Paul in 1995: Say, have you read The Ron Paul Survival Report?

Spread the love

Loading

I don’t think I’ll ever run for public office — but if I do, I think I’d hire Andrew Kascynski as my oppo researcher. That’s not just because he’s good, but mainly to keep him from working for my opponent.  Andrew just started a new gig at Buzzfeed, and his maiden post unearths another 1995 interview in which Ron Paul promotes the newsletters he claims now not to have read at all at the time:

Q: As we get started, I’d like if you could, give us, er, tell us a little bit about yourself, and your background and your experience. Thank you.

PAUL: Okay, just as an aside about the book that you refer to, although that book was put together in the early 1990s, it has materials from years before that, too.

Q. OKay.

PAUL: Like the minority views from the Gold Commission Report. That would have been done about ten years earlier. Anyway, I’m a physician here in Lake Jackson. I deliver babies for a living, but I also do an investment letter. It’s called the Ron Paul Survival Report, and I put that out on a monthly basis –

Q: I’ve heard of that.

PAUL: — which is a gold-oriented newsletter, but it’s also, uh, convening — expressing concern about surviving in this age of big government, where there’s a lot of taxes and regulations, and attacks on our personal liberties. I was concerned about this many years ago.  Even in 1974 I had a lot of concern about this, and, uh, advocated some of the things that they’re talking about right now.

This is similar to the clip Andrew found last week, in which Paul promoted his newsletters with very specific recollections of what they contained.  In this interview, Paul presents the more notorious of his newsletters not just as experience, but as the primary qualification for getting back to Congress.  That makes Paul’s recent assertions that he didn’t have a clue what the newsletters that he published, sold, and from which Paul derived a healthy income contained look a little disingenuous and self-serving now.  These two interviews from 1995 show that Paul wasn’t shy about promoting the newsletters when he thought it would benefit his political aspirations.

Video here

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
4 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

It gets better.
Eric Dondero says Paul isn’t racist or an anti-semite, just insane. He hates Israel and apparently thinks we intervened in WWII to save the Jews. His views on Pearl Harbor are crazy too.

http://dailycaller.com/2011/12/26/former-opponents-discuss-ron-pauls-racist-newsletters/

I also do an investment letter. It’s called the Ron Paul Survival Report, and I put that out on a monthly basis –

LOL!
Caught with his hand in the cookie jar!

Adjoran from Wizbang blog adds this:

Ron Paul has repeatedly referred to the newsletters as his own product – two videos from the ’90s have surfaced where he says “you should read the newsletter I write” or words to that effect, but they were hardly the only instances.

He also used them, claiming authorship, when running for Congress as an example of his thinking and qualifications.

He made millions over the years from the newsletters and their fundraising appeals. Does anyone seriously believe he didn’t even READ the small publication which was bringing him a six-figure income?

Sorry, no sale: even Ron Paul supporters aren’t THAT stupid.

Also, the idea this was one or two issues and something that slid through the cracks of editorial oversight is laughable.
Here is a selection of them over the years, there is something similar in every one to the type of language being discussed now.
http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/ron-paul-newsletter

Of course, Paul’s spent years lying about opposing wasteful spending, too – he has been one of the top three GOP House earmarkers and pork spenders since his return to Congress, slipping his projects in at the committee or conference level and then, when the final bill was certain to pass easily, loudly voting “NO” and going out to the Capitol steps to rail against spending.

Paul’s not worried about being caught. He knows his backers are too stupid or too stoned to care.

Adjoran on December 26, 2011 at 1:50 PM

Ron Paul has served in Congress three different periods totaling 24 YEARS! If that doesn’t make you Washington, I don’t know what does.

Paul has added earmarks but routinely votes against most spending bills returned by committee that he knows full well, will pass. He can claim “purity” of voting against spending bills while “bringing home the bacon” to his district. Paul compared his practice to objecting to the tax system yet taking all one’s tax credits: “I want to get their money back for the people.”

41 earmarks requests totaling $157,093,544

hyp·o·crite   [hip-uh-krit] noun a person who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that he or she does not actually possess, especially a person whose actions belie stated beliefs.

In 1987, Paul’s years between congressional terms, his news letter business added the more controversial Ron Paul Political Report. Many articles lacked a byline, yet often invoked Paul’s name or persona. Critics have cited statements in the newsletter that they described as racist, such as 95% of black men in Washington, DC being “semi-criminal or entirely criminal”, and the advice about using an unregistered gun to defend against black criminals.

It keeps getting better.

Ron Paul: “I Wouldn’t Have Risked American Lives” To End The Holocaust…
http://weaselzippers.us/2011/12/27/ron-paul-i-wouldnt-have-risked-american-lives-to-end-the-holocaust/

Wow. Just wow.