I did a deep dive into Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson’s dissenting opinion.
It’s even worse than I expected.
Follow this thread to see for yourself.
Their main argument is that the law discriminates on the basis of sex since there are certain medications that make boys look like boys, vice versa for girls.
But that’s insane.
These treatments are meant for diagnosable pathologies in order to restore normal physiology.
It would be like saying a patient without cancer but “identifies as having cancer” is being discriminated against because a doctor is refusing to give them chemotherapy.
They have the audacity to claim the majority opinion “contorts logic” while they rely on anti-logic.
They go on for quite some time as if they are certified, practicing doctors.
They describe commonly treated endocrine pathologies and how hormones are used to treat these conditions.
These genius legal minds are setting up a shifty play for their next move…
After their prolonged dissertation on basic endocrine pathology, they claim these hormones are used in children whose “gender identity is inconsistent with their sex identified at birth.”
This statement is sheer medical lunacy. It is not real. It has no basis in objective, observable reality.
It has as much legitimacy as your local Voodoo witchdoctor – like using a rabbit’s foot to treat a hemorrhaging carotid artery.
As if it couldn’t get any crazier, they cite WPATH!
This is the same organization whose legitimacy was completely decimated during the oral arguments.
It’s like relying on Purdue Pharma to justify the safety of Oxycontin to treat a mild headache.
Almost as if they did not pay attention to a single thing during the oral arguments, these Justices even repeat the thoroughly debunked WPATH talking point that puberty blockers merely “pause puberty.”
I guess they missed the part about puberty blockers causing infertility.
The Justices then claim it is a matter of “life and death.”
Thus, it appears they also missed the part when Chase Strangio, the lead ACLU attorney, conceded to Justice Alito that “gender affirming care” actually has no impact on rates of completed suicide.
This is like a Judge endorsing a guilty verdict in a murder case after finding out the victim is still alive.
After this their arguments progress even further into a tailspin of anti-logic and WPATH propaganda.
And although we won this case, we should not fail to appreciate the severity of the situation.
These Judges sit on the highest court in our country yet live in a reality informed by fantasy.
This is not a good state of affairs.
All this medical expertise on gender yet they cannot even define what a woman is!
1988WORST OTR I EVER CAST For the lefty that put”Wise Latina” on bench. 1992
By the time Bush put her on the Fed Bench I had been kicking my ass for almost 3.8 years!
BUT, “BUsH REPUBLICANS” HAVE ALWAYS BEEN LIBERAL!
My heart said; but, he spent 8 years part of the folk that made America great again. MY BRAIN SAID; dummopf; in the 1980 debates he clearly said “Christianity is a mere superstition” He hates you!
Heart was very, very wrong!
Never again a “Bush Republican”
TO ME BUSH’S GIRL IS A DUMB WISE ASS!
Since the asylums were defunded by Reagan, homelessness and insanity have free ranged, now they are organized. once cruel mental experiments were confined to the nut houses, well welcome to college, and the 12 years of prep for the new looneybin. MK ultra stuff with the unibomber was just the beginning.
Beware Mk Naomi, and chemtrails, darken the sun, or depopulation?