Arthur L. Herman:
If you thought Vladimir Putin’s military intervention in Syria was the result of some mad dictatorial impulse, better think again.
Wednesday, the New York Times ran a story about how American military analysts have been stunned by the precision and planning of the Russian operation in Syria. “What continues to impress me is their ability to move a lot of stuff real far, real fast,” the commander of the U.S. Army in Europe said, since it means that Putin’s military is fully capable of large-scale expeditionary power projection—something we used to think was solely an American specialty.
The Russians have also seamlessly carried out more bombing runs in a single day than the hapless American-led coalition conducts against ISIS in a month.
They’ve launched a new design of cruise missile against anti-Assad rebels that may match, or even surpass, American technology; and have overall displayed a professionalism and readiness that shocks observers who remember the sad old post-Cold War Russian military, or even the one that launched the invasion of Georgia seven years ago.
But the Times buried the real story in the third paragraph, which states that Russian air power “might soon back an Iranian-led offensive that appeared to be forming in the northern province of Aleppo on Wednesday. That coordination reflects what American officials described as months of meticulous planning,” i.e., between the Russians and Iran.
This confirms what many of us have suspected: Moscow and Tehran were only waiting for Obama to commit himself to a nuclear deal with Iran and then present it to the Senate and the UN Security Council, before they made their joint move on Syria. “The broad outlines were decided months ago,” said Lieutenant General Richard Zahner the Army’s former top intelligence officer in Moscow. Those plans were developed in late July, to be exact, when Iranian Quds Force commander Qassim Suleimani traveled to Moscow—in other words, at the same time that Iran was negotiating the details of its nuclear deal with Obama and Kerry.
Sure, Richard Fernandez wrote this about Afghanistan, but the same applies to Iran and Russia. in Syria.
Putin is not idiot. He waited until reversing course would be prohibitively politically expensive on Obama’s part….not to mention financially expensive as well.
@Nanny G:
The best thing about Russia getting Crimea back… Catherine the Great took it from the Turks… What happened right after Russia retook Crimea? The Russian FSB searched all the Turks living there… Why? NATO sponsors Islamist terrorism when it suits them.
Ukraine is the same scenario as Serbia… NATO bombs Serbia so the IMF can make loans for rebuilding and get control of Serbian iridium assets… The Kiev junta is just another IMF coup… NATO… North Atlantic Terrorist Organization.