Liberal icon says impeach Obama now

Spread the love

Loading

WASHINGTON — Worse than Richard Nixon. An unprecedented abuse of powers. The most un-American president in the nation’s history.

Nat Hentoff does not think much of President Obama.

And now, the famous journalist says it is time to begin looking into impeachment.

Hentoff sees the biggest problem as Obama’s penchant to rule by executive order when he can’t convince Congress to do things his way.

The issue jumped back into the headlines last week when, just before his first Cabinet meeting of 2014, Obama said, “I’ve got a pen and I’ve got a phone … and I can use that pen to sign executive orders and take executive actions.”

“Apparently he doesn’t give one damn about the separation of powers,” Hentoff told WND. “Never before in our history has a president done these things.”

And just to make sure everyone knows how extremely serious he regards the situation, the journalist added, “This is the worst state, I think, the country has ever been in.”

The rest is at WND

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
135 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

@retire05:

Now, I understand your desire to appear intelligent, but in all honesty, you have really fallen way short of that mark and seem to be masochistic to want to continue to prove it.

It is amazing to me how often and regularly some of these libs love to parade their ignorance for all to see. And all the while waving a flag to make sure we see it. Wow.

@Redteam:

And all the while waving a flag to make sure we see it.

Hard to miss that rainbow flag, isn’t it?

@retire05:

Or do you think he is just jealous of real men who don’t dress up in their mommy’s high heels when she’s not at home like he does?

I think that’s close. But I do think he has a particular animosity for rodeo clowns, must have had a bad experience.

@retire05:

Hard to miss that rainbow flag, isn’t it?

Teabaggers edition.

Redteam
those trolls have been indoctrinated and they are in a stun position,
they need a debriefing and they come here for help,
but we are not psychiatrist, it take a real one to take of that part of their mind,
which might never recover, if they wait too long for getting help,

but No.1 the correct answer is no. His father was not a US citizen therefore he is not a natural born citizen.

Let me help you out.

The weight of legal and historical authority indicates that the term “natural born” citizen would mean a person who is entitled to U.S. citizenship “by birth” or “at birth”, either by being born “in” the United States and under its jurisdiction, even those born to foreign parents; by being born abroad to U.S. citizen-parents; or by being born in other situations meeting legal requirements for U.S. citizenship “at birth”. Such term, however, would not include a person who was not a U.S. citizen by birth or at birth, and who was thus born an “alien” required to go through the legal process of “naturalization” to become a U.S. citizen.

Stupid troll. You have no knowledge of history, politics, or the constitution yet on a political hack site claiming you do. And you even have a cheer leading squad of lapdogs following you on an expired thread that has to be backpaged 3 times, helping you promote whatever stupid shit you make up on the fly to offset your abject ignorance and lack of debating skills, exposing what a fraud your/they are.

Busted!

Ronald J. Ward
YOU ARE THE BUSTED ON,
you forget the total allegiance needed to become a president of this USA,and it should be proven before the vote not after,
you are quick to accuse other and attack visciously, he is right,
and you are wrong,

Ronald J. Ward
you say : MEETING REQUIREMENT S FOR CITIZENSHIP,
wait it was
NOT NECESSARELY MEETING REQUIREMENT FOR PRESIDENTSHIP, which require extra attributs,
overlook by many PEOPLE WHO SHOULD HAVE KNOWN, BUT FAIL TO DO WHAT IS REQUIRED BECAUSE OF THEIR WISH TO WIN AT ANY PRICE, AND ACCOMPANY BY THE NON INVOLVEMENT
FROM McCAIN TO INSIST ON THE CHECK UP, MAYBE BEING INTIMIDATED BY THE MOB READY TO RIOT ON CALL
WHO WAS RULING AND THREATENING ANY EFFORT TO REFUSE HIM ,WHICH according to laws, WAS A LEGIT ACTION TO TAKE, AND INSIST ON OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICAT, SAME AS THEY INSITED TO SEE McCAIN PAPER
ONLY SARAH PALIN MENTIONED IT, SURE OF HERSELF BEING RIGHT, BUT SHE WAS TOLD BY
THE CANDIDATE McCAIN TO LET IT GO,

@Ronald J. Ward: In your opinion:

Let me help you out.

The weight of legal and historical authority indicates that the term “natural born” citizen would mean a person who is entitled to U.S. citizenship “by birth” or “at birth”, either by being born “in” the United States and under its jurisdiction, even those born to foreign parents; by being born abroad to U.S. citizen-parents; or by being born in other situations meeting legal requirements for U.S. citizenship “at birth”.

There is no ‘weight of legal opinion’ on the subject, it has never been adjudicated.
The ‘most common’ opinion is that if your mother and father are a US citizen then you are a natural born citizen. Which means no question of your allegiance. If you have split citizen parents, you’ll likely have split allegiance, therefore not natural born.

And I was able to say all that without calling you a stupid troll. But I will say that it is quoted ‘verbatim’ from the OFA literature for their paid mouthpieces. Too bad you aren’t able to form an opinion for yourself. Just link me to the OFA lit when you’re going to quote them, it’ll save your time.

@ilovebeeswarzone: Bees you are correct. RJW doesn’t understand the subject. He’s right that persons born in the country are citizens if they are not under the jurisdiction of another country, however, what he is overlooking is that persons born in this country to parents that are citizens of other countries are under those jurisdictions. An example would be, Bobby Jindal was born in the US and both his parents were citizens of India. He is entitled to citizenship due to a law, not due to where he was born. If his parents were to move back to India while he was still a child, he would have moved back with them and I’ll assure you he would not apply to become an Indian citizen. That’s the case with Obama, say he was born in Hawaii of a US citizen and a Kenyan citizen, then due to a law which says that since he was born in the US, even though one of his parents was a Kenyan, that he is entitled to be a US citizen. But note, it is because of a law, not because it was ‘natural’ as it would have been had both parents been US citizens. That’s why he’s not a ‘natural born US citizen.

@Redteam: A large percentage of “naturalized” citizens have one or more parents not born on American soil. Do you believe this affects the “allegiance” of this new citizen.

Redteam
even the KENYAN PEOPLE, HIGH RANK PEOPLE,where stunt to believe he had been voted on,
they said, HOW COME THE AMERICANS VOTED FOR A KENYAN TO BE THEIR PRESIDENT.
THEY COULD NOT COMPREHEND IT,

@Richard Wheeler:

Do you believe this affects the “allegiance” of this new citizen.

Absolutely.

You said:

A large percentage of “naturalized” citizens have one or more parents not born on American soil.

I’d guess that most naturalized citizens have two parents not born in America. If either one were an American citizen, then they would be citizens by law. (not natural born)

I have a nephew that was in the Army, in Kosovo, married a Kosovo citizen and they had a child there in Kosovo. They have moved back to the US. The child is a US citizen, by law, not by being ‘natural born’.

If your father was a US citizen and your mother a British citizen and they were living in Britain when you were born, then you are a US and British citizen. You don’t think you would have a split allegiance? What if you lived in Britain all your life? That’s similar,but not exactly, like Ted Cruz’s situation.

@ilovebeeswarzone:

HOW COME THE AMERICANS VOTED FOR A KENYAN TO BE THEIR PRESIDENT.

A very good question, and NO good answer.

THAT WAS A GIGANTIC FRAUD TOWARD AMERICA, DONE BY MANY FROM THE MUSLIM COUNTRIES, WHO HATE AMERICANS,
AND ALLOWED TO PROCEED WITH THE FLOW OF MONEY GIVEN TO HIM,
ALLOWED TO BE DONE, BY FACTIONS IN AMERICA, BEING ACCOMPLICIST TO THAT
WORLD WIDE SCAM,
IT SHOW THE VULNERABILITY THAT AMERICA HAS BECOME,

@Ronald J. Ward: Hey dipso, read this: you said:

or by being born in other situations meeting legal requirements for U.S. citizenship “at birth”

you see those little words there: “meeting legal requirements”. What does that mean? It means that there are legal requirements to meet to fit the situation, that means it is not ‘natural’. Had it been ‘natural’, it wouldn’t be covered by law and no ‘legal requirements’ would have to be met.

whentostopdiggin.com

Redteam
how’s that for allegiance?
IF THE WIND TURN ON YOU, I WILL TAKE YOUR SIDE, SAID TO MUSLIM COUNTRIES

@Redteam: Do you see any difference in potential allegiance to U.S between naturalized citizens and natural born ( your definition) citizens?
You are adamant in your belief that The Constitution states to be eligible for POTUS both parents must be born in the U.S.? Do you believe Orly Taitz has adequately represented your position on this matter.
Do you think you might be taken more seriously if you didn’t leave open the possibility of a BHO Kenyan birth?

Much like your cloned cohorts, you rely on a childish ploy of changing a given word, or the meaning of a given word or phrase to create a meaning to your liking. You then rely on your newly invented interpretation to supercede all agruments, regardless of how spectacularly flawed your nonsensical logic is.

Amendment 14 section 1 is quite clear. “A persons born or nationalized in the United States and subject to the Jurisdiction there of, are Citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside”.

Note that keyword “or” in born or nationalized.

Youtr silly non substantiated grasp to defend your claim that Obama is an ilegal president is noted but like most unhinged gibberished spewed here, it is profoundly wrong an renders you an abject fraud on any level of political punditry or of any reasonable level of debate.

@Richard Wheeler:

You are adamant in your belief that The Constitution states to be eligible for POTUS both parents must be born in the U.S.?

Where did I ever say that? I said both parents have to be US citizens.

Do you believe Orly Taitz has adequately represented your position on this matter.

Don’t follow her too much. From what I’ve seen, a lot of persons seem to feel as if her lack of English language skills might hurt her presentations a little, but I’ve never seen a presentation of hers, and I don’t form my opinions based on anything I know about her.

Do you think you might be taken more seriously if you didn’t leave open the possibility of a BHO Kenyan birth?

When and where did I leave open that possibility. I’ve said several times that where he was born has nothing to do with it. Maybe it clouds the issue for you, but not for me.

@Ronald J. Ward: Ok Dipso, who’s weaseling now?

Amendment 14 section 1 is quite clear. “A persons born or nationalized in the United States and subject to the Jurisdiction there of, are Citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside”.

Notice it doesn’t say ‘natural born’ citizens. Notice that this is a law that makes a person a citizen, therefore it is not ‘natural’ it’s a citizen ‘by law’. @Ronald J. Ward:

You said:

Youtr silly non substantiated grasp to defend your claim that Obama is an ilegal president is noted but like most unhinged gibberished spewed here, it is profoundly wrong an renders you an abject fraud on any level of political punditry or of any reasonable level of debate.

You’re sputtering and slobbering and foaming at the mouth. Need some defoamer? I told you to just link me to your OFA talking points and it would save you having a collapse.

A ‘natural’ born citizen does not have to have a law to make him a citizen. Clearly when a person is born of citizens of two different countries, a law has to be used to determine his legal status. If it determines he is a citizen, then he is by law, not by nature.
So, Dipso, try to stop the foaming at the mouth and use that brain cell and try to do some thinking. After you do that, you might try out:
whentostopdiggin.com

@Richard Wheeler:

Do you think you might be taken more seriously if you didn’t leave open the possibility of a BHO Kenyan birth?

Since you brought up that subject, (I didn’t) Why do you think it might be a possibility. If he was born, as it is generally claimed by his side, in Hawaii, why do you think he won’t allow his official certified copy of birth certificate to be released? Why do you think he condones this release of the fake BC? I’d prefer you just answer that question and not bring up the question of ‘if it is fake’. That’s clearly settled that it is fraudulent, so no discussion is necessary for that. Why do you think he does not have a drivers license? Why do you think he does not have an Original Social Security number. Why do you think he does not have a US passport? (I realize he travels to foreign countries as the Pres, but he doesn’t have to show a passport) None of this stuff raises any questions of you? You just buy his hook, line and sinker?

You are clearly doing exactly what I accused you of, manipulating the meaning of a word which changes nothing. You cowardly try to pick the white out of chickenshit and pretending that what you have left isn’t chickenshit.

Your argument does nothing to validate your claim that Obama is an ilegal president. President Obama is still leagally the President and you are still a dishonest troll with no substance for your illogical hatred.

@Ronald J. Ward: Okay Dipso,

You are clearly doing exactly what I accused you of, manipulating the meaning of a word which changes nothing. You cowardly try to pick the white out of chickenshit and pretending that what you have left isn’t chickenshit.

What word am I manipulating? If you think I’m manipulating the meaning of a word, tell me what the word is and what your meaning is and what you think the ‘real’ meaning is.

Tell you what, just cut and paste it from the OFA site, it’ll save you time and you won’t make so many spelling and grammar errors. And you’ll likely save defoamer.

@Ronald J. Ward:

You cowardly try to pick the white out of chickenshit

I find it interesting that you’ve apparently made a study of chickenshit.

@Redteam: Kenyan Birth Bees brought it up. B.C. fraudulent? Overwhelming majority believe it’s valid. According to Snopes his SS# is valid. He has a valid U.S passport.
Suggest you stick to your “Natural Born Citizen Clause ” argument
IMO these other claims make you look foolish.
BTW To be clear. I don’t think there is any chance he was born in Kenya.

@Richard Wheeler:

@Redteam: Kenyan Birth Bees brought it up.

Then why did you ask me about it? Didn’t you say?

Do you think you might be taken more seriously if you didn’t leave open the possibility of a BHO Kenyan birth?

Overwhelming majority believe it’s valid

No one that has seen it believes it is.

According to Snopes his SS# is valid

Two points. Snopes kisses obama’s ass. They think his middle name is God. and I didn’t say his SS # was not valid. Stay on point. I said Obama does not have an original SS number. He does have a valid number that belongs to someone else. No wonder you Libs stay so confused, you can’t stay focused.

He has a valid U.S passport.

I suppose you could prove that? I do know that Senators and Representatives are not issued regular passports, but ‘diplomatic’ passports. I suppose Obama has probably been issued one of those for publicity purposes, but he did not have a US passport prior to being elected Senator.

Suggest you stick to your “Natural Born Citizen Clause ” argument

Could you provide me a link? Never heard of a “Natural Born Citizen Clause ”.

@Redteam: Sorry RT it’s you far right nuts that are dazed and confused.
His SS# is his own and valid as is his passport. BC presented is valid.
Why not come out and help poor Orly with her presentation. We can have a couple of beers.

@Richard Wheeler:LOL. Just stick your head back in the sand. Pretend the truth is relative.

did ANY ONE NOTICE THAT ALL THE MOSQUES SPROUT UP ,
AFTER OBAMA NOMINATION,
HE LET IT HAPPEN, HE MADE MONEY OUT OF IT,
THEY ELECTED HIM,

@ilovebeeswarzone:

did ANY ONE NOTICE THAT ALL THE MOSQUES SPROUT UP ,
AFTER OBAMA NOMINATION,

It is not a secret that Obama is a muslim. Some of his followers don’t like to admit it, but it’s very obvious

CAVUTO
YOU ARE A SUPER HERO,
WE ARE COUNTING ON YOU,

It should be obvious to everyone that Barack Hussein Obama’s sudden rise to power had to be orchestrated by some very powerful and wealthy people. We can speculate who some of them are, but needless to say, Obama was not capable of pulling off political victories on his own.

So what was the purpose behind Obama’s push to power? What was his real job that his puppet masters gave him?

After five years in office, I believe that the real job the power tycoons gave Obama was to destroy the moral and ethical values and foundations of America. Think about what Obama has done or is trying to do since taking office:

Can you list anything positive that Obama has done since taking office in January 2009? I can’t. So ask yourself what was the real task given him by his secret handlers?

The reason behind it is simple. Once the moral and ethical values of Americans had been destroyed, the hidden power tycoons could take complete control of the nation. And they’re getting very close to accomplishing their goal.

Read more at http://lastresistance.com/4493/obamas-real-job-destroy-americas-moral-ethical-foundations/#aaOBhZE1fg2tT0Ve.99

@Ronald J. Ward: how do you know there is white in chickenshit tb ?is it part of your tb ritual with this one?are you channeling the folksy dan rather? whats the frequency tbagee

@Richard Wheeler: where did you get overwhelming majority from ?