Pamela Williams:
I want to start this report first by saying the meeting Donald Trump Jr. was recently involved in with the strange cast of foreign entities occurred before President Trump was even nominated. In fact, it would be no different than Hillary Clinton having tea with all of her cohorts from foreign countries, including Russia, and saying a few things about Trump. Make no mistake that did occur at some time in her past.
As I was putting this together, it occurred to me that Clinton has gotten away with so many crimes it would be impossible to list them all, but here are the ones that really matter and have gone unprosecuted and ignored. The people of the US know about them and feel ignored themselves by those in office, who should have prosecuted Clinton for the following crimes.
We have Huma Abedin, who served as Clinton’s deputy chief of staff linked to Muslim Brotherhood through al-Qaeda connections of her mother and father.
We have something that many have forgotten; nevertheless, in my opinion it was a crime. The Clinton-Gore campaign in 1996 allegedly took bribes from Chinese banks and their government to help their dwindling poll numbers. The Chinese embassy in D.C. helped siphon funds into the DNC. Secretary of Commerce Ron Brown (who was killed in a plane crash), and at Hillary’s instruction reportedly sold seats on department trade missions to China. Joint congressional hearings were canceled after Democrats threatened to bring up Republican campaign issues and then Monica Lewinsky actually saved this scandal from media attention.
She should go to prison for this one! Hillary kept all her official correspondence as secretary of state, as well as her personal emails, on a private email server located at her home, instead of using the government-mandated process while serving in the high appointed position. Her email system was unsecured for months while she used it for government business, and she did not sign a standard agreement when she left office that promised she had left government property behind. The Hill reported Hillary did not encrypt her private email service with a digital certificate for the first three months of her tenure as secretary of state.” That was while she was traveling to China, Egypt, Israel, Japan and South Korea. Several present and former members of the U.S. intelligence community said Hillary’s private email server was a major security risk, and America, going forward, ought to assume enemies of the state all had access to it. Hillary deserved prison time for insisting on an email system that clearly left the nation vulnerable to attack.
But with all the above crimes of Hillary Clinton, in my opinion, the worst are Benghazi and the Russian Uranium Deal.
1. BENGHAZI – On Sept. 11, 2012, while Hillary was secretary of state, Islamic militants attacked a U.S. special mission in Benghazi, Libya, and murdered U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and U.S. Foreign Service Information Management officer Sean Smith. Two CIA contractors, Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty, were also killed.
In the months leading up to the attack, Hillary’s State Department cut security in Libya. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., accused Hillary of “dereliction of duty” that led to the deaths of the four Americans. “The State Department not only failed to honor repeated requests for additional security, but instead actually reduced security in Libya,” Johnson wrote in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. “Although no one can say with certainty, I firmly believe a relatively small contingent of armed military guards would have prevented the attack, and those four lives would not have been lost.”
In “The REAL Benghazi Story: What the White House and Hillary Don’t Want You to Know,” New York Times bestselling author Aaron Klein provides shocking details about the central role Hillary Clinton actually played in the scandal. A security decision finalized personally by Hillary may have unwittingly doomed the Americans in Benghazi. Hillary herself signed waivers that allowed the facility to be legally occupied, since it did not meet the minimum official security standards set by the State Department. The waiver legally allowed the CIA annex to be housed in a location about one mile from the U.S. special mission.
According to accounts from Benghazi survivors, the delayed response time by those at the CIA annex may have cost the lives of Stevens and the three other Americans killed at the special mission. If the CIA annex had been co-located with the U.S. special mission, a rapid response team would have been on site during the initial assault in which Stevens was killed. Clinton’s waiver allowed the CIA annex to be housed at the separate location.
State Department emails show Clinton knew while the attack was under way that it was being carried out by terrorists! UNFORGIVABLE!
Judicial Watch has obtained previously classified documents from the U.S. Department of Defense and the Department of State revealing that DOD almost immediately reported that the attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, was planned and carried out by al-Qaida and Muslim Brotherhood-linked terrorists. A federal court ordered the government hand over more than 100 pages of previously secret documents that showed then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and other senior Obama officials were given reports within hours of the Sept. 11, 2012, attack. In those memos, the DOD described details of a plan 10 days in advance “to kill as many Americans as possible.”
Nonetheless, Hillary falsely blamed it on “rage and violence over an awful Internet video” when she spoke at a ceremony at Andrews Air Force Base on Sept. 14, 2012, as the remains of the four Americans were returned to the U.S. To this day, Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., says the State Department has failed to comply with requests for information about Benghazi.
2. URANIUM ONE – And last of all, but the one criminal act which fits in into the topic of “RUSSIA” is: How the Clintons Sold Out U.S. National Interests to the Putin Regime. To make a long story short, at the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.
Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.
As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.
Soon, Uranium One began to snap up companies with assets in the United States. In April 2007, it announced the purchase of a uranium mill in Utah and more than 38,000 acres of uranium exploration properties in four Western states, followed quickly by the acquisition of the Energy Metals Corporation and its uranium holdings in Wyoming, Texas and Utah. So Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, along with husband Bill, in exchange for donations, gave nuclear power Russia and Putin control of 20 percent of the world’s uranium supply. Yet neither Congressional Democrats, who accuse Trump of being too cozy with Moscow, nor their mainstream media, are eager to talk about the Clinton uranium deals with Russia. Unbelievably, the Russians have mining rights in the United States!
To move into the meeting young Donald Trump had with the cast of shady characters connected to Russia, I see a setup, but at the heart of the meeting was the Russian lawyer, Natalia Veselnitskaya, who is best known for her repeated attack against the Magnitsky Act, an American law that blacklists suspected Russian human rights abusers. The law so enraged Mr. Putin that he retaliated by halting American adoptions of Russian children.
As I was researching the Magnitsky Act, I found a very disturbing article by a man named, Bill Browder, who uncovered Russian corruption of the Magnitsky Act – BUT NOT ONLY THAT his story horrified me, as it clearly showed Putin in a way I had never imagined him. In addition, it made me see Natalia Veselnitskaya for the evil manipulator she is. Also, horrifically, her whole life is dedicated to overthrowing the Magnitsky Act. Once one reads the following story, one sees why the Magnitsky Act can never be destroyed. It must remain intact and respected for all time. The following video is one to watch to understand the reason Veselnitskaya was adamant about attending that meeting and what it was really about.
The left is trying to railroad innocent people to compensate for the defeat of perhaps the most corrupt, dishonest, incompetent and despicable candidate in history. This tells you a LOT about liberals.
But nobody ever proved any “Clinton crimes,” did they? After pissing away over one-hundred million taxpayer dollars on years of endless, repetitive, politically motivated investigations, each and every one came up absolutely nothing. Select an explanation from the possibilities below:
A. There were no actual crimes; or,
B. The people you elect are too effing stupid to prove what they told you is obvious.
But nobody ever proved any “Clinton crimes,” did they? After pissing away over one-hundred million taxpayer dollars on years of endless, repetitive, politically motivated investigations, each and every one came up absolutely nothing. Select an explanation from the possibilities below:
A. There were no actual crimes; or,
B. The people you elect are too effing stupid to prove what they told you is obvious.
The Uranium One story could be used as a test. Anyone with a brain can quickly find the holes in the tale. Unsurprisingly, many Trump supporters can’t.
@Greg:
Well, yeah… they did. Emails with classified information were found on her private, secret, unsecured server.
That’s a crime.
She lied to Congress, under oath, about having classified information on her private, secret, unsecured server.
That’s a crime.
She lied to Congress, under oath, about turning over all State Department emails.
That’s a crime.
She and her cronies destroyed devices the FBI had asked them to turn over to them.
That’s a crime.
She destroyed 33,000 emails that should have been preserved in State Department archives.
That’s a crime.
Now, those are the ones we KNOW of. There was plenty of evidence of influence peddling, more perjury, more obstruction of justice and LOTS of deaths surrounding the Clinton’s that would not take very much to turn up more prosecutable activity.
The fact that the corrupt Obama DOJ didn’t prosecute anything is no indication of innocence; only proof of widespread corruption. Comey’s little presentation showed that, as well as the tarmac Clinton/Lynch meeting. Justice and the law mean nothing to liberals. This, too, has been proven beyond any possible doubt. It can only be lied about as a defense.
You gotta be really blind, deaf and dumb (especially dumb) to miss it, Greg.