September 11, 2021: Twenty Years of Failure

Spread the love

Loading

by Robert Spencer

On Friday, September 10, 2021, the Philadelphia chapter of the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) is presenting a panel discussion entitled “Remember Pearl Harbor to Never Forget 9/11: Teaching Japanese American and Muslim American Histories.” There in a nutshell is much of what has gone wrong in our nation’s response to the 9/11 jihad attacks, and why we are so drastically on the wrong path now.
 
The CAIR panel is as noteworthy for what it is not about than for what it is about. It is not about the victims of 9/11, the lives lost, the lives destroyed, the magnitude of human suffering that was inflicted. It is most certainly not about the ongoing global jihad: a useful panel could be held on groups that still exist around the world that hold to the same belief system, ideology and goals that the 9/11 plotters and hijackers held, and which are an ongoing threat to Americans and to all free people. Hamas-linked CAIR is never going to hold such a panel, and neither is anyone else.
 
Instead, CAIR, predictably enough, focuses on the people who hold the same beliefs as the jihad attackers of 9/11 and have, CAIR claims, been victimized and discriminated against in the United States as a result. Statistically speaking, such claims are wildly exaggerated. FBI hate crime statistics show that anti-Semitic hate crimes are far more common than attacks on Muslims, which actually dropped 42% in the last year. No hate crime is justified, but the idea that Muslims are living in fear of MAGA-hat-wearing redneck vigilantes in America is Leftist fantasy.
 



 
Nonetheless, that is not just the focus of this unsavory Hamas-linked group, but of the establishment media as well. The Los Angeles Times on Friday published a lengthy weeper entitled “Muslim youth in America: A generation shadowed by the aftermath of 9/11,” all about how some people say rude things to innocent Muslims just because some people did something way back two decades ago. The article begins: “On a rainy day during her sophomore year of high school, as Aissata Ba studied in the library, a photo popped into her phone. It showed a beheading by Islamic State militants, along with a caption in red letters: ‘Go back to your country.’” In the big bad, “Islamophobic” USA, the perpetrator of this horror got off scot-free: “Ba reported the incident. Administrators never tracked down the person who sent it.”
 
The Times explained how Muslims are the true victims of the 9/11 attacks: “Asked when they thought such incidents became common, the Ba family didn’t hesitate. ‘It started with 9/11,’ said Ba’s mom, Zeinebou, who immigrated to Chicago in 1999. That day in 2001 caused a chain of tragedies — for the nearly 3,000 people who perished during the attacks in New York, at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania; for the young men and women who died serving their country in the wars that followed; and for Muslims, and those perceived as Muslim, who became targets of hate.”
 
It would be much easier to sympathize with all this if not for the fact that since 9/11, CAIR and its allied groups, with eager help from the establishment media, have insisted that any honest investigation of the motivating ideology behind the attacks, and jihad terror in general, constituted “hate.” Then there are the numerous fake anti-Muslim hate crimes, fabricated apparently in order to buttress the claim that Muslims are uniquely harassed and victimized in the United States. The facts don’t bear out this claim.
 

 
The LA Times was not alone, of course. The Associated Press came out with its own Muslims-Are-Victims 9/11 story on Tuesday: “Two decades after 9/11, Muslim Americans still fighting bias.” It opened with another unsubstantiated anecdote that, as all such anecdotes do, revealed more than it intended: “A car passed, the driver’s window rolled down and the man spat an epithet at two little girls wearing their hijabs: ‘Terrorist!’ It was 2001, mere weeks after the twin towers at the World Trade Center fell, and 10-year-old Shahana Hanif and her younger sister were walking to the local mosque from their Brooklyn home. Unsure, afraid, the girls ran. As the 20th anniversary of the Sept. 11 terror attacks approaches, Hanif can still recall the shock of the moment, her confusion over how anyone could look at her, a child, and see a threat. ‘It’s not a nice, kind word. It means violence, it means dangerous. It is meant to shock whoever … is on the receiving end of it,’ she says.”
 
If that really happened, it’s a shame, but the fact that both the LA Times and AP had to lead with stories of people saying rude things to Muslims unwittingly reveals that they didn’t have anything worse to head up their stories: no stories of Muslims being attacked, of mosques being burnt down, of laws targeting Muslims in the United States and denying them basic rights. Nor should there be such stories. But the fact that there aren’t any gives the lie to the entire establishment narrative.

Read more
 

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
5 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Times was “Americans last” when Chandler owned it 70 years ago. New owners; but still AMERICANS LAST!

Recall 1934, when the Three Stooges made their appearance? All of the original actors have passed; however, “slap stick comedy” is alive and doing well in dc. The new cast of the
The Three Stooges are blinken, austin, and still in the closet miley. collectively, they have reframed in present day mantra the incompetence and uselessness of American foreign policy.
Unlike 1934, when the movies displayed their perpetual miscarriages of stupidity, their ineptitude behavior and mismanagement of of chaotic situations is now posted instantaneously on the media.

One major difference, back in the ’30’s, people could actually tell the difference between ridiculous slap-stick whereas now, they can’t and need a disclaimer or “fact check”.

Bias, prejudice and bigotry (you know, like the blanket condemnation of all Trump supporters or all gun owners or all people who think getting a vaccine should be their own decision) is always wrong. However, Muslims have been their own worst enemy. The limited understanding of Islam needed clarification and distinction between peaceful Muslims and the radical extremist Islamists. All we got was that Islam was the “religion of peace”, as if we shouldn’t believe what we just saw.

Remember the attempt to put a mosque in downtown Manhattan, just a mile or so from Ground Zero? They randomly chose a building where one of the landing gear of one of the aircraft flown into WTC landed. It was a blatant attempt to spike the ball, it went on for years and there were many on the left that defended the effort.

It benefits the radical Islamist to maintain this suspicion and prejudice because they recruit future terrorists from it and the left wing media does all they can to exaggerate the few incidents that regrettably happen.

the gay terrorist obama wants a library in Chi. Look at the proposed pictures of this farcical library. Now start removing some of the veneer and minor structural additions. Wait, look again and you will see a mosque appear before your eyes. the alleged library is a mosque.