You would have thought that Chief Justice John Roberts had shouted “fire” in a crowded theater. In upholding Obamacare, he set off a headlong race for the exits by the same lobbying groups — believe it or not — that had cut deals with the administration to create the legislation. Back then, the lobbyists were telling each other: If you’re not at the table, you’re on the menu. Now the bodies are piling up in the doorway as those who pandered to the president trample over each other in their haste to get out of the blazing or crumbling structure that is Obamacare. To paraphrase Oscar Wilde on the death of Little Nell, no one without a heart of stone can witness this deadly scene without wanting to laugh out loud.
As reported on the front page of this weekend’s Wall Street Journal, every one of the health-care industry groups that signed on to Obamacare in 2009 is looking for a way out.
Hospital groups now say they want Congress to peel back $155 billion in payment cuts that they agreed to in 2009. Representatives of Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, Aetna, Inc., and Humana Inc. say they need greater freedom to adjust premiums to reflect risk. Medical-device companies are making a new push to roll back their 2.3% tax. Hotels, retailers, and restaurant chains are clamoring for a two-year delay in enforcement of a requirement that they cover full-time workers or pay a penalty, giving them until 2016 to comply.
Implement-and-improve, the Democrats are now saying in indicating a new willingness to make election-year concessions in revising the hated law. Or as the president put it on Thursday: “The highest court in the land has now spoken. We will continue to implement this law. And we’ll work together to improve on it where we can.”
But the race to the exits by doctors, hospitals, drug makers, insurers and others is evidence that the law is already beyond repair. To put that another way, the series of deals between the government and health-industry groups that gave rise to Obamacare is falling apart.
“The bargain that was struck seems to be out the window,” Bruce Siegal, chief executive of the National Association of Public Hospitals and Health Systems, was quoted as saying.
It is worth recalling how the White House and the Democratic leadership in Congress brought the doctors, the hospitals, and other special interest on board in the first place. In her telling of the story (“Democrats Hoodwink the Health Lobby,” WSJ, July 10, 2009), Kimberly Strassel noted that after retaking the House in 2006, Democratic Party leaders put out the word that drug companies and others that did not hire Democratic lobbyists would not get a hearing in Washington. She wrote in her Potomac Watch column:
The ruling party is now seeing the fruits of its bullying. These days, a meeting of health-care lobbyists is better described as a reunion of Senate Finance Chairman Max Baucus’s former aides. The new cabal of Democratic lobbyists does not exist to protect the industry from Congress. It exists to present Democratic ultimatums to business.
When Senate Republicans last month hosted a meeting to discuss reform ideas, Mr. Baucus’s office called in a block of these Democratic lobbyists to deliver a message. “They said, ‘Republicans are having this meeting and you need to let all your people know if they have someone there, it will be viewed as a hostile act,’ “reported one attendee to the Baucus caucus.
Under such conditions, different industry groups were bullied and cajoled into signing on to a program that clearly threatened their own independence and integrity:
- Under the leadership of Billy Tauzin, the Big Pharma lobby agreed to do a $150 million Obamacare-friendly advertising campaign in return for protection against strict price controls on Medicare prescription drugs and drug re-importation from Canada (one of Obama’s campaign pledges). Tauzin also agreed to chip in $80 billion from the industry to help close a gap in Medicare drug coverage For his success in brokering a deal with the administration, the former congressman turned pharmaceutical industry lobbyist, was paid $11.6 million in 2010.
- The health insurers’ lobbying group under Karen Ignagni cut a deal with the administration in which it gave up A and B in order to get C and D: It agreed A) to bite its tongue in the face of avalanche of new mandates and other problems, and B), to commit publicly to squeezing some $2 trillion in costs out of the system, in order to get C), a law that was supposed to force 30 million uninsured to buy insurance, and D), the all-important promise that administration would not put them all out of business by exercising the so-called public option.
- The American Medical Association lent public support to Obamacare in return for promises of a “doc fix” — protecting doctors from the automatic imposition of future reductions in their compensation. In a truly remarkable display of docility, 150 doctors from 50 states played dressy-up for the president in October, 2009 — wearing White House-provided white lab coats as they applauded his pep talk on Obamacare. “Nobody has more credibility with the American people on this issue than you do,” Obama told his guests at the photo op in the Rose Garden.
- Hospital groups agreed to $150 billion in future Medicare and Medicaid cuts — just to protect themselves against even steeper cuts down the road.
- Then there was the AARP sell-out. In the fall of 2009, many people were surprised when the American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) announced its support for Obamacare even though one of the ways the Democrats proposed to “pay” for the health care law was by taking an axe to the popular Medicare Advantage program and forcing millions of seniors back to the more expensive coverage of traditional Medicare. As David Catron wrote in this space (“The American Association for Retiree Plunder,” 3-30-11), AARP is really an insurance company fronting as an advocacy group. Most of its revenues come from sales of “Medigap” policies that fill in for gaps in standard Medicare. As Catron explained, “AARP endorsed a law that does real financial harm to seniors in order to reap a crop of new customers when Obamacare guts Medicare Advantage.” That impression was partly confirmed later in a trove of emails made public by House Republicans. “We really need to talk,” an AARP lobbyist wrote in an email to the White House, noting that calls from seniors were running 14 to one against Obamacare.
So those are some of the ways by which the president and his allies in Congress contrived to jimmy up enough credibility to pass the Affordable Health Care bill into law. Even then, with large Democrat majorities in both houses, the bill passed by narrowest of margins.
Michael Barone labeled the obama regime quite perfectly as ‘gangster government’; this report read like a ‘mafia protection racket’ rather than the work of a government working on behalf of its citizens.
I guess the words ‘lay down with dogs and, you’ll get up with fleas’ are appropriate with these beyond corrupt and unethical liberals occupying the democratic party.
Everybody wants out except the 30 million Americans without insurance. But conservatives say to them, “Who cares if you get sick and can’t afford medical treatment? Who cares if you become one of the 40,000 per year who dies because of the lack of health insurance? You probably deserve it anyway—for not making more of your life.”
Liberal1, What a wonderful strawman you bring to the table. I have never seen nor heard any of your statements that you surround with quotation marks – which in standard English are used to distinguish actual quotes – or at times to coin a phrase. If you are using it as the latter, you are realistically inventing things in your mind. If the former, provide the citation or get off it. Failure to properly cite the originator of a quotation is bad reporting/journalism and/or opens you up to fully being ignored for cause and devoid of any logical basis for your argument.
You might want to look at just this one item linked below to understand possibilities that many more than 30 million people will no longer have insurance due to the poorly written (and despite the ruling, I believe, still an un-Constitutional law) and poorly thought out law as written (or was it cleverly written to ensure this outcome). States now have to determine whether the requirements are affordable or simply not form the exchanges, thereby requiring the feds to do it – for which we will all pay. It simply isn’t this law and a couple of years that are at stake. It’s a long term future, and there have to be far better ways to make policy and law reform that stimulates the private sector to design better system(s) to address these issues. That really is one intent of our Constitution: put policy in place to allow the private sector to accomplish the work it does far better, and with far better results, than do inefficient and ineffective government bureaucracies.
Here’s the link:
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/obamacare_now_bigger_mess_ZQXHK0gILBo5NZ9NpCIPnN
Mike W
THAT’S HOW THEY EDUCATE THE YOUNG, THEIR PROPAGANDA
IS ALWAYS MADE OF LIES,
AND THAT LIBERAL1 [OBJECTIVITY] IS A REPETITIVE ROBOT.
NO HEART NO SOUL NO BRAIN, JUST RUSTED OLD RECYCLE METAL OF THE LEFT,
NOTHING NEW THERE, ALWAYS CORRUPT
@Liberal1 (objectivity): First of all, where was this 30 Million number of un insured found? Does it include Illigals? Second, those uninsured are getting medical care by law already since no hospital can turn them away.
Randy Do you think it right for the uninsured to get medical care for free? Do you think costs incurred by uninsured should be passed on to the insured? Do you believe a citizen who chooses to be “self insured” will pay a catastrophic bill of $25,ooo or more. I personally doubt it. Bankruptcy more likely. Another problem for society as a whole. I’ve got well to do business “friends” who’ve filed multiple bankruptcies.
Responsible people should carry health insurance AND take reasonable care of themslves.
Semper Fi Col. and a GREAT 4TH TO ALL