Stand Your Ground Self Defense Laws Under Ferocious Attack

Spread the love

Loading

The latest shooting “crisis”  has put Stand Your Ground Laws under attack after the Sanford, Florida incident. Anti gun groups claim that the law needs to be eliminated or changed. Nothing could be further from the truth. Whether Mr. Zimmerman acted correctly is a matter of speculation, and it will be until it is resolved by the County’s Grand Jury.

Stand Your Ground laws have saved more lives than have been taken by its misuse. Vocal opponents of the law are not aware that Florida’s Stand Your Ground “Castle” Law only creates a rebuttable legal presumption in the law that the person who acted in “self defense” had a right to do so.  Al Sharpton doesn’t know what that means, or even care. The law gives no absolute right to use deadly force. Generally, when a person uses deadly force to defend himself or another, there has to be an honest and reasonable belief that the person using that force has a fear of immediate death or serious bodily injury from the person he has used that force against.

Here’s where the rebuttable presumption in Florida comes into play. If the Prosecutor believes and has evidence that the killing or injury inflicted was done with malice, or that immediate fear of injury or death was not present, then the Prosecutor is free to charge the person with any applicable crime up to murder. The Prosecutor must also prove that the person charged is guilty of violating that law beyond a reasonable doubt.

However, in some states there is also the same type of rebuttable presumption that when a stranger is in your home and has no right to be there, that he is there to do you bodily harm. That is also rebuttable by the Prosecutor.

In both instances, it is the Prosecutor’s burden of proof to rebut the presumption that the person defending himself acted illegally. The defendant does not have to prove anything. If Stand Your Ground Castle laws are repealed we will be like England, where the joke is that homeowners’ televisions are actually stolen while they are being watched.

Here are actual examples of self defense that won’t be allowed if anti gun rights organizations are successful in repealing Castle Laws, and what has already actually happened on New Hampshire when there’s no Castle Law.

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
96 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Time to buy another gun!!

Here I thought this would die down once people realized Mr. Zimmerman is a Catholic Hispanic who used to be an Alter Boy, as opposed to the white, maybe Jew he was said to be on early TV/Radio/Media reports.

In the few days since he and the teen in the hoodie met and fought, more than 10 Hispanic/black deaths have happened in Obama’s ”hometown,” of Chicago.
More than 40 more have been injured there just in these few days.

Here in So Cal black VS Hispanic is an ongoing war with deaths every few days mostly in the warmer months.
Here it is turf war on the edges between two opposing gangs of drug/gun/prostitute/gambling/stolen goods territories.

Mr. Zimmerman may turn out to have been 100% in the wrong.
Facts are going to come out.
Some early reporting said he had a bloody nose and back of the head from the two of them fighting…..before he shot his weapon.
When we get to the bottom of it we can reach other conclusions, proper ones.
But to USE this incident – without knowledge of all the facts – as an excuse to change law is a mistake.

Zimmerman should have driven away and let the police take care of the kid. There’s no place for this vigilante macho crap in 21st century America.

Join the military you fat—

@Richard Wheeler: Innocent until proven guilty my friend. Also would you agree there is no place for Blacks to riot or create further racial tension??

No riots nescessary but peaceful protests are the American way.Presumption of innocence is correct. Let the truth play out as it will. I repeat. He called the police. They told him to back off.What the hell was he doing?

@Richard Wheeler:
I sure wish your point about the presumption of innocence would make it to Martin’s parents.
Sybrina Fulton is his mother and she said this:
“I feel that we need an arrest.”
Tracy Martin is his father and he said this:
“We want an arrest, we want a conviction, and we want a sentence for the murder of our son.”

Shame on them both for stoking the fires.
We don’t KNOW exactly what happened yet.

I actually agree with Obama here.
Obama said this:
“My main message is to the parents of Trayvon. I think they are right to expect that all of us as Americas are going to take this with the seriousness it deserves and we will get to the bottom of exactly what happened. I think every parent in America should be able to understand why it is absolutely imperative that we investigate every aspect of this and that everybody pulls together, federal, state and local to figure out exactly how this tragedy happened.”

All quotes from this article:
http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/23/justice/florida-teen-shooting/?hpt=hp_t1

Let not this escalate to a rodney king fiasco. This would be another excuse to impose already martial law in America. With idiot sharpton there, well talk about a racist, he is #2 outside of opie, jackson and fairacome. Smile America, this is going to go down the tubes with some violet acts of looting, shooting and killing. The fuse is lite and it is just a matter of when it hits the powder keg. But than opie can impregnate this kids mother and have a “son that looks just like him” quote opie

Calypso Louie calls for WAR!

Crime Farrakhan Tweets: ‘Where There Is No Justice, There Will Be No Peace…Law of Retaliation May…Be Applied’

The comments that follow will give a flavor for the mood of the country.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/farrakhan-tweets-where-there-is-no-justice-there-will-be-no-peace-law-of-retaliation-may-be-applied/

@Richard Wheeler: Did you also know that there are eye witnesses who say Travon was on top of this guy and beating him up?? Do you believe the comments by Sharpton and Farakhan will create a peaceful protest? Do you believe the earth is flat??

“Stand your ground” laws encourage irresponsible behavior. People who carry guns should do so in the certain knowledge that anyone who uses one against another person immediately takes on the burden of justifying what they’ve done. If you’re not responsible enough to make good, defensible decisions about firearm use, you’ve got absolutely no business owning and carrying one.

Zimmerman should be arrested. There’s every indication that the guy was completely out of line and may be a public danger. He stalked and killed a kid for no good reason. He’s exactly the sort of person who shouldln’t be allowed to own or carry a gun.

As usual the left wants to use the death of someone to erode Constitutional rights.
They are even falsely claiming that the law protects the shooter from being prosecuted. I’ve actually seen them claim that the law says you can shoot someone who simply punched you.
They don’t care about the truth or the facts, just advancing their anti-american agenda.

From what I have heard, he was overzealous. However, I know not all the details have come out.

@Jeff:
Not even close Jeff. You sound like the ignorant one, in fact. If you knew anything about Florida laws and what they teach for CCW there, you would know they don’t condone or encourage anything like what the guy did.
BTW, look at what the law was before they changed it. You might learn something.

There’s some info at the bottom of the article. Be responsible and read it before commenting again.

http://hotair.com/archives/2012/03/23/geraldo-blame-the-hoodie-for-trayvon-martin-shooting-as-much-as-the-shooter/

Nan G. What if it was your kid. Would you at least want the shooter detained?

Common Sense Let’s get testimony from eye witnesses and fully investigate. Again.we got a dead unarmed kid and a live shooter.Lets get to the truth.

Keyser People want the truth and in this case they will get it

Mos You should be ashamed of that comment Marine. The Corps should have taught you better.

Semper Fi

@Nan G:

Shame on them both for stoking the fires.
We don’t KNOW exactly what happened yet.

Shame? When an unarmed teenager is stalked and then shot down in the street, I don’t think it’s too much for the grieving parents to ask for the justice system to do it’s job and make an arrest if they have a legitimate suspect. What does wanting an arrest and a trial have to do with flaunting the presumption of innocence? A suspect arrested of a crime will have presumption if innocence when the case goes to trial.

I would like to meet the parent who thinks like you, Nan, who would say: My unarmed son was walking down a public street. An armed man with no law enforcement affiliation followed him because he looked ‘suspicious’, disregarded a police dispatcher’s command to stop his pursuit, and then shot my son dead. The man is not denying that he killed my son, only that it was his fault, regardless of the fact that he, as indicated by his own words on the 911 call, forced the encounter. Regardless of this overwhelming evidence that he’s responsible for killing my son, I don’t think this person should be arrested because we don’t KNOW exactly what happened yet. Only after every effort has been made to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that my son was not at fault in his own shooting, should they even consider making an arrest in this case, regardless of the overwhelming evidence already made public to the contrary.

Would that be less shameful, Nan?

Keyser What the hell does that story have to do with the Florida shooting? I thought you might send me something about eye witness accounts previosly alluded to.

@Tom:
Tom, you are making a whole lot of assumptions.
There are conflicting reports about what transpired before the shots were fired.
The police took Zimmerman’s statement and BASED on that they chose not to arrest him.
Things can change.
Forensics will either back up Zimmerman’s version of events or it will not.
Not every person who dies at the hands of another was ”murdered.”
My very favorite cousin killed a child once.
He was not criminally liable at all.
But his conscience ate him up and he died an early death at only 38.
I can’t think of one time we spoke after it happened that he did not bring it up.
Still he committed no crime.

@Nan G: Nan, thanks for helping to bring this around. Really tough story there. I would also like to propose that if we changed the circumstances to make the shooter Black and the victim White, would we see the same reaction?? Would the Blacks be OK with arresting the shooter without firm evidence??

Here is more info

911 Transcript (partial)

Dispatcher: Sanford Police Department. …
Zimmerman: Hey we’ve had some break-ins in my neighborhood, and there’s a real suspicious guy, uh, [near] Retreat View Circle, um, the best address I can give you is 111 Retreat View Circle. This guy looks like he’s up to no good, or he’s on drugs or something. It’s raining and he’s just walking around, looking about.

Dispatcher: OK, and this guy is he white, black, or Hispanic?

Zimmerman: He looks black.

Dispatcher: Did you see what he was wearing?

Zimmerman: Yeah. A dark hoodie, like a grey hoodie, and either jeans or sweatpants and white tennis shoes. He’s [unintelligible], he was just staring…

Dispatcher: OK, he’s just walking around the area…

Zimmerman: …looking at all the houses.

Dispatcher: OK… Zimmerman: Now he’s just staring at me.

Dispatcher: OK–you said it’s 1111 Retreat View? Or 111?

Zimmerman: That’s the clubhouse…

Dispatcher: That’s the clubhouse, do you know what the–he’s near the clubhouse right now?

Zimmerman: Yeah, now he’s coming towards me.

Dispatcher: OK. Zimmerman: He’s got his hand in his waistband. And he’s a black male.

Dispatcher: How old would you say he looks?

Zimmerman: He’s got button on his shirt, late teens.

Dispatcher: Late teens ok.

More info
http://www.wftv.com/videos/news/teen-shooting-911-calls-1-3/vGZnj/

There’s an awful lot of divergent subjects going on here. The most important one to me is, of course, that this doesn’t become a political football for the Stand Your Ground Self Defense law and intent.

That, of course, would entail that Zimmerman is under investigation for how the event came down. And it *should* be under investigation. The law is for a defense, not active aggression. A teen is dead. A man who seems to be an angel protector to some, but also displays vigilante tendencies shouldn’t escape scrutiny. If that were my child, I’d be all over law enforcement for an investigation.

I’ve not paid much detailed attention to this. Just hoping this doesn’t turn into a reverse-the-mirror “Rosewood” event. Nor does it seem to be black/white as the neighborhood is mixed. Zimmerman is of mixed Hispanic blood. And Sanford itself has 57% white, 30% black and 20% Hispanic denizens. It’s a widely diverse community.

But HR, I listened to the calls on your link above. I’ve only heard one 911 call prior to those, and it was before all this transpired… Zimmerman, himself, making one of his ga’zillion 911 calls. In that, he specifically stated the teen was running away, and the dispatcher clearly told Zimmerman *not* to pursue. Below is the unedited initial 911 call from Zimmerman.

Now all of the sudden there’s calls about a scuffle, screams for help, the gunshot, and Zimmerman supposedly the victim of an attack.

Sorry… this crap don’t add up for me. Martin was running away, not towards Zimmerman. And now, as @Comm0n Sense suggests above, we’re supposed to assume this slender framed teen who was running away turned and attacked a heavy set, aggressive Zimmerman, chasing him, and was on top in the scuffle? Don’t think so. Smells bad for Zimmerman.

@Comm0n Sense, the last 911 call on that link from HR was a woman who said she could see a guy in a white tee shirt on top in the scuffle just before the shooting. But Martin was wearing a dark hoodie, as confirmed by Zimmerman’s own 911 call above, as well as saying that he has “buttons on his shirt”. Call me crazy, but I don’t know the last time tee shirts had buttons.

Would the heavier set guy with the gun be the one yelling for help? Somehow Zimmerman doesn’t strike me as the victim in this confrontation, but the aggressor.

But that’s what the investigation should determine. I’m not only all for an investigation, I find it offensive they’d not consider doing one from the moment after the event.

Mata A voice of reason and common sense.

To be clear Mata, I’m not proclaiming anyone innocent or guilty. I know we don’t have all the details. The info above was just to provide additional data.
I do know this, when told not to pursue by 911 or whoever in law enforcement, you should listen.

What I also find disgusting is the left trying to use this to undo a law that protects justified shootings in their quest for gun control. From what little I have heard, it doesn’t sound like it falls under said law in this case.

Naw, I knew that, HR. But I’ll tell you what disgusted me the most, listening to the linked 911 calls you gave. The amount of people who cowered in their homes, ignoring calls from another human for help. Maybe it’s just not in my DNA, but I don’t hide when I hear such cries. I respond.

This is a sorry ass statement on humans, who’d allow such an event to transpire and demonstrate absolutely no will to come to the aid of another. Thank heavens that the Flight 93 passengers, or those who took down other airline passenger wannabe terrorists didn’t share that mentality.

Nan posted this in the Palin thread
Nan G says: 1
“….Mitt Romney says nothing at all….”
Obviously that is Mitt using code, right?
LOL!
Mr. Zimmerman’s dad wrote to the Orlando Sentinel.

“At no time did George follow or confront Mr. Martin. When the true details of the event became public, and I hope that will be soon,” the letter said, “everyone should be outraged by the treatment of George Zimmerman in the media.”

Police have released little information about what happened that night and no details about how Trayvon and Zimmerman came to be face to face.
…..
Police found blood on his face and the back of Zimmerman’s head as well as grass on the back of his shirt.

That jibes with what Cheryl Brown’s teenage son witnessed while walking his dog that night. Thirteen-year-old Austin stepped out his front door and heard people fighting, he told the Orlando Sentinel on Thursday.

“I heard screaming and crying for help,” he said. “I heard, ‘Help me.’ ”

It was dark, and the boy did not see how the fight started, in fact, he only saw one person, a man in a red shirt — Zimmerman — who was on the ground.

George Zimmerman has not talked publicly about what happened, his father said, because that’s the advice police gave him. Both Zimmerman families have moved out of their homes, at least temporarily, Robert Zimmerman said, because they’ve received death threats.

News to me:

Sanford police on Thursday also challenged a WFTV-Channel 9 report, in which Mary Cutcher said police largely ignored her even though she told them, “I know this was not self-defense. There was no punching, no hitting going on at the time, no wrestling.”

Police said they twice tried to interview her without success, and the third time, she wrote a very short sworn statement for her roommate that was consistent with Zimmerman’s account.

http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2012-03-15/news/os-trayvon-martin-shooting-zimmerman-letter-20120315_1_robert-zimmerman-letter-unarmed-black-teenager

I have no idea what to believe at this point.

@Nan G:

Tom, you are making a whole lot of assumptions.

The only assumption I’m making is that stating “shame on you” to the parents of a child who just died shows an astonishing lack of empathy on your part. There is a very good reason why neither parent will ever end up on the jury of any trial involving their son’s death. We, as a society, don’t expect grieving parents to be impartial. We don’t expect grieving parents to take your dispassionate view of the facts surrounding their son’s death. Any parent on Earth would be understandably distraught if their unarmed son was shot dead in the street and the identity of the shooter was known, yet there was no arrest. Do you expect them to think their son deserved to die? I don’t need a lecture on how the legal system works, Nan – that’s not why I questioned you. I questioned your attack on Trayvon’s parents, which I consider both crass and callous. You may personally identify more with George Zimmerman than Trayvon in this tragedy, but understand that parents are going to rage for justice, like any normal person would in their circumstances.

@Richard Wheeler:

Your quote…
“Keyser People want the truth and in this case they will get it”

What do people wanting the truth have to do with Louie calling for retaliation? If people want the truth, they must wait for the investigation to run it’s course, not by running out into the street screaming for someone’s head.

Your response to me was somewhat perplexing, when all I did was link a story about a well known Race-Baiter stirring the pot in an attempt to start a Race riot. If this concept flew over your head faster than the speed of sound…it is you who needs remedial course work in the art of interpretation.

The second link I posted has to do with hate crimes against Whites in Kansas City, which are going unreported because the MSM does not want to shed light on the true nature of these crimes…it was intended to show the HYPOCRISY of the reporting on the story from Florida, and the fake rage of the poverty pimp race baiters. If these professional agitators wish to complain about an injustice, then they must also condemn what their race is engaged in as well. If not, then they need to STHU.

@Nan G: The instigators in chief are flocking to the scene. Al Sharpton who managed to stir up the media for a false rape in NY and his buddy Jessie Jackson are either in the FL community or will be there soon. There will be no justice in this case. It will be tried in the media.

“The media also fills their articles with outdated baby-faced pictures of Trayvon. Very few include that he was a towering 6’2” football player. Is the media really reporting the news, or is this classic agitation/propaganda to advance a political agenda.”

“On March 16th, the Sanford police department released new details to the Orlando Sentinel. Once again, these details have been ignored or changed by the media.

The witness reports that George Zimmerman was on the ground and Trayvon is on top of him punching him.
The witness says that George Zimmerman was screaming and yelling for help.
Police arrive and find Zimmerman bleeding on his face and the back of his head. He also has had grass stains on his back. All this confirms the story told by Zimmerman and the witness.
Police play the 911 tape for Trayvon Martin’s father, who tells police that the voice screaming is not the voice of his son.”

“The media also characterizes Trayvon as a “model student.” In fact, he under a five day suspension when the shooting took place. That is why he was staying at a house so far from his school on a school night. A laywer for Trayvon’s family has blocked access to his school records. However, you have to do something pretty bad to get suspended for five days.

Now that you know the suppressed facts of the case, you can for form a better more balanced opinion. Maybe you still think Zimmerman was wrong to pull the trigger. However, I think you will come to the conclusion that the “mainstream” clearly is pushing an agenda. Even when they have to grossly alter and adjust a story to fit that agenda.”

http://www.examiner.com/charleston-conservative-in-charleston-sc/zimmerman-was-on-the-ground-being-punched-when-he-shot-trayvon-martin

Keyser and Randy If the police had acted responsibly with Zimmerman after listening to 911 calls and interviewing any witnesses Sharpton and friends would have had no reason to show up.

Cops weren’t doing a damn thing 3 days after the shooting of an unarmed kid.Doesn’t matter what color anybody was, Very shoddy police work.

Mata re#20 and #30 When I read these posts i wonder where I get the guts to ever question you lol OUT

And why the heck should Mitt, or any other candidate speak out? The only thing that needs to be said, if asked, is that when these instances occur, there should be investigations. Other than that, it’s a matter for Florida. I’m not interested in any candidate weighing in on this issue. And I’m even less interested in what Obama has to say.

But as far as the excerpts Nan G posted… first of all, I don’t care what Zimmerman’s Dad has to say. He wasn’t there.

However INRE that boy walking the dog, and the impression left that the armed and hefty Mr. Zimmerman was being bested by a 140 lb teen, the Miami Herald has more statements from that dog walking kid. And it sure doesn’t sound like the Orlando Sentinel interpretation, as that teen believed it was Martin calling for help.

A neighborhood eighth-grader out walking his dog said his family also called 911.

“I saw someone lying on the ground, and I heard screaming,” said Austin, 13, whose mother asked that his last name not be published. “I don’t know that it was the person on the [ground] who was screaming, but to me it sounded like a kid who was crying. It was a yell for help, and I think it was Trayvon.”

Austin wasn’t sure if the person was in a fight or had slipped and gotten hurt. Austin’s boxer puppy got off the leash so the boy went chasing after the dog and lost sight of the scene for a moment. Then, he heard a gun go off.

He ran home and told his sister to call the police.

The boy, who is black, has been rattled ever since. He feels angry and disconcerted, and wonders whether he’s at risk too.

“That people can stereotype like that makes you scared,” he said.

Austin’s mom said he’s been acting out in school and seems mad all the time.

“My son has a terrible feeling of guilt, because he did not do anything to help. He’s angry,” said Austin’s mother, Cheryl Brown. “They are saying that Trayvon looked suspicious, because he was walking slow. So I guess I have to tell my son “make sure you always run fast.”

Statements from people on the scene right after the shooting?

“I heard someone crying — not boo-hoo crying, but scared or terrified or hurt maybe,” said Mary Cutcher, 31, who lives in the Retreat at Twin Lakes townhome community where the shooting occurred. “To me, it was a child.”

Zimmerman said he tailed Trayvon in a mission to find out if the teen was up to no good. Zimmerman was out to put a stop to recent burglaries. He dialed police — his 46th call since 2001 to report shady people, reckless drivers and other disturbances around his neighborhood.

He offered to follow his suspect, but the dispatcher told him: “We don’t need you to do that.”

Some minutes later, Trayvon was killed with a gun the watch volunteer was licensed to carry.

“This was not self-defense,” Cutcher said. “We heard no fighting, no wrestling, no punching. We heard a boy crying. As soon as the shot went off, it stopped, which tells me it was the child crying. If it had been Zimmerman crying, it wouldn’t have stopped. If you’re hurting, you’re hurting.”

She and her friend say they heard the sounds from a few steps away, where they were inside beside an open window. Seconds later, they dashed out to find a boy face down on the ground and a man standing over him, a foot on each side of the body on the ground, with his hands pinning the shooting victim down.

“I asked him, ‘What’s happening here? What’s going on?’ ” said Cutcher’s friend, Selma Mora Lamilla. “The third time, I was indignant, and he said, ‘just call the police.’ Then I saw him with his hands over his head in the universal sign of: ‘Oh man, I messed up.’ ”

The women, who were the first on the scene, said they saw Zimmerman pacing back and forth.

“I know what I heard. I heard a cry and a shot,” Mora said. “If there was a fight, it did not happen here where the boy was shot. I would have heard it, as this all happened right outside my open window.”

The women think there may well have been a physical altercation between the two, but it must have taken place in a different spot, where Zimmerman perhaps had a chance to compose himself and draw his weapon.

How nice of them to ignore the pleas for help, but show up afterwards to rubberneck…

Lastly, in the Herald article, Zimmerman himself reveals that he ignored the police instructions NOT to pursue, and chased Martin down to interrogate him.

Police have not moved from their official statement of the shooting. But as the controversy grows, so does the number of voices disputing the official version that watch captain George Zimmerman gave to police: that the six-foot, three-inch, 140-pound teen assaulted him when Zimmerman, 28, tried to question him. In fear for his life, he pulled Kel Tek 9mm handgun from his waistband and shot.

All the witnesses seem to agree that they believe the cries for help were not from Zimmerman, but Martin.

I had also read somewhere that Martin’s father’s fiance lived somewhere in that same neighborhood, but haven’t seen that addressed more in depth. Or that could be wrong. Wouldn’t surprise me.

But if all the accounts, combined, prove substantially correct in the investigation, Zimmerman absolutely pursued Martin… perhaps more than once. If they got into a scuffle not at the shooting scene, Martin must have gotten free, ran again, and was again pursued by Zimmerman. I’d say that, if all this evidence bears out, Mr. Zimmerman is going to have to find himself an attorney.

@Keyser Söze: Keyser, thanks for adding this level of detail. These are pieces of the story that the MSM and Blacks who are screaming just don’t want to hear. I had heard the eyewitness account as you have said. I also find it amazing how folks want to make the defender white instead of hispanic. Once again if you where to have a black man shoot the white man, imagine the screams under the same circumstances. Should he have been arrested? Good question, as I see it there is no clear-cut answer. I am guessing common sense was applied by professionals who do this for a living, not people who just read and then write about it.

@Keyser Söze, a 6’2″ teen who only weighs 140lb teen is hardly a strapping muscle bound type of guy, as implied in that quote from the Charleston examiner/blogger. If he were on the football team, my guess is that he’d not be on the defensive front line.

Haven’t heard a witness yet that believed it was Zimmerman yelling help. But every bit of this comes down to a simple reality… did Zimmerman aggressively go after Martin, thereby putting the teen in the position to defend himself? Or was it the other way around.

According to Zimmerman’s own accounts, he tracked and confronted Martin.. not the other way around. And perhaps more than once. All against the express instructions of the police.

This means that the Stand Your Ground Self Defense is not applicable in this case. Zimmerman sought the confrontation. It’s far more likely that, had Martin been armed, he would have a better case for self defense.

@Comm0n Sense:
I agree.
The more that comes out, the better.
The more investigation into exactly how it all went down, the better.

But remember, we just last night got the definitive word* about Whitney Houston’s cause of death.
This may not move any faster.

The parents, the students who are walking out of school, the New Black Panther Party members, Louis F’s Nation of Islam buddies and Jesse and Al S are all fanning the flames when there is no need to.
I’ve even seen T-shirts already made up calling for the ”No Justice, No Peace” rioting that we’ve seen before.
All of this is out of balance and wrong.
The wheels of Justice are slow.
But they trample on inexorably to their end.

Obama has called for patience to let the investigation take place.
In this, I agree with him.

*Coroner says Whitney Houston accidentally drowned in bathtub
‎21 hours ago‎ – Los Angeles Times

Whitney Houston Died From Drowning Believed Spurred by Heart Disease, Cocaine
‎Mar 22, 2012‎ – ABC News

@Comm0n Sense, I believe that the justified complaint is that, following the incident, it should have been investigated and not ignored… assumed as self-defense.

As I said above, if Zimmerman admits that he chased and confronted Martin instead of following the police instructions not to pursue, the Stand Your Ground Self Defense law is not applicable in this case, IMHO. You cannot provoke someone into a fight, then kill claiming self defense. The fact that Zimmerman admitted doing just that in his reports/accounts to the police should have been the heads up that this didn’t fall under self-defense.

Sanford PD was really off the mark in not doing their investigation at the onset.

@Hard Right:

What I also find disgusting is the left trying to use this to undo a law that protects justified shootings in their quest for gun control.

Because it’s only political from the Left, right HR? It’s not outrage that a teen was shot, it’s all about gun laws. It’s not the idea that maybe this is a really poorly written law if it’s ambiguous enough for Zimmerman to legally hide behind it (that we will see). And from your perspective, you’re not using this to push your political beliefs on gun control at all, are you?

@Randy:

I’m not going to get into virtues and vices of specific pundits, but is it your opinion that there’s something wrong with pointing out that it’s highly probable that Trayvon Martin died that night because he’s black, because from Zimmerman’s perspective, he looked “suspicious”, he is one of those who “always get away”? You’d have to be willfully blind not to consider that possibility. Would Zimmerman have reacted the same way to a preppy white kid walking down the street? You tell me, I’m sure you can listen to the 911 call and draw your own conclusions. This idea that it’s “playing the race card” to have these types of conversations is not only preposterous, it’s dangerous, dangerous for other kids like Trayvon Martin. If you were a black parent, how would feel knowing it’s possible this kid died because of how he looked or dressed? I sure as hell am not going to censor myself because I don’t want to offend my fellow white citizens who find it appalling that people will point out the obvious: a kid walking down the street shouldn’t end up dead because he fits the profile of a criminal that some self-styled protector of the neighb0rhood has in his head. If you want to live in denial and cultivate a white victim mentality, be my guest – I’d rather tackle it head on.

I really don’t care what you say tom. Your opinion means less than nothing to me or anyone else for that matter.

Mata, I knew a 6’4″ guy in HS who was maybe 160 pounds. He also played on the football team…..and was a boxer too. To think he was an easy to take target was a mistake.

With that said, I’m still not placing blame.

All I know is what I heard… the Dispatcher told Zimmerman “we don’t need you to pursue him” it should have ended there…. Zimmerman “could” have followed from a [long] distance – that would have been sufficient enough to let the police know where Trayvon was once they arrived. But he didn’t.

I believe it is that cut and dry.

I do not believe this terrible incident should be used as a political foot ball for some Liberal agenda against the 2nd amendment.

As always, we’ll have to wait for all the facts to come out. If Zimmerman chased the kid and had a confrontation with him after the police told him not to (which appears to be the case), then he was the aggressor and was wrong. If he felt the kid was a threat and followed him, he was stupid as well because he had no idea if the kid was armed or if he had buddies waiting somewhere who could have waylaid him. This is coming from a ‘gun nut’ who is the process of getting a carry permit. No doubt the anti gunners out there will use this one isolated incident to argue against concealed carry. It looks like the race baiters have already started.

Is this a special situation? What about the kids who are killed by others with various weapons, just because they are at the wrong place at the wrong time or maybe they are the wrong color or fro the wrong gang or not part of a gang. It is a tragedy, but there are many tragedies across America every day.

is this a special situation because the mixed blood Hispanic speaker has a White or maybe Jewish name?

There is something very ugly beneath the surface, but there usually is something very ugly beneath the surface when the race pimps like Sharpton start the riots. Zimmerman is very lucky he isn’t really White and every damn one of you know exactly what I mean.

@Skook, I think what makes this situation “special” is that the Sanford PD chose not to investigate Martin’s death, and merely accepted Zimmerman’s assertion that it was “self defense”. Considering the guy chased him down, and admitted doing so, that strikes me as questionable right off the bat. Taking into account the text of the law, how could they ignore Zimmerman’s own admitted confrontational account, and assume self defense?

I happen to agree that, if the Sanford PD didn’t plan investigations, they needed to be prodded into it by whatever means possible. It’s too bad that, by not doing what they should have done, they have allowed this to be inflamed into a racial issue.

Let’s even assume the worst of Martin, as some of the not so subtle suggestions have been offered here. What if he was, indeed, a gang member, casing the neighborhood for potential theft. The fact still remains that Zimmerman chased him down for interrogation, merely because he was walking down the public road. He wasn’t snooping in windows, nor intruding on anyone’s private property. He wasn’t carrying stolen goods. Wasn’t armed. Zimmerman’s weak “probable cause” was merely his presence in the neighborhood, and not walking at a pace that he felt was adequate.

That stuff may fly if it’s a law enforcement officer approaching an individual in that circumstance. But no citizen has the right to interrogate someone merely if they are walking down the road. And Zimmerman, himself, admitted that’s all the guy was doing when he called 911. Nothing more. He just decided he may be up to no good, or “on drugs or something”.

Therefore, there was no “self defense” necessity to pursue him. Martin was running away. Zimmerman called it in, and was told not to pursue… then obviously did exactly the opposite. Were that to happen to me, and I couldn’t get away from some nutjob, I’d be fighting back against aggression from a citizen as well.

@MataHarley:

This is a very insightful analysis.

@Tom: It’s not the idea that maybe this is a really poorly written law if it’s ambiguous enough for Zimmerman to legally hide behind it (that we will see).

Tom, this has nothing to do with it being a “poorly written law”. As a matter of fact, 31 states have some form of “Stand your Ground” laws, passed after Florida did it first in 2005.

What this has to do is the same as any criminal activity… that it may be that someone disobeyed the intent of that law, and that a law enforcement dept dropped the ball in investigating that incident. If a law enforcement agency chooses not to enforce a law and it’s intent as they understand it, based on the information they have, then it’s not the law’s fault… it’s that of the law enforcement agency.

Text of the law does state such Stand Your Ground remedies are not available to the aggressor who initially provokes the use of force, and describes those protected as having “… a reasonable fear of imminent peril of death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another when using defensive force that is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm to another,”

Zimmerman’s gun was in his waistband, according to his own testimony. Did Martin see that when Zimmerman confronted him, against the dispatchers advice? Obviously he could tell that Zimmerman was not a police officer. Nor had Martin been been engaged in any illegal activity by walking down the street.

The more likely scenario is that Martin may have felt himself in danger of bodily harm from Zimmerman. In that case, had he defended himself and the tables reversed, that same law would have protected Martin.

Tom: I’m not going to get into virtues and vices of specific pundits, but is it your opinion that there’s something wrong with pointing out that it’s highly probable that Trayvon Martin died that night because he’s black, because from Zimmerman’s perspective, he looked “suspicious”, he is one of those who “always get away”? You’d have to be willfully blind not to consider that possibility.

Well, Tom… that’s a stretch into racial issues that really aren’t logical. The neighborhood is already mixed racially, so it’s not like a young black man walking thru Beverly Hills. What seems to be the most obvious from the accounts thus far is that the neighborhood had been experiencing increased robberies. So it’s not that Martin was black – like many of the neighbors – but that he wasn’t a local resident. And Zimmerman considered himself the quintessential neighborhood police captain, altho their neighborhood watch group wasn’t registered.

No one knows what the circumstances where and for anyone to provide their opinion is just that, an opinion. The only professionals that do this for a living made a judgement and if you don’t like their choice that’s your opinion. Or an assumption which can NOT be supported. If I am white or hispanic and living in this town, I’m locking and loading. No choice now that our racist Black President along with the racist Cracker Haters have arrived, the town will be a dangerous place for sure. The Florida Governor will likely need to activate the National Guard to put down the violent racist riots.

@Richard Wheeler:

GEE!…in Chicago last weekend we had 49 people shot with 10 dead. Only one was armed and he was a Chicago Police Officer who almost died.

Why was Sharpton not in Chicago? Could be, because it is Obama’s home town.

10 dead, at least 39 others wounded in weekend violence
SUN-TIMES MEDIA WIRE March 19, 2012 7:42AM
Reprints189Updated: March 19, 2012 7:55AM

Ten people were killed and at least 39 others were wounded in shootings across the city this weekend.

Most of the victims, male and female, ranged in age from their mid-teens to 30s, with the notable exception of a 6-year-old girl who was shot dead as she played on the front porch of her home in the Little Village neighborhood.

Neighbors said Aliyah Shell was playing on the porch of her home in the 3100 block of South Springfield Avenue about 3:40 p.m. Saturday while her parents sat on the front steps. A small gray pickup truck stopped in the street and one person inside got out and fired four shots — two of them hitting the little girl.

Aliyah was struck twice and initially was taken in critical condition to Mount Sinai Hospital, police said. She was declared dead at 5:24 p.m., the Cook County Medical Examiner’s office said.

Detectives recovered a gun and were questioning two men who have been charged shooting.

Besides the death of the 6-year-old girl, this weekend’s fatal shootings include:

Joel Sanroman, 42, shot in the head early Saturday as he drove in the 3100 block of West 53rd Street in the Gage Park neighborhood.

Adrian Cruz, 24, shot multiple times around 7 p.m. Saturday while standing in the 5900 block of South Fairfield Avenue in Chicago Lawn.

Vincent Fitts, 22, found shot in the head at 7:50 p.m. Saturday near 79th and Cottage Grove Avenue.

Jeremy Anthony, 24, who police believe drove himself to the University of Chicago Medical Center after being shot in the back while sitting in his car in the 6300 block of South Ellis Avenue in the Woodlawn neighborhood.

Bert Lindsey, 36, killed early Sunday from shots fired from a passing vehicle into a backyard party in the 7500 block of South Wolcott Avenue in Auburn-Gresham.

Equilla Coleman, 24, and two others were found shot early Sunday in the 1400 block of West 53rd after police nearby heard gunfire and found them with gunshot wounds.

Anthony Scott, 19, died Sunday — two days after he was shot in the 6300 block of North Oakley Avenue by a man who called him over to his vehicle.

George Marrero, 27, was killed at 10:50 p.m. Sunday during a gang-related drive-by shooting in the 1300 block of North Harding Avenue.

An unidentified 34-year-old man was shot multiple times in the chest about 1:35 a.m. Monday. He was taken to Mount Sinai Hospital where he later died.

Non-fatal shootings ranged across the city from Jefferson Park to West Pullman. Among them were a 1-year-old girl and her mother, both grazed by bullets Sunday afternoon in the South Side Chatham neighborhood.

Most recently, a man was shot in both legs about 1:45 a.m. while sitting in Ogden Park in the South Side Englewood neighborhood, police said. He was taken in serious condition to John H. Stroger Jr. Hospital of Cook County.

At least 33 others were wounded in shootings since Friday evening.

http://www.suntimes.com/news/crime/11392878-418/story.html

@Keyser Söze: Now there you go again using common sense and logic. Sadly it will go wasted, liberals just don’t want to understand this.

Keyser Soze What does any of that have to do with this. I’m in complete agreement with Mata’s analysis. What say you?

@MataHarley:

This entire incident is based on supposition and conjecture at this point. Let the investigators do their job and live with those results.

I find it quite fascinating that the Lib’s are also screaming for the death penalty for a solider without a trial, but no outcry for the Muslim Major from the Fort Hood shooting to be hung by the neck until DEAD!.

Double standards anybody.

@Richard Wheeler:

GEE! Rich…if you can’t see the violence in Chicago is 49 times worse than the Florida event…then there is no getting through to you. Feigning outrage in Florida but not in all of the other bad neighborhoods around the country is at best, deleterious to your mental health.

What?…compassion for one, but not for all.

@Keyser Söze: Called that one. Logic is far beyond their capacity.

@Keyser Söze: This entire incident is based on supposition and conjecture at this point. Let the investigators do their job and live with those results.

I don’t disagree with that in the slightest, Keyser. I think the point of the entire incident is that the PD had to be forced into doing an investigation… or rather than someone else now is investigating. This is preferable to simply having one dead teen, and one live shooter. After all, according to the law, the aggressor cannot deliberately provoke the violence, and it’s on record from Zimmerman himself that he did not stay out of harm’s way – when he could have – but chased a guy down the road just because he was walking down the street.

That, of course, brings up @rich wheeler’s question, about what the Chicago violence has to do with this. I’d wager a guess that the Chicago PD isn’t just closing the books on the shootings, and saying “oh well…”. That is how it differs from Sanford.