The Latest Trump Indictment Looks Like It’s Backfiring

Spread the love

Loading

by MATT MARGOLIS

If Joe Biden thought siccing his Department of Justice on Donald Trump would keep him from returning to the White House, that strategy appears to be backfiring.

A new poll conducted Aug. 2-7, which is entirely after the latest indictment by Special Counsel Jack Smith, shows that Trump now leads Biden in a 2024 rematch. The survey by Premise found that Trump garners the support of 42% of registered voters, while Joe Biden gets 38%, giving Trump a 4-point advantage.

If you’re a Democrat seeing this poll, it has to make you nervous. Trump was indicted earlier this month, and Democrats have been accusing him of crimes from the moment he decided to run for president. To them, the indictment not only represents Trump getting justice, but it’s the key to keeping him out of the White House. However, many experts panned the indictment for being weak and for criminalizing free speech.

As for the voters, while most Democrats support the indictment, Republicans and Independents do not, and a majority of all voters believe the indictments are political and attack free speech.

If the latest indictment hasn’t made Trump unviable for the presidency in the eyes of the voters, it is plausible that it has actually boosted him. In fact, we’ve seen it before. After his first indictment in Manhattan by the George Soros-funded prosecutor Alvin Bragg, Trump was beating Biden by seven points in the Rasmussen poll after he’d been behind Biden by three points before the indictment. That’s a ten-point swing in Trump’s favor. Biden was also beating Trump by four points in the YouGov survey before that indictment, and then Trump was leading by two points after — a six-point swing in Trump’s favor.

We’ve noticed Trump’s enjoyed a boost in GOP primary polling after the indictments, but these new polls suggest that nationwide, voters are troubled by the politicization of the judicial system, and that could help Trump in the general election.

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
13 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I sure hope this whole thing is blowing up in the faces of the Democrats their acceptance’s in the M.S Media and the UN Globalists CFR WEF as well as Soros and Bragg lets see them fall right off the cliff into the Bottomless

Tear it all down, and everyone’s lives will be better?

The MSM will try to scare the public into voting against him, but they don’t understand; the public WANTS Trump to tear it all down.

The administrative state is hellbent on protecting what they have. They see President Trump as a champion of and for the people. The government as well have known it for decades is not a government for and by the people. It is a government against the people. Trump put us in the room and at the table and what we are seeing disgusts us and we want it dismantled.

What do you think we’d be left with, in the absence of “the administrative state”?

The administrative state is no where in the Constitution.

Exercise by one branch of a power delegated to another violates the separation of powers provided for in the Constitution; i.e., it is unconstitutional. Constitutional powers may be classified as enumerated, implied, inherent, resulting, or sovereign—designations that explain the nature of a given power, its origin, and its scope of influence.

https://www.britannica.com/topic/delegation-of-powers

It would be impossible to manage a complex nation of 332 million without the delegation of powers.

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

The administrative state is 100% unconstitutional, full stop.

My Constitution makes no reference to governance relative to population.

From Kenneth Chesebro’s memo laying out the phony elector plot:

…Even if, in the end, the Supreme Court would likely end up ruling that the power to count the votes (in the sense of resolving controversies concerning them) does not lie with the President of the Senate, but instead lies with Congress (either voting jointly, or in separate Houses), letting matters play out this way would guarantee that public attention would be riveted on the evidence of electoral abuses by the Democrats, and would also buy the Trump campaign more time to win litigation that would deprive Biden of electoral votes and/or add to Trump’s column…

i.e., They knew damn well that Pence had no lawful authority to intervene in the vote count, but would have him do so anyway.

…If the Trump campaign ends up deciding to have all of its electors vote on December 14, even in States in which Trump has not been declared the winner, presumably word of this will leak out prior to December 14. So perhaps before then there should be messaging that presents this as a routine measure that is necessary to ensure that in the event the courts (or state legislatures ) were to later conclude that Trump actually won the state, the correct electoral slate can be counted in Congress in January just as the Democrats did in Hawaii in 1960, which ended up with Hawaii’s electoral votes being awarded to Kennedy, even though the litigation was not resolved until after the electors voted…

i.e., We have to spin this as a routine measure because what we’ve done is likely to leak out.

Chesebro is thought to be unnamed co-conspirator #5 in Trump’s federal January 6 indictment.