Why The American Imam Who Inspired The London Bridge Attack Can’t Be Stopped

Spread the love

Loading

Megan G. Oprea:

After every Islamist terror attack, investigators search for clues for what inspired the attackers and who helped them. Since the rise of the Islamic State, this has often meant looking for local recruiters or for connections to ISIS members in Syria or Iraq.

But some of the most influential radical clerics who have played a crucial role in recruiting and inspiring terrorists live in Western countries. Take Anjem Choudary, the British Salafist “hate preacher” who was convicted last year for inviting support for ISIS, after two decades of preaching Islamic domination, praising terrorists, and having connections with Islamist networks throughout Europe. There’s also the case of Musa Cerantonio, the Australian convert to Islam and popular radical preacher who on social media urged Muslims to join ISIS.

After the London Bridge attack that killed seven and injured 48 nearly two weeks ago, the clues are pointing in an unusual direction: America.

Khuram Butt, one of the London Bridge attackers, was allegedly an avid follower of a radical Salafist Islamic preacher, Ahmad Musa Jibril, who lives in Dearborn, Michigan. One of Butt’s friends told the BBC in an interview that his friend listened to Jibril’s sermons, which he called “very radical.” He was so concerned that he called the British government’s anti-terror hotline to alert them. The man went on to tell the BBC, “I am surprised this stuff is still on YouTube and is easily accessible.”

Here is the crux of the issue: how is a radical cleric, who was well-known to authorities, able to keep inflammatory Islamist sermons posted online without any pushback from authorities? What can social media companies and websites do to take down this kind of content? And to what extent is it their responsibility to do so?

Ahmad Jibril Is Apparently Very Influential for ISIS

So just how effective is Jibril? He is considered one of the most influential online clerics for followers of ISIS and radical Islam more generally. According to the deputy director of the Program on Extremism at George Washington University, Jibril’s “prominence is second only to (the late Yemeni-American cleric) Anwar Awlaki” among English-speaking ISIS supporters.

Awlaki, a U.S.-born cleric, was a top recruiter for al-Qaeda. He preached from his Virginia mosque to three of the 9/11 attackers, presided over the funeral of Fort Hood shooter Nadal Hasan’s mother, and is thought to have helped plan the attempted Christmas 2009 bombing of a Northwest flight into Detroit.

In 2014, the International Centre for the Study of Radicalization and Political Violence (ICSR) studied the Facebook pages of Syrian foreign fighters, including those fighting with ISIS and the al-Qaeda-linked al Nusra Front, and found that 20.9 percent of those examined had liked Jibril’s page (second place went to Cerantonio). At the time the report was released, Jibril’s fan page had more than 145,000 likes. It currently has 247, 242, despite being inactive since July 2014. As of the ICSR report, 60 percent of foreign fighters with Twitter accounts followed him. The ICSR found Jibril to be the most popular clerical authority for foreign fighters.

Their report on foreign fighter networks describes Jibril’s tactics:

Jibril is not a conventional cleric. It should be pointed out that Jibril does not openly incite his followers to violence nor does he explicitly encourage them to join the Syrian jihad. Instead, he adopts the role of a cheerleader: supporting the principles of armed opposition to Assad, often in highly emotive terms, while employing extremely charged religious or sectarian idioms. The general demeanour of his posturing towards the West is confrontational and distrusting, fuelling the perception of a Western conspiracy against both Islam and Muslims.

Jibril has been tied to two other cases in which men in the Detroit area are accused of ties with ISIS. Both men listened to Jibril’s sermons.

The Conflict Between Terrorism and Free Speech

Jibril, who has his own channel on YouTube, is important in part because he’s able to reach out to and communicate with English-speaking Muslims in the West. But he’s also a crucial tool in reaching out to Western Muslims because he’s spreading his message from the safety of the United States, where his speech is highly protected.

Were Jibril living in Europe, authorities perhaps would have arrested him back in 2014 during the surge in foreign fighters going to fight with ISIS, or would have taken his content down (YouTube has declined to take down the videos in question). America provides a shield for preachers like him because of how seriously our country takes individual freedom of expression.

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
4 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

stopping him would be politically incorrect. he is always the victim that hides behind the First Amendment

Well, there’s hate speech (like citing FBI data as facts proving the need for a secure border or how poverty cultivates crime) but imploring religious fanatics to slaughter those who dare not subscribe to that religion must be tolerated due to… tolerance. We shall also tolerate religious fanatics carrying out the murderous directives.

Careful, though… don’t be hateful.

Somebody just drove a van through a crowd in Finsbury Park area of London after midnight.
As far as “no-go zones” are concerned, Finsbury Park is up there with the Paris banlieues and Molenbeek in Brussels.
Abu Hamza runs a mosque there.

If it was a white person, I hope there will be education and support for him/her so he/she can integrate into the UK’s new society.
If he/she was drunk, I hope the multiculturalists will draw together to create a rehabilitation program for that driver.

(I’m kidding! Throw the book at the driver! Ethnicity is no excuse on any side.)

@Nanny G: Hard to say if it was another sect that decided these Muslims were not Muslim enough or if it was some westerner that has had enough of the terror attacks and decided to retaliate. Doesn’t matter; terror is terror.

However, what it may mark is a tipping point; people are reaching the limits of what they will tolerate. It is always, though, innocents who are at the receiving end of the retaliation or terror attack.

If it is a retaliatory attack, we can thank (in addition to the actual perpetrator) those who make excuses or blame away those responsible for the initial violence. Unless the criminal left here at home get control of the violent thugs they have unleashed, we will see more of the same here.

And, as I said, innocent people are always the victims, not anyone actually guilty of any provocation.