The Obama Domino Doctrine: Pro-Iran/Anti-Saudi

Spread the love

Loading

Remember, for one second, in January 2011, before even a dozen demonstrators were killed, a small herd of camel-riding Mubarakists rode into Tahrir Square trampling some protesters underfoot, and Obama immediately flew into an apoplectic rage, gliding close to personally claiming that Mubarak was a war criminal for attacking peaceful “democratic” demonstrators.

But in February 2012, after  Assad has murdered over 10,000 Sunni mostly totally unarmed civilians by lobbing barrages of multiple rounds of artillery into Homs, why is Obama all but numbingly silent in-between his own barrages of multiple rounds of 18-hole golf?

The reason: the US President Obama has artfully and silently pivoted US Middle East Policy from a Pro-Saudi, Anti-Iran paradigm to a Pro-Iran, Anti-Saudi imperative.

Crazy you say?  The Dubai Police Chief Dahi Khalfan Tamim, attending at a recent Gulf security conference with US diplomats, “undiplomatically” for over 18 minutes calmly stated, in essence:

1)     “US Policy is the Number One threat” to the Gulf States;
2)     America “has realized the dreams of Iran in Iraq;”
3)     the US has “adopted the path and ideology of Khomeini;” and
4)     the US “is no longer an ally” of the Gulf States.

http://www.thememriblog.org/blog_personal/en/41653.htm

To frame the instant question with a sharper point:

Why did President Obama, in his 2009 Cairo Speech, pro-actively incite and reflexively, over Saudi Arabia’s infinite anger, support the overthrow of President Hosni Mubarak, who was the US’ stalwart Sunni American ally for over 30 years and who acted as the sole-substantial Sunni Arab counterweight to Iran? How come the Nobel Prize-winning Obama unflinchingly allows Assad, a Shiite/Alawite, confirmed state-sponsor of terror, funneler of IEDs in Iraq which murdered thousands of US soldiers, and a stalwart ally of Shiite Iran, to cold-bloodedly massacre what is now over ten thousand unarmed Sunni Muslims?

And  why did President Obama anoint the Shiite Al Maliki, a known-Iranian stooge, as the omnipotent new-Shiite Saddam of Iraq, sideline the Iraqi Sunnis, and compound the decidedly pro-Shiite tilt by tacitly handing the keys of Iraq over to Iran leaving the Sunni Gulf states to fend for themselves against the a combined Iraq/Iran Shi’ite colossus from the North and East?

Why does Obama constantly refer to the ragtag, disjointed, barely-existing Sunni al Qaeda as the “greatest threat to the US” when the Shiite Iran and its Hizbullah and Iraqi based proxies have killed many times more US soldiers and US civilians in the past 20 years than al Qaeda has, – and Iran is nearing the acquisition of nuclear bomb and constantly claiming Israel is a “cancerous tumor” that needs to be “cut out” of the Middle East?

The answer can be found in Obama’ first documented foreign “policy” speech in 2002 dubbed the “Iraq War Speech” where Obama unambiguously declared:

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

5 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

The original article hear (if anyone bothers to read it) epitomizes ultra-conservative right-wing thinking: Ponying up a bunch of negative statements, which may or may not be related, and saying they support the conclusion—when, in effect, any number of conclusions may be posited from the same sentences. This is sometimes called propaganda in some circles.

Liberal1[objectivity
you got to be ABJECT to try to switch the propaganda to the right,
you like to bring those lies and you are copying litteraly to what you learn on your side,
the propaganda come from all parts of the left, be it OBAMA is the one teaching the young to adore his lies,
along his UNSCRUPULOUS MEDIAS, YES THEY ARE ON ELECTION MODE NOW AND REPEATING THE SAME LIES LIKE PREVIOUS ELECTIONS, we know it, because we remember it, they where stupid
reaching to the non-informed and ready to buy the promises which now they know where all lies,
you are a talking head robot repeating those lies all the time, no substance, no clue.
remove the old cd

Some joint Afghan-American investigation including the Ulema Council has called for the trials of 5 US military personnel over the burned korans.

In its statement Friday, the Ulema Council condemned the burning, said no apology would be enough to forgive the desecrations of the Koran and asked for guarantees that religious texts would never be dishonored again.

The NYTimes added a quote:

“The council strongly condemns this inhuman, bad and barbaric act by American forces based at Bagram Military Base and emphasizes that this devilish action cannot be forgiven by apologizing,” Maulawi Mohammad Said, a member of the council, said in a statement read to Mr. Karzai, according to the palace. “The perpetrators of this crime should be put on a public trial as soon as possible and be punished, and both NATO and the United States should guarantee that in the future no one will dare to desecrate Muslim religious materials.”

According to NATO, General Allen is supposed to be the lone decider of what becomes public from this joint council.

How many will have already died, been murdered in cold blood, before this council decides what to do?

Nan G
this is incredible they kill humans for their book, no matter if it’s a koran it is not as valuable as a human being , and they pursue the KILLING OF THE MILITARY WHO TEACH THEM TO TAKE OVER THEIR COUNTRY, and where shot in the back so cowardly. HOW LOW ARE THEY, YOU CANNOT GET LOWER,
and they have dessecrated that koran themslves by using it like a weapon,
and on top of that, no military is guilty of burning it wilfully
because they know first hand the MUSLIMS,
AND THE TALIBANS taking ADVANTAGE OF THAT EVENT, AFGHANISTAN followed the TALBAN ORDERS, THEY DESERVE EACH OTHER, THIS AFGHANISTAN is now the only evil place and people guilty of MURDERING THE MILITARY, THEY SHOULD BE PAYING THE PRICE OF THEIR ACTIONS,
THEY USE THE KORAN BOOK TO MURDER THAT IS THE ONLY GUILT, TO BE JUDGE NOW

when are the TROOPS START TO LEVEL THE PLACE SO THE MOB DISAPPEAR FROM THE SITE?