Transableism: Will it Emerge the New Protected Class?

Spread the love

Loading

By Wendi Strauch Mahoney

Transableism seems to be emerging as a more culturally accepted term for an extremely rare mental disorder called Body Integrity Identity Disorder (BIID). The diagnosis, however, is not currently recognized in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) as a mental disorder. It is not farfetched to imagine that this troubling “trend” of protected classes will also, at some point, include the governmental protection of those who want to purposely mutilate their bodies to achieve a long-desired disability.

Jørund Viktoria Alme is a transgender Norwegian man who always wanted to be a disabled woman. According to his Twitter profile, he is also a “wheelchair user due to a neurological condition called BID.” He is married with two children.

https://twitter.com/OliLondonTV/status/1652425308715339779?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1652425308715339779%7Ctwgr%5E5370043dc19b691a8152a5b133d47dd8c272ed48%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.uncoverdc.com%2F2023%2F05%2F03%2Ftransableism-will-it-emerge-the-new-protected-class%2F

In 2013, Chloe Jennings-White spent most days in a wheelchair by choice, despite having no actual disability. The only reason she hasn’t had the surgery is because it is so costly. She thinks it would be the “happiest day of her life” if she were to have the surgery. She often “fantasizes about being in a car accident” to realize her dream of becoming a paraplegic. Jennings-White also participates in “extreme sports,” like skiing aggressively when not in her wheelchair. She says it helps her deal with her anxiety from BIID. Jennings-White says she has never tried to get disability benefits because of the BIID. However, that does not mean that others with a similar affliction might not try to get them.


 
A few years ago, a “transabled” woman named Jewel “went blind on purpose” by blinding herself with drain cleaner. She found a psychologist “willing to help her” with the process. He told her if she “did the research,” he would help her become blind. After researching several painful methods involving chemicals, Jewel gave drain cleaner to the therapist, who then put droplets of the chemical into her eyes. He then waited by her side for thirty minutes “to ensure the damage was done” before rushing her to the hospital, where doctors fought to save her vision.


 
In another place and time, a psychologist who willingly blinded a patient to satisfy a psychological itch would be arrested and imprisoned for malpractice. However, we may now come to see the mutilating behavior as just another treatment rationalized by therapists who subscribe to the model of gender-affirming care therapy for body-dysphoric individuals.

Gender-affirming care was pushed in 2018 by the American Academy of Pediatrics as a preferred treatment for minors who are gender dysphoric. Because it is an affirmative, not an exploratory model of care, it sometimes leads to elective and dangerous sex-changing surgeries for children. It is a model of care whose defining rule is that the individual is who they claim to be, regardless of context. The second rule is that no one, including the parents, can question that claim. Affirming care is the subject of an excellent documentary called “Affirmation Generation.”

Transableism is BIID

According to a 2009 paper on BIID, the term “describes the extremely rare phenomenon of persons who desire the amputation of one or more healthy limbs or who desire a paralysis. Some of these persons mutilate themselves; others ask surgeons for an amputation or the transsection of their spinal cord.”

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

This is what public health care is for: wasting time and money on mentally ill whims and fantasies. No one wants to step and state the obvious: “What are you, f**king crazy? You WANT to be blind?” and then they go on the public dole as disabled. It’s probably these self-indulgent morons that take up the handicapped spaces where the truly handicapped can’t find one.

Remember the leftist idea that, when universal public health care was being proposed, it was suggested that fat people should be denied health care because they brought their obesity, heart problems, diabetes and joint problems upon themselves? How do they feel about perfectly (well, except for mentally) healthy people disabling themselves and then getting health care and government subsidies? My guess is, they do a 180 on this, because SOMEBODY might throw a fit.

Just like transgenders, these people seek attention. They also seek an excuse not to work and to have taxpayers pay their way. Why is it always leftists?