Richard Fernandez:
Michael Weiss starts off with a humdinger of a lead in Politico.
It’s hard to pinpoint just when, exactly, Barack Obama’s Syria policy fell apart. Was it in December, when Islamists humiliated U.S.-backed rebels by seizing what limited supplies America had given them? Was it back in September, when Obama telegraphed his reluctance to enforce his own “red line” after the Syrian regime used chemical weapons on its own people? Was it in the months beforehand, when the administration quietly and mysteriously failed to make good on its pledge to directly arm the rebels? Or did it collapse in August 2011, when Obama called on Syrian dictator Bashar Assad to go, only to do almost nothing to make it happen?
But collapse it has, and more than 130,000 deaths later, the White House is now pinning its hopes on a peace conference in Switzerland later this month that is being billed as the last, best hope for a negotiated solution to a conflict that has displaced a staggering 40 percent of Syria’s total population, some 23 million people, in what the United Nations says is fast becoming the worst and most expensive humanitarian catastrophe in modern history.
The only problem with Weiss’s article is that it has drawn its compass too small. The mayhem is much, much more extensive than Syria. For example, Syria really abuts on to Western Iraq, which is falling apart too. Sarah Birke of the New York Review of books reminds us “how al-Qaeda changed the Syrian War”.
Talk to any Syrian you meet on the Syrian-Turkish border these days, and in less than five minutes the conversation is likely to turn to Da’ash—the Arabic acronym for the rebel organization known as the Islamic State of Iraq and Greater Syria, or ISIS. Linked to al-Qaeda, the fearsome group has swept across northern Syria, imposing sharia law, detaining and even beheading Syrians who don’t conform to its purist vision of Islam, and waging war on rival militias. … The influence of the Islamic State of Iraq and Greater Syria is all the more startling given how recently the group entered the conflict.
The Washington Post reminds us that “a rejuvenated al-Qaeda-affiliated force asserted control over the western Iraqi city of Fallujah on Friday, raising its flag over government buildings and declaring an Islamic state in one of the most crucial areas that U.S. troops fought to pacify before withdrawing from Iraq two years ago.”
It seems Al-Qaeda is everywhere these days, excepting Benghazi, where the NYT assures us that a video was responsible for occasioning the burning of the US consulate there.
Still al-Qaeda’s resurgence is disturbing given the assurances as recently as the last presidential election that Osama bin Laden was dead and Detroit was alive. And what shall one make of Karzai a-fixing to double cross the United States?
The Afghan government is now considering releasing 88 detainees who are of particular concern to the United States. Collectively, Graham said, they killed 60 members of the U.S.-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF). … In March, the United States transferred control of the Parwan prison next to Bagram air base — with its roughly 3,000 detainees — to the Afghan government. Since then, Graham said, the Afghans have released 560 detainees without trial, and ‘some of those have gone back to the fight.’
You’d think the Taliban won that existential conflict; that they are going to take that place over shortly after the US leaves. If the US can leave, since the Pakistanis are making trouble over the amount they’ll charge to let Americans drive to the nearest port. And speaking of Pakistan, they “are determined to restore traditional peace of Balochistan” after 50 militant camps sprang up in it.
Well nobody said the course toward a world without nuclear weapons ran smooth. Never mind. At least John Kerry’s on track to broker a peace agreement between Israel and the Palestinians is on track. That’s reassuring in the wake of news that “Hezbollah has been transferring its long range missiles out of Syria and into Lebanon, including missiles which could reach the heart of Israel, the New York Times reported on Friday.” Foreign Policy is reporting that in addition, Hezbollah has acquired sophisticated anti-ship missiles that it has smuggled into Lebanon.
It sounds like a civil war is brewing there and that a new Israel-Lebanon war is in the offing.
But put those gloomy thoughts aside. How could such tragedy impend when President Obama vowed to serve the cause of peace and reach out to Muslims in his Cairo speech, where alas even now a war has been declared between the Muslim Brotherhood and the Egyptian government, in the very place where the chief executive enunciated his high purpose.
