This post by @shellenberger provides an opportunity for me to hit a point I’ve been making the last week, but which many are still missing.
“Every single Trump advisor, including and especially @StephenM, knows perfectly well that what they did is unconstitutional.
It’s up to the courts not the Administration to determine whether it is non-justiciable. The administration must comply with the order until a higher court reverses it or sets it aside. That’s how our system works.
If the Trump administration continues with these obviously unconstitutional actions, then it will lose the legitimacy, public support, and power it needs to pursue free speech diplomacy, which would be a very disappointing outcome”
For 2 months, Trump Administration has faced an avalanche of unconstitutional court orders from single federal judges.
More TROs & PI have issued against Trump Administration in 2 months than 4 years of Biden. And while appeals process is still ongoing for many of those, appellate courts have already stayed several orders showing my point re unconstitutionality is not spin but reality.
Supreme Court stayed one judge ordering payment of $2 billion in 36 hours & told judge to be more specific; 3 appellate judges said Trump likely to prevail on firing of Special Counsel Dellinger and ruled he remain out and not reinstated.
Another appellate court stayed order of 1 judge undoing Trump’s DEI policies, another judge reversed his TRO & refused to grant an injunction on putting USAIDs workers on leave.
MANY other injunctions will be overturned on appeal b/c lower courts lack jurisdiction to decide employment & grants or army policy. Breadth of overreach by lower court, 1 judge, district court injunctions interfering w/ Trump’s Article II power cannot be overstated
Yet not ONCE did Trump Administration declare “fine, then enforce your order.” For every MAGA person screaming “ignore those illegal orders,” the Trump Administration has NOT done that. And we are talking about clearly illegal orders that infringe on his executive power.
Instead, every time Trump has worked to find way to read order so he could comply AND not pit Article II against Article III. He did that in grant cases by reading exceptions court allowed for otherwise terminating funding. And he did that in the Alien Enemies Act case too.
Yes, Trump Administration did not turn planes around, but it isn’t saying you can’t order me to do that but that you didn’t order me to do that because only the minute order is binding and it cites case law to support its point.
And once the planes left US territory, Trump said the order didn’t apply because the “removal” took place. Throughout entire drilling by Judge, and even Judge’s requests for Trump’s team to say “we just disagree,” Trump didn’t say that.
Trump Administration said “we complied in good faith and here’s why.” Yes, the here’s why is a very narrow reading of the order & only the minute order, but it has case law to back that. Trump is not being pedantic–he is being prudent.
While Article III is going out of its way to trounce on Article II, Trump is going out of his way to show comity to Article III–even when judges don’t deserve it. Judges are not just looking for a fight but have hit Trump with several sucker punches.
Yet Trump…TRUMP! is refusing to engage. This cannot continue for much longer, however, as lower courts are framing injunctions more & more wildly, leaving Trump Administration little room to maneuver in way he can comply without sacrificing his Executive authority.
Which is why I said in the earlier cases before SCOTUS, there attempt at “prudence,” was imprudent: By letting it play out in lower courts and not putting a halt to judges clearly illegal orders, judges have been emboldened.
Appellate courts & SCOTUS must step in now & forcefully because problem is one of judiciary’s making–not Trump’s. And Trump should be applauded for lengths he has gone to not create constitutional crisis by crafting plausible basis by which he obeyed illegal orders.
1948 SCOTUS ruling (Ludecke vs Watkins) put the Alien Enemies Act under the full purview of the President.
The Federal Judge has no “Standing” and should be told so to his face.
But these corrupt judges don’t care. They make rulings they KNOW will be overturned simply to hamstring Trump’s efforts. If they can’t accurately determine where their jurisdiction starts and stops they don’t deserve to be a judge.
Take this ” Judge ” and make an example of him not following the Constitution for the rest of these radicals to know they are next if they continue this crap! This is a waste of time and money for this country!
I think that is one of the points, if not THE point, to some of these ridiculous orders. They are DYING for Trump to do what Obama and Robin Ware/Robert L. Peters/JRB Ware/Pedo Peter/idiot Biden did in so many rulings and FOIA requests; simply say “fuck you.” No doubt, the temptation is great and well warranted.
What’s worse is that the Republicans can’t get away with this because there are no activist conservative judges. Those are “conservative” judges due to the fact that they follow the Constitution, which precludes them from legislating from the bench. And a radical leftist activist judge will simply tell the Republicans, “you have no standing” or “I don’t have that jurisdiction”.
All Rogue UN/Globalists WCC Judges need to all be removed from their Jobs and retired
Biden’s appointee, United States district judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia Ana Reyes, cited the lefty musical, Hamilton,” to “justify” trannies in the military.
She also claimed the “fact” that is “patently” true that there are 30 sexes, not just two.
https://dailycaller.com/2025/03/19/biden-judge-cites-hamilton-ruling-transgender-military-members/
Of course, doctors only have TWO sex reassignment surgery types: male-to-female and female-to-male.
But facts are not important to this loon.
Gov De Santis points out that Congress can pass limiting constraints for the jurisdictions of lower court federal judges.
These judges’ decisions should not be applicable to the entire country unless they are appealed and agreed to by SCOTUS.
Case in point. “Conservative” judges are called such because they don’t issue frivolous orders for political purposes. SCOTUS needs to address all these injunctions NOW all at once. Are they legitimate or are they nuisance orders?
Conservative Judges abide by the U.S. Constitution and not by UN/Globalists Demands