Ace:
When they were slaughtering other children — boys — our press and political establishment (but I repeat myself) seemed rather not to care.
This focus on Boko Haram from both the media and the government is an unqualified good. The press arguably increased the pressure on global governments to do something about this backwards group of terrorists. But Boko Haram is not a new phenomenon. It was not long ago that some – including this author – were asking why this group’s atrocities were not generating any attention in the press.On February 25, between 40 and 59 children were killed by the fundamentalist militant group. Early that morning, Boko Haram terrorists attacked a boarding school and shot many of children, aged 11 to 18, while they slept. Some of the students were gunned down as they attempted to flee. Others had their throats slit. In some buildings, Boko Haram militants locked the doors and set the building alight. The occupants were burned alive.
All of the victims were boys. Reports indicated that the young girls the militants encountered were spared. According to the BBC, the militants told the girls to flee, get married, and shun the western education to which they were privy.
Beyond wire reports and a handful of segments on globally-focused outlets like NPR, this atrocity went unremarked upon in the popular news media.
February 25 was not Boko Haram’s first atrocity. By March, more than 1,000 people had been killed in the country’s northeast since the first of the year. Prior to Boko Haram’s shift in tactics, from wholesale slaughter of young men to the kidnapping of young women, the group traveled from village to village where they killed children and razed buildings with near impunity.
I would imagine the answer is fairly simple: The boys and other victims were not in The Victim Class. They were usually Christian — which is officially an Oppressor Class and not a Victim Class at all. Thus the media and political establishment blesses Boko Haram through silence, as you can’t victimize an Oppressor.
To even discuss such a thing upsets the principle paradigm through which all global events are viewed: Victim Class righteous, besieged, and to be defended at every step; Oppressor Class evil, privileged, and to be attacked at every turn.
What I noticed (I think, correct me if I am wrong) was that the media and the left said NOTHING about even the kidnapping until Obama announced he was going to send some sort of help to find and retrieve the hostages. THEN, the left and the media was all aghast about such a despicable deed.
It appeared they had to wait until Obama showed his hand so as not to embarrass his inaction by denouncing it. So goes the sycophantic left.
Interesting charts and article here:
http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/nigeria-kidnapping/
GDELT’s data shows that the number of kidnappings [in Nigeria] over the past three decades has risen from just two in 1983 to 3,608 in 2013.
The fact is kidnapping so as to get a slave or bride is getting more common as Islam moves south in its takeover of all of Africa.
I think Obama only reacted at all because he didn’t want other elected blacks to ”pull a Biden” on him by their open anger on this issue.
Yesterday the entire female contingent of the Congressional Black Caucus made public their outcry.
Today almost every one of the one minute speeches mentioned this issue.
The only thing missing from all of this is the fact of the Muslim-ness of Boko Haram vs the non-Muslim-ness of the vast majority of their victims.