by Kyle Becker
The Democratic Party simply cannot imagine a world where, in the immortal words of former President Bill Clinton, abortion is “safe, legal, and rare.”
The Supreme Court late Wednesday night handed the organized left a stunning moral and legal defeat by essentially upholding Texas’ Heartbeat Law. A number of the state’s abortion providers had brought lawsuits over the legislation, which gives expectant mothers six weeks to decide whether or not to terminate the life of a developing child.
As National Review notes, the 5-4 decision “came down along ideological lines, with Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court’s three liberal justices dissenting.”
“The applicants now before us have raised serious questions regarding the constitutionality of the Texas law at issue,” the court’s majority wrote. “But their application also presents complex and novel antecedent procedural questions on which they have not carried their burden.”
“In reaching this conclusion, we stress that we do not purport to resolve definitively any jurisdictional or substantive claim in the applicants’ lawsuit,” the decision said. “In particular, this order is not based on any conclusion about the constitutionality of Texas’s law, and in no way limits other procedurally proper challenges to the Texas law, including in Texas state courts.”
The decision forestalls an October hearing of a Mississippi case that could determine the constitutionality of the issue, which was purportedly addressed by Roe v. Wade in what is considered by several legal scholars to be a flawed and questionable decision.
The Supreme Court’s decision on Texas’s heartbeat law has been accompanied by apocalyptic pathos on the part of Democratic politicians. Governor Gavin Newsom, whose job is on the line, attempted to make it a campaign issue in deep blue California.
Texas has effectively banned a woman’s right to choose.
Passed the worst voter suppression law in the country.
And continue to push anti-science COVID laws that put lives at risk.
This could be the future of CA if we don’t vote NO on the Republican Recall by 9/14.
VOTE.
— Gavin Newsom (@GavinNewsom) September 1, 2021
“Texas has effectively banned a woman’s right to choose,” Newsom wrote. “Passed the worst voter suppression law in the country. And continue to push anti-science COVID laws that put lives at risk. This could be the future of CA if we don’t vote NO on the Republican Recall by 9/14. VOTE.”
Newsom, it should be noted, has ignored citizens’ right to make their own actual health choices his entire time in office.
Vice President Kamala Harris remarked that the bill will “disprortionately affect communities of color” (true, since it will save more of their children’s lives), but also that it violates a ‘constitutional right.’
Texas law SB8 blatantly violates the constitutional right established under Roe v. Wade nearly five decades ago. It will disproportionately affect communities of color and individuals with low incomes from getting access to the health care they need.
We must protect that right.
— Kamala Harris (@KamalaHarris) September 1, 2021
“Texas law SB8 blatantly violates the constitutional right established under Roe v. Wade nearly five decades ago,” Harris wrote. “It will disproportionately affect communities of color and individuals with low incomes from getting access to the health care they need. We must protect that right.”
This is a remark that should make someone ineligible to pass a state bar exam, let alone be a state attorney general. But President Biden also made the legally ignorant claim:Today, Texas law SB8 went into effect. This extreme Texas law blatantly violates the constitutional right established under Roe v. Wade and upheld as precedent for nearly half a century. The Texas law will significantly impair women’s access to the health care they need, particularly for communities of color and individuals with low incomes.
Needless to say, there can be no Constitutional right that is not contained or implied in the Constitution or an amendment passed into law. The Supreme Court is not empowered to make law. But the state legislatures do have that power.
Remember Bill Clinton had thousands of acres set aside and had Rivers designated as Wild and Scenic while he was Pro-Abortion
kamalslut is ignorant of Wade vs. Roe, and the communist gavin is posturing for a job when his dumb , liberal, communist ass gets kicked out of Ca. What these two assh*les do not understand, and the SCOTUS made it clear in 1973 that “Abortions are not birth control”. Marylin Monroe used ab’s 22 times as birth control. wonderful, bobby and john were banging her on alternate days, wonder who knocked her up x 2.
So it is ok for the liberals, pregnant female to lie on a kitchen table and use a coat hanger used to abort the fetus?? What the public does not comprehend is that an ab or this type will require a d&c otherwise the patient will become septic. “unqualified ” clueless liberals have no knowledge of medicine but love to protest the insanity of wokeness. libs are really dumb.
Yes, and that will be reflected at America’s ballot boxes in 2022 and 2024.
Funny most Republicans run on pro life platform, its what you get flooding the country with mostly Catholics from south of the border. How does that wall look now genius?
It looks like Democrats aren’t the calculating bastards that Republicans have become.
More than 60% of Americans oppose abortion. Your views are more closely aligned with those of the CCP
Supporting mass murder in the guise of “choice” isn’t calculating?
Pfft. You mean the ones paid for by Zucks Bucks and stuffed with copied ballots?
I don’t think abortions should be illegal, but there has to be a culture that requires people to be responsible with their reproductive organs.
“My body, my choice” would make sense if there wasn’t another body involved, who isn’t the mothers.
#abortedlivesmatter
Yeah… Here’s the official Texas Right to Life Snitch Site:
https://prolifewhistleblower.com/anonymous-form/?fbclid=IwAR1xPi5WuFhg077lKVAAAxryvhNqHfmVYhOyAxHgH2IKmKk8nx2qxvufHJk
I think maybe I’ll anonymously report Governor Abbott and any other idiots who come to mind. How stupid are the Texas Right to Life people not to see THAT coming?
Reporting crime. What’s wrong with that? You want to ban people who don’t wear your face pacifiers or won’t get vaccinated from public life. Choice or no choice?
For Republicans yes not democrats
An abortion informant site has been set up where you can anonymously snitch on women considering an abortion:
https://prolifewhistleblower.com/anonymous-form/?fbclid=IwAR1xPi5WuFhg077lKVAAAxryvhNqHfmVYhOyAxHgH2IKmKk8nx2qxvufHJk
Remember, citizens! The great days we’ve worked so long and hard for in Texas at last are here! Any abortion after 6 weeks is ILLEGAL, with NO EXCEPTIONS for RAPE or INCEST!
You can snitch on the woman or ANY person who assists her—her doctor, her nurse, a counselor, a friend, a relative, or a neighbor who drives her to an appointment.
Remember also: ANYONE can file a lawsuit in Texas against any such person! If they are found guilty, all of your legal fees will be paid in full, PLUS you will be paid a $10,000 REWARD.
(Seriously—This IS PRECISELY what the new Texas law does. And there’s the new SNITCH SITE to assist you! Imagine what the NAZIs could have done with such anonymous informant technology at their disposal! )
Why should you have issue with that? You supported your fbi requesting people to snitch on fellow Americans just living their lives as they sought fit.
That would be a false equivalence fallacy, wouldn’t it? One of the many ways you folks evade rational discussion…
Oh, comparing the federal government wanting citizens to report others for thought crimes to reporting real crimes is a false equivalency?
“considering” isn’t against the law. Can’t you discuss anything without lying?
There’s no reason at all why the site can’t be used as a tool of harassment, is there? Is THAT against the law???
At least they don’t use ANTIFA to harass them and look the other way from the violence, like Democrats do.
Being a male, abortion is not my call. I find it disgusting, but it is not my choice to make. However, there is NO EXCUSE for abortions after 20 weeks without a medical complication. NONE. The left pushing that envelope right up to the moment of birth and beyond is what has made such laws as this necessary.
Abortion is not banned. It merely must be carried out within 6 weeks, a period where most don’t argue too strongly about “murder”. Like their lies about the election integrity law, the left must lie to their minions to get them sufficiently stirred up so they can be easily manipulated.
The Democrats don’t want to give up their ability to get rid of those “human weeds”.
The law is about 6 weeks, not 20. It will FORCE girls to bear the babies of rapists and incestuous male relatives. Most won’t even know they’re pregnant until more than 6 weeks have past. Texas will be known as the state that did that, and Republicans will be known as the party that did that.
No it won’t. It will force them to get a pregnancy test after a night of screwing and get an abortion within 6 weeks. I guess like getting an ID, you simply think people are too stupid to handle that?
Yeah, tests are always available to young girls raped by incestuous male relative, aren’t they?
Scratch the surface of republican males who forced this legislation on the female population of Texas, and you’ll find a repressive authoritarian Taliban mullah.
Yes they are. They are sold at many stores. Is this some personal experience you are deflecting to? Again, it is your own abuse of the privilege of abortion you had that is causing the backlash. Late, late term abortions, harvesting body parts, undercutting parental authority… you are your own worst enemy.
Do Trump supporters only pretend to be stupid, or is it entirely real?
What was it I wrote that you regard as “stupid”? You think destroying your straw man is stupid? I would argue that inventing the incestuous brother to try and defend killing babies as a form of birth control is not only stupid but barbaric. Yeah… like the Taliban.
That’s not an “invention”. It’s a deviant behavior that actually happens. So does pregnancy from non-incestuous rape. Part of the Texas prison population are convicted rapists. Why should the female victim of either crime—possibly a minor, who has been terrified into concealing the crime until her pregnancy can no longer be hidden—be forced to continue the pregnancy resulting from it?
Ask Governor Abbott. He signed the stupid bill that will have this result.
FIRST you get violated by a rapist, THEN you get violated by Texas law.
Texas law does nothing to violate them. Democrats do all the violating.
Why don’t you provide your statistics on girls raped by their brothers and prevented from getting a pregnancy test. Then we can do a cost/risk analysis on how many girls knocked up by their brothers and can’t take a pregnancy test compared to how many babies are murdered through abortion.
You never did back up your accusation that the election integrity law that blocks your party’s attempts to steal elections through fraud (how we got this disaster known as idiot Biden) suppresses any votes. Your first attempt was found to actually EXPAND access to voting.
Where did these clumps of cells go?
Dont even pretend to care. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9951033/Biden-administration-lost-track-one-three-migrant-children-released-custody.html
Not quite as dumb as Elizabeth Warren who thinks there is no prosecution for raping ones daughter. Which ignorant lib said they would like to see the fathers pay or be jailed, like there is no such thing as child support, huber law for those behind in payments, the government also will take tax returns, the ignoramus doesnt live in the real world.
Symptom of dementia
“My Mind is Going Blank Now” – Biden’s Brain Freezes as He Tries to Remember His Own Daughter’s Wedding
Biden White House Official “Appalled and Literally Horrified” That Joe Biden Abandoned Americans in Afghanistan
biden is in free fall. His approval is heading south with no possibility of recovery
Love to see the leaks the Democrats used to undercut Trump working against these anti-American scumbags.
https://ussanews.com/News1/2021/09/02/the-number-of-people-who-now-want-biden-to-resign-is-staggering/
Then there’s the Rasmussen polling graph that shows Trump’s approval rating is even lower than Bidens: https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/current_events/politics/prez_track_sep02
Guess which one totally screwed up Afghanistan and got 13 soldiers killed, though? Guess which one is currently pretending to be president? Idiot Biden on both counts.
BREAKING: Joe Biden in the Dog House – NPR Poll Has Joe Biden at 43% Approval But That’s Only with a +7 Democrat Advantage
FOIA Request Reveals Clueless Biden Regime Lost Track of 1 in 3 Unaccompanied Migrant Children Released Into US; Negligence Raises Child Trafficking Concerns
Well, they’re around here somewhere.
Haha. “Polls” show that Putin and Xi are popular, bit I’m thinking reality differs from the propaganda they want to use on sheep like you who are afraid of being outside of the herd.
It’s all Pravda.
Daily Kos is garbage.
More from the Texas Taliban: Sept 2, 2021 – With abortion curbed in Texas, medication abortion bill about to become law
As a novel six-week abortion ban has significantly curtailed abortion care in Texas, another bill, aimed at restricting medication abortion, is set to become law in the state.
The Legislature this week advanced the bill, called Senate Bill 4, which would limit access to medication abortions for many. For now, patients can obtain the medication up until 10 weeks of pregnancy in the state. The measure would prevent physicians from administering it to people who are more than seven weeks pregnant and prohibit the pills from being mailed in Texas.
The bill is on the desk of Gov. Greg Abbott, who had yet to sign it Thursday afternoon…
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/abortion-curbed-texas-new-medication-abortion-bill-about-become-law-n1278402
hey greg, https://babylonbee.com/news/woman-living-in-texas-wishes-there-were-some-activity-she-could-abstain-from-to-be-sure-she-wont-get-pregnant
Hey, if I’m the Taliban, do I get a free Humvee, M-16 (or more), free ammunition, free night vision goggles and free uniforms? Maybe a free Blackhawk and some free generators?
How about we expect people to stop rutting like monkeys and understand that sex produces children?
Right now the law of the land is unchecked abortion.
Checking it a little is just being respectful the fact that our country isn’t a uni-culture, and no one idea gets to destroy everyone else’s right to life.
At six weeks a human fetus is the size of a grain of rice. There’s no one there yet to HAVE any right to life.
This is as true in Texas as anywhere else.
Trump IS your middle finger. That’s pretty much his appeal to a lot of people. It’s one of the reasons a majority of American voters finally decided to knock your MAGA hat off.
It he hadn’t been frauded out of office, we wouldn’t be in such disastrous shape right now.
Bull , even Suess knew a persons a person no matter how small, and the size of a sweetpea not grain of rice,damn you will repeat any ignorant murderer. So what is a reasonable time to say its to late, Greg
GoDaddy Is Giving Texas Abortion Snitching Site the Boot – They’ve got 24 hours to get out of town.
https://gizmodo.com/godaddy-is-giving-texas-abortion-snitching-site-the-boo-1847616447
It couldn’t happen to a more deserving pack of fundamentalist Nazi’s.
thats no big deal there are other servers sites
The Nazis are those who believe they own a human life and have the right to terminate it just because of convenience.
You’re full of it. This is all about controlling women, not about protecting a right to life. A six-week fetus IS NOT a person. It has no consciousness. A heartbeat doesn’t make something a person.
There’s a male human being who is equally responsible for every unwanted pregnancy. Why don’t the elected republican jackasses of Texas put up a $10,000 reward and set up an online snitching system for THEM in?
…for turning THEM in?
No one is controlling women; THEY have all the control. Ever heard the phrase “Women control half the money and all the pu$$y.”? It is within their power to put every abortion clinic out of business. Without unwanted pregnancies there would be no abortion. There aren’t enough “Texas brothers raping their sisters” to keep even one small clinic in business.
No, it is the Democrats that dream to control women. Abortion is a drug they’ve become addicted to and Democrats are the pushers. Fat, white Democrat men knocking up their secretaries, girlfriends, staff and interns supply far more business to clinics that “Texas brothers” and that’s why THEY support it.
Oh my that’s a game changer. They will have to change that law now… LOL
You are truly stupid if you think this will do anything.
They’re too damn stupid to change a law requiring victims of rape or incest to carry their rapist’s baby.
As always, wealthy Texas republicans will find doctors to privately provide safe abortions when their own little darlings “make a mistake”.
Rice doesn’t have a heartbeat.
Tadpoles the size of a grain of rice have heartbeats. So does a mouse fetus. What’s your fixation on heartbeats? A heartbeat doesn’t define what is or isn’t a person.
Because it’s what hearts do. Hearts of living human beings. If you had one, you would understand.
If you had a heart, you wouldn’t support a law that forces a kid to give birth to the child of her rapist.
I don’t. I support protecting life. You support imaginary scenarios.
If you support the Texas law, you support a law that MAKES NO EXCEPTIONS for rape or incest.
No matter what the circumstances, they all have 6 weeks to get an abortion. What’s the problem?
Sure it does greggie. Get your abortion prior to 6 weeks.
BIDEN LIED: Most Afghans Who Assisted US During 20-Year Occupation Did Not Get Evacuated – Due to Chaos at Airport Gates and Taliban
If only Trump hadn’t cut troop levels to 2500, with no concessions from the Taliban but a promise to be nice…
No, if only idiot Biden wasn’t an idiot that only worried about the politics and “perceptions” of leaving Afghanistan and wasn’t incompetent. Then maybe he wouldn’t be totally responsible for a complete and embarrassing (and deadly) disaster.
Wait greggie, Trump reduced troops 8 months ago but still provided air support and the Taliban did very little. Biden took all troops out in the middle of the night and that was not reducing troops? You really need mental health evaluation.
2500 troops was fine. Bringing our finest home, one of Trump’s great achievements.
As for the pullout, the disaster is Biden’s and Biden’s alone.
Only a infantile child would suggest otherwise.
You clowns thought you were owed the country, completely, to the point of overriding out fair and free elections.
Now the world can see plainly how lacking Leftwing ideology and leadership really is.
Biden/Obama Is Sending Cuban Refugees Back to Cuba But Unvetted Soldier Age Men from Afghanistan Are Welcomed with Open Arms
Here is the good news. The Texas law is now saving 150 babies a day from certain death at the hands of an abortionist.
And, revenue for planned butcher hood is on the down slope.
AZ Gubernatorial Candidate Kari Lake: “Well Done, Texas. ARIZONA IS NEXT” – Calls On Ducey To Sign Arizona Heartbeat Law: “If My Predecessor Refuses To Sign It, I WILL DO SO IN A HEARTBEAT.”
They do not need godaddy, pft
After SCOTUS Shuts Down Dems — Biden’s DOJ Is Stepping In to END It
The federal government cannot interfere with states. Our government was intentionally set up that way to prevent tyranny of a centralized government.
Yeah, the Civil War clearly demonstrated THAT, didn’t it? The pissant wanna be tyrants all seem to be at the state level—at least since Trump got flushed down the federal toilet.
Satanists Admit They Are Making Child Sacrifice Through Abortion an Official Ritual by the Satanic Temple
October 6, 2021 – District court judge blocks landmark Texas ‘fetal heartbeat’ abortion law
A district court judge issued a Temporary Restraining Order blocking Texas S.B. 8 abortion law on Wednesday, finding in favor of the U.S. Department of Justice, which had sought the order to block the law from going into effect.
“A person’s right under the Constitution to choose to obtain an abortion prior to fetal viability is well established. Fully aware that depriving its citizens of this right by direct state action would be flagrantly unconstitutional, the State contrived an unprecedented and transparent statutory scheme to do just that,” U.S. District Judge Robert Pittman, of the Western District of Texas, Austin Division, wrote in a 113-page ruling.
The Texas law, signed by Republican Gov. Greg Abbott in May, prohibits abortions once medical professionals can detect cardiac activity, usually around six weeks and before many women know they’re pregnant. Rather than having the state enforce the ban, the law creates a private right of action against individuals who commit or aid and abet an abortion that violates the law – but not against the woman who undergoes the procedure.
—
(Actually, at 6 weeks a fetus is the size of a single grain of rice. There is no audible heartbeat because a heart has not yet formed. No blood is being pumped through a circulatory system. There is only a slight flutter in the microscopic area where a heart forms at a later stage of development, detectable with a sophisticated ultrasonic device.)
—
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals had rejected requests for a stay when abortion providers sought to prevent the law from going into effect until the resolution of a court dispute. The plaintiffs appealed to the Supreme Court, but the Supreme Court allowed the law to go into effect. The Department of Justice under President Biden then filed a motion to block the law, and Pittman ruled on that motion.
Judge Pittman ruled that Texas had “deliberately circumvented the traditional process” under the Constitution and had “drafted the law with the intent to preclude review by federal courts that have the obligation to safeguard the very rights the statute likely violates.”
He ruled that Texas had violated the precedents under Roe v. Wade, the 1973 ruling that upholds a right to abortion, and ordered the state not to enforce the law.
The judge added that the injunction prevents intervenors, who expressed their intention to sue people who aid or abet abortions that violate S.B. 8, from engaging in lawsuits.
“From the moment S.B. 8 went into effect, women have been unlawfully prevented from exercising control over their lives in ways that are protected by the Constitution,” Pitman wrote, citing the fact that many abortion facilities in the state ceased operation out of fear of lawsuits under the law. “That other courts may find a way to avoid this conclusion is theirs to decide; this Court will not sanction one more day of this offensive deprivation of such an important right…”
—
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/district-court-judge-blocks-texas-abortion-law
greggie, if you were smarter, you would understand that this is just one of the steps to get to the Supreme court. Roe v. Wade was a poorly contrived decision not based upon any thing valid in the Constitution. Obama’s appointed District Court Judge fell right in to the process for protecting the unborn with a heart beat.
Take away women’s guaranteed right to abortion, and women will end the careers of the politicians involved in doing it. Nearly everyone supporting the Democratic Party will be there to help them do it.
Anyone smart would certainly have figured THAT out.
Ah, yes, the Democrat’s sacred cow, abortion. There is no better way of making sure that blacks, Hispanics and low income whites do not increase their numbers. No more lynching trees. Just kill the kid while it is still in the womb. As Margaret Sanger said, it’s just getting rid of the weeds.
Judge Pittman would change his tune rapidly if women started telling him they wanted an abortion because they were afraid their baby would be born gay.
“There’s no better way of making sure…”
What it’s making sure of is that ANY individual woman has a guaranteed right to make her own reproductive choices. The church gets no say, the state gets no say, I get no say, and YOU get no say. She herself has the right to decide. This is a fundamental principle.
There is no freedom at all when the Church or State has taken control of your own body.
Oh, but I DO get a say, especially when I am expected to pay for it. Also, MURDER is still against the law, even when leftists do it.
And, since you ignorant leftists believe MEN can get pregnant, I guess it now affects ME and I’m opposed to it. I’ll control my “reproductive choices” by acting responsibly and that’s the standard I’ll apply to the rest of “US” that can get pregnant. If I can do it, anyone can do it.
There is no “right to abortion”. Absolutely no such thing.
The left called returning Vietnam service members baby killers. The left has never lived that down nor have they apologized.
It is the left that are the real baby killers. Now the left wants to murder the unborn up and until the moment of birth and post birth.
The left is pro-murder
That the left called soldiers returning from Vietnam “baby killers” is a persistent right-wing myth. The protests were against the government and the war.
It didn’t matter whether the war was being conducted by a Democratic or Republican administration. The protests became continuously more forceful because growing numbers objected to our involvement.
greggie, you are so ignorant. Soldiers traveling from HI through San Francisco were spit on and routinely called baby killers. They were also required to be in uniform. You may think it was just protests against the government, but the left was taking it out against the military personnel. Even college instructors were doing the same thing. You were taking too much LSD likely then and now!
Soy boy woke greg does not know his ass from a hole in the ground. He would not know his own dick even if it was in his own mouth
Maybe that actually happened somewhere, sometime, to somebody, but it wasn’t really “a thing”. It’s part of the right’s “martyrdom-and-mistreatment” mythology, which gets equal time with “outrage anecdotes”, as with Trump’s 9/11 story that in Jersey City “thousands and thousands of people were cheering as that building was coming down.” He claimed to have seen this himself.
The inconvenient thing about freedom is that people can make choices that others don’t like. The right to choose abortion is one such.
The alternative to that right is to deprive women of control over their own bodies. Doing so is totally incompatible with personal freedom. Doing so makes as much sense as declaring all persons to be born equal, with certain unalienable rights, and then harboring the institution of slavery.
“The inconvenient thing about freedom is that people can make choices that others don’t like.” Um… you mean like wearing a useless mask or getting a vaccine you might not need or want? THAT kind of freedom?
You irresponsible leftists cannot concede that life begins SOMETIME and have proven totally irresponsible with aborting, murdering, dismembering and selling the parts of viable, living human beings. The only solution is to LOSE that ability to kill something to compensate for irresponsibility and inconvenience. As a fellow birthing person, I say NO abortions.
The democrat party is the party of death among other deplorable vices that have no moral qualities.
Let’s see:
Slavery comes to mind.
There are many others
Neither you nor the Texas Taliban GET to say what women can or cannot do with regard to their own bodies.
greggie, when there is a heart beat, it no longer is just a woman’s body.
If men got pregnant, the right to terminate an unwanted pregnancy would have never been challenged.
Well, apparently we can because that’s what the science-hating idiots from your side say. So, we get to make the call.
“The inconvenient thing about freedom is that people can make choices that others don’t like.”
OK, so you have finally accepted that people can refuse to wear a face diaper or get the jab and it is none of your business and you don’t have a right to slam them? Is that the opinion you now hold?
“Neither you nor the Texas Taliban GET to say what women can or cannot do with regard to their own bodies.”
Exactly what is it that women are doing with “their own bodies” that you think pro-life Texans are against? Isn’t abortion a reaction to a previously made decision on the part of the woman?
“Pro-life” Texans have put cash bounties on anyone assisting a pregnant rape or incest victim to obtain an abortion. And you don’t understand what’s wrong with this…
You never did provide your data on the vast number of incestuous rapes. I’m pretty sure I know why.
Ask Governor Abbot. He must know the stats; he publicly stated Texas was going to remove all perpetrators.
The man thinks the people he works for are idiots. Most rapists are KNOWN to their victims. Listen to the states cited in the rest of the video.
Abbot’s not the one lying about it… YOU are. So, where’s your proof?
Give us the exact language in the bill proving your claim that says there is a cash bounty on anyone assisting a pregnant rape or incest victim.
THE EXACT LANGUAGE.
The exact language would be found in Texas S.B. No. 8, Sec. 171.208 (b) (2) and (3):
(b) If a claimant prevails in an action brought under this section, the court shall award:
(2) statutory damages in an amount of not less than $10,000 for each abortion that the defendant performed or induced in violation of this subchapter, and for each abortion performed or induced in violation of this subchapter that the defendant aided or abetted; and
(3) costs and attorney’s fees.
https://legiscan.com/TX/text/SB8/id/2395961
Nice try, Comrade, but no cigar.
Your reference does NOT contain any of the words you used such as “bounty, rape, incest.” I asked for the EXACT language that proved your claim (of those words).
As usual, your handlers failed you because you can’t prove what doesn’t exist. But since you are such a fan of murdering an unborn child, perhaps you can give us your preferred method. Is it the saline treatment where an infant is burned to death and then its destroyed body is extracted from the womb? Or how about the crushing of the child’s skull to minimize the resistance to being pulled from the womb? Or maybe the process of taking it out of the womb piece by piece, first an arm, then a leg, then another leg, and so on and so on? The more gory the better, right Comrade? Have you changed your name to Vlad yet?
I am still waiting on your response to my questions:
Exactly what is it that women are doing with “their own bodies” that you think pro-life Texans are against? Isn’t abortion a reaction to a previously made decision on the part of the woman?
But then, being the coward you are, you continually evade answering questions that might have an effect on your agenda; to slaughter and end the life of as many minority children as possible which is, and has been, the goal of Democrats for many decades, including the sterilization of Native American women.
So do try to get your handlers to give you some valid answers. You know, those kind that would hold up in court since you fancy yourself some sort of legal eagle. Misrepresenting the exact language of a bill just don’t work, Comrade Useful Idiot.
You’re right, because there are NO EXCEPTIONS MADE for rape or incest. That was the point, remember?
There is also no bounty offered so you, once again, have to change what you actually said to fit your response to my questions. Well, one of my questions, that is. If a question makes you uncomfortable, you just ignore it like all left wing idiots do.
There happens to be another life involved. It’s not the Republicans fault that this is how we multiply, but there is no “right” to murder for convenience.
biden rambles for 30 seconds. What did he say?
Cmon, man! What he is saying is crystal clear. He is clearly stating, “I am a mentally impaired moron. I was hidden from view during the campaign so I would not run off ALL my voters, but here I am… THIS is me. I’m an idiot that serves as a puppet for unelected manipulators that are actually running the country. I’m not making this up. Truaninonashufodopressure.”
What is entertaining is soy boy woke greg. His attempt to defend his president is a constant drumbeat of anything Trump. His president is a 38% approval. Of that 38%, I would wager more than half most likely do not have a firm grasp on relevant topics of the day.
Reference any video from Campus Reform. The mindless dolts on the campuses of America respond affirmatively if any statement is prefaced with bidens name. Then, to their utter astonishment, they are told it is President Trump’s comment and it becomes a deer in the headlights moment…
Jobs report (194,000 jobs… missed the projection by 300,000) won’t help his approvals. Back to dismal labor participation rates as well. Gee… looks a LOT like when Obama was running the economy…
You should be happy so soy boy. Time to start killing babies again. You leftists only care about killing the unborn. Some day you may find yourself in judgement by our creator and it sucks to be you. So, cheer for the murdered unborn as you rot in hell.
Maybe you should punch your computer screen. You might feel better. Most people reading your posts certainly would.
Why no victory lap from your president today? The Afghan war started 20 years ago today.
biden has created a terrorist super state. The taliban got 83-85 billion of functioning military equipment.
And, China got a first class Air Force base.
This is sure to ruin your day soy boy woke greg…
It appears murdering babies in Texas is on hiatis…
Texas abortion law given reprieve by appeals court
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/texas-appeals-court-reinstate-abortion-ban
I do not think the creator of all life is a proponent of murdering babies.
New Poll Shows How Many Republicans Want Trump To Run Again In 2024
If the Supreme Court upholds the procedural “logic” of the Texas abortion law, it could have serious implications for gun manufacturers and retailers. The conservative lawyer defending the Texas abortion law acknowledged this during questioning today. Surprisingly, he said he was OK with this.
Jeffrey Toobin, CNN’s legal analyst, explains the unintended consequences that the writers of the law failed to consider:
No surprise you would reference the guy who was choking his chicken on tv.
What he should be talking about is the unintended consequences of j*acking off while on his employer’s clock.
But no comment about Texas lawmakers opening the door for ruinous lawsuits against gun makers and sellers, I guess…
Why should I discuss what you want as if you even care about those who make their living as gun makers or gun sellers. Your Party would put them all out of business so only the left had weapons. Or comment on a stupid YouTube video because idiots like you have to rely on YouTube.
How about you commenting on why you would put any faith into the opinion of a pervert who got his rocks off in public. But then, Toobin is a Democrat and Democrats can do no wrong in your view.
Greggie the vllage idiot reaches deep in his empty progressive bag of tricks to try to find something to rant about! I thought the Obama avoiding WWIII by removing the defensive rockets from Ukraine allowing Russia to take Crimea was one of the last tricks.
Planned Parenthood: Supreme Court Ruling Upholding Texas 6-Weeks Abortion Ban Is ‘Terrifying,’ ‘Dangerous,’ Discri
Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor, in her dissenting opinion:
“By foreclosing suit against state-court officials and the state attorney general, the Court effectively invites other States to refine S. B. 8’s model for nullifying federal rights. The Court thus betrays not only the citizens of Texas, but also our constitutional system of government.”
This will seem just fine to conservatives–until a state uses the same tactic to effectively nullify the Second Amendment. THEN they’ll slowly figure out what they’ve actually done.
Here’s what Justice Roberts had to say. It’s also a very serious warning. Refer to page 32 of the pdf:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-463_3ebh.pdf
If you’re looking to destroy American democracy in favor of authoritarian plutocracy, everything might seem to be right on track.
Sotomayor doesn’t think the pain of the embryo is anything to consider. You leftists worship barbarism.
States ALREADY nullify the 2nd Amendment. So do cities. Leftists do not respect anyone else’s rights or privileges but they expect THEIR satanic death rituals to be considered untouchable.
Again, show me where in the Constitution abortion is protected. So ahead.
Brain structures necessary for human consciousness don’t even BEGIN to develop before the end of the first trimester. But such facts don’t enter into your thinking, do they?
What does that have to do with feeling pain and suffering? Hell, you leftists NEVER develop a brain. You just have a system directing you to believe and repeat whatever propaganda you are told.
But, you now admit life begins at the 2nd trimester.
Given that governor blackface of Virginia would allow post birth abortion, it would seem aborting all democrats post birth would be a solution to the problems in the country
By foreclosing suit against state-court officials and the state attorney general, the Court effectively invites other States to refine S. B. 8’s model for nullifying federal rights. The Court thus betrays not only the citizens of Texas, but also our constitutional system of government. I AM THE LAW!
Has that nutty B ever read the Constitution?
The citizens of Texas have better control of their State representatives than they do the Supreme Court or Congress.
Your ignorant remark on gun control See NY CA and IL for infringement.
All States named above have an exodus issue. Perhaps with strict laws on things they hold as sacraments Texas will save itself from assholes moving in and turning it into a shithole too.
As Abortion cannot be found in the Constitution it is up to the States. As R V Wade did not specify common sense guidelines that left it up to each State.
As of last February, a majority of Texans polled–55%–thought abortion laws should be less strict or remain as they were. The republican governor and the republican legislators DO NOT represent the will of the majority.
https://texaspolitics.utexas.edu/set/should-abortion-laws-be-more-or-less-strict-february-2021
Similarly, Trump DOES NOT represent a majority of the American people. He didn’t in 2016, when he lost the popular election by 2.9 million votes. He sure as hell didn’t in 2020, when he lost the popular election by over 7 million votes, and lost the Electoral College vote by 306 to 232.
Nurse Jill Biden to Travel to Waukesha Three Weeks After Christmas Parade Massacre as Joe Biden Stays Behind
Solyndra 2.0? Biden Megadonor Gets $500 Million Loan to Build Solar Company in India
That’s probably a very solid investment. Solar energy will be huge in India.
Joe Biden Needs Notecards For His Interview with Late-Night Comedian Jimmy Fallon
MSNBC Primetime Hosts Completely Ignore Conviction Of Jussie Smollett In Hate Crime Hoax
Who cares about another celebrity phony? To whatever extent I might, I’m glad he was convicted.
Florida Governor Ron DeSantis Outlines Legislation Targeting Private Sector Contractors Who Facilitate Unlawful Immigration and Joe Biden’s Human Trafficking Operations
Did DeSantis mention that undocumented workers represent 6 percent of Florida’s workforce?
They are illegal immigrants and illegal is illegal.
REMINDER: One Possible Reason Why Jussie Smollett Created His Hate Hoax Is Connected to Cory Booker, Kamala Harris and Others
Unfit, Unwell Joe Biden Needs Notecards for His Interview With Late-Night Comedian Jimmy Fallon
File under Unintended Consequences:
—
December 12, 2021 – Gavin Newsom calls for bill modeled on Texas abortion ban to crack down on gun manufacturers
California Gov. Gavin Newsom said Saturday he will push for a new law modeled on Texas’ abortion ban that would let private citizens sue anyone who makes or sells assault weapons or ghost guns.
Newsom has excoriated the Texas law for limiting women’s access to abortion by allowing people to sue anyone who “aids or abets” one performed after about six weeks, before many women know they are pregnant. Nevertheless, he said the Supreme Court’s decision Friday to let the law stay in effect while legal challenges proceed has opened an avenue for states to circumvent federal courts.
In a statement Saturday evening, Newsom pointed to a recent federal court decision to strike down California’s assault weapons ban. In his decision, a judge compared assault weapons to Swiss Army knives, language Newsom has harshly criticized.
“I am outraged by yesterday’s U.S. Supreme Court decision allowing Texas’s ban on most abortion services to remain in place,” Newsom said. “But if states can now shield their laws from review by the federal courts that compare assault weapons to Swiss Army knives, then California will use that authority to protect people’s lives, where Texas used it to put women in harm’s way.”
Newsom said he will work with his staff, the Legislature and California Attorney General Rob Bonta to craft a bill that would let citizens sue anyone who “manufactures, distributes, or sells an assault weapon or ghost gun kit or parts” in California. They could seek damages of at least $10,000 per violation plus costs and attorney’s fees, Newsom said.
“If the most efficient way to keep these devastating weapons off our streets is to add the threat of private lawsuits, we should do just that,” said Newsom, a longtime advocate of strict gun control laws.
Legal experts had predicted that other states would try to copy the tactic used in the Texas abortion law, which attempts to circumvent legal challenges by giving private citizens the power to sue.
Arguing against her conservative colleagues’ decision to let the Texas law stand, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor had warned their action would “clear the way” for other states to “reprise and perfect Texas’ scheme in the future to target the exercise of any right recognized by this court with which they disagree.”
https://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article256524466.html
—
They’ll craft a gun control law that can only be undone by nullifying the tactic Texas used to take away abortion rights. They may destroy the gun industry in the process.
Gosh, California attacking gun owners and manufacturers. What will they think of next? Proves my point that the left LOVES to infringe and suppress the rights of others but HATES to have any of their “rights” restricted or regulated. Let’s not forget, though, that the RIGHT to bear arms and self defense is actually written in plain language in the Constitution. However, NO WHERE is there a “right to murder for convenience” there. So, as in every other case, anything idiot Newsome does will be struck down. What a pathetic crybaby.
Why don’t you leftists go out and stomp puppies or baby birds to death to satisfy your desire to kill for the fun of it?
“California will use that authority to protect people’s lives, where Texas used it to put women in harm’s way.” And just look at the marvelous job Newsome and his socialists do of protecting people’s lives now!
You don’t actually have a clue how the Texas anti-choice law works, or what the implication for the Constitution would be if it isn’t overturned, do you?
What, exactly, is in the Constitution that is being overturned? Where does it say there is a right to an abortion?
Women still have 6 weeks to do their killing.
Exactly,
Roe v Wade is not in the constitution. It is a case period. There is no constitutional right to a abortion.
The Supreme Court of the United States determined that it IS in the Constitution, and that decision has stood for half-a-century. The stability of our entire system of constitutional law is based on the premise that, once established, such precedents are not arbitrarily cast aside anytime there’s a shift in the political wind.
People who what abortion banned aren’t even in the majority. They’re a cranky minority who want to impose their will on others. They’re not content that individuals should be able to decide for themselves, based on their own beliefs, morals, and personal circumstances.
People who WANT abortion banned…
“No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States” Do you know where those words appear?
—
For any state to make a law that intentionally deprives women of sovereign control their own bodies is a damn serious abridgement, and a damn serious invasion of privacy. It’s hard to imagine a governmental intrusion that’s more serious, more personal, or more egregious. In doing this, a state DICTATES that a pregnant woman must give birth.
I looked real hard for the right to kill a baby out of convenience, but didn’t find anything like “The right to abortion shall not be infringed. ” You know… like the 2nd Amendment (which you leftists LOVE to trample” is specifically spelled out.
Really? I don’t see where the Constitution says you have any right to meddle in another individual’s personal business.
I don’t see where the Constitution says Texas can put a $10,000 bounty on someone who drives a woman to an abortion provider, or force a terrified girl who discovers that she’s pregnant as a result of incestuous rape to bear her rapist’s child. Can you tell me where THAT is written?
Maybe it’s in the Constitution of Texas somewhere. If it is, be advised that the Constitution of the United States supersedes any such state provision.
Why don’t you share the clause of SB8 that says “bounty” or give us the percentage of abortions that are performed due to “incestuous rape?”
You leftists are so dedicated to the god of death. Of course, abortion is the Democrat’s sacred cow and shall be honored. “KILL BABIES” should be your Party motto.
Why don’t the Democrats just end all welfare to single moms and their children. Those babies could have been slaughtered before they became a burden on the taxpayer but obviously that doesn’t make any difference to Dems (Demon Party).
Gramsci was right; destroy the family, degrade religious faith and take control of education and in one short generation, we get useful idiots like you.
“You leftists are so dedicated to the god of death.”
We’re not the ones who want a pistol in every pocket.
We’re not the ones who want a pistol in every pocket.
You told us you have a pistol, do you think every one of the 22 million hunters out a couple of weeks ago were Republicans? That would be cool.
Up in everybodys business? Lots of businesses in Dem country will never come back.
Incestuous rape, leave Bidens out of this, if the diary that the FBI was hot after is true. The laptop from hell shows the apple doesnt fall far from the tree.
Did you read the diary that was posted online? I did, but I didn’t see the part where Joe Biden was accused of incestuous rape. Perhaps you could send me the link.
After the Trump years, aren’t simple and unfounded accusations — without clear sources or proof — all that’s needed to convince the public of absolute guilt?
Can’t you just infer whatever you want, given the precedence set?
Can’t you just say Trump said to inject bleach without providing actual proof or a video that doesn’t negate the accusation altogether, for example?
Can’t we just say Biden raped his daughter, if we can say Trump colluded with Russia and got peed on and said vets were “losers” all without any evidence or even evidence that prove the opposite?
Aren’t we just holding Biden to the same standards of a usurping government manufacturing false public opinion by just seeding the minds of the weak with falsehoods they infer to be true?
Shouldn’t Biden be held to the same standards as his predecessor, meaning we can make things up and actually work against him because we think it’s better for the country?
Isn’t this what you wanted by doing it to Trump and all non-Leftists?
Then you read about showers and the negative effect they had on his daughter, but his Son Hunter and the step daughter /niece he cant be alone with her at all. There are degrees to rape, as a groomer you should learn them prison isnt kind to kiddie diddlers.
Admittedly, as far as we know, idiot Biden only raped Tara Reade. Though he has fondled and harassed dozens (as seen on video), he only raped Reade.
Haven’t armed citizens saved many times more people than armed criminals have taken?
Nah, you’re just the ones making a pistol in every pocket NECESSARY for public safety.
A pistol in every pocket would give us the lowest crime stats we’ve ever seen.
So, once again… NO ANSWER. Leftists just want to do what they want to do when they want to do it. Leftists feel they have the power of life and death over everyone else but no one regulates or restricts them.
Murder is a “personal issue”? Taking a life because it would be more convenient than taking personal responsibility for personal behavior is a personal issue? How about we just deem guns a instrument of late, late term abortion?
A rape victim has six weeks to get an abortion. A party slut has six weeks to get an abortion. Anyone concerned about carrying a baby has six weeks after the sexual act to get an abortion.
You goddamned barbaric leftists pushed your abortion cult to the extreme and now you are getting the just deserts. You refuse to acknowledge that life begins SOMETIME and that you don’t control when. You refuse to act as civilized human beings. You determine that life is disposable if it might be an inconvenience. You try to regulate, restrict and oppress every aspect of the lives of others but throw an infantile fit if YOUR life gets regulated. Too bad about your abortion worship, but YOU aborted it yourselves.
“We’re not the ones who want a pistol in every pocket.” And who wants that? Tell us. But, again, what’s the problem? Killing someone when they get in your way or disrupt your life is “right”, isn’t it? Some of those are simply too big to kill with a probe or forceps.
‘The Supreme Court of the United States determined that it IS in the Constitution, and that decision has stood for half-a-century.‘
No, it is not in the Constitution. In order for anything to be included into the original document, it must go through the amendment process. There is no amemdment to the Constitution regarding baby killing.
Roe V Wade is case law, not unlike Plessy V Ferguson. Plessy V Ferguson was case law where the Supreme Court deemed segregation lawful and that decision stood for more than half-a-century until Brown V Board of Education.
Brown V Board of Education overturned Plessy because Plessy was bad case law.
The current case regarding Mississippi before the Supreme Court is the equlivent to Brown.
Plessy was not inserted into the Constitution for if had been vis-a-vie the amendment process, in order to nullify Plessy would have required 2/3 state ratification.
That never happened and will not happen with Roe because it is not in the Constitution.
‘If it is, be advised that the Constitution of the United States supersedes any such state provision.‘
This is a pure lack of understanding of the Constitution. I revert to the 10th amendment, that is in the Constitution.
10th Amendment (Full Text)
“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
If the baby killing(abortion) is not in the Constitution, The Constitution can not supercede state law. Preceding Courts have made bad case law and the genius of the constitution is it provides remedies to bad case law.
The Mississippi case before the Court is an effort to correct bad case law. Abortion is a States rights issue, not a Federal issue. It is in essence a Tenth amendment case and Roe stripped the ability of the individual States to practice Federalism that the states insisted upon or the ratification of the US Constitution would have never occurred.
It is just that simple…
“No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States” Do you know where those words appear?
The clause of the Fourteenth Amendment,
“No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States,” does not refer to privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States other than those privileges and immunities embraced in the original text of the Constitution, article four, section two.
The Fourteenth Amendment, it is believed, did not add to the privileges or immunities before mentioned, but was deemed necessary for the enforcement as an express limitation upon the powers of the States. It had been judicially determined that the first Eight Amendments of the Constitution were not limitations on the power of the States, and it was apprehended that the same might be held of the provision of the second section, fourth article.
Shortly thereafter, on March 31, 1871, Bingham elaborated:
The Fourteenth Amendment does not apply in the case of Roe bucause Roe is not in the Constitution.
Rand Paul offers to buy Ilhan Omar a plane ticket back to Somalia…
From the party that claims to support small, non-intrusive government and individual rights:
Feb. 22, 2022 – Oklahoma Republican lawmakers advance Texas-style anti-abortion bill on party-line vote
Apparently Oklahoma women would be required by law to report the beginning date of each menstrual cycle to local authorities.
Elect idiots, and this is what you get.
How do these bills expand the government? Will there be an entire state agency?
Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Shitt (R) on Tuesday signed into law a bill that makes providing an abortion a felony.
This is what comes of the left pushing to allow abortion up to and beyond the moment of birth. You were warned; you ignored the warnings. Eventually the Supreme Court will judge the Constitutional protection of infanticide.
Comrade Greggie worships at the altar of Kermit Gosnell.
There’s nothing more intrusive than a State taking control of a woman’s reproductive function. But go ahead. We’ll see what woman think of that at the ballot boxes.
The state forces women to go out and get pregnant? I’d like to see some verification of that. Note that murder is not reproduction.
Given the statistical probability of rape and incest pregnancies, that’s okay.
Low statistical probability is cold comfort if you yourself are the victim.
Oh… like the probability of being murdered or run over by an illegal immigrant that idiot Biden is stocking the US with? That probability is higher than pregnancy from rape or incest, but you support INCREASING that probability AND have the US taxpayer pay billions for the privilege of that threat.
How many of those cases suddenly turned into rape after they were caught due to the pregnancy? Got a stat on that, Mr. “Believe Her only applies to non-Democrats”?
5%???
Haha.
No.
But if we use the “estimates”, that’s still okay.
Totally acceptable.
Let’s get going with having strong families again, instead of dead family trees ending in selfish “career” goals and monkey-shit notions of being gay or trans.
Grow up.
Calling it a “notion” makes it sound as if you’re saying that being gay is a choice or a whim.
Calling it a “notion” makes it sound as if you’re saying that being gay is a choice or a whim.
If you believe in the “born gay” b/s, then please provide me with the research that proves the gay gene.
Being part of the alphabet soup clan IS not a nature issue, it is a nurture issue. While I don’t believe it to be a “whim”, it is a choice.
You think 5 to 9 year olds know the difference?
It’s not clear to me what point you’re trying to make in relation to the sentence you cited.
This is all about sexually insecure men desperately trying to maintain dominance over women who are no longer willing to put up with their bullshit. Preoccupation with gender issues is part of the same insecurity. It’s all about control.
Abortion is murdering babies.
This is all about sexually insecure men desperately trying to maintain dominance over women who are no longer willing to put up with their bullshit. Preoccupation with gender issues is part of the same insecurity. It’s all about control.
Greg thats total bullshit.
You obviously dont know its the females insecurity that leads her into sexual promiscuity, It is the couples choice not to take precautions. There are only 2 genders, follow real science not the pseudo born gay, in the wrong body groomers narrative.
It’s all about Democrat men wanting to make sure when their mistresses get knocked up, they can abort the evidence or when up-and-comers like Kumalover get knocked up interviewing for her next appointment, she can get rid of the baggage.
Low statistical probability is cold comfort if you yourself are the victim.
What is cold comfort is the way the victim is treated. No woman wants her name smeared all across the inked page while Soros funded DAs make sure the prep gets a light sentence and is treated like a mental patient, not a criminal. Hell, your side is already trying to make pedophilia normal.
The statistical arm of Planned Parenthood claims that only 1% of abortions are due to rape and only 1/2 of 1% of abortions are due to incest. In its latest report (2017) 862,380 abortions were performed in the U.S. Bet that made you happy.
Of course. Soros funds DAs, now?
MTG just said that enlisting in the military is “throwing your life away.” Will we learn that she’s Soros-funded next?
You’re being facetious, right?
OK, so you join the Marines and work your way up to E9. All you want to do is be a true warrior who is capable of defending your nation and its citizens. What you get is CRT/LBQXYZ/D & E training instead.
Would you consider that you probably threw your life away at that point?
You must be related to Comrade Greggie. Are you still teaching school or are you another “Michael?”