You Are Watching the Last Days of the Fake News Media

Spread the love

Loading

I can’t think of a single major mainstream media outlet that has admitted to its audience that it has examined how it ended up presenting the Trump–Russia collusion hoax as real news for more than two years, figured out what went wrong, and made the necessary corrections to ensure that it doesn’t happen again.

Isn’t that a telling sign? They can’t bring themselves to admit it was all a hoax, because that would mean exposing the role they themselves played in creating and sustaining it for more than two years, as they relentlessly gaslighted the entire country.



They should be confessing what they did, admitting it was a huge mistake, and promising their audience they have made the prerequisite changes to ensure that there’s never a repeat. Instead, I’m watching all of these fake news outlets double down on their false narratives.

They appear to be fully determined to keep up the illusion that the Trump–Russia collusion hoax is still alive, and that President Donald Trump must have obstructed the Mueller investigation in some way to hide that. No retractions, no recriminations, no nothing. And so here we are.

We are living in the last days of the fake news media. When Trump declassifies all the FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) documents, and when Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz releases his FISA court abuse report, these fake news outlets literally won’t be able to cope with it. I believe the massive fallout will destroy many of them.

Trump knows what he knows. He’s seen what he’s seen. He knows what’s coming and that the fake news outlets doubling down on this Trump–Russia obstruction fantasy has left them no avenue of retreat.

The editors and political activists—disguised as reporters and editors at these fake news media outlets—went “all in” on this fake narrative several years ago. At the time, it looked like a safe call to make. The consensus was that Trump wasn’t going to last very long in the White House.

Since Trump was supposedly doomed to a short, ignoble presidency marred by countless scandals and corruption, many top activists at these fake news outlets eagerly put themselves at the disposal of the “Get Trump” #Resistance machine inside the federal agencies.

These political partisans were consciously working hand-in-hand with corrupt federal officials in both law enforcement and intelligence agencies to launch fake scandals that would cripple and sabotage the incoming Trump administration, assuring that Trump’s time in power would be very brief.

I’ve talked in the past about the practice of “strategic leaking,” how corrupt federal officials target a person for investigation and make anonymous leaks to media allies to place the target under suspicion.

This is exactly how they went after Trump campaign adviser Carter Page, Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort, Trump national security adviser Gen. Michael Flynn, and others. Leak incomplete, slanted, or fake information to the mainstream media to drum up media cries for the target to be investigated, then move to answer the cries you created with your own leak.

Nowhere has this practice of strategic leaking and wrap-up smear been so clearly exposed as in the Flynn case. Somebody high up leaked the transcript of phone calls Flynn had with then-Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak to The Washington Post’s David Ignatius, which led to media cries for Flynn to be investigated for “collusion” and a possible Logan Act violation.

The leak of the Flynn phone calls appeared in the Post on Jan. 12, 2017. That placed Flynn under suspicion of having tried to do some kind of secret deal with the Russians under the table. It was surmised he somehow must be undermining President Barack Obama’s new sanctions and somebody should look into it quickly.

So after about a week and a half of letting the hue and cry build in the fake news media of “Somebody needs to investigate that Flynn guy! Logan Act violation and stuff!”, the FBI actually dispatches FBI agents Peter Strzok and Joseph Pientka to interview Flynn on Jan. 24, 2017, in the White House.

Any veteran reporter who looked into the facts of the story would have immediately realized that the narrative about Flynn being sold in the fake news media from Jan. 14 to Jan. 24 had holes in it the size of a Mack truck.

Here’s what you’re supposed to believe without question in the fake news media’s narrative about the nefarious Flynn getting caught in a lie about his Kislyak phone calls by the intrepid Strzok:

  1. A military general with more than 30 years of extensive intelligence experience “forgot” that all phone calls with top Russian officials are monitored, transcribed, and placed in intel reports.
  2. Flynn “forgot” that the FBI must have full transcripts of all his calls with Kislyak.
  3. It’s illegal for an incoming national security adviser to make contact with foreign officials to discuss the presidential transition or discuss foreign policy issues.

All three of these key points in the fake news media’s narrative about Flynn are 100 percent false.

  1. As an experienced military intelligence officer—who previously served as the director of the Defense Intelligence Agency—Flynn couldn’t have forgotten that every phone call to Russian officials is monitored by the National Security Agency and others.
  2. There is simply no way Flynn wouldn’t know the FBI had the full transcripts and that Strzok and Pientka had seen them.
  3. Not only is it not illegal for the national security adviser in an incoming presidential transition team to call up foreign officials and discuss key foreign policy issues with them, but it’s his job to do so.

Isn’t it quite telling that the fake news media hasn’t done anything to correct the record? Instead, the media ignores or downplays the holes in their own Flynn narrative.

This is another sign that many in the fake news media knew all along that the Flynn narrative they were helping government officials to push out there was fake. They can’t correct the record at this point, because it would expose the fact that many of the top “journalists” involved were willing participants in this fraud perpetrated against Flynn.

Understand that it’s not just the loss of whatever small amount of credibility they still possess at this point that leads the people running these fake news media outlets to double down right now.

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

8 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I can’t think of a single major mainstream media outlet that has admitted to its audience that it has examined how it ended up presenting the Trump–Russia collusion hoax as real news for more than two years, figured out what went wrong, and made the necessary corrections to ensure that it doesn’t happen again.

Hell, name a single liberal that is DEMANDING to know the answer to those questions? They believed it and, for many, still do and are not bothered in the least that they were lied to on a global scale and made to look like idiots.

The “evidence” was weak from the beginning and it is hard to believe that, as much as they simply WANTED to, anyone REALLY believed it. Maybe they just liked saying “tee-tee”.

This is another sign that many in the fake news media knew all along that the Flynn narrative they were helping government officials to push out there was fake. They can’t correct the record at this point, because it would expose the fact that many of the top “journalists” involved were willing participants in this fraud perpetrated against Flynn.

Why correct the record? The “record” isn’t important; using the enormous and extensive powers the liberal media has to further the liberal agenda is what is important. Besides, who got hurt? A military guy. From the liberal point of view, he had it coming.

This is all true and makes perfect sense, but I simply cannot be confident that it will happen.

@Deplorable Me: We are back to the days of partisan media this is a recycle of history, the 1800s was open and honest about where they stood politically and the bias of a newspaper.

The Fall and Rise of Partisan Journalism

and rise again.

@kitt: But what happened to Claude/Michael/Gary/Carl/Ben/AJ?

@Deplorable Me: Short answer moderation.

Good Bye CNN,MSNBC,CNBC, Good Bye NYT’s Good Bye lie a day news media

@kitt: Moderation? like in they were asked to leave, shown the door, let the door hit them in the ass? I sincerely hope not…really…Michael especially….he was soooooo sure and smug….it must suck to be him…..gary…well, he’s just a dumbass….jus sayin

@olhardhead: just a guess

@olhardhead: Well, they were all WRONG, along with Greg and Rich, but I just can’t stand the “echo chamber” of the sight without the opposing views. Sure, the stupid, ongoing, relentless on and on about copyrighting was annoying and even Greg tried to straighten him out, but “he persisted”. It’s in the liberal DNA; much of what we discuss here cannot be argued by liberals, so they tangent to stupidity.