The story about a 10 yr old pregnant girl who had to go from Ohio to IN for an abortion gives me serious pause for a number of reasons. There are many red flags.

Thread via Megan Fox

The story about a 10 yr old pregnant girl who had to go from Ohio to IN for an abortion gives me serious pause for a number of reasons. There are many red flags. I’m going to detail them here.
 


 
A pregnant 10 year old is evidence of a heinous crime against a child but in every article (and there are SO MANY) there is no mention of criminal investigation, no police involvement, not even a town where this allegedly occurred.
 
An unnamed alleged “child abuse” doctor called Dr. Caitlyn Bernard (an abortionist in Indiana) to ask for help. But any doctor who knows of abuse would be required to also call law enforcement. There should be a criminal investigation going involving Ohio DFS and police.
 
The TIMING of this horrific story is too on the nose. Roe v. Wade was just overturned. The media is desperate for stories to push the pro-abortion narrative, stoke fear, anger, and division. They love this.
 
The article first published in the Indy Star, a local Ohio paper’s site but in record time was picked up by huge international press. On the 2nd, The Hill and Newsweek had it and by the 3rd, The Guardian had it, and by the 4th it was on TMZ, reaching all the kids. I heard about it from a teenager at a 4th party and a red flag went off big-time. If the kids have heard about it it was placed where they will see it intentionally. Fake news is always sold to the young’ns because they will swallow it the fastest. 
 
It was immediately used as a political weapon against Republican Governor Kristi Noem and will be used against other pro-life politicians to make them answer this possibly hypothetical or made-up scenario to win political hit points.
 
#DrCaitlynBernard, the only source, is an abortionist and has been in the NYT participating in an anti-Trump hit piece and is clearly an activist. She has a stake in preserving abortion, it literally pays her bills.
 
There’s no way to verify Bernard’s claim. She has doctor patient confidentiality. No one can FOIA her. The media won’t ask any questions and even if they did she wouldn’t answer. There is no proof that this 10-year-old even exists and yet the media ran with it full tilt.
 
Jennifer Rubin used this to batter conservatives, her former colleagues, in the Washington Post. This further gives me serious doubts about the veracity of the story. Rubin is a notorious tool for the left using this story to harm pro-lifers . 
 
Why don’t any of them care about the crime committed against the child? Lawmakers in OH should demand an investigation into who raped this child. They are the only ones who can get information through DFS and help the girl seek justice for the crime, if it happened. Did it?
 
#DrCaitlynBernard got a call from another doctor asking for help for a horribly abused child and her first instinct was to call the media. That should make you all stop and think for a minute. What’s really going on here? Here’s what the spread over time through media looks like according to the first two pages of a Google search. I’m going to do other search terms. But this story had legs. Is that an accident that it got maximum coverage?
 

 
Here she is again #CaitlinBernard in June interviewed by PBS, crying. Predicting doom…the very thing she’s now claiming. How is she in contact with so much media? (web.archive.org/web/2022070101…)
 

 
The big question now is why was it the @indystar that reported this exclusively of all local OH news stations (CBS, ABC, NBC) that didn’t? According to star site, they are owned by Gannet Co., a huge media company. But Gannet’s site doesn’t list them. So is this still accurate?
 

 
And here’s #DrCaitlinBernard again! More media coverage in June before this alleged incident where she is predicting doom. She’s a serious abortion activist (web.archive.org/web/2022063006…)
 

 
And AGAIN! On June 30th in YET ANOTHER publication! This woman sure gets around. WTHR this time. (web.archive.org/web/2022063022…)
 

 
By the time I’m done it’s going to be harder to find news outlets #DrCaitlinBernard is NOT in. Here she is in Politico on June 19th.
 

 
29th correction. not 19th. typo
 
And here she is again July 5th in The Republic. (web.archive.org/web/2022070505…)
 

 
Here’s #DrCaitlinBernard encouraging women to give themselves abortions. No, really. In the Herald Bulletin on July 5. How does she have time to do abortions between media hits? (web.archive.org/web/2022062420…)
 

 

 
Here’s an updated graph on the related media featuring #DrCaitlinBernard and this story or “women are going to die” because of Roe stories she was involved in. Still going. This is going to be a big spreadsheet by the time I’m done
 

 
#DrCaitlinBernard is also the plaintiff in a case to fight the abortion restrictions in the 2nd trimester (web.archive.org/web/2022070600…)
 

 
This is the law #DrCaitlinBernard is suing over. She wants to tear second trimester babies limb from limb. The ACLU is helping her do this. This is from her lawsuit
 

 
Don’t know the outcome. It was filed in 2019. It’s not a fun read. (aclu-in.org/sites/default/…) #CaitlinBernard sued to stop a law in IN that would outlaw dismemberment abortions in the 2nd trimester and won. Now that Roe is overturned the state is asking to have that injunction lifted. Naturally, Bernard is spitting nails. (tinyurl.com/yckbm4v8) Here is #DrCaitlinBernard again on July 1 but this time instead of encouraging self-abortions, she now says they’re “risky” and is blaming Republicans for them. See above where she said self-abortions are an option for women though, contradicting herself. (web.archive.org/web/2022070207…)
 

 
I think this is all of the news stories from this one claim by #DrCaitlinBernard. Notice that there are no local Ohio stations reporting. Just IndyStar. But from that one article all of these outlets ran with it. I have questions.
 

 
Not even Snopes can confirm this story. They want to, but they can’t. #DrCaitlinBernard doesn’t return anyone’s calls. I wonder why that is? (web.archive.org/web/2022070601…)
 

 
Here’s my press inquiry to the editor of the @indystar which I don’t think he will respond to, but it’s worth a shot. What kind of vetting happened here?