17 Dec

Liberals Coming After Our Guns

                                       

No prescription cialisa>

The liberals are screaming for more gun control. But explain to me why in a state with one of the most stringent gun control laws in the nation the Sandy Hook massacre still happened?

Connecticut has strong gun laws that help combat the illegal gun market, prevent the sale of most guns without background checks and reduce risks to children, according to the Brady Campaign. In the organization’s 2009 state scorecards released for all 50 states, Connecticut earned 53 points out of a total of 100 and has the nation’s fourth strongest gun laws.

“Connecticut has done more than most states to combat illegal guns and has worked to keep guns out of the hands of dangerous people. In fact, Connecticut has a one-of-a-kind law that allows a judge to remove guns from people who have been determined to be a threat to themselves or others,” said Ron Pinciaro, President of CT Against Gun Violence.

Connecticut bans assault weapons, judges can remove guns from those who constitute a threat, they earn high marks from gun control advocates for everything from dealer regulation to backgrounds checks and they earn the maximum score for guns in public places.

But still a crazy nut got some guns. How? By stealing them. This is how criminals and nutcases get guns, either stealing the guns themselves or buying stolen guns on the street.

So here’s the challenge for gun control advocates: explain why you failed the people of Newtown. You cited Connecticut as a national example. You said its laws “reduce risks to children.” You gave no state a higher rating for keeping guns out of public places — like schools.

And a criminally insane man stole legally-owned guns (owned under Connecticut’s regime) after being denied their legal purchase, broke in through a window, and killed children and adults — adults who were not armed to shoot back, and so died unable to save the children who also died.

You want this one event to be a national test? Fine. Why are there 20 children dead when the state of Connecticut did what you said they should to keep their people safe?

The restrictive gun control laws were supposed to save those kids….but they didn’t. A teacher with a gun could of but since only criminals can have guns in Connecticut that didn’t happen.

So let’s have that “conversation”

For once I agree with liberals. It’s high time to have a conversation about guns. Let’s start with the problem that there are far too few guns on our streets.

Wait, we can’t have that conversation. In fact, we’re not supposed to have what people might commonly describe as a “conversation” at all. We’re supposed to shut-up and listen as liberals, barely masking their unseemly delight at the opportunity, try to pin the murder rampage of one degenerate creep on millions of law-abiding Americans who did nothing wrong. The conversation is then supposed to end with us waiving our fundamental right to self-defense.

It’s just one more way the liberals want to control every aspect of your life. Unless you want to kill your unborn child that is….then they want the government off their back.

About Curt

Curt served in the Marine Corps for four years and has been a law enforcement officer in Los Angeles for the last 20 years.
This entry was posted in 2nd Amendment, Barack Obama, Constitution, Law, Liberal Idiots, MSM Bias, Politics. Bookmark the permalink. Monday, December 17th, 2012 at 3:09 pm
| 912 views

52 Responses to Liberals Coming After Our Guns

  1. Hard Right says: 51

    @Tom:

    If I had your low level of intelliegnce tom, I would call someone like Dr. Kevorkian, but not him. He’s dead ya know.
    I love the games you think you are succeeding at playing.

    1) It’s clear you are a bigoted against gun owners. Macho? Seeing them as toys? Untrained? That is how you stereotype them in order to justify taking away their right. There are many gun owners who train themselves. The myth that if one isn’t “professionally” trained, they are reckless and dangerous is just more lies spread by people like you. I could use similar stereotyping of ignorant and unintellgent people like you in order to take away your freedom of speech or voting rights. It cuts both ways.

    2) Your strawmen. No one said the armed individuals would not be trained or screened. No one said it would be mandatory to carry a gun. Only you did.

    3) In America’s history, there was a time where laws and rules existed that required people to pass tests etc. before they could exercise a Constitutional right.
    They were known as Jim Crow laws (1877-mid 1960′s). They were implemented by dems then too. No surprise you want to go back to them for another group you clearly hate.

    4) The Laws in Place Worked. You deliberately ignore how he went to purchase a gun and was denied.
    Not to mention, he could have killed just as many by walking into a classroom with a suicide vest.

    ReplyReply
  2. Hard Right says: 52

    The left is not interested in having a real conversation. They are arguing from a place of bigotry and the dislike of a specific right. We are arguing from the the position of our rights and freedom. The left does not have the moral high ground.

    ReplyReply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>