Media Matters Shrieks About Tucker Carlson Using “Naughty” Language on Decade-Old Shockjock Radio Show; Tucker Carlson Says He Won’t Be Apologizing

Spread the love

Loading

By the way: It’s not just Media Matters pushing this hit.

It’s Pierre Omidyar operative/Bulwark towel-boy Jim Swift. And Head Cuck Bill Kristol. They’re pimping this story on Twitter and Conserving so much Conservatism you just can’t even believe it.



I saw someone say: Jim Swift and Bill Kristol have decided the free speech hill to die on is an abortion-crazy leftist’s twitter attacks on pro-lifers, second-amendment defenders, and cancer patients — but not this Tucker Carlson Class Traitor.

Here’s the Media Matters tweet containing Tucker’s shocking language, and here’s a USAToday article dutifully carrying water for MMFA.

Some of the Shock Words are pure political argument (about whether the law actually supports convicting a cult leader for “facilitation of child rape” for performing a marriage service between a 16 year old and 27 year old; Tucker opined that twisting the law to cover something it wasn’t designed to cover was really just convicting a guy for being “weird and unpopular”) and another bit which is obviously an ironic joke: claiming that what really turns women on is “arguing with them,” especially if they’re feminists, and telling them that they should “just kind of be quiet and do what you’re told.”

Obviously, a joke, because (let me explain Being Human to NPCs) women do not like being argued with/disputed, even the non-feminist ones, which every man knows, hence Tucker’s advice is plainly intended to be Very Bad Advice and he’s relying on the non-NPCs listening to understand he is speaking nonsense which is intended to be silly.

Carlson issued this non-apology statement:

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

29 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

So… what is it that was so shocking the liberals? Are they not aware they now support anything “marrying” anything and also support pedophilia?

@Deplorable Me: Suggest you take a day off–or even a few hours– and reflect on all the crap you post on here almost 24/7—-To Eox’s credit they’ve rebuked their own hate mongers Piro and Carlson.

@richard wheeler: I’ll certainly take that under advisement. Will you be fact checking yourself and try in the future not to be such a liberal mouthpiece?

@Deplorable Me: Dream on.
Looks like Tuck and da Judge are under a zombie attack

Tucker Carlson is a creep and misogynist and certainly proud of it. And it’s no surprise that he’s defended here on this website. “Curt” here actually posts that calling a woman the “c” word is either a joke or a political argument.

Dr. John must be so proud.

Tucker’s response is epic.
He doesn’t hold back from describing Republican leaders as cucked by their Dem overlords.
And he’s right.

Only if FDR + JFK were conservative can one honestly say, “It’s Pierre Omidyar operative/Bulwark towel-boy Jim Swift. And Head Cuck Bill Kristol .. Conserving so much Conservatism you just can’t even believe it.”
Bill in particular has hatted Ronny for over 40 years. He was oblique in his hatred from 7/80 to 2/89. but hated Ron just the same.

@Nan G: It is insane to call Tucker on this, it was a shock jock show, there is always satire, I never found them amusing but they had an audience not exactly for polite company. No, Tuck should’nt back down and cow to the liberal zombies.
They rally around and cow to the jew hater thats not satire, they bow to Islam.

When is Mediamatters (kick started by funds from George Soros) going to demand that Rashida Tlaib apologize for calling the President of the United States a MFer in front of children?

Oh, wait, MM considers that any extremely foul language is AOK as long as it is being used against a Republican.

@Gary Miller:

Tucker Carlson is a creep and misogynist and certainly proud of it.

Oh, naughty, naughty. You are calling names and they don’t even have any basis in reality. YOU are calling names simply because seeing someone smarter and more articulate than yourself makes you angry.

@retire05: Media Matters is a weapon created by Soros to destroy Fox News. In this they have been supremely unsuccessful and as such should have their tax exemption revoked.

@Deplorable Me:

Dude, get some help.

@Gary Miller: I look to you for guidance.

For instance, explain what makes Carlson “a creep and misogynist”. I’m really ready to learn.

@Deplorable Me: Im sure his wife is worried he hates women, real worried. Perhaps fools should look up a word before they try to use it.

@Deplorable Me:

You’re on record on this website as calling Trump an honest man. I should engage with you?

You actually think calling a woman c—ty, calling women primitive and calling women “whores” is not an example of being a creep and misogynist. I’m sure you’ll provide your usual ass-backwards reasoning.

@Gary Miller:

You’re on record on this website as calling Trump an honest man. I should engage with you?

Well, I’m damn sure not begging you to. You’re not very good at it, either.

I don’t know what “c—ty” is, but some women are primitive and whores. Kamala Harris, for instance. Describing someone honestly is not misogyny but hiding behind the accusation is cowardice.

@Deplorable Me:

You don’t even know what Carlson said and you’re defending him.

It’s not Tucker Carlson’s language that’s offensive, it’s the bullshit that he’s saying. He’s essentially defending a patriarchal facilitator who was arranging marriages between underage females and adult males.

@Gary Miller: Well, I listened to the Media Matters attachment. I think YOU don’t know what he said and you’re ATTACKING him. I also note you condone the attack on his wife and children. Wow, that’s really decent of you. Don’t feel alone; Greg thinks the woman and her children had it coming, too.

@Greg: No he wasn’t. He was stating, accurately, that performing the ceremony is not the same as 1st degree rape. He clearly states he thinks it is creepy and wrong but NOT rape. However, you liberals think laws don’t mean what they say or do what they do; they exist to facilitate the liberal agenda.

When liberals decreed that anything can “marry” anything, this is what you authorized. Nice work.

Sorry – I don’t care one whit about liberal SJWs whining about Tucker’s comments from 10 years ago when they make all kinds of excuses for Bill Clinton’s behavior, or Gillebrand keeping a sexual harrasser on her payroll until media heat got too much for her.
I don’t care about liberal SJWs wailing about racism when they lionize klansman Robert Byrd, and when they look the other way about Northram wearing blackface in his yearbook page in the 80s, and having the nickname “Coonman”.