Michelle Obama Politicizing Religion: ‘No Better Place’ Than Church to Talk About Political Issues

Spread the love

Loading

In yet another example proving that our Constitution and laws mean absolutely nothing to the Obama’s, Michelle Obama announced to an enthusiastic gathering of Obama-cultists at an African Methodist Episcopal Church conference that separation of church and state means nothing in an Obama regime by calling for politicization of religion — endorsing Barack Obama from the pulpit is just fine:

(CNSNews.com) “There is no better place than church to talk about political issues because they are ultimately moral issues, First Lady Michelle Obama told a church gathering on Thursday.

 

“To anyone who says that church is no place to talk about these issues, you tell them there is no place better — no place better,” Obama told the African Methodist Episcopal Church‘s 49th general conference, held in in Nashville, Tenn.

“Because ultimately, these are not just political issues — they are moral issues,” she said. “They’re issues that have to do with human dignity and human potential, and the future we want for our kids and our grandkids.”As Bill Donahue, president of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights is noted in the piece to correctly point out, Michelle Obama’s comments amounted to politicizing religion:

… “Michelle Obama followed in the footsteps of her husband yesterday when she called for the politicization of religion,” he said in a statement. “President Obama has explicitly called for ‘congregation captains’ to organize for his reelection.”

“Since the Obamas have taken the gloves off — in effect calling for Americans not to be restrained by separation of church and state legalisms — others should follow suit,” Donahoe said. “I hope that the bishops, priests, evangelical ministers, and the orthodox members of all religions are taking note.

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
13 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

BOTH Moochelle and OFraud are typical = “Do as I say – Not as I do” = ELITISTS!!!

They are disgraceful in many of their selfish, self-centered completely phony actions…especially THIS one!!

I ask… Is Tax Payer monies being used for this little campaign side tour too?!?

I hope the Church members come to their senses and ask themselves…why all of a sudden are they showing ‘interest’ … I do hope these people see right through this… Obama has no ‘real’ interest…except for their ‘votes’ of course…and after he gets their votes…he will forget all about them like it never even happened… but, then again it would not surprise me if in all their awe they don’t see through his elitist propaganda… Fools are Fools, and there are fools even in a Church…

Does it not seem like these two have some kind of “Svengali hold” on the morally devoid, dysfunctional, ignorant people in this “new” society… ???

Color, not content of character is all that matters for the corrupt obamas, their display of lawlessness is nothing – that’s who they are, always have been, and continue to be unless they are literally dragged out of the white house.

The narcissus couple have all their lifes got free ‘affirmative action’ rides, never accomplished anything on their own; not even being able to keep their law licenses, because of fraud and corruption. Their license are inactive due to fraud.

Do not be surprised, when november rolls around, the narcissus’ losing the election, but refuse to leave. That is who they are!

barry and michelle are the biggest free loaders in the entire country. They believe they are entitled; they believe they are above the law; they believe that everyone should bow down to them and they believe everyone should believe the way they do. get ready bandm (bm for short) pack your bags because you are going to be leaving the WH come January 2013.

More right-wing blather.

Cali says “Their licenses are inactive due to fraud” I say BULLSHIT. It’s racists like you that will cost Romney the win.

Michelle Obama voluntarily asked that her own law license be placed on the inactive list.
Why?
We don’t know.
Was it because she had no intention of practicing law?
Was it because she was going to lose it soon?
Was it to save money on fees and insurance premiums?
Was it to save her having to take more continuing education classes to keep up with current law?
All of these answers (yes or no) are only to be found in Michelle’s head.
I don’t read minds, do you?

Barack Obama put his law license on the retired list.
I’m sure there are slight differences between ”inactive” and ”retired.”
But neither of them wants to practice law.

Unlike Bill Clinton who surrendered his law license, the Obama’s could reactivate theirs with some remedial schooling and payment of fees and insurance premiums and get into law if they want to.

Nan #6 Is there even a hint of wrong doing by either re their right to practice law? Most here expect better from YOU. Shame on you!

@Richard Wheeler:

LOL!
I let the chips fall where they may.
But to properly quote Jesus about politics he said, ”My kingdom is no part of this world.
Had my kingdom been a part of this world my father would have offered a legion of angels to fight for me.
But, as it is, my kingdom is no part of this world.”
Every place is a better place to discuss political issues than inside a church.
That’s what soapboxes used to be used for after the soap was emptied out.

Nan Please tell me what your #8 has to do with #6? You insinuate wrong doing re Obamas’ law licenses. Unless you’re a racist like Cali in#2 pls. follow up.

@Nan G: Michelle obama was given a choice by the Chicago Court to either turn in her license upon the courts request, or being charged with insurance fraud.

Obama’s license was surrended due to fraud for a number of reason such as if he ever used drugs – his answer was ‘no’.
He also vouched to never have had another name than ‘barrack obama’; which we all know to be a lie.

These are facts and, if someone is interested to know, go to

http://www.directorblue.blogspot.com

It’s always easy to accuse someone of racism, when it has nothing to due with the color of obama’s skin, but rather the content of his character, which also includes his wife.

I really was proud when America voted to have a ‘bi-racial’ president or a black; it is his many lies, his shaded history, his dubious claims in his book, and countless promises he broke, which changed my mind.

He had an opportunity to achieve a great legacy; his ego got the better of him. It is tragic – wanting for obama to succeed, representing all americans here and abroad. He destroyed the hope he campaigned on all by himself.

@Richard Wheeler:

I have posted a response regarding the law licenses of both the Obamas. The website listed has a snapshot of obama’s, which contained misrepresented answers.
May I remind you, that michelle obama was involved in ‘patient dumping’ in chicago-google it!!

You are the racist – you do not have answers so you go back to the old chlichee – it has to be racism.
Guess what, my husband is a black retired Armed Forces member, my children are black and, so am I!!!!

Try again with your baseless idiocy and, stop projecting!

Cali No public disciplinary action has ever been brought against either Obama. No basis in fact to claim they surrendered their licenses to avoid ethics charges. It’s a common practice.
Put simply. You’re full of shit. Learn to spell.

I have two professionl licenses–which I have hd since the early 1980’s, and at least here in TX, there are several reasons a person voluntarily gives up his/her license. The one overriding reason is that the person is about to be charged with professional misconduct for one reason or another. The person can then voluntarily surrender the license or the state board will take it away. If the person volunteeers ro surrender it, there is no publicity surrounding the issue. If the state removes the person’s license, then specific reasons and date(s) of incidents are published. It sounds as if a court (in this case, in Chicago) had threatened to take away Michelle Obama’s license due to charges of insurance fraud and instead she voluntarily surrendered it, there was legitimate cause to bring that action against her. Courts and professional licensing boards don’t act on frivilous charges. They have to have proof of what they’re charging the person with. It has nothing to do with racism, as some posters would ask us to believe.