Business Week:
The apparent military ouster of Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi is a triumph for the coalition of protestors who have massed in Tahrir Square in recent days. They include many of the young, secular, tech-savvy activists who captured the world’s imagination more than two years ago, when they helped bring down Hosni Mubarak’s autocratic regime. That’s one reason the Obama Administration hasn’t attempted to stop or even condemn the coup. Morsi’s removal may well empower forces that are more friendly to the U.S. than the Muslim Brotherhood. It also signals the end of a decade-long U.S. project to bring democracy to the Middle East. (Update: The military has deposed Morsi and suspended Egypt’s constitution. Follow the latest developments at Bloomberg News.)
In the aftermath of the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, the administration of George W. Bush initiated a profound shift in U.S. foreign policy. The U.S. would no longer continue to give a blank check to autocratic Arab regimes that deprived their citizens of political liberty. The logic of the Freedom Agenda, as it came to be known, was that democracy would help ease the frustrations of restive Arab populations and stem the appeal of Islamic extremism. That theory was one of Bush’s main justifications for invading Iraq, a decision that ultimately brought to power a government allied with Iran. The Bush Administration also pushed for elections in the Palestinian Authority—which were won by Hamas, an organization committed to Israel’s destruction.
In 2008, Barack Obama staked his presidential candidacy on his opposition to the Iraq war. In office, Obama sought to distance himself from the excesses of the Freedom Agenda, telling a Cairo audience that while the administration supported the democratic aspirations of Egyptians, “no system of government can or should be imposed upon one nation by any other.” As the Arab Spring unfolded in 2011, however, Obama more openly embraced democratization. The administration gave tacit support to the revolution in Tunisia, publicly called for Mubarak to step down, and undertook military action to aid the rebellion against Libya’s Muammar Qaddafi.
The result has been, in a word, chaos.
Obama is still stumping for the Muslim Brotherhood:
Obama Call for Muslim Brotherhood Role Overtaken in Egypt begging the military to avoid :arbitary arrests” of Morsi or Muslim Brotherhood leaders.
Not surprisingly this Bloomberg article is supportive of the Obama administration’s position, even going so far as to state this:
Coptic Christians would no doubt have a completely different outlook on such a disingenuous assertion by the article’s writers. The Brotherhood’s action belie this false narrative of how nonviolent the movement is.
Associated Press:
Oh, wait. “Islam is a religion of peace.” Obama will most likely blame this on an Egyptian TEA Party group.
So what was a bloodless coop, now results in wounded and fatalities as the fanaticism of the Muslim Brotherhood strikes back against peaceful overthrow of the oppressive Islamisist Morsi regime.
imagine those here in AMERICA, THERE IS SOME HERE AS WE SPEAK,