the uninitiated that more people were jumping up and clapping than actually were.
That said, the speech was a joke- everytime he said “investment”, you could just viscerally FEEL the money leaving your wallets, and he said it 29 times in the speech. He said nothing about owebammacare, or tarp, or stimulus or any other money he stole from our children and grandchildren- the man is an unmitigated thief who is trying to use things like Cap and Tax to gouge us out of more money.
A goood example- Jeffery Immelt is CEO of GE Industries, with ties to ALL kinds of Green Technology, and he has been appointed a government post that is allegedly for “Investment” in green tech- does noone besides me see a problem here?
Can you just imagine if Dick Cheney was the Vice President AND CEO of Halliburton? But noooooooooooooo, he had to give up all ties with Halliburton, so as to avoid appearances of conflict of interest, and Immelt DOES NOT?
This is but the latest example of the blatant hypocrisy progressives flaunt in our faces- they do not even try to hide it- and you could go line by line in the Resident’s speech, and find lie after lie so blatant that only a child might believe in them.

Blake: A goood example- Jeffery Immelt is CEO of GE Industries, with ties to ALL kinds of Green Technology, and he has been appointed a government post that is allegedly for “Investment” in green tech- does noone besides me see a problem here?

Indeed I do, Blake. I did my post on the SOTU a few days ago, when I got wind of the spending he’d be peddling, and the media already calling it a move to the center.

Right…. as I said, to the center of whom??

So I didn’t anticipate anything different that came down. In that post I grumped not only about the sleight of tongue verbage for “spending” and the repackaging joke that this is a “centrist” move, but also noted that Immelt’s appointment to a “jobs” council was a huge conflict of interest. GE is, after all, a manufacturer of various alternative energy products. Not to mention it seems Immelt’s idea of job creation seems to work out better for other nations than it does here in the good ol’ US. BTW, don’t know if you are aware, but Immelt’s council is to replace the much ignored Volcker economic advisory council. They have been discarded, just as Obama has discarded his birpartisan debt commission’s suggestions. Apparently he needs councils made up of kindred souls only.

Therefore all we can expect from this council is the creation of jobs that will enrich GE and other manufacturers of similar energy technology. For the nation, it will be a job boost only during construction, few permanent jobs, and more expensive energy. The ill winds of reality waft across the ocean from Spain.

But Immelt isn’t Veep. Not sure if the council is on payroll, or advisory only. So I don’t see your Cheney/Halliburton comparison as applicable. But we do know what to expect of Obama’s “job” council now.

@disenchanted:

Yes, he wanted to turn it into a green energy propaganda machine.

I really think Obama has no idea what he’s saying, and no interest in what the words coming out of his mouth actually mean. He’s all about empty image, period. That’s why away from the teleprompter he’s all but incoherent.

@DrJohn:

Dr. John, I await your brilliance.

@Smorgasbord: They’ll just hook it on as a funding amendment to the bull…I mean, bill. Just like the housing sales tax they snuck in the Death Care Bill, and the hiring of 16,000 more IRS agents.

I am still anxiously waiting for all the Leftists to stop by to tell us how fantastic and wonderful the LightBringerTM was during the speech last night.

So far, all is quiet on the Leftist Front.

I’ll post my thoughts on the SOTU later on today after work.

Aye Reminds me you haven’t commented on the perceived “Wellstone Effect” engendered by the Tucson speech.I’ve noticed prognostication is not one of your many strong points.

@rich wheeler:

I haven’t commented on that Rich?

You should go back and check to see what I’ve said.

@MataHarley:

Blather, rinse, and repeat.

Aye I believe you said his disingenuous (my word) Tucson speech would hurt him in the polls.Please clarify. Thanks

@rich wheeler:

Again, you should go read what I had to say.

Don’t rely strictly on your memory because it’s doing you no favors today.

For all his promises to freeze government and stop spending, Obama could only come up with ~ $40 Billion/year in actual savings.

Our deficit for this year is $1.5 Trillion.
So, Obama brings us up to $1.5 Trillion a Year and smiles and says, “Ah! But I’m cutting things back! I’m saving $40 Billion!”

Great.
Not even cutting back on raises, bonuses or all of the new oppressive regulatory burdens from his HUGE government workforce.
It is all through attrition.

What percent of $1,500,000,000,000 is $40,000,000,000 anyway?
Less than a third of one percent, I think.

Why do we need new federal spending for roads and bridges? What has happened to all the road use taxes we pay on both the state and federal level? Also, how will rechargeable cars contribute to road use taxes?

I have a question.
Remember the rumors that Obama had studied the idea of confiscating all of our 401K’s and pensions and IRA’s?
It wasn’t even floated as a trial balloon like the military men and women having to pay for their own medical care was.
HOWEVER…….last night he mentioned that our retirement plans should NOT be dependent on the whims of the stock market.
Do you think he’s going to make that play?

@Blake, #23:

This is but the latest example of the blatant hypocrisy progressives flaunt in our faces- they do not even try to hide it- and you could go line by line in the Resident’s speech, and find lie after lie so blatant that only a child might believe in them.

Where’s the hypocrisy? Why should the Obama administration try to hide Immelts’s green energy connections? A national renewable energy initiative has been a high-profile part of the agenda since day one. It came up repeatedly throughout the 2008 presidential campaign and has been mentioned repeatedly since.

Perhaps we’d be more comfortable with something along the lines of Cheney’s 2001 secret meetings with the CEOs of Exxon Mobil, Conoco, Shell Oil, BP, and Chevron.

Apparently government/industry collaboration is a bad thing when a democratic administration does it openly, but OK when a republican administration does it behind closed doors.

Greg;

It would seem to me . . . as obfusticated as I am . . . but isn’t green energy . . . ah . . . enery? Where the heck does the DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY fit in with “Competitiveness” . . . wow . . . there are so many disconnected dots in this feasco that even you have to admit that “YOU know nothing”! LOL

Seen this?

Rep. Bobby Schilling has written Obama as a response to Obama’s challenge during SOTU:
OBAMA:
“If you have ideas on how to improve this law by making care better or more affordable, I am eager to work with you.”

Well done, Rep. Schilling!

@Nan G: #36

I caught that in his speech too. You have to keep in mind that we are too stupid to know the best way to invest our money. Only the politicians know how to invest OUR money so we make a decent profit. I am retired, so I am guessing the takeover won’t effect me, but it wouldn’t surprise me if he even goes after retirees retirement money.

But…..but……92% of the folks that watched the STFU speech thought it was the greatest thing since sliced bread!!

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20029581-503544.html?tag=contentMain;contentBody

The poll:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/01/26/politics/main7284238.shtml?tag=contentMain;contentBody

Curt–

Thanks for watching Obama’s SOTU address so I didn’t have to.

Come on now….

There’s got to be at least one mouth slobberin’ callous kneed Leftist who will step up and tell us how super-d-duper The WonTM did with his SOTU speechifying last night.

Surely there’s got to be at least one of you out there somewhere that will step forward and sing the praises of your TelePromTer Jesus….

Bueller? Bueller? Anyone?

What he’s trying to do is paint himself as a centrist that way when the Republicans start going after the leftist agenda that he forced down eveyone’s throat that was rejected at the polls in 2010, he can claim that they are extremists and that he represents the middle of the road. For example he’ll be wanting to “invest and create jobs” through repairing the infrastructure which is what we were told the Stimulus Program was supposed to do which means it didn’t. If the Republicans tell him, “You were already given $987 billion for this, no more money”, he will then claim that they are denying jobs to Americans. It’ll be interesting to see if the majority of Americans are gullible enough to be fooled twice. If so, the Republicans had better focus on expanding their gains in the House and winning the Senate in 2012 because 2012 will be a lost cause trying to recapture the WH.

@Aye:

Well, it was vague, but a necessary drift more center. I agree with him about energy. Even if you don’t believe in global warming, I think we can can all agree that we do need alternative energy sources. I part with many of my liberals friends who oppose military recruiting on college campuses, so it was good to hear him speak in favor of that. I always advocate showing young people as many options as possible when making choices for their lives. When he proposed an entire freeze on domestic spending, I raised an eyebrow, but then he went on to talk about “trimming the fat” – a freeze on spending isn’t the same thing as cutting back, so I wondered what he was actually asking for. Both of my roommates are teachers for special needs children, and they need more than a kudos from the President. They get very little support, especially in the field they are in. This week alone, one had chairs thrown at her, and the other was bitten by a child whose parent is HIV positive (she’s fine). Yet they are extremely limited in available recourse or protection. The field needs a lot more than the President telling people to become teachers. All in all, he really didn’t say much, but there I did get more of a feeling of unity in Washington than I’ve seen in a very very long time – though I’m quite sure it’s more show than anything. But perception in leadership is probably as close as we’ll get to reality. I don’t think it was as great as some of my liberal friends did, but not as horrible as my friends here. I did expect better, especially after his speech last week.

Lawrence O’Donnel on MSNBC found is plane crash “joke” rather distasteful, and I agree, though I missed it when it was said. I do think his SuperBowl quip came off as sour grapes about daaa Bears not making it, but neither my Giants nor the Jets did either, and I do agree with the point that Arts and Sciences are as vital as Athletics in a well rounded education. The Salmon stuff was great!

Also, I’m not at all a Michelle Bachmann fan, but I do realize that she’s not an actress or a newscaster. Someone on her set should have told her where to look before the camera started rolling. Working at the baseball stadium, I’ve walked by players shooting commercials and announcements, and while Derek Jeter has done it a million times, someone always tells him where his eyeline is/ Heck, ACTORS are told what the shot is before they start rolling. It’s not her fault, but a BIG fail on someone’s technical end.

Aye Heck you didn’t like his Tucson speech which left you pretty lonely even here at F.A.That great speech was a hard act to follow but I ‘ll agree with 92% of my fellow lemmings er citizens who watched it and say this speech was pretty damn good.

@rich wheeler:

Aye Heck you didn’t like his Tucson speech which made you pretty lonely even here at F.A.

Again, Rich, I strongly encourage you to go re-read what I said about his Tucson speech because, my friend, you foggy memory is doing you no favors and, as a result, you’re bearing false witness against me.

@Rides A Pale Horse:

I saw that this morning, and followed the link, the caveat:

“As is often the case, those who watch the speech were more likely to be from the President’s party.”

Internals,

44% Democrats, 25% Republicans and 31% Independents. According to a CBS/NYTimes poll, that is mention in the internals, there are only 34% of the public that are Democrats, 27% Republican and 39% Independents. Dems are getting a 20 point advantage, maybe more if you if you look at polling other than CBS/NYTimes. CBS should be embarrassed to put this data out and should have asked for their money back.

@MataHarley:

It’s not for you. You’re not the light of the world. It’s for the benefit of those who read other posts. It’s not span; it’s spreading the word. You sound like an Obama-ite. Instead of getting with it, you seem to have gotten lost. So what.

That’s okay, AdrianS. We all needed a laugh after the O’bama SOTU. And you birthers and your spam are always good for that.

Ya know, if there was some proof that suggested you aren’t just feeding your conspiracist hunger and desperation to get rid of Obama any way possible, the best you’re ever going to get is that he doesn’t run again. And I wouldn’t be betting on that one.

No SCOTUS will ever unseat this POTUS. Period. And the lawsuits are dropping like flies.

Cary, thanks for the kind words. But AdrianS has always had it in for me some way or another. Personal problem with him/her/it, I guess. I lose no sleep about it.

But like I said… ya’ll are really good for a laugh…. on a rare *occasion*. Not spamming three… er make that four… times within a few days, repetitively. You might at least try a bit of unique phrasing instead of the cut and paste stuff to hold our interest more than a couple of seconds…. LOL