Shocker: “Architect” of New York Times’ Racist Revisionism “1619 Project” Is Herself a Vicious, Virulent Racist

this pulitzer prize project is on big HOAX. her timeline is false and filled with historical hole she is a piece of feculence brain matter. she is a member of cair, blm and a big supporter of antif**K up. there is an excellent book White Cargo, by Andrew Rice which address the over 300,000 slaves sent to America between 1683 and 1786 from britton. britton sent slaves to work in US..
-jones is a journalistic hucketer, no different than the political huckster-in-chief, ex terrorist muslim pres.
-pulitzer sat on the board of the slime for years. the journal school at columbia is
his creating-completely socialists and marxists.
– she and work are frauds and gigantic journalistic HOAX

If black racists, like Nikole Hannah-Jones, thought a “Day without Mexicans,” would have been eye opening, they should try a day without white people.
And, if she even pretends to think life would be all rosy if only white people disappeared, she’s sorely deluded.
Blacks rape, pillage, enslave and murder their own in huge numbers both in Africa and in all countries where blacks live.

Boko Haram are black African terrorists/rapists/murderers, looters.
Somali pirates are the only law in that country.
African clans are causing more violence/death on that continent than black gangs do here.

She’s never been there.
She’s living in her fantasy world where blacks are noble and peaceful.
Probably thought Black Panther‘s Wakanda (created by white guy, tan Lee, was a real place.

Weren’t all three of the shooting victims in CHAZ/CHOP blacks?
All the shooters, too?
How long did that hold together?
1 week?

Expose them to the truth will be like exposing Dracula to the sunlight

Scholars Call on Pulitzer Board to Revoke Prize Given to 1619 Project Author Nikole Hannah-Jones

“the article itself was false when written, making a large claim that protecting the institution of slavery was a primary motive for the American Revolution, a claim for which there is simply no evidence”

Nikole Hannah-Jones has admitted that her ‘1619 Project’ was more about controlling the narrative than presenting an accurate portrayal of history. She and the New York Times have also already scrubbed central aspects of the project, angering progressives.

Now, a group of scholars is calling on the Pulitzer board to revoke a prize awarded to Jones last spring.

We call on the Pulitzer Prize Board to rescind the 2020 Prize for Commentary awarded to Nikole Hannah-Jones for her lead essay in “The 1619 Project.” That essay was entitled, “Our democracy’s founding ideals were false when they were written.” But it turns out the article itself was false when written, making a large claim that protecting the institution of slavery was a primary motive for the American Revolution, a claim for which there is simply no evidence.

When the Board announced the prize on May 4, 2020, it praised Hannah-Jones for “a sweeping, deeply reported and personal essay for the ground-breaking 1619 Project, which seeks to place the enslavement of Africans at the center of America’s story, prompting public conversation about the nation’s founding and evolution.” Note well the last five words. Clearly the award was meant not merely to honor this one isolated essay, but the Project as a whole, with its framing contention that the year 1619, the date when some twenty Africans arrived at Jamestown, ought to be regarded as the nation’s “true founding,” supplanting the long-honored date of July 4, 1776, which marked the emergence of the United States as an independent nation.

Beginning almost immediately after its publication, though, the essay and the Project ran into controversy. It has been subjected to searching criticism by many of the foremost historians of our time and by the Times’ own fact checker. The scrutiny has left the essay discredited, so much so that the Times has felt the need to go back and change a crucial passage in it, softening but not eliminating its unsupported assertion about slavery and the Revolution.

Stanley Kurtz, who is one of the signatories on the letter calling for the revocation of the Pulitzer Prize, writes at National Review:

The letter revisits the sorry tale of the 1619 Project’s errors and distortions and invokes these in calling for the revocation of the prize. The recent revelations that The New York Times stealthily edited out the signature claim of the project—that the advent of slavery in the year 1619 constitutes our country’s “true founding”—were, however, the immediate occasion for this letter. As Phillip Magness (another signatory) has shown, Nikole Hannah-Jones has several times denied ever claiming that 1619 was our true founding, although in fact she has made this latter claim repeatedly…

Imagine that a Pulitzer Prize for Literature had been awarded to a novel for which it later emerged that the most famous passage had been plagiarized. At that point the prize would rightly be revoked. Now imagine that a Pulitzer Prize for Literature had been awarded to a novel whose author, after receiving the prize, surreptitiously edited out the most famous passage from the e-book and denied repeatedly that the passage had ever been in the novel to begin with.