Sessions Shreds Fiction From White House On Debt

Loading

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NtA6OxPMRpM[/youtube]

The myth that President Obama has a $4 trillion deficit-reduction plan: “The only plan that the president has put on paper and allowed anybody to see is his February budget, which doubles the national debt… If there is a secret plan that does exist somewhere, it should be made public. This afternoon. Let’s see it… As of now, there is only one debt limit plan on paper… That’s the plan we are debating today: cut, cap, and balance… Washington Democrats are resisting cut, cap, and balance because they know there’s no gimmick or accounting trick to get around it… The American people do not support a Washington plan to pass some grand deal with tax hikes that never go away and spending cuts that never materialize.”
 
The myth that the Iraq and Afghanistan wars and the Bush tax cuts are the cause of our fiscal crisis: “Over the entire decade, the cost of the Afghanistan and Iraq wars is about $1.3 trillion… This year alone, the deficit is expected to be $1.4 trillion… The total amount of money spent since the president took office is $8.5 trillion dollars… In the last two years, non-defense discretionary spending has soared 24 percent. The stimulus package alone—enacted into law in a single day in 2009—cost more than the entire war in Iraq.”
 
The myth that the Gang of Six outline is a concrete plan with $4 trillion in deficit reduction: “My staff on the Budget Committee, taking the summary pages that they’ve produced for us, can only find $1.2 trillion in reduced spending in that outline, along with what is clearly a $1 trillion tax increase. Where does the other $1.5 trillion in deficit reduction claimed in the outline come from?”
 
The myth that the modest spending cuts being discussed will be sufficient to change our debt trajectory: “Our Democrat colleagues have said—although no plan has ever been made public to this effect—that they could get behind a budget deal that reduces the deficit $4 trillion over the next ten years, half of it comprised of spending cuts. This is not even close, frankly, to what is needed to ultimately balance our budget. We are projected to spend $46 trillion over the next ten years… In just a little over 2 months our debt will equal 100 percent of our GDP—matching the size of our entire economy. It already costs us a million jobs or more a year.”

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
7 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Woooeeeee, Jeff Sessions, he da man!!!!
My favorite politician in Congress, well,
now that Jesse Helms has passed on. He
do us southern boys proud, yes he do!!!!

This thread is a saver!!! Yeeeeah, man!!!!

Brian, that was probably the lowest form of ad hominum attack I have seen in a long while.
You have NOTHING to say about the substance of Senator Sessions’ remarks.
So you make fun of where Senator Sessions was born and raised?
That’s all you’ve got?
Pathetic!

I was born in North Carolina and raised in Alabama.
Jeff and Jesse [are] my favorite Senators, you ditz..

Open mouth, insert foot [again]? 🙂

If this is your way of flirting with me,
it ain’t working, babe. But yer funny.

I like that speech, IT was presidential style that the AMERICANS would appreciate and understand,
that he was very good, and so very smart to have that speech deliver the way he did, for all
to study. thank you SENATOR SESSIONS, THAT WAS BRILLIANT,
CURT, thank you for giving it to FA’s people

Brian, don’t blame anyone, but you, and your building’s blocks on the other POST,
THAT GOT ALL ON THE DEFENSIVE MODE, AND THE REACTION WONT BE FORGOTTEN EVERY TIME YOU SHOW UP HERE, YOU HAVE MARK YOUR APPEARANCE ON THIS BLOG, YOURSELF,
BY INSULTING MANY OF OUR SMART GROUP,
NOW YOU MUST LIVE WITH THE CONSEQUENCES THAT YOU CREATED

Brian,
I noticed you have completely changed your post at #3 three times since you first put it up.
The improvement is appreciated.
Debate is not moved forward via simple insults to one’s opponents.
It is a common courtesy that, if you are being sarcastic, you end your sarcastic remark with this symbol/.
Since your 1st post didn’t end that way (and I has No Idea where you were from) I had no reason to think you weren’t simply being flippant against Sen. Sessions as a person as opposed to agreeing or disagreeing with the content of his remarks on their merits.

So, now that you’re thinking about debate points, what do you think of Sen. Sessions strong remarks from the Senate floor?

I think he made some great points.
It is too bad that Cut, Cap & Balance died this morning in the Senate.

Nan @ #6

Yeah (he says sheepishly), my girlfriend got me to change it, and I changed it again after she went to take off her 25 lbs. of makeup …, which is the closest that she gets to going on a diet. 🙂 (ducking here)

You women, you’re always sticking up for each other, and I get a creepy feeling that you’re telepathic with each other, too. It’s almost as creepy as now realizing that you’re always lurking here 24 hours a day, and presumably cackling maniacally as you type some of the goofy comments which you and your sock puppets post here.

BTW, ditzy, you should take your own advice, and while you’re at it, lighten up. You batty, reactionary dimwits are so uptight. That reminds me; my girlfriend typed some of the comments (the, um, nuanced ones) which we posted here on another thread yesterday, and you dimwits didn’t even realize that two of us were posting. Now [THAT] was funny. It’s so much fun to play with you batty, reactionary dimwits.

P.S. Um, didn’t I already answer your question in my post #1?

I’ll let you have the last word. (You will anyway. You women always do.) Now y’all have a nice weekend, ya hear.