By AL PERROTTA
I know I’m not the brightest bulb on the tree, but I am getting the impression Democrats don’t want us to know the truth about the election.
Let’s take a look at a couple stories lost in the holiday shuffle.
Maricopa County Election Officials Ignore Subpoena on Dominion Machines
Last week, the Arizona State Senate served the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors with a subpoena, ordering Dominion voting machines in the county secured, a forensic audit and a scanned ballot audit.
The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors ignored the subpoena. In fact, they are going to court to block the subpoena. Now why in the world would they want to block an effort to examine Dominion voting machines? What skin is it off their back? It’s not like they’d be the ones forced to give up holiday time to do the technical analysis. Seems worth it to have a few tech geeks put down the egg nog for a couple days just to assure voters the machines were clean and not compromised.
With Christmas parties cancelled, and travel discouraged, what else they have to do anyway?
But no, Maricopa County officials are blocking the road to truth. Why?
See No Fraud, Hear No Fraud
You know why. They saw the results of a similar audit in Antrim, Michigan. That forensic audit revealed a 68% error rate — which allows for the manual “adjudication” of ballots — deleted security and adjudication logs, vote switching functions enabled, and on and on. In fact, Russell Ramsland Jr. revealed Saturday that the redacted parts of this company’s analysis indicate the results of some down-ballot races were switched.
Perhaps the Maricop-outs also saw a new analysis that indicates Joe Biden received an average of 5% more votes on Dominion machines than he did on other voting systems.
Well, except for the HART InterCivic voting system. Old Joe got 6% more on those machines. Guess who bought HART just a couple months ago? Delvin Talbott, the son of Clinton Machine fixture Strome Talbott. You knew Hillary had to be in the election debacle mix somewhere. Incidentally, HART was one of the companies NBC News highlighted in its 2019 report on lack of election security.
This analysis echoes the findings of insurance fraud investigator Ben Turner, who calculated Biden got a 2%-3% vote shift in counties that used Dominion machines.
Joe Biden’s margin of “victory” in Arizona is only 10,457 votes.
Maricopa County doesn’t want anyone looking at the machines that generated that tally. Does their stonewalling make you more confident or less confident the election was on the up-and-up?
Michigan Secretary of State Official Seems to Want Illegal Ballots Counted
An official with the Michigan Secretary of State’s office is caught on video displaying a shocking lack of interest in voter fraud.
It happened during a “risk-limited audit” in Antrim County.
As Gateway Pundit reports, a male ballot counter from Central Lake Township notes “multiple ballots with same signature.” Matthew DePerno puts the figure at 138 ballots. However, this female official insists those dubious ballots be counted.
A female counter asks “So when we’re done with the audit, there’s still the opportunity to challenge the fact that we have multiple ballots with the very same signature?” she asks.
Nothing doing. When the two counters press the issue, they are again shut down. “That is not the process.”
WATCH:
Actually, this is the third video in Gateway Pundit‘s report. The first two show other shenanigans during that “risk-limited audit.”
Naturally, Michigan’s Secretary of State office is dubbing the article “Misinformation.” That’s the buzz-word workshopped before the election for any evidence which contradicts the official story, that Joe Biden won the election legitimately.
Georgia Whistleblowers Punished
Two whistleblowers in Georgia who swear they saw election wrongdoing are paying the price of coming forward, Epoch Times is reporting.
The election was Stolen by Biden and the Globalists and the DNC
If Democrats actually thought the election was legitimate, were aware that half the nation suspects it was fraudulent and wanted to restore faith in “honest” elections, why would they do everything they possibly can to make it all looks totally suspicious and fraudulent?
Oh, yeah…. because it WAS.
The only reason “half the nation” suspects there was election fraud is because there’s been a ceaseless national disinformation campaign conducted with the intention of putting that wrong idea into their heads. The fact is that Trump lost the election because a HUGE majority of American voters wanted him gone.
On his way out the door, Attorney General William Barr states he sees no need to appoint a Special Counsel to investigate Hunter Biden; also, that he has still seen no evidence of election fraud.
December 21, 2020 – Barr Says No Need For Special Counsel For Hunter Biden Probe, Election Fraud Claims
@Greg: No Brother wrong as usual, as your beloved mockingbird has pushed out this idea that there is no evidence while demonizing those that have gathered the evidence. You can continue to misquote William Barr he is gone bubbye now and no longer has a voice we hear. We watched the hearings sometimes they ran all day. We know the path of the coup.
Were the Dominion machines hooked to the internet, you keep weaseling out of answering the question.
William Barr is Attorney General until Wednesday. He was not misquoted.
If they were, maybe we should look into the possibility that many of Trump’s votes were fraudulently changed from Biden votes by Russian hackers.
If we’re going to assume that election fraud took place without requiring any credible evidence to support the assumption, why would we imagine that known liars and cheats like Trump & Company wouldn’t have been far more likely to be behind it?
@Greg: No the question was a yes or no, there has been testimony and affidavits have has your media bothered to show you anything, its censorship and shameless lying. You most certainly misquoted Barr and did it intentionally.
The Justice Department hasn’t found evidence to support allegations of widespread fraud that could have changed the result of last election.
Did the man even look?
@Greg:
No, the reason is because they, like myself, watched the fraud unfold in real time. We watched Trump build an insurmountable lead in numerous states, watched those states “pause” counting, then resume in the middle of the early morning with massive numbers rolling in for Biden. I understand that, since you accept the necessity of lying, fraud, corruption, usurping power, trampling the Constitution and ignoring laws, possibly really can’t see the OBVIOUS reasons for suspicions.
When people have their suspicions piqued, they begin to look closer and it only took cursory investigation to begin uncovering MASSIVE irregularities. The irregularities lead to the outright and pre-meditated fraud. No, it wasn’t just one grand plan; it was thousands of leftists all with the same concept of acquiring power: through fraud by any means.
Now, suppression and cover up is underway. You think THAT doesn’t raise suspicions? Why not cooperate and open the books to SHOW how honest you are? Well, I know why. Hell, YOU know why. We all know why, so why continue with the theater? YOUR PARTY IS TOTALLY CORRUPT.
Russia wanted Biden. Putin even said so, saying he and Obiden see eye to eye on numerous things. Putin doesn’t want Trump in office. Neither does China or Iran; he kicks their asses and makes them toe the line. The prefer weak chumps like Obama and Obiden… or someone they can blackmail and/or bribe like Hillary.
@Greg:
You mean “credible” evidence that you, and your fellow Commies, are willing to accept, don’t you?
But your idea is absolutely brilliant. So let’s prove that Bargain Basement Joe actually won by recounts in states that are refusing to hold them, by forensic investigations of the Dominion Voting Systems voting equipment, by checking the signatures of mail in ballots with the voter registration applications?
Think how great it will be for you, and your fellow dredges of the Democrat party to rub a proven Biden win in our faces.
@retire05: Brilliant, Trump arranges a Yuge fraud using militant type liberals, throws the election just so he can cover up his landslide win and blame Biden for the cheat.
Even asks Putin to hack the election.
Do you think greg has to have a plastic protector on his keyboard to protect it from imbecile drool?
@retire05:
If it’s not credible, it’s not really evidence. Which is why judge after judge has observed that there isn’t any.
@Greg: Like Russian collusion. No evidence; it is even KNOWN in advance the accusations were baseless… but you all ran with it for 4 years.
Don’t tell us you care anything about evidence or even knows what it is.
@Greg:
That is a really, stupid, STUPID statement.
It’s credible if someone actually signs a sworn statement or testifies in a court of law. It is then up to the opposition to prove (there is that word you want to ignore) that the testimony is not credible and the reason for that claim.
If you shoot someone, and I witness that shooting, and I sign a sworn affidavit that I saw you shoot someone, it is up to the defense to prove I didn’t. It is called an “eye witness” account.
Like I have said before, if you ever need an attorney, please represent yourself. We will be done with you forever.
And how many of those judges you love to refer to, including sitting on the USSC, have even heard any evidence of fraud? How many of those cases have been a) thrown out for “standing”, b) latches (which was absolutely absurd) or c) adjudicated based on evidence? I’m sure you have the numbers are your fingertips, right?
Must you continually prove what an idiot you are?
@retire05, #12:
No, that’s how things actually work in courtrooms and in other important areas of reality.
Attorneys and judges will not hear voter fraud evidence because they fear left wing retaliation
https://www.theepochtimes.com/former-wisconsin-judge-our-court-system-has-been-deeply-intimidated-by-the-left_3625725.html?utm_source=newsnoe&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=breaking-2020-12-20-2
@Greg:
And in how many court rooms have you challenged evidence presented by an opposing side? And don’t give me your standard bullshit of “I can read”
@Deplorable Me, #14:
No credible evidence was presented with the lawsuits. That’s why they were dismissed and not accepted for trial. Without credible supporting evidence, the lawsuits were found to be without merit.
Judges aren’t inclined to allow their courtrooms to be turned into political propaganda platforms. When Rudy Giuliani finally got time in a federal district courtroom before a judge in Pennsylvania, he suddenly denied that he was actually asserting fraud. The reason was a complete lack of credible evidence. He knows he can get away with spinning bullshit yarns to television cameras while standing on a soapbox in front of a lawn and garden supply store; he also knows that he can’t get away with it in a courtroom before a perceptive judge.
@retire05, #15:
I assure you, the number of times I have done so cannot be counted.
@Greg: You have no proof it isn’t true. As usual.
@Greg:
That is because zero from zero, or even zero plus zero, is still ZERO.
In how many cases was evidence of fraud even allowed? Or is that another question you’ll dodge?
You have never argued in a court of law but are too chickensh!t to admit it.
Communist pond scum. That describes you accurately.
@retire05: He is simply a lost villiage idiot that thinks we will be believe anything thing he types. He might have watched a few episodes of Nancy Grace and court tv with MSLSD in pip so that does qualify him to be an expert commentator on CNN.
How long did it take you to work that out?
@Greg: About as long as it takes to read and verify ALL the evidence of Russian collusion you or any other leftist has every presented. Yet, you cling to that like a tick to a dog’s nuts.