Over the last few weeks, FiveThirtyEight’s forecasts for who will win the presidential election transitioned from a virtual tie between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, to Clinton now taking an 81.7 percent chance of victory compared to 18.3 percent for Trump. At the end of July, polls were bouncing back and forth between Clinton and Trump, but recent polls show Clinton with leads as high as 14 points.
No policy stances have changed in either the Trump or Clinton campaigns during the past two weeks. Trump has provoked negative publicity with boorish comments, but given his entire presidential campaign so far, this isn’t out of the ordinary. The seemingly impressionable voter base that falls in line behind mainstream reporting is alarming. The media’s impact on elections shouldn’t be underestimated. It does, however, illuminates the importance of objectivity and balance from the mainstream press, which has been particularly lacking this campaign season.
The July Wikileaksrelease of nearly 20,000 Democratic National Committee (DNC)emails validated the concerns of Bernie Sanders supporters that the DNC helped rigthe primary election for Clinton. These emails provided a glimpse into how the DNC and the mainstream media work together in providing public relations support for the Democratic establishment.
Rather than informing voters to enrich democracy, the mainstream media has developed a feedback loop between support for particular candidates and the political agenda they intend to support. The freedom of the press is necessary for a democracy to function. This freedom was subverted by the DNC at the consent of the mainstream media outlets. Instead of remaining autonomous, they allowed themselves to be manipulated by the DNC to back Clinton’scoronation as theDemocratic presidential nominee.
More at the Observer
No surprise here since the news media pretty much are the demac-RATS chief bootlickers and appologists
I’m not sure where The Hill is on the Left-Right spectrum, but a few hours ago they totally photoshopped an Hillary gathering.
According to the door count 171 people came in.
But look at their photo:
https://twitter.com/search?q=the%20hill&src=typd
https://twitter.com/thehill/status/762733561946345472
Their link is to the real speech with tight camera shots so no way to see the whole crowd.
Hubby’s years as a printer led him to see the phoniness of that photo immediately.
I thought it was as weird as the cover of the Beatles Sgt Peppers Lonely Hearts Club Band.
If she is so popular why fake her crowds?
If liberalism is so wonderful, so beneficial, so equitable, why is it necessary to block out all other points of view? Why doesn’t liberalism simply sell itself with it’s own achievements?
Oh… there aren’t any. That’s right….
@Nanny G: Fake everything , polls, crowds, winning the primary, is there really a way to verify general election voter count with the Soros machines?
In about every election the media reptiles always support the demac-RATS the New York Slimes(All the Sludge thats Fit to Print)hasnt supported a GOP canadate since Eiesenhoer