Supreme Court is the left’s new Trump

Spread the love

Loading

by Don Surber

Having convinced themselves that Democrats will cream President Trump next year thanks to ballot harvesting, the left has moved to remove the last obstacle to their total control of our country, which was a constitutional republic until January 20, 2021’s installation of Biden in the White House.

The left now attacks the Supreme Court.

Democrats want to give Congress control of the court by creating an ethics commission of some sort. That’s like Jack the Ripper calling for knife control.

If such a commission does not work, assassination is not outside the left’s ken. Justice Samuel Alito flat out raised that possibility when asked about the leak of his draft of the decision that overturned Roe.

Readers must understand that we now have a government of the government by the government and for the government.

The deep state preferred Bidden because he allowed the deep state to run the government as he appointed tokens and flunkies to his Cabinet who know not how to run their departments. This means Civil Service-protected lifers — not Congress or the Cabinet secretaries — will decide whether you can have a gas stove.

The agency is not the Department of Energy but the Consumer Product Safety Commission. Its concern is not that gas stoves will blow up but that children might somehow develop asthma by eating meals cooked on gas stoves instead of electric. This is all based on one peer-reviewed paper in a little known journal.

The gas stove regulation shows the power of every agency in government. The lockdowns, the mask edicts and the vaccine mandates show our government cares nothing about the public, which it treats as a cat treats a mouse — something to play with until the cat gets bored and kills it.

The only thing that stands between the people and a totalitarian government now is the Supreme Court. Trump beefed it up with three conservative justices which means even if one dies or resigns, the court will have conservative majority.

The left, though, is willing to hasten death or resignation in order to regain control of the Supreme Court, which it had enjoyed since the days of FDR. Don’t fall for the argument that Republican presidents appointed many of the justices on the liberal court because every one of them needed confirmation by a Democrat Senate with the exception of Chief Justice Earl Warren.

Well-timed retirements enabled conservatives eventually to regain a 5-4 majority until Antonin Scalia’s death made it a 4-4 court. Mitch McConnell kept Obama from breaking that tie with the detestably partisan Merrick Garland. Trump got to pick his successor and Anthony Kennedy’s as well, maintaining a 5-4 majority. When Ruth Bader Ginsburg finally kicked the bucket, Trump made the majority 6-3.

Having used the court to shove their agenda for a half-century, the left now seeks to de-legitimize it. Everything and everyone are disposable to Marxists in their quest for power.

The Wall Street Journal reported, “Justice Samuel Alito: ‘This Made Us Targets of Assassination.’”

The story began, “Justice Samuel Alito was supposed to speak to law students at George Mason University in Arlington, Va., but when they showed up, he wasn’t there. ‘That Alito was speaking via closed circuit from a room at the Supreme Court seven miles away, rather than in person, was a sign these are not normal times,’ the Washington Post reported. The Post didn’t explain what made the ‘times’ abnormal.

“It wasn’t a lingering fear of Covid-19. In a mid-April interview in his chambers, Justice Alito fills us in on the May 12, 2022, event: ‘Our police conferred with the George Mason Police and the Arlington Police and they said, It’s not a good idea. He shouldn’t come here. . . . The security problems will be severe. So I ended up giving the speech by Zoom,’ he says. ‘Still, there were so many protesters and they were so loud that you could hear them.”

This was the result of the leak of the reversal of Roe. Someone leaked his draft opinion and this put six justices in danger. Police arrested a man who was in Brett Kavanaugh’s yard intent on his assassination — to be followed by two others.

As it was, noisy protesters broke the law and marched at three justices’s homes. Police never enforced the laws banning such protests.

Now Democrats are counterfeiting ethics complaints against Neil Gorsuch, John Roberts and of course, Clarence Thomas, whose skin color has especially discombobulated Democrats who fear he will become a role model for black children. One in four Democrat votes now come from black people. Without them and ballot harvesting, the party is as dead as the Mugwumps.

I’m no lawyer. Glenn Harlan Reynolds of Instapundit fame is.

He wrote, “The Supreme Court has ruled against the left on guns and abortion and is expected to strike down affirmative action any day now.

“Thus it must be delegitimized in any way possible.

“Just as the breathless coverage of the (entirely fake) stories of Donald Trump cavorting with Russian hookers in Moscow convinced some people that with so much smoke there must be fire.”

In DC, where there is smoke, there is dry ice from the CIA and the FBI.

My favorite senator, John Kennedy, said, “Americans may be poor under the Biden administration, but they are not stupid. They know what’s going on here.”

What is going on is Democrats trying to extort the court.

Kennedy said, “Why? You don’t need to be Einstein’s cousin to figure it out. They aren’t getting their way. So, they want to change the rules, but the Constitution isn’t a game, folks. And now, some Democrats want Congress to override the Supreme Court of the United States and apply rules to its justices.

“The constitutional separation of powers means that no branch of the federal government can dictate how another should govern itself. . . . This is to protect the people from abuse. The framers insulated the federal judiciary from political control to ensure that the justices would decide cases impartially, impartially—without fear of the kind of retaliation that fills the pages of some—not all, but some—left-of-Lenin Democrats’ playbook.”

The justices, too, are resisting the Mob tactics by the Democrat mob.

Lawyer Thomas Jipping of the Heritage Foundation wrote, “All nine current justices signed a lengthy Statement on Ethics Principles and Practices explaining how they approach ethical questions, including in ways that necessarily differ from lower court judges.

“The more serious problem, however, is that these bills would then allow anyone to file a complaint that a Supreme Court justice has allegedly violated some provisions of such a code.”

Sarah Palin resigned as governor after she had to defend herself against 28 unfounded ethics complaints. The legal fees nearly bankrupted her.

Jipping wrote, “Listen closely and you might hear the left preparing action alerts, fundraising appeals, and hysterical tweets urging their minions to start preparing those complaints.

“Think that’s paranoid?

“Starting even before Justice Brett Kavanaugh was confirmed, no fewer than 83 complaints were filed with the court on which he previously sat. That was just practice for what would come under these bills.”

Even if the complaints don’t force justice to leave the court, the complaints may lead to more recusals.

While everyone looks to Dobbs — the overturning of Roe — the real force behind Democrat efforts to eliminate the court is the post-Trump court’s willingness to take the deep state on. That is why West Virginia v. EPA was a bigger case than Dobbs because the court told the deep state NO! That word was a red flag waved at these bulls. Hence the attempt to rein in the courts on ethics by unethical Democrats.

The big test of whether the court caves to deep state pressure comes this year in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo.

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
4 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Why else did American Traitor and Draft Dodger/Democrat Bill Clinton singed America onto the ICC(International Crinimal Court)as part of Treason on his last day in office

I keep saying the left will never let up. Sorry, but this will be a fight to the death; some form of metaphorical or even literal death. No matter how they are constitutionally defeated, the left will strike back by unconstitutional means. With Herr Gruppenfuhrer Garland running the DOJ, we’ve seen they have no regard for the Constitution, laws, morals or justice. The ends justifies their corrupt means.

I don’t see why Ketanji Brown Jackson felt the need to recuse herself. Perhaps that is tradition.

Democrats (and she is a Democrat first, Justice last) rarely recuse anytime. They simply don’t care and, in fact, a conflict of interest is a bonus. That’s what they’re there for. Democrats hate justice, they hate our government, they hate the Constitution. They love money and power.

Dems latest smear against Clarence Thomas and his great nephew just blew up in spectacular fashion…

Dems are like a pit bull when it comes to taking down their enemies. Once they get a whiff of blood, they won’t let go until they bring their target down. Fortunately, they’re not always successful, and in the case of Justice Thomas, who they’re currently targeting, they’re barking up the wrong tree.

Dems are salivating over the latest so-called “scandal” involving Republican megadonor Harlan Crow and Justice Thomas. Harlan Crow covered the costs for the private boarding school education of Clarence Thomas’ great nephew, who he and his wife raised as if he were their own child. The left is screeching that Thomas didn’t disclose the “gift” payments… but there’s one big problem with the left’s latest political hit job… Justice Thomas didn’t have to disclose it.

Foiled again!
The Washington Times:

A former Trump administration official who is a friend of Justice Clarence Thomas is pushing back against another report alleging the justice flouted ethics rules by allowing a GOP megadonor to pay the private school tuition of his great-nephew, whom he raised as a son.

Mark Paoletta, who served as general counsel to the Office of Management and Budget in the Trump administration, said billionaire Harlan Crow’s payments of the great-nephew’s tuition did not constitute a gift that Justice Thomas had to disclose.

He bashed the reporting as “malicious,” saying ProPublica — the news outlet that published the tuition story — is dragging the justice’s relative into a false scandal.

Here’s the official statement from Mark Paoletta:

STATEMENT OF MARK PAOLETTA, FRIEND OF JUSTICE THOMAS

The Thomases have rarely spoken publicly about the remarkably generous efforts to help a child in need. They have always respected the privacy of this young man and his family. It is disappointing and painful, but unsurprising that some journalists and critics cannot do the same.

The Thomases—quietly and honorably—devoted twelve years of their lives to helping a beloved child in desperate need of love, support, and guidance. In 1997, Justice Thomas and his wife brought their great nephew to live with them. They agreed to take in this young child much as Justice Thomas’s grandparents had done for him and his brother in 1955. Justice Thomas’s grandparents changed the trajectory of his life, and the Thomases hoped to do the same for a child in need.

Justice Thomas and his wife made immeasurable personal and financial sacrifices and poured every ounce of their lives and hearts into giving their great nephew a chance to succeed. In the summer of 2006, the Thomases were struggling to find a school where they could send their great nephew. In discussing these challenges with their dear friends, Harlan and Kathy Crow, Harlan recommended that the Thomases consider one more option: sending their great nephew to Randolph Macon Academy. Harlan had attended Randolph Macon, and he thought the school would be a good fit.

Harlan had financially supported Randolph Macon since the 1980s, and funded scholarships for students from disadvantaged backgrounds. Harlan offered to pay the first year of Justice Thomas’s great nephew’s tuition in 2006, and that payment went directly to the school. Harlan Crow’s Office confirmed that he did not pay the great nephew’s tuition for any other year at Randolph Macon.

After some time, Randolph Macon recommended the great nephew attend a boarding school in Georgia for one year. Harlan offered to pay the first year of tuition for their great nephew at the Georgia school, and again, those tuition payments went directly to the school.

By the next school year (2009), the Thomases’ great nephew returned to Randolph Macon. He moved back to Savannah in December 2009, after he turned 18. The Thomases love their great nephew. It is despicable that the press has dragged him into their effort to smear Justice Thomas.

This story is another attempt to manufacture a scandal about Justice Thomas. But let’s be clear about what is supposedly scandalous now: Justice Thomas and his wife devoted twelve years of their lives to taking in and caring for a beloved child—who was not their own—just as Justice Thomas’s grandparents had done for him. They made many personal and financial sacrifices to do this. And along the way, their friends joined them in doing everything possible to give this child a future.

Harlan Crow’s tuition payments made directly to these schools on behalf of Justice Thomas’s great nephew did not constitute a reportable gift. Justice Thomas was not required to disclose the tuition payments made directly to Randolph Macon and the Georgia school on behalf of his great nephew because the definition of a “dependent child” under the Ethics in Government Act (5 U.S.C. 13101 (2)) does not include a “great nephew.” It is limited to a “son, daughter, stepson or stepdaughter.” Justice Thomas never asked Harlan Crow to pay for his great nephew’s tuition. And neither Harlan Crow, nor his company, had any business before the Supreme Court.

This malicious story shows nothing except for the fact that the Thomases and the Crows are kind, generous, and loving people who tried to help this young man.

If a government institution or even a branch of the government will not serve the Democrat agenda 100%, they will seek to destroy it.