The Supreme Court on Thursday, may have just written the epitaph for the Illegal Alien in the United States. Not so surprisingly, the justices voted straight down party lines for a 5 – 3 decision; with Justice Kagan recusing herself, because of her prior role as a solicitor general for the Obama Administration.
In effect, the Supreme Court ruled, Arizona is within its rights to require employers to check the citizenship status of workers through a government data base. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce sued Arizona over the law, maintaining that immigration enforcement is a purview of the federal government.
In 1986, a sweeping immigration law reform, removed the rights of states to enforce immigration law; except for one clause, that allows states to enforce immigration law in accordance with: “all licenses necessary to operate the business.”
Chief Justice Roberts wrote the main opinion for the court, which will leave the door open for states to end the illegal alien invasion:
“We hold that Arizona’s licensing law falls well within the confines of the authority Congress chose to leave to the states and therefore is not expressly preempted.” “no basis in law, fact, or logic” for the argument that Arizona should be stopped from doing so in the name of federal “preemption” of state activity.
Other states are following Arizona's example and considering requiring all employers to enroll in the Homeland Security Department's voluntary E-Verify program, which compares employees' names and Social Security numbers with government data bases. Georgia has just recently enacted this type of law.
A federal version of E-Verify will soon be introduced by House Judiciary Committee Chairman Lamar Smith, R-TX. Congressman Smith weighed in on E-Verify:
“I am pleased the Supreme Court has ruled in favor of the Arizona E-Verify law and their right to revoke business licenses for employers that knowingly hire illegal immigrants. Not only is this law constitutional, it is commonsense.”
The fascinating prospect of this law is that states that don't have E-Verify will soon have their Socialist Dystopias over run by the Illegal Alien hordes. An important win for efforts to stop the illegal alien invasion, because E-Verify actually works: the illegal alien population fell by seven percent from 2008 to 2009, according to Homeland Security, but in Arizona, the number of Illegal Aliens fell by eighteen percent.
The court's decision was a major loss for the Chamber of Commerce and the Obama Administration, they hoped to prevent states from being able to enforce immigration law; although, the decision doesn't necessarily mean that the court will uphold SB1070, Arizona's law that makes it a state crime to be an illegal immigrant within the state. We realize it is a “Catch 22” type of situation, but E-Verify may be enough to start the repatriation of all the illegals. A dozen states have already enacted E-Verify type legislation of varying degrees, but they now have a broader width to set up enforcement. The Court's ruling has set up the guide lines and states will no longer be timid to enact legislation with the fear of Holder Injustice Department taing them to court.
House Judiciary Committee chairman Lamar Smith (R., Texas) is introducing an E-Veify Bill in the near future; hopefully, Boehner will find hid huevos and put it on fast track. The Camber of Congress/Obama partnership was probably planning on offering E-Verify as a barging chip for type of amnesty, but now the bargaining chip is lost to the unions, Obama, and the Chamber of Congress with their comprehensive reform and amnesty plans.
Here are some famous epitaphs of history, perhaps we can come up with some for the Illegal Alien:
The epitaph to the Thee Hundred at Thermopylae:
Go, tell the Lacedaimonians, passer-by
That here obedient to their laws we lieWilliam Browne on the Countess of Pembroke:
Underneath this sable hearse
Lies the subject of all verse,
Sidney's sister, Pebroke's mother
Death! thou has slain another
Fair and learn'd, and good as she,
Time shall throw a dart at thee.Dryden on his wife:
Here lies my wife, here let her lie
Now she's at rest and so am IJohn Wilmont, on King Charles or perhaps King Obama:
Here lies a great and mighty king
Whose promise none relies on;
He never said a foolish thing,
Nor ever did a wise one.
Surprisingly, to only the most gullible, the court ruled along party lines: Breyer, Ginsberg, and Sotomayor the perpetual stooges of the Left, (except for Kagan, who recused herself) ignored federal law empowering states to use inherent licensing to control the employment of illegal workers. Let's hope our states and our congress, especially Boehner, have the huevos to see this through without wetting their trousers over Obama and his hissy fits.
The Supreme Court has provided an opportunity to stop the illegal invasion, it is imperative to seize the initiative and capitalize on this first real chance to end the problem.
Gravestone near Uniontown, Pennsylvania, USA:
Here lies the body of Jonathan Blake,
Stepped on the gas instead of the brake.
Epitaph in cemetery at Girard, Pennsylvania, USA:
In loving memory of Ellen Shannon, aged 25,
Who was accidentally burned March 21, 1870,
By the explosion of a lamp filled with R.E. Danforth's
Non-explosive burning fluid.
A Cemetery in Ruidoso, Lincoln County, New Mexico, USA, has this:
Here lies
Johnny Yeast
Pardon me
For not rising.
In a Cemetery in Thurmont, Frederick County, Maryland, USA:
Here lies an Atheist
All dressed up
And no place to go.
Found in a cemetery in Albany, New York, USA:
Harry Smith
Born 1903 – Died 1942.
Looked up the elevator shaft to see if the car was on the way down. It was.
Found in La Pointe, Wisconsin, USA:
To the Memory of Abraham Beaulieu
Born 15 September 1822
Accidentally shot 4th April 1844
As a mark of affection from his brother.
Margaret Daniels grave at Hollywood cemetery, Richmond, Virginia, USA:
She always said her feet were killing her but nobody believed her.
Found in Elmwood cemetery, Burlington, Vermont, USA:
She lived with her husband fifty years
And died in the confident hope of a better life
Rest in Peace?
Iris Benbow, recently widowed, requested the epitaph 'Rest in Peace' on her husband's gravestone.
When Iris later found that he had left all his money to his mistress, she attempted to get the mason to change the carving. This proved impossible as the words had been chiselled by a stonemason and could not be changed.
'In that case,' Iris demanded, 'please add “Until We Meet Again.” '
A professional horseman for over 50 years, Skook continues to work with horses. Skook has finished an historical novel, Fifty Thousand Years, that traces a mitochondrial line of DNA from 50,000 years ago to the present. The story follows a line of courageous women, from the Ice Ages to the present, as they meet the challenges of survival with grit and creativity. These are not women who whimper of being victims, they meet the challenges of survival as women who use their abilities without excuses or remorse, these women are winners, they are our ancestors.
Fifty Thousand Years is available in paperback and e-book, it is getting great reviews. You can purchase a copy here; Visit me on Facebook.
Twitter: https://twitter.com/Dylantheauthor
When I saw the two parties:
Arizona VS the US Chamber of Commerce
I wondered which side Obama would root for.
LOL!
He despises them both!
But my favorite old epitaph was on a grave from about 150 years ago.
It simply read, “I told you I was sick!”
As I have mentioned before, Obama’s and the other liberal’s philosophy is, “We don’t have to fool all of the people all of the time; we only have to fool enough of them to get elected.
I learned two important things from this article:
(1) The Supreme Court cares more about America than the liberals do. Either that or the majority just go by the US Constitution and not their own feelings.
(2) We need to get and keep a constitutionist in the Whitehouse or the court will be liberal and our country will be in bigger trouble than they are now.
I believe I mentioned on another thread that some of my family is buried at Forest Lawn in Glendale. Not far from where they are, there’s a crypt with the inscription, “I had a pretty good time”. That one made me smile.
Gummo Marx is buried at Forest Lawn, Glendale, too. Curiously, he’s not down in the cordoned-off basement of the Great Mausoleum with all the other famous people – he’s in a crypt mixed in with the “regular people”. I wonder if there’s a story there.
Last time I was out there, I also saw Louis L’Amour’s final resting place. He’s buried outside near the entrance to the Great Mausoleum on the edge of a West-facing hill, naturally.
Skookum, the ruling has other implications. Like 10th Amendment inplications. The opinion basically said that states, and not the federal government, were in charge of the licensing policies of businesses in that respective state. That includes supporting federal law that says it is illegal to hire illegal immigrants.
What the Congress of Arizona did when they wrote the law was basically used federal law against the feds. When the federal law says it is illegal to hire illegals, the Chamber of Commerce could not very well argue that the states have no right to enforce federal law by legal means approved by the feds. Being able to refuse to renew the license of a company basically has the effect of putting that company out of business.
But it also opens the door to other state laws against illegal immigration. If a state is allowed to enforce federal law by the means available to them (such as licensing) it stands to reason they then become required to enforce other federal laws. A state or local law enforcement agency cannot refuse to investigate a bank robbery or a kidnapping, both federal laws, just because they don’t want to. The Chief of Police in Chicago cannot refuse to accomodate the feds, and work in conjunction with the feds, in a bank heist, just because they don’t want to.
Cooperation between local law enforcement, and the feds, is standard practice. There are many joint task forces, such as those between state/local police and the DEA, the FBI and the CIA. The use of local LE is practical since they are more familiar with the area and the population at large. The fact that local LE refuse to enforce immigration laws, even after being trained by the feds, should be a reason to sue those cities that are simply santuary hold-outs.
This ruling gives me hope that SB 1070 will be upheld.
I like Chief Justice Roberts, but this doesn’t seem right to me:
Congress doesn’t choose what powers to “leave to the states”, the Tenth Amendment does.
I don’t read anything in Article I, Section 8 which could remotely be construed to grant Congress the power to regulate commerce within a state.
The head of the DNC. Is this the dumbest person ever?
http://michellemalkin.com/2011/05/29/dnc-chair-2/
Uh, it IS a crime to be in this country illegally, genius. The conservative position(not the Republican), is that they want to enforce the laws on the books, not necessarily make new ones.
Rush Limbaugh has dubbed her “Debbie Blabbermouth-Shultz” LOL!
Also, in a fascinating example of LSM bias that I never noticed, they only show the woman from the waist up. Do a Google image search and see for yourself. There’s a reason for that: She has the ass of a water buffalo. See:
I’ve Never Seen Debbie Wasserman Schultz From the Waist Down Before
Somehow, I should be able to tie this in with the 1984 thread…
MORE AND MORE REASON TO GET THE CONSERVATIVES IN THERE,
WITH THEM HAVING THE POWER TO MAKE THE RIGHT MOVES THAT americans want and deserve.
Some thoughts:
FedEx can track up to 26 million parcels daily. Each illegal in the entitlement system gets a parcel for tracking purposes.lol
Fetuses are aborted. The act of drug mules smuggling valuables is considered private and very personal.
Two semis were stopped at the border with over 500 illegals detained. The Democratic ” Get out the vote” scheme is in full swing.
There could be 12 swing seats for the Republicans in the Senate( Real Clear Politics). Conservatives should get all primaried up and go Rino hunting. Bachmann, Palin, Liz Cheney, Noem, and Blackburn should try for the Senate. They would all get the swimsuit vote.
Destroy the Electoral College and you destroy your republic.
I saw this one in a rundown 19th century cemetery by the Rock river in Northern Illinois:
“Remember me as you walk by
for as you are now so once was I
as I am now so you must be
so prepare for death and follow me”
So I can’t get a job unless I pee in a bottle and my name is favorably entered in a Federal data base. Swell. Just swell.
I can’t tell who I have more to fear from. The right or the left.
This all sounds good until you think about the state licensing business. Restraint of trade and regulatory capture.
Why not go after the real problem? Welfare?
@M. Simon: #11
So, you are looking for a job that lets you do drugs and they don’t care who you are or what you have done. Are you afraid of loosing your job or not getting one if it becomes law?
Obama’s likely answer to this will be a total, blind, blanket granting of amnesty.
On a tomb stone on boot hill; Here lies Less More. Killed by four shots from a fourty four. no less, no more.
@John Cooper: OMG!
Great catch!
I read what I wanted to read, apparently.
I thought Chief Justice Roberts wrote:
“We hold that Arizona’s licensing law falls well within the confines of the authority [the Constitution] chose to leave to the states and therefore is not expressly preempted.”
I totally missed that.
A few years ago I got ”chess blindness.”
You know, you miss obvious ploys.
Oy!
Getting old!
Smorgasbord says,
Ever hear of avoidant paruresis? I have it. Since age 2 or earlier. I can’t pee in a bottle on command. And of course since there is no test for it then it is not a reason. So I can’t get a job in my field. Not to worry. I’m sucking off the government tit until it gets fixed. Thank you for your support.
@M. Simon: #17
If you are going to make up something I have said, at least pick I subject I know something about. I’m not even going to look it up.
Smog,
I believe you praised peeing in a bottle to protect you from deranged dopers who are otherwise indistinguishable by their behavior from ordinary folk. To wit:
So, you are looking for a job that lets you do drugs and they don’t care who you are or what you have done. Are you afraid of loosing your job or not getting one if it becomes law?
It appears (according to you) that you have an opinion on a subject of which you are ignorant. I LOVE the Internet!
@M. Simon: #19
You said:
“So I can’t get a job unless I pee in a bottle and my name is favorably entered in a Federal data base. Swell. Just swell.”
This tells me you are afraid of both. I am a retired truck driver and was required to have a physical every two years. This included a MANDATORY drug test along with the random drug tests. I wouldn’t want to work in a place that didn’t do drug testing of any kind.
I’m curious what Federal data base you are afraid you are in.
Smorg,
Let me explain it so it is clear: I have a medical condition. I can not pee in a bottle on command. This disqualifies me from a job in my field – engineering.
Let us look at data-bases. Suppose the error rate is .1%. If 500,000 people a month change jobs – that is 500 people a month whose papers are not in order.
A more reasonable number – 1% and you have 5,000 mistakes a month.
The minimum for government is probably 10% – if they screw up they will not lose “customers” or their job. That is 50,000 people a month who will have government job trouble. Assuming an “ordinary” economy.
OK. This could all work in an “honest” administration. But suppose we had a bunch of communists running the country and your name accidentally gets deleted from the data base and the paper work to get it re-instated keeps getting lost? Well you may have to change careers.
And you like a program that “protects” you from deranged dopers who are otherwise indistinguishable by their behavior from ordinary folk? Otherwise you wouldn’t need a pee test. Care to buy gremlin insurance? Because it is not the dopers who are the problem when it comes to accidents. It is the alkys. To do something about them you would have to test every day.
I’m always amazed at folks who wouldn’t trust the government on anything totally buy into the Drug War propaganda. Demon Rum. Demon Drugs. Sold to you by the very same people. Progressives. You can look it up.
M. Simon, I read you and SMORGASBOARD, AND I’m trying to pick what your point is,
on you’re 11, you seem to question which you can trust more of the right or left,
for what reason do you question? is seems to be because of the peing in the bottle, for test
about drugs, where does SMORGASBOARD BECOME YOUR POINT TO PICK ON,
THERE IS AN ALTERNATIVE TO YOUR PROBLEM TO BE UNABLE TO PISS IN A BOTTLE,
that is a DOCTOR’S PAPER ATTESTING OF YOUR PROBLEM WHERE HE HAD MADE THE TEST BY EXTRACTING THE URINE WITH A CERTAIN MEDICAL WAY OF DOING. THEN THAT PAPER YOU CARRY ON YOU WITH REFERENCE TO BE CHECK ANY TIME.
THAT WOULD BE YOUR DOOR OPENING TO YOUR FIELD OF WORKING AS YOU MENTIONNED ENGENERING.HOPE YOU GET SATISFACTION ON YOUR QUEST FOR A POSITION YOU PREFER.
@M. Simon: #21
If a person tests positive for drugs, a second, more acruate test is AUTOMATICLY done. It involves drawing blood and testing it. I you were picked for a dug test, they would draw your blood.
There are usually exceptions that apply in most cases that you have mentioned. You seem to be like someone I knew who always looked at the negative side of things and always came up with things that could happen or go wrong. I have tried to be positive about the future and whatever I do. If a person expects things in there live to go bad, they probably will.
I do hope things will work out for you and wish you the best.
@John Cooper: based on the picture I’d say Debbie’s issue is short stumpy legs more than a really wide butt, but I suppose tastes vary.
@M Simon: Error rates in government databases vary wildly. It’s true, for example, that the IRS is plagued with literally hundreds of thousands of cases a year of identity theft – which in this case just means someone using someone else’s social security number to file a return. However, there are also example of government databases that are quite well maintained, such as the list of people currently licensed to drive (at least in my state, Pennsylvania; if you want to tell me it’s different in Louisiana, well, that may be). I also believe that the instant background check for gun purchases works quite well, in that I have not heard of any complaints from people who were falsely disqualified. The thing with such a database is that, first of all, it can be designed such that its errors are mostly false positives (suppose that 5% of illegals end up erroneously checking out as OK to work… this would not defeat the purpose of the system). Second of all, it can be designed with an appeals process (this is one of the things that I think is incredibly boneheaded about the no-fly list… no built-in appeals process, they had to tack one on).
Your medical problem sounds annoying, but I am surprised that there are really *no* jobs you could get without a drug test. I suppose if your specialty is one that is used mainly by federal contractors (something like aerospace engineering) then it makes sense.
Here are some points that must be considered, with the scourge of illegal immigration? We should amend the 1986 Immigration Control and Reform Bill, signed by the late President Reagan. So there is an expeditious visa authority to allow the highest concentrations of highly skilled workers. So Instead of our brain drain through American companies going overseas, we bring in these job seekers. Our biggest problem of this century is not stopping illegal immigration, as although we need top notch professional workers, we must do everything in our power to stop the stream of endless poverty. Not mediocre job seekers, from India and other low income countries from abroad, but the people who have amassed verifiable science degrees in engineering or computer technology. People who will not become a weighted down welfare recipient, or need public assistance to survive.
The farm worker dilemma after the 1986 Simpson-Mazzoli bill was rampant with fraud, which eventually cost US taxpayers 73 billion dollars amid an extra 4 million people subsisting on welfare entitlements. After these people staked their amnesty claim, they disappeared and turned up in the main job market. The main loser was the farmers and agriculture. I don’t think the politicians in Washington have any idea, if another amnesty was made the law of the land? The 11 million we supposedly have in the illegal alien population, within months would materialize into 20 million plus? Can you imagine the mounting financial burden of legalizing these numbers? If it was 73 billion dollars, just after 1986, can anybody estimate the cost today?
The Heritage Foundation, a non- profit, that it would cost tax payers through future years at least $ 2.6 TRILLION DOLLARS.
In a nation going broke and proportionately owned by Communist China, wealthy Arabs and other rich investors? While our manufacturing industry closes down for good, locations like China are stealing our dollars through marketing cheap goods. American corporations in Mexico and other foreign countries, are using the CAFTA and NAFTA treaties, are also stealing our children’s futures. I cannot understand the mentality of these treaty negotiators; a blind monkey could do better? We owe more money to the rest of the world, than ever before; we are the debtor instead of the lender. It’s difficult even to understand the magnitude of $14.5 Trillion dollars and yet this country is still importing poverty, because our borders remain porous?
We need strong, unbending attitudes of people as Rep. Lou Bartlett whose previous legislation would have finally put an end to any facet of Amnesty, masquerading as Immigration Reform and current laws as E-Verify. This was the real substance of upheaval that opened the dam, on the rising consequences of illegal immigration and the expenditures of small towns like Hazleton, Pennsylvania. It was renounced by the administration who filed a lawsuit. However the Supreme Court has deliberated, informing the 3rd Circuit Court in PA of appeals to reconsider the case. As for the Supreme court rejecting a law that will stop illegal alien students from getting in-state tuition. I think a massive battle is building in America that is about to explode, with likely civil unrest .
Today, the people who are coming here illegally are economic aliens; with past and today’s governments ignoring the damaging outcome. Not only are these new sweeping economical aliens here, with their hands out, but they are stealing money through giant loopholes in the tax refund system. As an addition more than $40 billion dollars is transferred to foreign banks every year. It scares me where either the Liberal-Democrats or the Republicans are taking us? I cannot even afford to send my autistic son to college, but the children of illegal aliens are getting in State tuition, in many academic institutions. My now deceased Independent grandmother couldn’t even have her dentures repaired some years back in California, but the children of illegal aliens get free education, free health care, free breakfast and lunch at; all the family has more monetary privileges than citizens, especially if you conceive a child will squatting here.
Of those illegal immigrants who pay taxes using the ITIN, to feel more secure, collects most of it back in refunds. This country is deterioration fast, because of spending on people who have no right to even be here. For me and millions of patriotic Americans, no matter your race or religion the TEA PARTY is our only hope? Illegal immigration has become a major impediment in our social entitlement system, so we must fight this tumor that is eating away at common sense. It’s my hope that Michelle Bachmann steps into ring, realizing she is going to be attacked on all fronts by our shadow government, the George Soros’s and the fanatics who wants world government and open borders.
IS THE AMERICAN TAXPAYER EXPECTED TO PAY FOR EVERY “ECONOMIC” ILLEGAL ALIEN, FOR THE REST OF THEIR LIVES?
Attn: The Arizona Senate has defied the majority of the American people, THE TEA PARTY and stripped the 14th Amendment, instant citizenship law from moving towards the Supreme Court. By deliberately not addressing this gaping loophole, Congress in effect rewards law-breakers and punishes those who have chosen to follow the rules and immigrate legally. We expect it from the leftist and the democrats, but all will be intensely remembered in 2012, or whenever they come up for re-election. This is a hundred billion dollar Ponzi scheme, even bigger than Bernard Madoff could ever imagine.
IS THERE NOT A REAL AMERICAN STATE LEADER THAT WILL EMBRACE THIS PART OF THE 14TH AMENDMENT, AND FAST TRACK IT TO THE SUPREME COURT? WHERE ARE THE REAL POLITICIANS AND NOT THE CLOWNS?
Estimates are around 300.000 babies annually are intentionally born to illegal aliens, so they hope not to get deported. Taxpayers need to yell at their incompetence and frightening aspect of reneging on the instant citizenship going to the justices.
WHY SHOULD AMERICAN CITIZENS AND LEGAL RESIDENTS BE FORCED TO PAY FOR BABIES OF ILLEGAL PARENTS? OUR US CONSTITUTION IS BEING TRAMPLED INTO THE DIRT, BY BOTH POLITICAL PARTIES.
This is the exact tumult that began 1776 War of Independence? “TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION?” THIS IS YOUR MONEY THEY ARE SPENDING.
Brittanicus, so well put in words that so many should take the advice to expose those very unfair GOVERNMENT BLIND MUTE AND DEAF ATTITUDE, THE SHOUT SHOULD NOT HAVE TO BEGIN FROM THE PEOPLE BUT FROM ALL THOSES WHICH GET PAID BY THE PEOPLE TO LOOK AFTER
THE PEOPLE’S INTEREST NOT OTHER COUNTRYS INTEREST WHERE THEY SPENT THE PEOPLE’S MONEY. THEY SHOULD BE YELLING AT EACH OTHER TO REMOVE THE WRONG BEHAVIOR OF LEADERSHIP WHICH IS RUINING AMERICA MORE THAN ONE CHUNK AT THE TIME NOW, THAT WE SEE WHAT WE FELT BEFORE, THAT IS ,THE ACCELERATION TO HAVE THE PEOPLE’S MONEY MOVE IN OTHER COUNTRYS WHO HAVE REJOICE ON THE 9/11 MASSACRE BY THEIR SYMPATISER TERRORISTS
WHICH THEY PROTECT FROM OUR INTELIGENCE AGENCY TO CAPTURE THEM, THEY PROTECT
THE GROUP OF THEIR FIGHTER WHO ARE GIVING THE WAR ON THE MILITARY OF THIS NATION,
THEY ARE WELL RECEIVED IN THIS WHITE HOUSE AND SWING DEALS OF BILLIONS OF DOLLARDS THAT SHOULD NEVER LEAVE AMERICA BECAUSE IT COME OUT OF THE CITIZENS POCKETS EARNED WITH THE SWEATH OF THEIR BODY OR THE BLOOD OF THEIR OWN BRAVEST.
THEY SHOULD KNOW THAT, ALWAYS THE FIRST HOWLING OF THE WOLF PACK IS DONE BY THEIR LEADER
Brittannicus,
again ,I come to mention what came to mind ,from your comment, allowe me
to say that there is many skilled people already here from roots who posess the knowledge to fill thoses jobs rendered hard to get because of hard times given to COMPANYS ESTABLISH FROM GENERATION,
WHO ARE NOT SUPPOSE TO VEGETATE FOR ANY REASON BUT ARE SUPPOSE TO BE ALLOWED TO BE SUCCESFULL AS THEY WHERE BEFORE some try to bleed them of their wealth acquired with
employees living and helping their COMPANY ‘S SUCCESS, AGAIN THEY SHOULD HAVE THE PRIORITY OF THE JOB MARKET OVER THE IMMIGRANTS WHO SEEK TO IMMIGRATE, BUT THE SAME SKILL ON FAVORING IMMIGRANTS SHOULD NEVER UNDERMINE THE ROOTED AMERICAN OF SAME SKILLS,
THAT IS UNFAIR AND SO VERY IMPORTANT TO THINK AMERICA FOR AMERICAN FIRST SPECIALY
IN ECONOMIC DOWN TURN AS NOW, UNTIL IT PICK UP THE DEMAND THAT IS NOT THERE TO FILL BUT THEN AGAIN THOSE IN UNIVERSITYS ARE SOON TO BE ABLE TO CONTINIUE THE EXCELENCE OF WHAT IT IS TO BE GOOD IF MADE IN AMERICA THE BEST PRODUCTS YOU CAN FIND, THE BEST BRAINS YOU CAN EMPLOYED