30 Jun

Obama’s Leadership: Whine to MSNBC, Talk to Muslim Brotherhood

                                       

The thin skinned Candidate Obama…er, I mean President Obama…is back.

As if he ever left:

YouTube Preview Image

And the sniveling didn’t end there for our “leader”

Drudge also notes the difference between his refusal to meet with the Republicans to his acceptance of this:

This is what leadership looks like in the Obama age I suppose. He is like a little kid who sulks and gives people the silent treatment if not given his way.

This Presidency is the epitome of how NOT to lead a nation.

The Brotherhood is the world’s most important Islamist organization. It is openly, unabashedly committed to the destruction of the United States and the West. In typical Obama fashion, this disastrous decision to engage America’s avowed enemies has been couched as the mere continuation of prior policy: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is reported to have confirmed that the U.S. would “resume” contacts which had “occurred in recent years.” But make no mistake about it, this is a new policy.

The contacts that have occurred in recent years have been outside of U.S. policy — at the urging of leftists in the State Department, the intelligence community, the commentariat, and, in particular, the Obama White House. They have long campaigned for a policy of “engagement” with the Muslim Brotherhood (including Hamas, the terrorist organization that is the Brotherhood’s Palestinian branch). They’ve needed to do this campaigning because it was American policy not to deal with the Brotherhood — dealing with the Brothers empowers them, bolstering their status as leaders of mainstream Islam and legitimizing their agenda, which calls for Islamicizing societies, ultimately establishing a global caliphate, destroying Israel, and incrementally expanding sharia throughout the West.

…Only a few months before Clapper’s testimony, the Brotherhood’s Supreme Guide, Muhammad Badi, called for “jihad and sacrifice” in confronting the United States and Israel. He proclaimed that America is “experiencing the beginning of its end and is heading toward its demise.” The enthusiastic endorsement of violence, particularly against Israel, would be surprising only to those who drink the Obama Kool-Aid that claims the Brotherhood has renounced violence.

As I have repeatedly pointed out — and as Barry Rubin argues in this excellent analysis of the new Obama policy — the Brotherhood has always favored violence where it would advance the Islamist cause; it tactically renounced violence against the Egyptian regime because it would have prompted ruinous retaliation from Mubarak and because the Brotherhood was making progress through the political process and influence over Egyptian institutions.

Quite apart from its long history of violence, the Brotherhood has long endorsed terrorism (which it calls “resistance”) against Israel and against Western forces operating in Islamic countries.

Halperin said it best….this man is a dick.

About Curt

Curt served in the Marine Corps for four years and has been a law enforcement officer in Los Angeles for the last 20 years.
This entry was posted in Barack Obama, Fanatical Islam, Media, Middle East, Politics, War On Terror. Bookmark the permalink. Thursday, June 30th, 2011 at 4:44 pm
| 581 views

13 Responses to Obama’s Leadership: Whine to MSNBC, Talk to Muslim Brotherhood

  1. FAITH7 says: 1

    The article says:
    “The contacts that have occurred in recent years have been outside of U.S. policy — at the urging of leftists in the State Department, the intelligence community, the commentariat, and, in particular, the Obama White House. ”

    What I am not understanding is if the lefty’s/progressives want to ‘embrace’ the muslim brotherhood, don’t they realize this is like trying to embrace a grizzly bear, boa constrictor or rattle snake (take your pick)… do they really believe they will become ” immune to the hatred” and possible death by the hands of these terrorist groups by virtue of attempting to ‘befriend’ or try to ‘understand’ them or their hatred? What purpose does this serve?

    Since the MB makes no bones or excuses for their wanting the destruction of the West/America …Why would the left/WH (be so naive /stupid/ ignorant/ arrogant) as to put themselves, their families/friends and the rest of America at such risk???

    There is going to come a day when we are going to stand up and say Screw Political Correctness … and start calling things as we see them… People are just going to have to grow a few more layers of skin… because things are just becoming more wrong on many levels in this country and people need to be made aware of it… even if it “hurts their feelings” …. get over it!

    ReplyReply
  2. anticsrocks says: 2

    Oh wow, that was TOO funny that a talking head on MSLSD said Obama was “being kind of a dick.”

    Does this mean that the end times are upon us when Obama’s favorite “news” outlet is turning on him?

    ReplyReply
  3. Smorgasbord says: 3

    Has anyone kept track where Obama is during the five or so times a day Muslims are supposed to pray?

    ReplyReply
  4. Liberal1 (objectivity) says: 4

    Here we go again–Islam-o-fascism. The Muslim Brotherhood is a broad political party whose extreme conservative wing would be similar to Fundamentalist Christians in this country–with their desires to have government act in continuity with their religious principles. Anybody who blindly accepts the rhetoric to the contrary, needs to do some serious research. By research I mean searching out information on both sides of the issue–instead of being influenced by only those positions with which they agree.

    ReplyReply
  5. johngalt says: 5

    @Liberal1 (objectivity):

    By research I mean searching out information on both sides of the issue–instead of being influenced by only those positions with which they agree.

    Sounds like someone needs to start taking their own advice.

    ReplyReply
  6. Nan G says: 6

    1/8th of the mandatory zagat (money from every Muslim) must go to fight jihad in the war Allah has called against all the rest of the world, until Islam is over everyone.
    The other 7/8ths goes to Mosques, various religious leaders, religious schools and other seemingly secular needs.
    It is to garner more of that 7/8ths of this honeypot that almost every terrorist (jihad) group also forms a non-fighting wing.
    Thus Fatah is made up for non-fighting, but they have a military wing called the Al Aqsa Martyr’s Brigade.

    If you read about the HolyLand Foundation case where CAIR was an unindicted co-conspirator, you see that this was the issue.
    All zagat is fungible when given.
    So CAIR’s money to a ”peaceful brother” of a terror organization equaled giving money to the terror organization as well.
    Of course, recently, Obama let CAIR off.

    ReplyReply
  7. Smorgasbord says: 7

    @Liberal1 (objectivity): #4
    Since I am not a church goer I agree with almost everything you say about religion.  The Constitution says that the government can’t establish a religion. To me that means that it can’t sanction ANY religion either.  Right now, the Christian religion is the dominant religion of the USA and the members want the USA to go by their rules.  Using the Christian logic of dominance, this means that if Muslim or any other religion should become the dominant religion in the USA, the the Federal government has to go along with their rules.

    Since marriage isn’t mentioned in the Constitution, this means there are no Federal laws regulating it except those written later. When I lived in Massachusetts there was a question about gay marriage.  Some said the state constitution allowed it because marriage wasn’t mentioned in it.  Anything that isn’t declared illegal is legal.

    I personally would like to see all tax exempt status eliminated for ALL religions.  Some are created just to make money or other reasons, not to spread The Word.  The good religions would survive.  The ones who can’t get enough money to keep going will fail. There should at least be requirements that the religions that teach any kind of hatred against others should not qualify.

    I will throw out one more of my beliefs for free.  For those who say being gay is a choice, you have to admit that being straight is also a choice.  It can’t be one way for one type of life style and a different way for another life style.  Either you CHOOSE to be gay or straight, or you are naturally gay or straight.  There is nothing in the Constitution about being gay, so there is no law against it except in religions.  I do believe the Joint-Chiefs-of-Staff should decide about military service for gays.

    ReplyReply
  8. in THE TIMES INDIA, I READ JUST A FEW MINUTE AGO, HILLARY SAYING:
    US WILL RESUME CONTACT WITH EGYPT MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD ,
    SHE ADDED: THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION’S DECISION
    AS A CONTINUATION OF AN EARLYER POLICY,
    it reflex a shift that US official nowwill be able to deal directly
    with the BROTHERHOOD, who are not member of PARLEMENT,
    I wonder what it mean on the last line,
    are the OBAMA ADMINISTRATION NOT ABLE TO DEAL WITH AMERICANS
    who are not member of PARLEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA? !!!!!

    ReplyReply
  9. anticsrocks says: 9

    @Liberal1 (objectivity): You incorrectly stated:

    The Muslim Brotherhood is a broad political party whose extreme conservative wing would be similar to Fundamentalist Christians in this country–with their desires to have government act in continuity with their religious principles.

    Really?

    So Fundamentalist Christians in America are willing to die for their religious beliefs?

    Really?

    PLEASE show the proof of that. Cite a source, provide a link.

    Because THIS is what the MB is:

    Their motto states, “Allah is our objective. The Prophet is our leader. Qur’an is our law. Jihad is our way. Dying in the way of Allah is our highest hope.

    The Brotherhood’s founder, al-Banna, was a devout admirer of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi regime.

    In an effort to possibly hide their militant Islamit rules from the eyes of Western observers, the Brotherhood removed the organizational by-laws from their main English language website in mid-February 2011. The bylaws, which are still available to Arabic readers, have long been a source of discussion and debate because of the group’s stated goal of establishing an Islamic state while uniting Muslims around the world. For example, section E of the bylaws states, “Need to work on establishing the Islamic State, which seeks to effectively implement the provisions of Islam and its teachings.” Likewise, Section G reads as follows: “The sincere support for a global cooperation in accordance with the provisions of the Islamic Sharia … and constructive participation towards building a new basis of human civilization as is ensured by the overall teachings of Islam.” – Source

    One of the few Western officials to have studied the document before the publication of Besson’s book is Juan Zarate, named White House counterterrorism czar in May 2005 and before that assistant secretary of the treasury for terrorist financing. Zarate calls “The Project” the Muslim Brotherhood’s master plan for “spreading their political ideology,” which in practice involves systematic support for radical Islam. Zarate told Besson, “The Muslim Brotherhood is a group that worries us not because it deals with philosophical or ideological ideas but because it defends the use of violence against civilians.

    “The Project” is a roadmap for achieving the installation of Islamic regimes in the West via propaganda, preaching, and, if necessary, war. It’s the same idea expressed by Sheikh Qaradawi in 1995 when he said, “We will conquer Europe, we will conquer America, not by the sword but by our Dawa [proselytizing].”

    Thus, “The Project” calls for “putting in place a watchdog system for monitoring the [Western] media to warn all Muslims of the dangers and international plots fomented against them.” Another long-term effort is to “put in place [among Muslims in the West] a parallel society where the group is above the individual, godly authority above human liberty, and the holy scripture above the laws.” – Source

    So go ahead liberal1 (absolutely no objectivity), please, PLEASE provide proof that American Fundamentalist Christians are planning the overthrow of the rest of the world, that they prefer to die for God because that is “their way.”

    *taps foot impatiently*

    ReplyReply
  10. Hard Right says: 10

    @anticsrocks:
    It’s quite telling that libtard #2 RARELY posts more than once on a thread. It only proves that even he/she knows how wrong it is in addition to being unable to coherently defend it’s views.

    I recall the one time it tried to debate. Gen. Custer himself commented that even he didn’t get his butt kicked as badly.

    ReplyReply
  11. anticsrocks says: 11

    @Hard Right: You said:

    I recall the one time it tried to debate. Gen. Custer himself commented that even he didn’t get his butt kicked as badly.

    LOL, reminds me of the time that GaffaUK tried to defend his statement that the world would be better off if there had never been religion…

    ReplyReply
  12. Hard Right says: 12

    @anticsrocks:

    Now that must have been a hoot. I call him Gaffe UK for reasons such as that.
    I would say Liberal #2’s goal is to irritate and aggravate. Quite sad that it has such hate towards us. Then again attacking us allows it to avoid taking a hard look inward.

    ReplyReply
  13. anticsrocks says: 13

    @Hard Right: True about liberal2. And yeah, Gaffer tried, but I pinned him to the wall and his frustration bled through.

    ReplyReply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>