George Will @ The WaPo:
When, in his speech accepting the 1964 Republican presidential nomination, Barry Goldwater said “extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice” and “moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue,” a media wit at the convention supposedly exclaimed, “Good God, Goldwater is going to run as Goldwater.” When Mitt Romney decided to run with Paul Ryan, many conservatives may have thought, “Thank God, Romney is not going to run as Romney.”
Not, that is, as the Romney who 12 months ago, warily eyeing Iowa, refused to say a discouraging word about the ethanol debacle. Rather, he is going to run as the Romney who, less than two weeks before announcing Ryan, told the states — Iowa prominent among them — that he opposes extending the wind energy production tax credit, which expires soon.
This may seem a minor matter, as well as an obvious and easy decision for a conservative. The wind tax credit is, after all, industrial policy, the government picking winners and losers in defiance of market signals — industrial policy always is a refusal to heed the market’s rejection of that which the government singles out for favoritism. But ethanol subsidies also are industrial policy. And just a few days after Romney got the wind subsidy right, nearly half of the 11 Republican senators on the Finance Committee got it wrong, voting to extend it. So even before choosing Ryan, Romney was siding with what might, with a nod to Howard Dean, be called the Republican wing of the Republican Party. For Romney, conservatism is a second language, but he speaks it with increasing frequency and fluency.
Romney embraced Ryan after the sociopathic — indifferent to the truth — ad for Barack Obama that is meretricious about every important particular of the death from cancer of the wife of steelworker Joe Soptic. Obama’s desperate flailing about to justify four more years has sunk into such unhinged smarminess that Romney may have concluded: There is nothing Obama won’t say about me, because he has nothing to say for himself, so I will chose a running mate whose seriousness about large problems and ideas underscores what the president has become — silly and small.
He on whose behalf the Soptic ad was made used to dispense bromides deploring “the smallness of our politics” and “our preference for scoring cheap political points.” Obama’s campaign of avoidance — say anything to avoid the subject of the country’s condition — must now reckon with Ryan’s mastery of Obama’s enormous addition to decades of governmental malpractice.
Seems Romney and Ryan had read this before they went on the air on 60 Minutes tonight.
Many of the same thoughts were expressed.
Ramirez’s political cartoon in the Sunday Funnies has a timeline of that nasty ad and Romney and Bain and the steel company.
I saw one fine point and had to fact check it because nobody else had mentioned it: The steel workers went on STRIKE after Bain had turned the company around to profitablity.
Only after that did the company go under.
If the guy who lost his job and then his wife wants to place blame, he might think about how his UNION ruined his company and led to him losing his job.
Response toNanG@#1
Correct me if I am wrong here…(as I do know that many U.S. Steel plants have been shut down for various reasons…among them cheaper steel from outside the US…)
“The steel workers went on STRIKE after BAIN had turned the company around to profitability.”
Profitability – Strike – Union – in the same sentence…..
One can only imagine “why ” they went on Strike???
And if it sounds like I am reading it…I can only surmise some [Union?] “people” wanted a piece [$$$] of the profitability ‘action’…. a strike ensued, loss of production… which ultimately led to the plant closing….
WOW! If that is the case…what a fine “thank-you” for saving my Job THAT is!! …
…..Got Greed???
Hopefully with Romney and Ryan people will start looking at the BIG PICTURE instead of the petty bullshit that gets in the way….I believe a lot of Conservatives let the petty stuff roll off their backs because it’s really a distraction from what they ‘want to accomplish’ in all aspects of their lives …
George Will finally hangs the tag “silly” on Obama. Now someone needs to complete the picture and give his philosophy the ridicule it so richly deserves. Silly socialists… silly socialists… say it laughing.
If you believe anthropology—instead of religion—people banded together for mutual protection. This togetherness gave them a new feeling of liberty and freedom. This primitive form of government was responsible for giving the individual security and safety from the outside world. That is the purpose of government.
@Liberal1 (objectivity): Crawl back in your cave dude. Welcome to reality instead of fantasy land!!
@Lib1,
Which explains why Leftists, such as yourself, believe in a form of “Democratic Feudalism,” and not true, representative Republicanism.
@Liberal1 (objectivity):
If you believe anthropology—instead of religion – If you were unable to contribute to the tribe or clan, you were kicked out and left to fend for yourself. Your argument is invalid.