The riveting ‘2000 Mules’ proves there was massive election fraud

Spread the love

Loading

By Andrea Widburg

Dinesh D’Souza is an effective filmmaker and he didn’t disappoint with 2000 Mules, a riveting documentary examining the way leftist organizations used activists to stuff ballots in the 2020 election (and the 2020 Georgia run-off election that handed the Senate to the Democrats). However, after watching it, I felt there were some unanswered questions that also deserve scrutiny so I hope D’Souza follows up on these issues.
 
2000 Mules begins with the premise that Trump voters have found it impossible to believe that Trump lost the election. When they contrast his campaign appearances (60,000 screaming fans) with Biden’s campaign appearances (6 vaguely animated lumps sitting in little circles); the bellwether states showing Trump winning by a large margin; the significant gains Trump made with Hispanics and Blacks; the millions of votes Trump gained over the four years of his presidency; and the mysterious overnight counting shut-down in the states that ultimately gave Biden his “victory,” they know that something is wrong.
 
The folks at True the Vote also suspected that something was wrong, very wrong. The founder, Catherine Engelbrecht, working with Gregg Philips and a team of computer analysts, came up with a very clever way to determine whether there was fraud. They suspected as much, thanks to the way in which Democrats in key states used COVID as an excuse to increase absentee voting. That included states which allowed only absentee voting with drop boxes across cities and towns, where there had been massive ballot harvesting. That is, people, both real and fake, didn’t fill out their own ballots. Instead, they were collected, completed, and put into drop boxes by partisan and paid activists.
 
To prove this theory, True the Vote obtained geo-tracking information for major urban areas in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia, and Arizona, allowing them to follow cell phone signals. They marked all the drop boxes and all the facilities for left-wing non-profits. They then looked for cell phones that traveled between the non-profits and drop boxes at least ten times (to be sure to winnow out statistical noise). Through FOIA requests, they also obtained as many videos as they could showing people stuffing multiple ballots into the drop boxes, a completely illegal act.
 
Their data revealed 2,200 mules in just five cities, visiting between 20 and 45 drop boxes each, at which they dropped off an average of five ballots. When you do the math, the numbers are staggering:
 

 
They only get worse when you contemplate the fact that 10 trips per mule is an exceptionally high bar and that these were just mules in five cities. When one considers the small margin by which Biden “won” in the disputed states, had these mules not been active, Trump would have won the election by a medium to huge margin.
 
D’Souza also speaks to Hans von Spakovsky about the various methods of committing election fraud and to a think-tank head (whose name I forgot to note down) who explains how various leftist non-profits, helped with Zuckerberg’s $419,000,000 handout, focused on creating voters, rather than promoting their candidate.
 
[the_ad id=”157875″]
 
The movie is clear and competent: D’Souza carefully walks Engelbrecht and Philips through their methodology and findings. He also talks to well-known Salem Radio* hosts (Sebastian Gorka, Dennis Prager, Charlie Kirk, Larry Elder, and Eric Metaxas) to gauge the effect information had on their preconceived ideas about election fraud. All but Prager suspected fraud before seeing the evidence and felt that the data proved it. As for Prager, he went from being agnostic to believing that there was indeed significant fraud in the election.
 
As for me, I’ve long felt that Biden could only have attained the White House through fraud, for the reasons mentioned above, so the evidence True the Vote gathered merely confirmed my suspicions. However, I was left with two questions.
 
The first was which left-wing organizations made the fraud happen. The movie never names them, presumably because they are being investigated or because D’Souza wants to avoid a defamation suit. Both are good reasons but not identifying them diminished the movie a little.
 
Second, and more importantly, the movie failed to explain what happened the night of the election. As best as I could tell (and I could be completely wrong about this), the mules were operating for days or even weeks before the election—as opposed to frantic drop box fraud the night of the election itself. Assuming my version of events, on the night of the election, in all the jurisdictions in which the mules were at work, Trump had a compelling lead as of 11 at night. And then, in each of those jurisdictions, something happened that had never happened before: The counting stopped.

Read more
 

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
68 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

We knew, of course, this was coming. The left set it up clearly. To hell with rules, laws and constitutions, the left enabled fraud by encouraging absentee voting without ID or verification. Examples of fraud would not be received with any surprise whatsoever.

My first clue was State Farm Arena. The “water main break”, the shut down, the spike in votes for idiot Biden all raised suspicions for me. Then it was reported that the “pause” in counting and spikes happened, simultaneously in numerous states.

The evidence simply continues to pile up. Democrats even openly called for the commission of fraud in the Georgia run-off by suggesting that people “move” to Georgia, register to vote and vote Democrat. No one spoke of “staying”.

Here we see the actual fraud in real time. It is undeniable (well, if you want to advertise your stupidity and useful idiot membership, you can deny it) and blatant. Preventing this from happening again on any scale at all is the duty of every AMERICAN that supports this nation and the Constitution.

Shame but I dont think we will ever see the sequel to this movie 2000 arrests and convictions. They wont ever stop until they are punished.

Since greg won’t post here, when he says “there’s no evidence,” I’m just going to say “2000 mules”.

Trump will probably have private screenings at Mar-o-Lago. But a movie is not evidence. It’s only another way to convince a receptive audience that they’ve seen some.

Last edited 2 years ago by Greg
Last edited 2 years ago by TrumpWon

Why is it not evidence?

For the same reason that Oliver Stone’s JFK is not evidence.

Last edited 2 years ago by Greg

Roger stone is a director?

A typo, which I have now corrected. Thank you for pointing that out. OLIVER Stone.

Movies can do an end run around critical thinking by presenting an internally consistent alternate reality. We routinely suspend our disbelief when we watch them. “You will believe that a man can fly.” But it’s still a movie.

Last edited 2 years ago by Greg

Why did Wisconsin immediately drop 7.2 million voters from their roles following the release of 2000 mules?

They didn’t.

Why did Wisconsin immediately drop 7.2 million voters from their roles following the release of 2000 mules?

Wisconsin Election Commission Takes Down Voter Roll List and Voting History of 7.2 Million Voters After Release of “2000 Mules” Documentary

Uh uh. Story and spin by Jim Hoff, of Gateway Pundit.

The Wisconsin Election Commission explained that the internet domain is temporarily offline owing to a glitch with the renewal of the domain’s security certification.

greg, globalists using the deep state and Democrat party toppled our government and installed their own. They released Covid, and rigged an election.

We’re now in a real civil war.

They did so because it is evidence of fraud

Movies can do an end run around critical thinking by presenting an internally consistent alternate reality. We routinely suspend our disbelief when we watch them. “You will believe that a man can fly.” But it’s still a movie.

Oh… you mean like Inconvenient Truth.

greggie, critical thinking is absent in those on the left. Like you, everyone there must be told what to think!

For the same reason that Oliver Stone’s JFK is not evidence.

I think I see the problem. You can’t tell the difference between “entertainment” and a fact-based documentary. Seek help.

There’s much more evidence, but 2000mules gives enough to show the election is was fraudulent.

greg, here’s evidence.

Answer now for yourself. The election was rigged. We see the proof. What’s your deflection now?

No no, greg has the new marching orders. Just keep saying the “audience” is wrong for being fooled or something.

They cheated. They know it. We live in a new country now, but one that will most likely become at least two when these Marxist jerks are pushed out to enjoy their hell on their own.

Yes it was already shown screened there, big party. All the data will be open source, Very hard to ignore even for you, the audits showed it, the videos of destroyed government documents and delivery of ballots late in the night.

One of the few things leftists can do well is ignore. They ignore the lies they are told, they ignore the violence they blame on others, they ignore their massive and repeated failures, they ignore their growing fascism and they ignore their corruption.

Seems there is a reason Stacy became wealthy How much of that is covid cash, Soros Money or Zuckerbucks?
comment image

Or they keep moving the goalposts. Greg is good at that, remember?
Greg:
“There’s no evidence of vote fraud!”
Later:
“There”s no credible evidence of vote fraud!”
Later still:
“There’s no evidence of vote fraud that’s been adjucated in a court of law!”

WB Brother cat

Then, ultimately, “There’s no evidence you’ll ever get me to admit to. The ends justifies the means. We won, didn’t we?”

Wisconsin Election Commission Takes Down Voter Roll List and Voting History of 7.2 Million Voters After Release of “2000 Mules” Documentary

Nothing to see here. Move along, let us turn in your ballot for you, nothing to see here.

Thats a neat trick The census says…
total population under 6 million

Tsunami of discontent: Biden’s approval rating underwater in 46 states: pollHis approval rating is also underwater in every age group, sex and education level.

joe biden’s approval rating continues to plummet, with just four states having a net approval rating of the commander-in-chief, according to a new poll by Civiqs.

Out of nearly 200,000 respondents, 54% disapprove of Biden and 36% approve. The president is only seeing a positive net approval rating in Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts and Vermont.

His approval rating is also underwater in every age group, sex and education level.

When broken down by race, 29% of white people like Biden while 63% disapprove of him.

He is more popular among black voters by 65% to 18%. However, he is barely above water with Hispanic voters, who disapprove of him 54% to 12%.

Biden’s job approval hit 33% last month, tying the low he received in January.

You mean even Delaware rejects idiot Biden?

The American people are not dumb. The know a shister when they see one.

How will they verify that they made the ballot deposit for payment?

I bet there will be a group of Republicans at every drop box this 2022 election with cameras recording license plate numbers, and numerous facial photos.

The new White House press Secretary
comment image

Note that on Big Tech platforms, it’s fully permissible to argue that the 2000 presidential election was fraudulent and the results illegitimate. Same with the 2004 and 2016 elections, and the 2018 Georgia election.

So, here is the buried lede, if a Republican wins the Presidency or a gubernatorial race, it is only because of voter fraud. But, if a democrat wins in either of the same races, any discussion of voter fraud regardless of the evidence is baseless…

Fact check: Gaping holes in election fraud claims of ‘2000 Mules’ movie

…True the Vote has said it found some 2,000 ballot harvesters by purchasing $2 million worth of anonymized cellphone geolocation data — the “pings” that track a person’s location based on app activity — in various swing counties across five states. Then, by drawing a virtual boundary around a county’s ballot drop boxes and various unnamed nonprofits, it identified cellphones that repeatedly went near both ahead of the 2020 election.

If a cellphone went near a drop box more than 10 times and a nonprofit more than five times from Oct. 1 to Election Day, True the Vote assumed its owner was a “mule” — its name for someone engaged in an illegal ballot collection scheme in cahoots with a nonprofit.

The group’s claims of a paid ballot harvesting scheme are supported in the film only by one unidentified whistleblower said to be from San Luis, Arizona, who said she saw people picking up what she “assumed” to be payments for ballot collection. The film contains no evidence of such payments in other states in 2020.

Plus, experts say cellphone location data, even at its most advanced, can only reliably track a smartphone within a few meters — not close enough to know whether someone actually dropped off a ballot or just walked or drove nearby.

“You could use cellular evidence to say this person was in that area, but to say they were at the ballot box, you’re stretching it a lot,” said Aaron Striegel, a professor of computer science and engineering at the University of Notre Dame. “There’s always a pretty healthy amount of uncertainty that comes with this.”

What’s more, ballot drop boxes are often intentionally placed in busy areas, such as college campuses, libraries, government buildings and apartment complexes — increasing the likelihood that innocent citizens got caught in the group’s dragnet, Striegel said.

Similarly, there are plenty of legitimate reasons why someone might be visiting both a nonprofit’s office and one of those busy areas. Delivery drivers, postal workers, cab drivers, poll workers and elected officials all have legitimate reasons to cross paths with numerous drop boxes or nonprofits in a given day…

Data isn’t credible evidence when it’s open to completely different, mutually contradictory interpretations.

Police use this as evidence tracking in murder trials using the same data type. The videos of the ballot stuffers, your debunker still says no evidence, Dont believe your lying eyes, some of these (you dont like mules) ballot coyotes came from other states. Hand sanitizer not good enough for a brief touch on an outdoor ballot box must use gloves, gloves or not it shows her dropping multiple ballots, thats illegal. This is not the only method they used, they pulled out all the stops, for this coup.
We accept the fact you will never admit there was a coup, every one could confess and go to prison and you would still deny it as fact.

Last edited 2 years ago by kitt

Police use this as evidence tracking in murder trials…

When they have connected the phone to a specific owner. The 2000 Mules data consisted only of tracked phones, and the frequency of their proximity to a ballot drop. The same people can carry their cell phones by the same spot frequently in any busy location, on foot, in cars, in buses, on bicycles, etc. This doesn’t mean the spot in question is their destination, anymore than a nearby light post or tree is their destination. (Unless they’re walking their dog.)

Last edited 2 years ago by Greg

The phone IDs have been given to the AG 20 50 even 100 boxes thats a long doogo walk.
comment image

Ten times near the same box location and the same nonprofit over 33 days equals a mule? That seems to me like a VERY big assumption.

You could probably find the same sort of proximity patterns for any two random objects near any busy location.

If a cellphone went near a drop box more than 10 times and a nonprofit more than five times from Oct. 1 to Election Day, True the Vote assumed its owner was a “mule” — its name for someone engaged in an illegal ballot collection scheme in cahoots with a nonprofit.

Last edited 2 years ago by Greg

You could probably find the same sort of proximity patterns for any two random objects near any busy location.

Probably maybe possibly could? Sure, happens all the time. So does ballots that get mailed but have never been folded. Happens all the time. Nothing to see here.

“Probably” because no one has checked how often one particular cell phone is carried by the same fire hydrant and Goodwill store.

Why is bidens economy tanking?

Because the GOP thinks huge high-end tax cuts are OK when we’re already running huge deficits? They’ll do it again if they get the chance.

Why is bidens economy tanking?

You can not dispute the evidence and so you put out some lame asshat excuse. The forensic data is way over your head

What the patterns of cell phone movement represent is nothing but an assumption. This is a variation on the State Farm Arena security camera videos with added suggestive captions. Someone is telling you what you’re supposed to be seeing.

Last edited 2 years ago by Greg

Well greggie, the path of the people with the cell phones are facts concerning time and travel path. The government videos of the people stuffing the many ballots in the drop box are facts. Now, just what is the assumption? The statistical values are 99.999%. See, someone had to tell you greggie what you were seeing because you still are to ignorant to understand.

“Probably” because you are grasping at any straw, no matter how weak and tenuous. Idiot Biden is a total and complete failure, inflicting possibly irreparable damage to this country. All because of Democrat election fraud.

YOU PEOPLE, with your endlessly exploitable gullibility and your lying, amoral populace leaders and are the “possibly irreparable damage.”

Last edited 2 years ago by Greg

05/10/22 – Mark Esper was asked if Trump was a threat to democracy. Here’s what he said.

Former Secretary of Defense Mark Esper was asked a very simple question by Fox’s Bret Baier on Monday: “Do you think Donald Trump was a threat to democracy?”

Here’s what Esper said in response:

“I think that given the events of January 6, given how he has undermined the election results, he incited people to come to DC, stirred them up that morning and failed to call them off, to me, that threatens our democracy. … I think the answer would — what else can you conclude, Bret?”

Esper isn’t some “Never Trumper.” Or someone who routinely sought out attention in the past. He is a military man who spent time as chief of staff at the conservative Heritage Foundation. He is a former secretary of the Army. When Trump picked Esper as secretary of defense, he called him “a highly respected gentleman with a great career — West Point, Harvard, a tremendous talent.”

In short: Esper’s credentials are unimpeachable. He is someone with a lifetime of service — both in and out of government.

He is also someone who saw Trump operate up close. He is intimately familiar with how the former President works — and doesn’t.

Given all of that, it’s a pretty stunning thing for Esper to say that he believes Trump was an active danger to democracy while in office.

The cynics and Trump allies will dismiss Esper’s claim as nothing more than a naked attempt to sell his new book, which is a memoir of his time in office. This isn’t about democracy, this is about lining Esper’s pockets, they’ll say.

Which, OK, sure. There’s no question that Esper is being interviewed and making these comments now, well over a year since Trump left office, as part of his book tour. And that, yes, he stands to make some material gain off the book sales.

But ask yourself this: What incentive would Esper have to disingenuously answer a question about whether or not he thought Trump represented a real threat to democracy during his time in office? Why risk all the credibility he’s built up over the years solely to sell a few books?

It’s illogical. What you are left to conclude is that Esper truly believes that Trump’s actions in office — and, in particular, in the run-up to January 6, 2021 — posed a direct threat to American democracy.

What’s remarkable about that statement is how little it will change the political landscape. Trump isn’t just a potential 2024 candidate, he is essentially the de facto nominee for the Republicans. And there’s almost no one who thinks that Esper’s assertion will change that. In fact, for some of Trump’s most loyal allies, Esper’s allegations will just firm up their belief that the “Deep State” is out to get Trump. (Forget that Trump not only picked Esper as secretary of defense, but also touted his credentials for the job.)

Esper’s comments then, which would be an absolute bombshell in any other administration with any other president, will likely cause nothing more than a brief ripple in this version of the Republican Party.

Which, well, fine. But let’s not get it twisted: The former secretary of defense just said that the former President was a threat to American democracy. That matters.

Last edited 2 years ago by Greg

Which, well, fine. But let’s not get it twisted: The former secretary of defense just said that the former President was a threat to American democracy. That matters.
Doesnt mean anything we dont have a Democracy, The country was not founded as a democracy. Esper with his fine education should understand that, but it seems he doesnt, that makes him a threat to the Republic. Telling tales out of school means he has no honor, no ethics a shell of a beta cuck.

Idiot Biden has done exactly what you accuse Trump of doing (from the old play book). Idiot Biden, along with almost every other Democrat, because they are all butthurt over the possible loss of their beloved, most worshiped imaginary “right” to kill a baby, have incited violence and intimidation against the 6 Supreme Court Justices that actually read the Constitution.

No greggie, it is you and those like you who supported the illegal voting. I hope you were one of those stuffing the ballot boxes. Maybe we can finally see your photo front and side!

YOU PEOPLE, with your endlessly exploitable gullibility and your lying, amoral populace leaders and are the “possibly irreparable damage.”

Gullible people believed “Russian collusion”… hell, STILL believe it. Gullible people believed 33,000 emails destroyed were all about yoga and weddings. Gullible people believe inflation, which started in February of 2021, is Putin’s fault.

REALLY gullible people believe idiot Biden got 81 million votes.

Let us hope irreparable damage is done to the left wing lie machine, for THAT is the source of our problems.

Not just near one box and the ballot honey hole, identification is simple those devices connect to the internet so need an individual IP.
AP and politico fact checkers failed you, you might need to see it yourself to debunk it.

Exactly. All they identified were phones passing by two particular locations, with no clue why they were doing so. They simply attached their assumption about why to the patterns.

Last edited 2 years ago by Greg

greggie, if a phone stopped at a specific drop box at a specific time and stayed there for a specific time and the camera recorded the person with the phone depositing the ballots at the same specific time for the same specific time frame that is a fact that the person with the phone on the video is performing a criminal task. Only the village idiot could fail to make the connection!

How many times were ALL of those factors documented for any one particular cell phone? Without all of those things being known, we don’t really know what is behind any particular pattern. A guy walking his dog… Someone on a regular delivery route… People walking to work… The pattern could be anything.

…if a phone stopped at a specific drop box at a specific time and stayed there for a specific time and the camera recorded the person with the phone depositing the ballots at the same specific time for the same specific time frame…

Last edited 2 years ago by Greg

Why has biden failed?

Last edited 2 years ago by TrumpWon

PURE EVIL: Biden DOJ Is Threatening Jan. 6 Defendants With Life in Prison after Walking Inside US Capitol and Taking Pictures

It is quite evident that you didn’t watch the whole movie or you would not be centered on the trailer data.

Well, the same cell phone going between two points numerous times is significant. When those two points contain a Democrat headquarters and a drop box, it’s suspicious. Far more suspicious and substantiated than you have a guy named Trump and a place called Russia, so the President is a Russian asset, yet you STILL cling to that lie. Face it, you support corrupt liars that will stoop to any measures to cling to power.

“Notice the gloves?” Yep. I also notice the mask, and the bald head, and remember the photo was taken during the COVID pandemic. What does that suggest, Mr. Robot?

greggie, you obviously failed to watch the whole movie, so you made assumptions without seeing all of the facts!