In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court has issued a big win to the Donald Trump administration. The ruling pauses an order from a lower court judge that required the administration to give illegal immigrants a warning before sending them to other countries with which they have no prior ties.
The program, called “third-country removal,” was shot down by a federal judge in May. U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy blocked the administration’s attempt to deport a group of immigrants to South Sudan. Shocker: Murphy is a Joe Biden appointee.
BREAKING VICTORY: Supreme Court 6-3 rules IN FAVOR of President Trump deporting illegal aliens to "third countries" like Sudan.
Dissenting was Jackson, Kagan and Sotomayor.
GREAT timing as this comes on Clarence Thomas' birthday! pic.twitter.com/wl5UXdiqPQ
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) June 23, 2025
Another shocker: the three justices who dissented were Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagen, and Ketanji Brown Jackson.
“When illegal aliens commit crimes in this country, they are typically ordered removed,” wrote Solicitor General D. John Sauer in his petition to the court. “But when those crimes are especially heinous, their countries of origin are often unwilling to take them back. As a result, criminal aliens are often allowed to stay in the United States for years on end, victimizing law-abiding Americans in the meantime. The Executive Branch has taken steps to resolve this problem by removing aliens to third countries that have agreed to accept them.”
“A single federal district court, however, has stalled these efforts nationwide,” Sauer continued. “On behalf of a nationwide class of aliens with final orders of removal, the district court issued an extraordinary preliminary injunction that restrains DHS from exercising its undisputed statutory authority to remove an alien to a country not specifically identified in his removal order (i.e., a “third country”), unless DHS first satisfies an onerous set of procedures invented by the district court to assess any potential claim under the Convention Against Torture (CAT), see 8 U.S.C. 1231 note, no matter how facially implausible.”
Fortunately, the six conservative justices saw the value in allowing third-country removals. One bonus to this story: this judgment came out on Justice Clarence Thomas’ birthday. Happy Birthday, sir!
This is not a victory for the Constitution. None of these judges has any jurisdiction in these cases, including the SCOTUS.
Immigration and Nationality Act
This strips the Article III courts’ jurisdiction over immigration cases. This was passed in 1952, and has been amended several times. (Authority: Article III, Section II, Clause 2) To ask the Supreme (Article III) Court to rule that it is itself in violation of the Act is a pipe dream as they have been usurping the powers of the other two branches since Marbury vs. Madison (1803). The solution is to impeach each judge in violation. The President is required by his oath to defy and ignore such unconstitutional orders, in order to “…preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
On September 30, 1996, President Bill Clinton signed the “ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION REFORM AND IMMIGRANT RESPONSIBILITY ACT OF 1996” Under Sec 302, it states that illegal aliens can be “removed from the United States without further hearing or review”.
Not one single Penny to Rioters Looters Arsonists who wave their Home Nations Flag in America they all belong in Prison for 50 Years
The deflation caused by operation wetback gave “working Americans” a material,TAX FREE py raise yearly from 1954 to 1960! I have direct knowledge of this!
If illegals had any regard for others they would not be BREAKING THE LAW BY BEING HERE!