Liberal Movie Critics Decry Pro-Military, Pro-American ‘Act of Valor’

Spread the love

Loading

The new film “Act of Valor” doesn’t accuse U.S. military members of war crimes, nor does it paint them as cold killing machines.

That simply won’t do for many film critics, who cling to the kind of anti-military movies which routinely flop at the box office. “Valor” uses amateur actors – active duty Navy SEALs – and certainly can be faulted for their flat line readings. And the episodic nature of the movie also invites fair critiques, even if it’s remarkable the cast routinely acted around live gunfire. But many critics went beyond the call of duty to smite a film that dared to show SEALs as heroes, and their efforts to stop terrorists a noble endeavor.

Time Out New York’s Joshua Rothkopf calls the film “scary,” with a “ridiculously limited view of American righteousness.”

Tampa Bay Times critic Steve Persall dubs “Valor” “a land mine movie for anyone to review who isn’t a military veteran, who hasn’t bought into the cult of warfare,” later adding “pacifists won’t be nearly as impressed.”

How ’bout audiences who realize terrorists are a legitimate threat, and that military intervention is often necessary to prevent them from wiping out hundreds, if not thousands, of innocents?

Philly.com’s David Hiltbrand seemed upset by sequences in which people responsible for the capture and torture of a CIA agent met their gruesome fate:

You watch as one of our snipers dispassionately and from a great distance lays out these scruffy untrained campesinos one after the other with graphic head shots.

So, as long as you’re a “scruffy, untrained campesino” we should give you a pass for torturing a woman. But Hiltbrand’s moral confusion intensified as the film wore on:

Near the end, the film degenerates into an extended, chaotic firefight. You know who you’re supposed to be rooting for because they’re the ones wearing uniforms, but it’s easy to lose touch with why.

Here’s a clue – the folks who want to commit terrorist acts are the bad guys and need to be stopped. The ones stopping them are the heroes. Now, how hard is that?

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
11 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Listening to Michael Medved interviewing the director right now. Definitely the next movie I will go see!

http://www.breachbangclear.com/site/component/content/article/1-blog/79-act-of-valor-the-truth-according-to-the-duo.html

Others, like particularly dimwitted hacks like Michael Schenker, will be downright insulting about it, using their review soapbox to accomplish little more than a halfway decent command of the English language and an utter inability to do much of anything than spew bilious anti-military invective stored up from his latest self-congratulatory circle-jerk in the back room with Keith Olbermann, Rachel Maddow and Chris Matthews.

Now, let’s be clear. There are some awkward parts. These are seasoned operators, not actors and occasionally that comes though in the dialogue. Some parts are more awkward than others (like one scene that looks like it could be filmed in Danny’s—which if you’re curious DOES have the best burgers anywhere) but it’s not enough to detract from the rest of the movie. It’s also not as noticeable when they’re not focused in on the talking (if that makes sense). Once they’re moving (and operational) that slight hitch in their stride goes away. You can definitely tell they were more comfortable in the action sequences than just waiting around waiting on close-ups.

The special effects are magnificent, largely because they’re mostly not special effects. When you watch the gatlings chew up a technical, it’s because those SWCC boys are really chewing up a technical. You see, the production of this movie didn’t involve any special deployments or training exercise to accommodate the plot. In fact, quite the contrary. The writers were forced to remain semper gumby and issue constant FRAGOs so they could incorporate jumps, SDVs and whatever as they became available during training iterations, predeployment evolutions, actually deployment cycles, etc. No taxpayer money was spent to make this movie. It took over two years to shoot because of that, and because almost everyone in the movie did at least one combat tour in Afghanistan during filming. All the events, everything that happens to the boys on the ground, are based on real events. All of them.

It would be nice if for once liberals would root for America. We ask too much it seems.

We’re going to see it tomorrow with a small group.
Some are veterans, some have a grown son in the service now.
We are all looking forward to this movie.

Even if I wasn’t going to see the movie when it comes to my area, I would go to it just because the liberals don’t want me to. It will be great to root for the good guys, and the good guys are us! As in USA!

I read somewhere that Brad Thor’s latest book was being filmed. That ought to get the lefties panties in a wad. 😉

@Jim S:

I love his books. I wouldn’t say he is a great writer, but he tells a pretty good story. I still need to read The Athena Project.

@Jim S: Depends on who the director is? Hopefully he/she won’t start with their “panties in a wad”.

@Marine72: This is the blurb I read…. I don’t know any of these guys…

AMERICAN ASSASSIN
Although Ed Zwick was attached last June, The Hollywood Reporter now has word that Traitor direct Jeffrey Nachmanoff will direct the Vince Flynn novel American Assassin. Set up at CBS films, the project is officially described as follows:
‘American Assassin’ tells the story of legendary CIA agent Mitch Rapp. Long before he began hunting terrorists, Rapp was a gifted college scholar/athlete. Then, tragedy struck and Rapp was recruited into the nation?s most elite covert operations program. After completing training designed to teach the kind of lethal skills necessary to target our most dangerous enemies, here and abroad, he is a man reborn with a mission of retribution.
Zwick adapted the screenplay alongside Marshall Herskovitz (The Last Samurai), but recently left the project to direct the upcoming The Great Wall instead (also written with Herskovitz).
Lorenzo di Bonaventura (Transformers, RED) and Nick Wechsler (The Road, We Own The Night) are still attached to produce the film, which is based the eleventh entry in Flynn’s Mitch Rapp series. Another adaptation, Consent to Kill is also in development by CBS Films.

OK.
1. Packed house.
2. Spontaneous applause.
3. Top movie I’ve seen in over ten years.
4. Something got into the eyes of a lot of grown men in the audience.
(Bring tissues)

I highly recommend Act of Valor to anyone still sitting on the fence about seeing it.

Liberals would prefer to see Sy Stalonne pretend to be a Seal, than to see the real thing. Stalonne, et al pretend to be heroes, but need stunt men ( oops stunt people) and pretend bullets in a pretend war.

I’ve met seals and Stalone et al, are not them.

Does not matter if the dialogue is stilted. It’s the real deal.