Why GM’s safety calamity, an utter Washington failure, isn’t a hot TV topic

Spread the love

Loading

Howard Kurtz:

The General Motors safety debacle is about everything that’s wrong with Washington.

And yet somehow it hasn’t caught the imagination of television news.

Apparently, at least 13 people dying from a car defect that was covered up by a giant American automaker and has led to a recall of 2.6 million vehicles doesn’t hold a candle compared to, say, a missing Malaysian airliner.

But the federal government is complicit is more ways than one.

GM, you’ll recall, had to be rescued by the taxpayers in 2009, and the federal stake was so large that the company was dubbed Government Motors when it went through bankruptcy. But bankruptcy rules require a disclosure of all liabilities as well as assets. By hiding the defect in its cars, GM may have committed bankruptcy fraud.

Beyond that, the utter failure of the National Highway Transportation Safety Agency to crack down on the defective ignition switch is an embarrassing failure. But regulatory agencies are a journalistic backwater, drawing a fraction of the coverage lavished on the White House, Congress and politics.

Even so, with GM’s CEO and the acting NHTSA chief scheduled to be hauled before a Hill committee today, you’d think there would be a drumbeat on the air. Yet if there have been many great cable segments on the subject, I’ve missed them.

My theory is that in a television culture that thrives on heroes and villains, it’s hard to know who to blame.

You can’t single out President Obama because the government’s failure to act stretches back to the Bush administration, so it doesn’t make for a left/right slugfest.

You can’t fault Mary Barra, the new GM boss, because she didn’t know about the cavalier disregard for safety until she was promoted into the top job.

You most certainly can blame a Beltway culture of coziness between the regulators and the regulated—but that’s an old story and perhaps too abstract.

Let’s drill down here with the help of the New York Times, which has done consistently strong reporting on the subject.

What’s the NHTSA track record?

“Federal regulators decided not to open an inquiry on the ignitions of Chevrolet Cobalts and other cars even after their own investigators reported in 2007 that they knew of four fatal crashes, 29 complaints and 14 other reports that showed the problem disabled air bags, according to a memo released by a House subcommittee on Sunday.

“Then in 2010, the safety agency came to the same decision after receiving more reports that air bags were not deploying.”

Now we get to the mutual back-scratching that corrodes each administration. Many former top NHTSA officials “now represent companies they were once responsible for regulating, part of a well-established migration from regulator to the regulated in Washington…

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

5 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Recall 2009 when there were stories on the news and on the front pages of many papers about Toyota and its Sticking Accelerator Pedal?
There were over 50,000 such stories.
According to Google there are a total of 1,665 stories in the news on GM.
Only 166 of these are in depth.
That’s not a hot topic.
One story helped Obama, thus hot coverage.
The other story hurts Obama, thus the coll coverage.

The newly invented Chrysler minivan and the compact pickups were rolled out without ANY rollover protection, because there was no law requiring it, since they were new kinds of vehicles. People were injured, and some died in rollovers.

The Ford Pinto was know to be likely to catch fire if rear ended. Ford gave the problem to their mathematicians to figure out which would be cheaper. (1) Repair the cars at about $30-40 per car, or let the people get injured or die in fiery accidents, then pay the claims. Ford went with the lower number and chose higher profits over death and injury.

Other auto companies have had similar stories. Would you believer that not one person in any of those companies was charged with a crime? One advantage to having enough money to buy off enough politicians is that you can have them make laws that you want, and the corporations had a law passed that an executive can’t be charged with a crime in such situations; only the company can, and only the company will have to pay if convicted.

Since humans existed, there have always been those who will chose to make a profit, even if it costs SOMEONE ELSE their health or their life. I keep a list of companies and people not to do business with.

The General Motors safety debacle is about everything that’s wrong with Washington.

No, it isn’t. It’s about what’s wrong with American corporate culture, and with the ethics—or lack thereof—of people who are part of it. It all comes down to putting profits ahead of public safety.

@Greg: #3

The General Motors safety debacle is about everything that’s wrong with Washington.

No, it isn’t. It’s about what’s wrong with American corporate culture, and with the ethics—or lack thereof—of people who are part of it. It comes down to putting profits ahead of public safety.

It’s both. washington dc is like a truck in Russia. The driver has to be a trained mechanic to drive one, because they are always breaking down.

You also have businesses like Ford with the Pinto that give the defect problem to their mathematics department and had it figure out which would be the cheapest way to go. Since nobody in the company can be charged with a crime if someone is injured or dies, they don’t worry about that.

I have wondered how they would feel if one of their relatives or close friends were seriously injured or killed in one of the vehicles that had a known defect. Would the extra profits they helped make for the company help them sleep at night?

The law has to be changed so that when a company lets known defective products go out to the customer, and someone dies, the ones who made the decision can be charged with voluntary manslaughter.

The media’s messiah had spoken: al Qaeda is on the run, Osama bin Laden is dead and General Motors is alive.
Too bad when you can be wrong on two out of three and proven so wrong so soon after saying it.