why the hell did they killed her,
they could have arreste her further down,
who the hell where they trying to protect ?
she ram on the BARRICADE not the WHITE HOUSE,
SHE WAS AMONG THOSE MANY EXSASPERATED CITIZENS,
SHE DID NOT SHOOT SHE RAM THE DEM BARRICADE,
THEY WHERE OUTNUMBERING HER, THERE WAS NO PLACE FOR HER TO RUN,
WHY SUCH A RUSH TO KILL
WHY DID THEY ACT LIKE A BUNCH OF PANICK PEOPLE,
THEY BLOW UP THE CAR WINDOWS, OF COURSE THEY KILLED HER AND COULD HAVE KILLED HER BABY,
THIS IS A WASTED KILL AND FOR WHAT,
SHAME ON YOU TO COWARD ON A WOMAN WITH A BABY,
i have seen the other police officers following a car for long time before they arrested him and no one was shot,
she is worthy of life as much as the president who cause that shut down and exasperation to the civilians,
he carry the responsibility of that lost life,
Greg
11 years ago
I see a government employee protecting an important national symbol from desecration.
what did you see when they were trying to keep octogenarian vets out of their own memorial? jerk.
Greg
11 years ago
The Lincoln Memorial was vandalized a couple of months ago, as I recall.
Smorgasbord
11 years ago
@ilovebeeswarzone: #6
Let’s wait until the report of the investigation in finalized. At one point, she almost ran over one or more officers.
Smorgasbord
11 years ago
When I visited the different monuments, I saw very few park officials, and I don’t remember any of them at the open air memorials. How many more officials are working now, than were before the shutdown? I’m guessing quite a few.
Smorgasboard
what is that,
she almost run over one officer,
she only ALMOST,
Smorgasbord
11 years ago
@ilovebeeswarzone: #12
All I am saying is that I don’t have enough information to know what happened. One report said she rammed one police car. If it was the police car that one picture showed, then she was going very fast, and if she wasn’t stopped, she could easily kill one or more innocent bystanders, or a police officer. I will leave it at that for now.
Smorgasbord
she try to leave and the police cars came to block her, if they would have let her leave
and then go after her on a farther road distanced from the CAPITOL,
THEY COULD HAVE GET HER LATER AND ALIVE,
THERE WAS THEIR MISTAKE, AND THEY DECIDE TO KILL HER,
TO HURRY THE END,
DID YOU SEE WHEN THEY WHERE ALL AROUND HER, SHE DID NOT TRY TO LEAVE,
SHE GAVE THEM TIME TO GET AWAY FROM THE FRONT,
DID YOU EVER SEEN OFFICERS ACT LIKE THAT EVER ON EVEN WORSE DANGER, THEY WHERE NOT THE REGULAR POLICE, THEY ARE THE CAPITOL POLICE,
ANY OTHER POLICE WOULD NOT HAVE PUT THEMSELVES IN FRONT OF A CAR AND A WOMAN WITH A BABY IN THE BACK, THEY WOULD HAVE LET HER LEAVE, IT WAS OBVIOUS IT’S WHAT SHE WANTED, SHE WAS IN PANICK,
AND GET HER LATER AND FAR AWAY FROM THE CROWD,
THEY SHOULD NOT HAVE BLOW UP THE WINDOWS OF THE CAR
A SENSLESS KILLING OF AN AMERICAIN,
I see a government employee protecting an important national symbol from desecration.
Must have been back before the shutdown and all those policemen were laid off. LOL. I’m sure all those 90+ year old vets are there to desecrate their Memorial and the Lincoln Monument. I’m glad Obama hasn’t learned the First Rule of Holes.
I laugh at the Republicans who cannot face the fact that it was GOP Representatives who voted to shut down the government because of their addition of an amendment delaying the ACA http://goo.gl/OjQzl0
If you are referring to Obama as “the leader”, then I agree with you. Neither he, nor the GOP, nor the Democrats have what it takes to lead.
Scott in Oklahoma
11 years ago
@Uncle Larry: Nope, you’re wrong Larry. The shutdown is ALL on the Dem’s. Follow me here… has the Senate, under the direction of their supreme leader Obama followed the law and passed a budget every year for the last five years like they were supposed to, this would not be an issue. Had Reid NOT rejected out of hand and without consideration ANY of the bills passed by the House related to the ACA and the budget, we wouldn’t be in this position.
The left saw what they view as a great opportunity to take complete control without firing a shot, and YOU have allowed it to happen.
In a Republic or a Democracy, the will of the people overshadow and over-rule the will of the politicians; in a Dictatorship, the will of the “leader” overshadows and over-rules the will of the people. Tell me again, what kind of government do we currently have?
Uncle Larry
all you need is your unquestioned love for AMERICA
AND A BRAIN MATTER WHICH IS FONCTIONNING WITHOUT THE NEED OF WEED,
AND THE GOPS HAVE BOTH, AS WE HAVE NOTICE,
Redteam
11 years ago
@Uncle Larry: Do you have your alarm clock set to wake you at some point?
The GOP controlled House added the amendment delaying the ACA knowing that the Senate would reject it. Any Representative who truly believed that it would get through the Senate should be run out of office as being too stupid to govern. The House had no intention of passing a straight CR, which would have kept the Government working.
Redteam
11 years ago
@Uncle Larry: yep, if I were a Rep, I would send the word to the Senate that when they are ready to negotiate, let em know. Go home til Senate gets a brain.
The GOP controlled House added the amendment delaying the ACA
Uncle Lar, I’m gonna guess that ‘since the ACA is the law of the land’ that the House does not have the right to delay it. Is that your premise, that one branch of the government doesn’t have the ‘right’ to delay something that is already law? Ok, then why is it ok for Obama to delay it? He’s only one branch, no right to change a law written by Congress.
The GOP controlled House added the amendment delaying the ACA knowing that the Senate would reject it. Any Representative who truly believed that it would get through the Senate should be run out of office as being too stupid to govern. The House had no intention of passing a straight CR, which would have kept the Government working.
If you had ever bothered to read the U.S. Constitution, Section 7 to be precise, you would know that it states clearly that the Senate is to “consider” the bills sent to it by the House when it comes to the matter of bills that deal with “raising revenue.” Instead, Harry (Real Estate Crook) Reid tables bills that should not be tabled, refusing to allow the Senate to even consider them.
I believe in both economic AND social freedom.
Then you believe the federal government should not be able to commit legal theft, taking our earned incomes, for anything other than what is expressly stipulated in the Constitution, right?
@retire05: Exactly! Although the Constitution allows for an Income Tax. I am for repealing that amendment and replacing it with something (flat tax, sales tax, etc). The big issue is not the Government’s ability to tax, it’s what the taxes are going for.
@Redteam: According to the right, I am liberal (on social issues), but to the left, I am conservative (on economic issues). The truth is, I’m just right…
@Redteam: I am all for education, it’s just not a proper function of Government to pay for it. The Government should also not be supporting any families, out of wedlock or not. And the “killing babies” statement sounds like you’re trying to get into the abortion thing and I’m not going there.
Uncle Larry
are you a pendulum person, swaying from one place to another,
I don’t think so,
WE CAN HELP YOU MAKE YOUR MIND,
YOU CANNOT SERVE GOD AND LUCIFER TOGETHER
BYE
@Redteam: I am all for education, it’s just not a proper function of Government to pay for it. The Government should also not be supporting any families, out of wedlock or not.
I pretty much agree with that. Education, I think the communities, counties, states ought to provide an education for the children. I don’t think the Fed gov should be involved. Families support, the only support would be food if it was the difference in starving, or not. But then, no money, just food to eat. Abortions, gov should not pay for them.
Redteam look how many agencies he created, look how many public work there,
as if there is no tomorow, they keep hiring the people with the money of the hard worker,
that’s where the money is, not in the jobs outside which are 30 hours of work,
this is the world upside down, the government doesn’t work for the best of the citizens,
they dump them in welfare, as a permanent statue, as long as they vote for the democrats,
what a life good job to kill the jobs and suply the sustenance, on a large group of people, and on top of that they allow the foreigners SOME WHO HATE AMERICA, to come and take the jobs of real AMERICANS,
THE BARRICADES SHOULD BE AT THE BORDER NOT IN THE PEOPLE’S PARKS, AND NO ILLEGALS UNTIL ALL THE AMERICANS WORK FIRST, A BASIC KNOWLEDGE OF ANY FAMILY WHO MAKE A BUDGET,
The poster for the next revolution
@bike mike: Indeed…..
The entire Obama Administration explained in one photograph.
Picture is gone. Have a back-up?
Yes. As defined here, Amerika is definitely at an incredible cross road….very shocking…never thought I’d see something like this…
why the hell did they killed her,
they could have arreste her further down,
who the hell where they trying to protect ?
she ram on the BARRICADE not the WHITE HOUSE,
SHE WAS AMONG THOSE MANY EXSASPERATED CITIZENS,
SHE DID NOT SHOOT SHE RAM THE DEM BARRICADE,
THEY WHERE OUTNUMBERING HER, THERE WAS NO PLACE FOR HER TO RUN,
WHY SUCH A RUSH TO KILL
WHY DID THEY ACT LIKE A BUNCH OF PANICK PEOPLE,
THEY BLOW UP THE CAR WINDOWS, OF COURSE THEY KILLED HER AND COULD HAVE KILLED HER BABY,
THIS IS A WASTED KILL AND FOR WHAT,
SHAME ON YOU TO COWARD ON A WOMAN WITH A BABY,
i have seen the other police officers following a car for long time before they arrested him and no one was shot,
she is worthy of life as much as the president who cause that shut down and exasperation to the civilians,
he carry the responsibility of that lost life,
I see a government employee protecting an important national symbol from desecration.
what did you see when they were trying to keep octogenarian vets out of their own memorial? jerk.
The Lincoln Memorial was vandalized a couple of months ago, as I recall.
@ilovebeeswarzone: #6
Let’s wait until the report of the investigation in finalized. At one point, she almost ran over one or more officers.
When I visited the different monuments, I saw very few park officials, and I don’t remember any of them at the open air memorials. How many more officials are working now, than were before the shutdown? I’m guessing quite a few.
Smorgasboard
what is that,
she almost run over one officer,
she only ALMOST,
@ilovebeeswarzone: #12
All I am saying is that I don’t have enough information to know what happened. One report said she rammed one police car. If it was the police car that one picture showed, then she was going very fast, and if she wasn’t stopped, she could easily kill one or more innocent bystanders, or a police officer. I will leave it at that for now.
Smorgasbord
she try to leave and the police cars came to block her, if they would have let her leave
and then go after her on a farther road distanced from the CAPITOL,
THEY COULD HAVE GET HER LATER AND ALIVE,
THERE WAS THEIR MISTAKE, AND THEY DECIDE TO KILL HER,
TO HURRY THE END,
DID YOU SEE WHEN THEY WHERE ALL AROUND HER, SHE DID NOT TRY TO LEAVE,
SHE GAVE THEM TIME TO GET AWAY FROM THE FRONT,
DID YOU EVER SEEN OFFICERS ACT LIKE THAT EVER ON EVEN WORSE DANGER, THEY WHERE NOT THE REGULAR POLICE, THEY ARE THE CAPITOL POLICE,
ANY OTHER POLICE WOULD NOT HAVE PUT THEMSELVES IN FRONT OF A CAR AND A WOMAN WITH A BABY IN THE BACK, THEY WOULD HAVE LET HER LEAVE, IT WAS OBVIOUS IT’S WHAT SHE WANTED, SHE WAS IN PANICK,
AND GET HER LATER AND FAR AWAY FROM THE CROWD,
THEY SHOULD NOT HAVE BLOW UP THE WINDOWS OF THE CAR
A SENSLESS KILLING OF AN AMERICAIN,
yes this other picture send a chill on the spine, of AMERICANS,
@Greg:
Must have been back before the shutdown and all those policemen were laid off. LOL. I’m sure all those 90+ year old vets are there to desecrate their Memorial and the Lincoln Monument. I’m glad Obama hasn’t learned the First Rule of Holes.
I laugh at the Republicans who cannot face the fact that it was GOP Representatives who voted to shut down the government because of their addition of an amendment delaying the ACA http://goo.gl/OjQzl0
Uncle Larry
too bad there are too many ignorants who still believe in the leader,
to be a good person,
If you are referring to Obama as “the leader”, then I agree with you. Neither he, nor the GOP, nor the Democrats have what it takes to lead.
@Uncle Larry: Nope, you’re wrong Larry. The shutdown is ALL on the Dem’s. Follow me here… has the Senate, under the direction of their supreme leader Obama followed the law and passed a budget every year for the last five years like they were supposed to, this would not be an issue. Had Reid NOT rejected out of hand and without consideration ANY of the bills passed by the House related to the ACA and the budget, we wouldn’t be in this position.
The left saw what they view as a great opportunity to take complete control without firing a shot, and YOU have allowed it to happen.
In a Republic or a Democracy, the will of the people overshadow and over-rule the will of the politicians; in a Dictatorship, the will of the “leader” overshadows and over-rules the will of the people. Tell me again, what kind of government do we currently have?
Uncle Larry
all you need is your unquestioned love for AMERICA
AND A BRAIN MATTER WHICH IS FONCTIONNING WITHOUT THE NEED OF WEED,
AND THE GOPS HAVE BOTH, AS WE HAVE NOTICE,
@Uncle Larry: Do you have your alarm clock set to wake you at some point?
The GOP controlled House added the amendment delaying the ACA knowing that the Senate would reject it. Any Representative who truly believed that it would get through the Senate should be run out of office as being too stupid to govern. The House had no intention of passing a straight CR, which would have kept the Government working.
@Uncle Larry: yep, if I were a Rep, I would send the word to the Senate that when they are ready to negotiate, let em know. Go home til Senate gets a brain.
@Uncle Larry:
Uncle Lar, I’m gonna guess that ‘since the ACA is the law of the land’ that the House does not have the right to delay it. Is that your premise, that one branch of the government doesn’t have the ‘right’ to delay something that is already law? Ok, then why is it ok for Obama to delay it? He’s only one branch, no right to change a law written by Congress.
@Uncle Larry:
The Senate didn’t reject it, it hasn’t been voted on.
@Redteam: Who’s talking about “rights”? I’m talking about the stupidity of the GOP. They have just ensured Hillary as the next Prez.
@Redteam: I would cal that a rejection.
@Uncle Larry: That’s why you’re a liberal.
@Redteam: Libertarian, not Liberal. I believe in both economic AND social freedom.
@Uncle Larry:
If you had ever bothered to read the U.S. Constitution, Section 7 to be precise, you would know that it states clearly that the Senate is to “consider” the bills sent to it by the House when it comes to the matter of bills that deal with “raising revenue.” Instead, Harry (Real Estate Crook) Reid tables bills that should not be tabled, refusing to allow the Senate to even consider them.
Then you believe the federal government should not be able to commit legal theft, taking our earned incomes, for anything other than what is expressly stipulated in the Constitution, right?
@retire05: Exactly! Although the Constitution allows for an Income Tax. I am for repealing that amendment and replacing it with something (flat tax, sales tax, etc). The big issue is not the Government’s ability to tax, it’s what the taxes are going for.
@Uncle Larry:
a Liberal Libertarian, a rarity.
@Uncle Larry:
Had you not been educated by Libs, you would call it a no vote.
@Redteam: According to the right, I am liberal (on social issues), but to the left, I am conservative (on economic issues). The truth is, I’m just right…
Uncle Larry
that is all right, you have more fun with CONSERVATIVES,
@Uncle Larry:
And that means you are for not educating people in schools, supporting out of wedlock families, killing babies, etc. Is there one I’ve missed?
@Redteam: I am all for education, it’s just not a proper function of Government to pay for it. The Government should also not be supporting any families, out of wedlock or not. And the “killing babies” statement sounds like you’re trying to get into the abortion thing and I’m not going there.
@ilovebeeswarzone: Naw, both of them are fun.
Uncle Larry
naw one is full of zombies repeating their master rhetoric,
glad to know you have the CONSERVATIVES VALUES,
BYE
@ilovebeeswarzone: Both are full of it…
Uncle Larry
no no no, not the SMART CONSERVATIVES, YOU SHOULD KNOW
BYE
Uncle Larry
are you a pendulum person, swaying from one place to another,
I don’t think so,
WE CAN HELP YOU MAKE YOUR MIND,
YOU CANNOT SERVE GOD AND LUCIFER TOGETHER
BYE
@Uncle Larry:
I pretty much agree with that. Education, I think the communities, counties, states ought to provide an education for the children. I don’t think the Fed gov should be involved. Families support, the only support would be food if it was the difference in starving, or not. But then, no money, just food to eat. Abortions, gov should not pay for them.
THE VETERANS are angry at the WHITE HOUSE FOR WHAT THEY HAVE DONE
they are coming to tell their mind, AND THE ABUSE ON VETERANS ,
THE PEOPLE ARE IDIOT THEY PICK ON THE CONGRESS AND REPUBLICANS
FOR WHAT OBAMA DONE
ALL BY HIMSELF,
Redteam look how many agencies he created, look how many public work there,
as if there is no tomorow, they keep hiring the people with the money of the hard worker,
that’s where the money is, not in the jobs outside which are 30 hours of work,
this is the world upside down, the government doesn’t work for the best of the citizens,
they dump them in welfare, as a permanent statue, as long as they vote for the democrats,
what a life good job to kill the jobs and suply the sustenance, on a large group of people, and on top of that they allow the foreigners SOME WHO HATE AMERICA, to come and take the jobs of real AMERICANS,
THE BARRICADES SHOULD BE AT THE BORDER NOT IN THE PEOPLE’S PARKS, AND NO ILLEGALS UNTIL ALL THE AMERICANS WORK FIRST, A BASIC KNOWLEDGE OF ANY FAMILY WHO MAKE A BUDGET,