Obama Budget “Another Top-Down, Backward-Looking Document,” AP: “Obama’s Budget Plan Never Reaches Balance”

Spread the love

Loading

David Hauptmann:

President Obama released his budget proposal for the next fiscal year today, but it being Groundhog Day, the budget has little to distinguish it from his previous proposals, which are all more tax-and-spend policies designed to grow government rather than grow the economy.

Politico describes it as “a $4 trillion budget . . . designed to convince Americans that they can have it all.” And the story adds, “To pay for it, Obama proposes raising a number of taxes on wealthy taxpayers or businesses — revenue measures that have already been dismissed as nonstarters by the Republican Congress. The budget proposes new taxes on the wealthy, fees on big banks and taxes on companies that do business overseas — plus spending cuts on health programs and other savings — to cover the costs of all the new initiatives, senior Obama administration officials said on a conference call with reporters Sunday. . . .

“The budget will call for $1.091 trillion in discretionary spending for fiscal year 2016, including $74 billion that goes beyond the spending caps after the ‘sequestration’ spending cuts that Obama wants to eliminate. That would produce a $474 billion deficit for next year.”

The AP notes a few more key details. “Obama’s fiscal blueprint, for the budget year that begins Oct. 1, proposes spending $4 trillion — $3.99 trillion before rounding — and projects revenues of $3.53 trillion. That would leave a deficit of $474 billion. Obama’s budget plan never reaches balance over the next decade and projects the deficit would rise to $687 billion in 2025.”

Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell found little impressive in the budget proposal, saying, “President Obama promised in the State of the Union to deliver a budget filled with ‘ideas that are practical, not partisan.’ Unfortunately, what we saw this morning was another top-down, backward-looking document that caters to powerful political bosses on the Left and never balances—ever. The new Congress will focus on ways to help the Middle Class instead as we work to pass the serious kind of budget all Americans deserve: one that roots out and reforms wasteful spending, and that aims to grow Middle-Class jobs and opportunity instead of Washington’s bureaucracy.

“We’re asking the President to abandon the tax-and-spend ways of yesterday and join us in this practical and future-oriented approach.”

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
4 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

When you expect a blank check, spend like there is no tomorrow, how could it ever balance?

I am hearing rumblings of “other” taxes besides capital gains….to pay for “roads” “bridges” and infrastructure….I thought all that was covered under not ONE, but TWO stimulus Bills????

What?? We’re we lied to about THAT also?? /Sarc

This is going to be interesting ….no doubt.

In 2012, Obama’s budget was defeated by the Democrat controlled Senate 97-0.
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/163347-senate-votes-unanimously-against-obama-budget
In 2013, his budget was defeated by the Democrat controlled Senate 99-0.
http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/227857-senate-rejects-obama-budget-in-99-0-vote

Gee.
I wonder will his budget this time around will get any votes?

Levy a tax on the profits from movies and music. Levy a 50% tax on those profits. Let us see what that does to the far left entertainment industry, the costs of movie tickets and “music” and how many people make those purchases. Levy a tax on the costs of abortions and cosmetic surgery.

The increase in defense spending is nothing but an obvious attempt to hold national security hostage to more liberal social engineering. Otherwise, why propose raising defense spending when the world is “safer than ever before”?

Levy a tax on Lobbyists. Lobby PACs. For every dollar they give a campaign, require one quarter to one half of it to be taxed in order to help pay for the legislation they want their bribed owned supported candidates pass.