Marcus: At a certain point, hasn’t Obama made enough money?

Spread the love

Loading

Ed Morrissey:

Sell-out. Hypocrite. Greedy. Critics of Barack Obama’s decision to take six-figure speaking fees from Wall Street have used or implied all of these terms — and that’s just from among the former president’s allies. Writing today in the Washington Post, Ruth Marcus concedes that this has become a tradition for former presidents, but that makes it no less unseemly for a retiree who used to rail against corporate greed:

In collecting $400,000 from a Wall Street investment firm to make a single speech, Barack Obama is following in the Gucci-clad footsteps of past presidents. Ronald Reagan landed a $2 million speaking gig in Japan. George W. Bush, on his way out, announced it was time to “replenish the ol’ coffers.” Bill and Hillary Clinton reported making more than $235 million after leaving the White House.

But to acknowledge that Obama has plenty of precedent on his side is not to say that his choice is wise. Indeed, it’s unfortunate. …

The Wall Street angle feels like unfortunate icing on an already distasteful cake. Would we really feel better if Obama were taking the money from, say, a public university? At least the Cantor Fitzgerald check comes from folks who can easily afford it — not out of taxpayer dollars.

The former first couple have a lucrative future already in the memoir business. The bidding price for a joint book deal went over the $60 million mark, an astounding sum that seems less connected to potential book sales than it does to publishers’ egos. Marcus wonders why that’s not enough for the man who once argued that there should be a limit to largesse:

Marcus might be better off recalling the run-up to Obama’s second presidential campaign. When it first appeared in the summer of 2011 that Mitt Romney would become the Republican frontrunner in the 2012 election, Obama began turning up the heat on his class-warfare rhetoric. That inspired the Occupy Wall Street movement in October 2011, which then franchised out into several other Occupy efforts around the country, a progressive activism which Obama and the White House fanned for their own political purposes.

For instance, in that same month Obama implied that Martin Luther King Jr would have supported Occupy, tying the civil-rights movement to modern anticapitalism:

“At this moment, when our politics appear so sharply polarized, and faith in our institutions so greatly diminished, we need more than ever to take heed of Dr. King’s teachings,” Mr. Obama said, who praised King’s belief in the “creative tension of nonviolent protests.”

“If he were alive today, I believe he would remind us that the unemployed worker can rightly challenge the excesses of Wall Street without demonizing all who work there,” the president said. “Those with power and privilege will often decry any call for change as divisive. They’ll say any challenge to the existing arrangements are unwise and destabilizing. Dr. King understood that peace without justice was no peace at all.”

Maybe this is Obama occupying Wall Street in a different way, eh? His decision to cash in certainly doesn’t represent a “challenge to the existing arrangements”; it’s an embrace of them and the “excesses of Wall Street,” which these extraordinary speaking fees epitomize. It reveals the cynical nature of Obama’s use of progressive activists in 2011-12 to demonize Romney for his wealth. It was pure political contrivance, and one reason why Democrats like Elizabeth Warren are speaking out now is because Obama has merely made it obvious.

That being said, the problem here isn’t that Obama’s selling his wares on the open market for speakers. As Marcus notes, this is significantly less problematic than what the Clintons did for more than a decade while they schemed to get back into the White House. The Clinton Foundation and all of the speaking gigs were clearly an influence-peddling operation, which is why it’s going defunct after Hillary’s defeat. The Obamas do not appear to have those ambitions; Michelle Obama reiterated her complete lack of interest in going back this week. In a way, their motives are purer; they just want the cash.

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

6 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Oh, the Obama’s only want the money so they can do GOOD. Just like the Clinton’s. And Soros.

Just to do good things… as THEY see it.

We know what Obama is being paid, for what, and by whom, or we wouldn’t be looking at this stupid article. Obama released his tax returns for every year he was in the Senate, and for every year he was President. You can, in fact, inspect the Obama tax returns for every year from 2000 through 2015, the most recent year available.

Where are the tax returns Donnie Boy promised to show the voters, Ed, and why don’t you seem to give a rat’s patootie about that?

What about the fact that the republican-majority House is aiding and abetting his efforts to hide his financial deals, tax evasions, and foreign financial entanglements? Is that not a more relevant matter than the fact that someone will openly pay a former president big bucks for a speaking engagement? Should we not be the least bit curious about how the tax plan Trump is pitching would affect his own taxes? Or have we become too frickin’ stupid for such a thought to ever cross our minds?

House GOP rebuffs bill to release Trump tax returns and visitor logs

@Greg: Trump deleted them and Bleach-bit the storage medium, so it’s OK. All that was shown on his returns was yoga lessons and wedding plans.

Trust me.

@Bill… Deplorable Me: OMG this is a chunk of pure gold!
I love wikileaks
http://investmentwatchblog.com/hillary-2013-i-would-like-to-see-people-like-donald-trump-run-for-office-theyre-honest-and-cant-be-bought

Found the link to wikileaks and it does not mention DT by name inspite of CBS running the same line.

@kitt: My God… do they NEVER stick to a principle? I wonder how much THAT statement added to her purse?

@Bill… Deplorable Me: She was only SOS at that time, I bet she only got 1/3 from Goldmans as she got from the Russians.
heres the link, but she is a forest dwelling has been these days https://archive.org/stream/HRCPaidSpeechesFlags/HRC%20Paid%20Speeches%20Flags#page/n53/mode/2up